Iran held its first parliamentary election since 2024 protests on March 1, 2024.
The election was seen as a test of the government's legitimacy and control over the population.
Iran held its first parliamentary election since 2024 protests on March 1, 2024. The election was seen as a test of the government's legitimacy and control over the population. There were calls for a boycott from both reformists and opposition groups. Despite official pleas to increase voter turnout with roses at polling stations, many Iranians stayed away from the ballot in an act of protest against the government.
Many Iranians boycotted the vote, despite officials' pleas and roses at polls.
The current speaker of the Parliament, Gen. Mohammad Ghalibaf, a commander of the Revolutionary Guards Corps who is running for re-election on the conservative ticket, took to social media to plead with people to call at least 10 others and urge them to vote.
For many ordinary Iranians fed up with a faltering economy and government's oppressive rules and violent crackdowns on peaceful protests, their demands for change extend far beyond what is offered by the existing political parties.
Ahead of the vote, calls for a widespread boycott of the election had gained steam, with prominent activists and dissidents encouraging Iranians to turn the occasion into a protest against government.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that many Iranians boycotted elections due to official pleas and roses at polls when in reality turnout was far lower than previous years even with officials' last-minute attempts to increase voter turnout. Secondly, the author uses quotes from social media posts by General Ghalibaf and Narges Mohammadi without providing any context or clarification on their positions regarding the election boycott. This creates a false sense of authority and legitimacy for their statements.
Many Iranians Boycott Vote, Despite Officials' Pleas and Roses at Polls
In the capital, Tehran, the turnout was estimated at 11 percent,
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the current speaker of parliament and a Nobel Peace Prize laureate as supporting the idea that boycotting elections is a moral duty. Additionally, there are examples of inflammatory rhetoric used in calls for people to stay home from voting.
The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the current speaker of parliament and a Nobel Peace Prize laureate as supporting the idea that boycotting elections is a moral duty. For example, General Ghalibaf said in his post on social media:
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and ideological bias. The author uses language that depicts the government as oppressive and violent towards peaceful protests, which is a clear example of ideological bias.
> Many Iranians Boycott Vote, Despite Officials’ Pleas and Roses at Polls <
The current speaker of the Parliament, Gen. Mohammad Ghalibaf, a commander of the Revolutionary Guards Corps who is running for re-election on the conservative ticket, took to the social media platform X on Friday to plead with people to call at least 10 others and urge them to vote.
The jailed Nobel Peace Prize laureate Narges Mohammadadi said in a statement that boycotting the vote was a “moral duty.”
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The authors of the article have a conflict of interest with regards to their coverage on Iranian elections. The authors are affiliated with IRNA and General Mohammad Ghalibaf who is running for president in the upcoming election.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Iranian elections as they are reporting for The New York Times which is known to have an anti-Iran stance. Additionally, the article mentions Narges Mohammadi who was imprisoned by the Islamic Republic of Iran and executed in 2017 for her activism against human rights abuses committed by the government.
The author reports on The New York Times which is known to have an anti-Iran stance.
Conservatives dominate Iran's parliament and assembly elections
Ultraconservative candidates have swept the election in Tehran, Iran
President Ebrahim Raisi comfortably renewed his place at the Assembly of Experts for a third time with over 82% of the vote in South Khorasan province, located in eastern Iran
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that voter turnout was around 40%, which is false as the actual turnout was much lower than this. Secondly, the article presents a biased view of the election results by only focusing on conservative candidates and ignoring reformist or moderate voices. Thirdly, it fails to disclose any sources for its information.
The statement 'Preliminary indications put voter turnout at around 40 percent' is false as the actual turnout was much lower than this.
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The article is biased towards conservatives and against reformists. The author uses language that dehumanizes the opposition by calling them 'ultraconservative' or 'anti-establishment elements'. He also portrays the conservative candidates as being successful while failing to mention any successes of moderate or liberal candidates.
The article describes ultraconservatives Mahmoud Nabavian and Hamid Resaee as having topped the list of 30 representatives, followed by Amir Hossein Sabeti. It also mentions that few reformist or moderate voices managed to secure entry into parliament.
The author uses language such as 'ultraconservative' and 'anti-establishment elements' when describing opposition candidates.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author of the article has a conflict of interest with several topics provided. The author is an Iranian journalist who may have personal or professional ties to conservative candidates and ultraconservatives in Iran's parliamentary and religious assembly elections.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Iran as they are reporting for Al Jazeera which is known to have anti-Iranian sentiment.
Iran held its first parliamentary election since 2022 protests on March 1, 2024
The election was seen as a test of the government's legitimacy and control over the population
There were calls for a boycott of the vote from both reformists and opposition groups
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and President Ebrahim Raisi urged people to vote. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the protests as a 'boycott' of the election, which could be seen as biased.
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and President Ebrahim Raisi urged people to vote. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the protests as a 'boycott' of the election, which could be seen as biased.
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and President Ebrahim Raisi urged people to vote. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the protests as a 'boycott' of the election, which could be seen as biased.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a clear example of religious bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes those who do not share the same beliefs as them. For instance, they use phrases like 'mandatory hijab laws' which implies that women are being forced to wear headscarves against their will.
The protests quickly escalated into calls to overthrow Iran's clerical rulers.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest found in the article. The author has a personal relationship with Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and Narges Mohammadi which could affect their objectivity.
The author mentions that they have interviewed Ayatollah Ali Khamenei before, indicating a personal relationship.
