Iran's Presidential Election: Reformist Masoud Pezeshkian and Hard-liner Saeed Jalili Advance to Runoff

Tehran, Tehran Province, Iran Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Approximately 1 million votes were voided in the election results.
Masoud Pezeshkian is a reformist lawmaker and former health minister in Iran.
Masoud Pezeshkian received approximately 10.5 million votes in the Iranian presidential election.
Saeed Jalili is a hard-line security adviser and former nuclear negotiator in Iran.
Saeed Jalili received approximately 9.5 million votes in the Iranian presidential election.
The runoff vote between Masoud Pezeshkian and Saeed Jalili is expected to take place on July 5, 2024.
Iran's Presidential Election: Reformist Masoud Pezeshkian and Hard-liner Saeed Jalili Advance to Runoff

Iran's Presidential Election: Reformist Masoud Pezeshkian and Hard-liner Saeed Jalili Head to a Runoff

The Iranian presidential election, which took place on June 29, 2024, saw reformist Masoud Pezeshkian and hard-liner Saeed Jalili emerge as the top two candidates. Both men received significant votes in the first round of voting.

According to reports from various sources,

  • Masoud Pezeshkian received almost 10.5 million votes, making him one of the leading contenders.
  • Saeed Jalili received almost 9.5 million votes, also placing him among the top candidates.

The results were announced by Mohsen Eslami, an election spokesperson for Iran's Guardian Council. The runoff vote is expected to take place on July 5, 2024.

Background Information: Iran has been experiencing economic turmoil and mass protests in recent years. Some prominent figures, such as imprisoned Nobel Peace Prize laureate Narges Mohammadi and opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi, have called for a boycott of the election due to disenchantment with the vote and government-approved candidates.

Facts:

  1. Masoud Pezeshkian is a reformist lawmaker and former health minister in Iran.
  2. Saeed Jalili is a hard-line security adviser and former nuclear negotiator in Iran.
  3. The Guardian Council, an influential body in Iranian law, will review the results before the top two candidates start campaigning again for the runoff vote.
  4. Approximately 1 million votes were voided in the election results, which is a common sign of people feeling obligated to cast a ballot but not wanting to select any of the candidates.
  5. The overall turnout was reportedly 39.9%, lower than previous elections such as the one that elected Ebrahim Raisi in 2021 and the March parliamentary election in 2023, which saw a turnout of 41% and 42%, respectively.

Bias: It is important to note that all sources used for this article have an overall score above 90%, indicating they are reliable sources. However, it's crucial to remain skeptical of any information provided by the mainstream media due to their known biases and collusion with each other.

Conclusion: The Iranian presidential election has resulted in a runoff between reformist Masoud Pezeshkian and hard-liner Saeed Jalili. Both men received significant votes in the first round of voting, setting the stage for an intriguing race to replace late president Ebrahim Raisi. The Guardian Council will review the results before campaigning resumes for the runoff vote on July 5, 2024.



Confidence

95%

Doubts
  • The sources used for this article have an overall score above 90%, indicating they are reliable. However, it's crucial to remain skeptical of any information provided by the mainstream media due to their known biases and collusion with each other.

Sources

96%

  • Unique Points
    • >1 million votes were voided in the election results
    • >There have been calls for a boycott of the election, including from imprisoned Nobel Peace Prize laureate Narges Mohammadi and opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi
    • >Pezeshkian is seen as another government-approved candidate, with some expressing animosity towards him similar to that experienced by his generation during the 1979 revolution
  • Accuracy
    • >24.5 million votes were cast in total
    • Masoud Pezeshkian received almost 10.5 million votes
    • Saeed Jalili received almost 9.5 million votes
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains a few informal fallacies and appeals to authority. It also uses inflammatory rhetoric by mentioning the low turnout and voided votes. The author does not make any false statements, but the quoted individuals and official election results contribute to some fallacies.
    • . . . the lowest turnout poll ever held in the Islamic Republic by percentage.
    • There had been calls for a boycott, including from imprisoned Nobel Peace Prize laureate Narges Mohammadi.
    • More than 1 million votes were voided, according to the results, typically a sign of people feeling obligated to cast a ballot but not wanting to select any of the candidates.
    • There’s also been criticism that Pezeshkian represents just another government-approved candidate.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

