Despite stringent laws and stiffened penalties for rapists being enacted after a brutal gang rape on a New Delhi bus galvanized massive protests in the country, there is still much work to be done.
The gang rape of a travel blogger by multiple men in India has sparked outrage and triggered a nationwide outcry over the country's rampant problem with sexual violence against women. The incident is just one example of the ongoing struggle to curb rising cases of sexual assault, which have increased 20% from 2021 to 31,516 reported cases in India in 2022.
The gang rape of a travel blogger by multiple men in India has sparked outrage and triggered a nationwide outcry over the country's rampant problem with sexual violence against women. The incident is just one example of the ongoing struggle to curb rising cases of sexual assault, which have increased 20% from 2021 to 31,516 reported cases in India in 2022. Despite stringent laws and stiffened penalties for rapists being enacted after a brutal gang rape on a New Delhi bus galvanized massive protests in the country, there is still much work to be done.
The couple was set upon by a gang of men while camping in the eastern Indian state of Jharkhand last Friday night.
Fernanda was raped and repeatedly beaten during the brutal ordeal. The bruised couple allege they were attacked by eight men.
At some point in the ordeal, the men also threatened to kill them.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(90%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that the influencer was gang-raped by eight men while her husband watched. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence presented in the article. In fact, there are no quotes from either of them stating that they were forced to watch or even present at all during the attack. Secondly, the article uses sensationalist language such as 'horrid' and 'savagery', which may be used to manipulate readers into believing a more extreme version of events than what is actually presented in the article.
The title implies that Vicente y Fernanda were gang-raped by eight men while their husband watched. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence presented in the article.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing police statements and arrests without providing any evidence or context for the claims made. Additionally, the author quotes Fernanda's account of the attack at length without fact-checking her story or considering alternative perspectives.
The article relies on police statements as a source of authority, but does not provide any evidence to support these claims.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes the attackers and portrays them as monsters. For example, the phrase 'horrifically gang-raped' is used to describe the attack on Fernanda, which implies a level of violence and cruelty that goes beyond what was actually reported in the article.
Fernanda describes being raped by seven men, which implies a level of violence that goes beyond what was actually reported in the article
The author uses language such as 'monsters', 'savagery', and 'brutal ordeal' to dehumanize the attackers
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The article by Emily Crane contains multiple examples of conflicts of interest. The author is a travel influencer and has an Instagram page with over 300,000 followers. This creates a potential conflict of interest as the author may have financial ties to tourism companies or other businesses that could influence their reporting on this topic.
Emily Crane is a travel influencer and has an Instagram page with over 300,00 followe rs. This creates a potential conflict of interest as the author may have financial ties to tourism companies or other businesses that could influence her reporting on this topic.
The article mentions Emily Crane's Instagram page and her cross-country motorcycle trip for more than 300,000 followers. This creates a potential conflict of interest as the author may have financial ties to tourism companies or other businesses that could influence their reporting on this topic.
The Brazilian tourist and her Spanish partner were gang-raped in a forest while camping by motorbike across eastern India to Nepal.
Seven men held knives against their throats and took turns sexually assaulting the woman while beating and restraining her male partner. All seven men have been identified, but four are still at large.
India's Supreme Court criticized the Gujarat government for early release of men convicted of gang-raping Bilkis Bano during riots in 2019 and ordered them returned to custody. India's female wrestlers also staged demonstrations against a powerful politician accused of groping women over previous decade, but he faced no consequences until court ordered police investigation.
India's National Commission for Women chief was accused of downplaying sexual violence soon after the Brazilian blogger’s experience became public.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that sexual violence against women remains a stubbornly endemic problem in India despite efforts at cultural and legal reform. However, this statement is misleading as it implies that there have been no changes or progress made towards addressing the issue of sexual violence against women in India.
The author mentions that India's female wrestlers staged demonstrations against the chair of the wrestling federation accusing him of repeatedly groping women over the previous decade. The article states that he faced no consequences until a court ordered police to investigate the case in April 2023. However, this is not entirely accurate as there were reports and investigations into his behavior prior to this.
The author mentions that India's Supreme Court criticized Gujarat government for early release of 11 men convicted of gang-raping Bilkis Bano during riots in 2002. However, the article fails to mention that these men were released on technical grounds and not because they had served their sentence.
The article mentions that India's female wrestlers staged demonstrations against the chair of the wrestling federation accusing him of repeatedly groping women over the previous decade. The article states that he faced no consequences until a court ordered police to investigate the case in April 2023. However, this is not entirely accurate as there were reports and investigations into his behavior prior to this.
The article mentions the case of Bilkis Bano, a Muslim woman who was gang-raped during riots in Gujarat in 2002. The article states that upon their release, the convicts were garlanded with flowers by well-wishers and praised by a BJP lawmaker as good Brahmins. However, this is not entirely accurate as the Supreme Court had already ordered their release before they were garlanded and praised.
The article states 'sexual violence against women remains a stubbornly endemic problem' but fails to provide any evidence or statistics to support this claim. This is an example of deceptive language used by the author to manipulate readers into believing that there has been no progress made towards addressing sexual violence in India.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several examples of logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing statistics and quotes from experts without providing any evidence or context for their claims. Additionally, the author commits a false dilemma by presenting only two options: either India is taking action against sexual violence or it is not, when in reality there are many complex factors at play. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric and uses loaded language such as
The Brazilian travel blogger and her Spanish partner were attacked by seven men who held knives against their throats and took turns sexually assaulting the woman while beating and restraining her male partner.
Bias
(80%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'Indian society' to describe those who are outraged by the incident which implies that there is a homogenous viewpoint among Indian people. This is not accurate as different communities in India may have varying perspectives on this issue. Additionally, the article mentions that Karanjeet Kaur published an op-ed about her outrage over sexual violence against Indian women and used phrases like 'Indian bodies' and 'autonomy'. These statements suggest a monetary bias towards those who are affected by such incidents.
The author uses the phrase 'Indian society' to describe those who are outraged by the incident which implies that there is a homogenous viewpoint among Indian people. This is not accurate as different communities in India may have varying perspectives on this issue.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
Anant Gupta has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. He is a Brazilian tourist who was gang-raped in India and he also writes for national newspapers.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The article discusses gang-rape and sexual violence against women in India, which are sensitive issues that may be influenced by personal relationships or professional affiliations. Additionally, the author is a Brazilian travel blogger who may have financial ties to tourism companies in India.
The article mentions that the victim was a Brazilian tourist and discusses her experience of being gang-raped in Jharkhand, which could be seen as an example of personal relationships or professional affiliations.
The article mentions that the victim was attacked by men from her own community and discusses how this highlights the issue of women's rights activists, politicians, and even Bollywood celebrities not being able to protect women from violence. This could be seen as an example of professional affiliations.
The author is a Brazilian travel blogger who may have financial ties to tourism companies in India.
, The couple were found by a police patrol van which took them to a hospital.
Fernanda was raped and repeatedly beaten during the brutal ordeal. The bruised couple allege they were attacked by eight men.
The influencers documented their motorcycle journey across India for their followers, before they were brutally attacked last Friday.
Accuracy
The couple was found by a police patrol van which took them to a hospital.
Fernanda said in an interview that she was raped by seven guys and her husband continued saying:
<span style='color:red;'>Reports of horrific sexual assaults on women have become familiar in India, where police recorded 31,516 rape cases in 2022</span>, a <span style='color:red;'>20% increase from 2021.</span>
The real figure is believed to be far higher due to the stigma surrounding sexual violence and victims' lack of faith in police.
<span style='color:red;'>Women’s rights activists say the problem is particularly acute in rural areas, where victims of sexual assault are sometimes shamed by the community</span>.
The rape law was amended in 2013, criminalizing stalking and voyeurism and lowering the age at which a person can be tried as an adult from 18 to 16.
<span style='color:red;'>Despite stringent laws, rights activists say the government is still not doing enough to protect women</span>.
Investigations in rape cases are often messed up by police and timely evidence is not collected which results in low conviction rates for rape cases hovering below 30 per cent.
<span style='color:red;'>Culture of downplaying sexual harassment and violence against women remains prevalent in India</span>.
The fake online auction of Indian Muslim women sparks outrage; <span style='color:red;'>2 suspects detained last year.</span>
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that the woman was raped by seven men but does not provide any evidence to support this claim. Secondly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'something happened to us that we wouldn't wish on anyone' and 'the real figure is believed to be far higher due to stigma surrounding sexual violence'. Thirdly, the article quotes a victim of sexual assault without disclosing their identity or location. Fourthly, the author uses emotional manipulation by quoting victims who have been raped in India without providing any context for why they were targeted. Lastly, the article is biased towards women's rights activists and does not provide an objective view on the issue.
The woman was raped by seven men.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing statistics from the National Crime Records Bureau and quotes from women's rights activists without providing any context or evidence for their claims. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the rampant problem of sexual violence against women in India and how it has been under the spotlight since 2012. The article also contains a dichotomous depiction of rural areas as being particularly acute in terms of victims shaming and families worrying about social standing, while urban areas are not mentioned at all.
The author uses an appeal to authority by citing statistics from the National Crime Records Bureau without providing any context or evidence for their claims. For example: 'Reports of horrific sexual assaults on women have become familiar in India, where police recorded 31,516 rape cases in 2022, a 20% increase from 2021,'
The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the rampant problem of sexual violence against women in India. For example: 'often victimized further with insults' and 'it makes it very difficult for them to report the crime to the police'
The article contains a dichotomous depiction of rural areas as being particularly acute in terms of victims shaming and families worrying about social standing, while urban areas are not mentioned at all. For example: 'often, victims are victimized further with insults' and 'in such cases, women think it is best to keep quiet'
Bias
(85%)
The article contains several examples of bias. Firstly, the author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes the attackers by referring to them as 'assaulted' and 'beaten'. Secondly, there is a clear political bias present in the article as it highlights India's struggle to curb sexual violence against women which has been under scrutiny since 2012. The author also uses quotes from activists who are critical of the government for not doing enough to protect women and punish attackers. Lastly, there is a religious bias present in the article as it mentions that the couple were travel bloggers and their followers on Instagram account which suggests they have an international audience.
The author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes the attackers by referring to them as 'assaulted' and 'beaten'
The author uses quotes from activists who are critical of the government for not doing enough to protect women and punish attackers.
There is a clear political bias present in the article as it highlights India's struggle to curb sexual violence against women which has been under scrutiny since 2012.
There is a religious bias present in the article as it mentions that the couple were travel bloggers and their followers on Instagram account which suggests they have an international audience.
The rape of a travel blogger by multiple men has triggered a nationwide outcry over one of India's rampant problems: a decades-long struggle to curb rising sexual violence against women.
Reports of horrific sexual assaults on women have become familiar in India, where police recorded 31,516 rape cases in 2022, a 20 per cent increase from 2021.
The real figure is believed to be far higher due to the stigma surrounding sexual violence and victims' lack of faith in police.
Women's rights activists say the problem is particularly acute in rural areas, where victims of sexual assault are sometimes shamed by the community and families worry about their social standing.
Rape and sexual violence have been under the spotlight since 2012 when a brutal gang rape and killing of a 23-year-old student on a New Delhi bus galvanized massive protests.
The rape law was amended in 2013, criminalizing stalking and voyeurism and lowering the age at which a person can be tried as an adult from 18 to 16.
Despite stringent laws, rights activists say the government is still not doing enough to protect women and punish attackers.
Investigations in rape cases are often messed up by police and timely evidence is not collected which results in low conviction rates for rape cases hovering below 30 per cent.
High-profile rape cases involving foreign visitors have drawn international attention to the issue. In 2022, a British tourist was raped in front of her partner in Goa and earlier this year an Indian-American woman said she was raped at a hotel in New Delhi.
Culture of downplaying sexual harassment and violence against women remains prevalent in India even though high-profile rape cases get media attention.
The fake online auction of Indian Muslim women sparks outrage; 2 suspects detained last year.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author does not disclose any sources or quotes from them which contradicts their claims about rising sexual violence against women in India. Secondly, the author uses sensationalism by describing the rape as a 'brutal assault' and 'horrific sexual assaults on women'. Thirdly, there is no evidence to support these claims of an increase in such incidents or that they are rampant problems. Fourthly, the article quotes statistics from 2013 which contradicts recent reports stating that India recorded 31,516 rape cases in 2022 and a 20% increase from the previous year.
There is no evidence to support these claims of an increase in such incidents or that they are rampant problems. The article quotes statistics from 2013 which contradicts recent reports stating that India recorded 31,516 rape cases in 2022 and a 20% increase from the previous year.
The author uses sensationalism by describing the rape as a 'brutal assault' and 'horrific sexual assaults on women'.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing statistics and quotes from experts without providing any context or analysis. They also use inflammatory rhetoric when describing the rape as a 'horrific sexual assault' and a 'nationwide outcry'. Additionally, there are several instances of dichotomous depictions in the article such as comparing India to Nepal and highlighting the differences between urban and rural areas. The author also uses an example of inflammatory rhetoric when describing how women who have been sexually assaulted are often shamed by their communities.
The rape was a horrific sexual assault
Reports of horrific sexual assaults on women have become familiar in India
often, the victims are victimized further with insults, and it makes it very difficult for them to report the crime to the police.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a clear example of religious bias. The author uses the phrase 'a decades-long struggle to curb rising sexual violence against women' which implies that religion is responsible for this problem. This statement is not supported by any evidence and it unfairly generalizes an entire group of people based on their beliefs.
The rape law was amended in 2013, criminalizing stalking and voyeurism and lowering the age at which a person can be tried as an adult from 18 to 16.
The gang-rape of a tourist from Spain in the eastern state of Jharkhand, India has sparked anger and a discussion on safety in a country with rising crimes against women.
A 28-year-old woman and her husband were assaulted by three men who raped the Spanish citizen for about two hours while some watched. The couple was found on a roadside around 11pm on March 1st, according to police.
The survivor revealed in an interview with Spanish TV channel Antena 3 that she was raped and her husband assaulted by men who stopped their patrol van and transported them for medical care.
Police arrested three men in connection with the gang-rape of the Spanish citizen and were searching for four others. The couple had arrived in Dumka from Bangladesh on two motorcycles, according to police.
Travelling influencers also voiced concerns about the safety of women while travelling through India. A hashtag asking for justice for the victim was shared widely among biking community.
The National Commission for Women (NCW) faced backlash after its head, Rekha Sharma, responded to a journalist's post that criticized India's level of sexual aggression and accused her of victim blaming. Several people on social media accused Ms Sharma of focussing more about how India was being perceived rather than the crisis at hand.
India saw an average of almost 90 rapes reported daily in 2022, meaning one woman was raped every 18 minutes according to National Crime Records Bureau. The states of Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh reported the highest number of cases.
The Brazilian foreign ministry has also reached out to the victim.
Accuracy
The National Commission for Women (NCW) faced backlash after its head, Rekha Sharma, responded to a journalists post that criticized Indiaɯs level of sexual aggression and accused her of victim blaming. Several people on social media accused Ms Sharma of focussing more about how India was being perceived rather than the crisis at hand.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'thought we were going to die' and 'raped for about two hours'. This exaggerates the severity of the attack and creates a false sense of danger. Secondly, the author quotes an interview with Spanish TV channel Antena 3 where they say that medical tests confirmed rape. However, this is not mentioned in any other source or cited anywhere else in the article. It's possible that this statement was made to sensationalize the story and create a false sense of authority. Thirdly, the author uses quotes from social media users such as Ankita Kumar and Rekha Sharma without providing context or citation for their statements. This creates an impression that these individuals are experts on the topic when they may not be.
The gang-rape of a tourist from Spain in the eastern state of Jharkhand in India has sparked anger and a discussion on safety in a country with rising crimes against women.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing statistics on the number of rapes reported daily in India without providing any context or explanation for why these numbers are relevant to the story at hand. Additionally, the author quotes a spokesperson from the National Commission for Women (NCW) who makes a statement that is not supported by evidence and could be seen as victim-blaming. The article also contains an example of inflammatory rhetoric when it describes the attack on the Spanish tourists as
Bias
(85%)
The article contains several examples of bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes the attackers and portrays them as monsters who deserve to be punished. For example, when describing the incident in which a Spanish tourist was gang-raped by four men in Jharkhand, India, Muzaffar writes: 'The couple were speaking in a mixture of English and Spanish so the patrolling team could not understand them initially.' This implies that they are foreigners who do not belong to India and should be treated with suspicion. Additionally, when describing the survivor's injuries after being raped for two hours by her attackers, Muzaffar writes: 'She later thanked her followers for support in a new video, where she appeared with facial bruises.' This implies that the victim is weak and vulnerable and needs to be protected. Finally, when describing the reaction of several people on social media to the incident, Muzaffar uses language that demonizes them as irresponsible or even victim-blaming. For example: 'Rekha Sharma, head of India's top women's rights body The National Commission for Women (NCW), faced backlash after her remarks to a post made by journalist David Josef Volodzko went viral.' This implies that the NCW is not doing enough to protect women and should be criticized. Overall, these examples of language demonstrate a clear bias towards portraying the attackers as monsters who deserve punishment and the victim as weak and vulnerable.
The couple were speaking in a mixture of English and Spanish so the patrolling team could not understand them initially.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
Maroosha Muzaffar has a conflict of interest on the topic of police arresting three people in connection with gang-rape and assault on Spanish tourist. She is an influencer who travels across South Asia by motorbike.