96%

  • Unique Points
    • Masoud Pezeshkian received almost 10.5 million votes and is one of the top two candidates
    • Saeed Jalili received almost 9.5 million votes and is also one of the top two candidates
  • Accuracy
    • Iran will hold a runoff presidential election on Friday, June 17, 2023
    • Masoud Pezeshkian and Saeed Jalili are the top two candidates in the runoff election
    • The initial vote saw neither candidate securing over 50% of votes cast
    • Turnout for the election was at 39.9% or 40%
    • Twenty-four million votes were cast in total, with Pezeshkian receiving over 10.4 million and Jalili receiving over 9.4 million
    • There have been calls for a boycott of the election
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

100%

  • Unique Points
    • Iranian reformist Masoud Pezeshkian and hard-liner Saeed Jalili are heading to a runoff presidential election in Iran.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

92%

  • Unique Points
    • Iranian reformist Masoud Pezeshkian hopes for friendly relations with all countries except Israel.
  • Accuracy
    • ][Iran will hold a runoff presidential election on Friday, June 17, 2023][
    • Masoud Pezeshkian and Saeed Jalili are the top two candidates in the runoff election
    • None of the candidates secured more than 50% of the votes in the first round
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (75%)
    The article does not contain any formal fallacies. However, it does contain some informal fallacies and dichotomous depictions. The author presents a scenario where the race between reformist Masoud Pezeshkian and hard-liner Saeed Jalili is too close to call due to seesawing results, implying that this is unusual or unexpected. This could be seen as an appeal to surprise. Additionally, the article provides turnout figures as a 'crucial component' of the election outcome without providing any actual numbers, which may create a misleading impression for readers. The author also presents Iran's electorate as being in a difficult position after years of economic turmoil and mass protests without acknowledging other factors that could influence their vote. Lastly, the article mentions calls for a boycott and criticism of Pezeshkian but does not elaborate on the reasons behind these calls or criticisms. These examples demonstrate an absence of context and a tendency to oversimplify complex issues.
    • The seesawing results released early Saturday in Iran’s presidential election put the race between reformist Masoud Pezeshkian and hard-liner Saeed Jalili, with the lead trading between the two men while a run-off vote appeared likely.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

86%

  • Unique Points
    • Masoud Pezeshkian is the sole reformist running in the Iranian presidential election.
    • Pezeshkian hopes for friendly relations with all countries except Israel.
    • Iran and Israel have a long-standing conflict, with Iran calling for the destruction of Israel.
    • Iran launched missiles and drones at Israel in April 2024 as retaliation for a suspected strike on a consular building in Damascus.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (50%)
    The author makes editorializing statements and displays bias by taking a clear stance against Iran's relationship with Israel. The title itself implies that Iran's desire for peaceful relations with all countries except Israel is noteworthy and unusual.
    • Iran and Israel have long waged a shadow war with the Islamic Republic reputedly calling for the destruction of the Jewish State.
    • Masoud Pezeshkian, who voted at a hospital near the capital, Tehran, appeared to have the country’s ongoing confrontation with the West in mind as he responded to a journalist’s question about how Iran would manage international relations if he were president. ‘God willing, we will try to have friendly relations with all countries except Israel,’ the 69-year-old candidate said.
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (80%)
    The author does not demonstrate any bias in the article. However, the author does quote Masoud Pezeshkian making a statement about wanting warm ties with all countries except Israel. This statement alone is not enough to determine bias on the part of the author as it is a direct quotation from Pezeshkian. However, given that Iran and Israel have a long-standing conflict and Iran has been quoted as calling for the destruction of Israel, this statement could be seen as reflecting an anti-Israeli sentiment. Therefore, while there is no overt bias in the article itself, the author's inclusion of this quote could be considered an example of religious or political bias if taken out of context.
    • Masoud Pezeshkian told journalists after voting he hopes the country will have good relations ‘with all countries except for Israel.’
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication