Israel Discovers Tunnels Under UNRWA Headquarters in Gaza

Israel has discovered a network of tunnels under the headquarters of UNRWA, the United Nations agency for Palestinian refugees in Gaza.
The Israeli military claims that at least part of the tunnel ran underneath UNRWA's courtyard and supplied it with electricity.
Israel Discovers Tunnels Under UNRWA Headquarters in Gaza

Israel has discovered a network of tunnels under the headquarters of UNRWA, the United Nations agency for Palestinian refugees in Gaza. The Israeli military claims that at least part of the tunnel ran underneath UNRWA's courtyard and supplied it with electricity. Hamas militants used this space as an electrical supply room according to Israel.



Confidence

90%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

71%

  • Unique Points
    • Israel unveils tunnels underneath Gaza City headquarters of UN agency for Palestinian refugees
    • Hamas militants used the space as an electrical supply room
    • UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini said that UNRWA had no knowledge of the facility's underground, but found out about it through this discovery
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (50%)
    The article by Ariel Schalit is deceptive because it implies that Hamas militants used the UNRWA headquarters as an electrical supply room for their tunnels without providing any evidence. The author also fails to disclose that Israel has frozen UNRWA's bank account, embargoed aid shipments and canceled its tax benefits, which could be seen as a conflict of interest.
    • The Israeli military says it has discovered tunnels underneath the main headquarters of the U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees in Gaza City, alleging that Hamas militants used the space as an electrical supply room.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the Israeli military's claims without providing any evidence or context for their reliability. Additionally, the author makes a false dilemma by presenting only two options: either Hamas is using the UNRWA facility as an electrical supply room or they are not. This oversimplifies a complex situation and ignores other possibilities that may be at play. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric when it describes the Israeli offensive in Gaza as
    • Bias (85%)
      The article is biased towards Israel and against the UNRWA agency. The author uses language that dehumanizes Palestinians by referring to them as 'terrorists' and accusing them of using civilians as human shields. The author also implies that Hamas has been building tunnels for malicious purposes, without providing any evidence to support this claim.
      • Hamas militants used the space as an electrical supply room.
        • The Israeli military says it has discovered tunnels underneath the main headquarters of the U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees in Gaza City
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          The author of the article has a conflict of interest with UNRWA and Hamas. The tunnels underneath the Gaza City headquarters were used by Hamas militants to launch attacks on Israel.
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
            The author has a conflict of interest on the topics of Israel and UNRWA as they are both organizations that have been involved in political disputes. The article also mentions Hamas militants which is another topic related to Israel's relationship with Palestine.

            86%

            • Unique Points
              • Israeli forces have discovered a tunnel network hundreds of meters long extending partly under UNRWA's Gaza headquarters.
              • Hamas has acknowledged building hundreds of kilometers (miles) of tunnels across Gaza. One of the main objectives of the Israeli offensive is to destroy that network.
              • The Associated Press journalist could see a tunnel stretching beyond the area underneath the facility and estimated it to be at least half a kilometer long with at least 10 doors
              • Israel has found similar primitive quarters in tunnels across Gaza over the course of its campaign in Gaza.
            • Accuracy
              • Israel unveils tunnels underneath Gaza City headquarters of UN agency for Palestinian refugees
              • Hamas militants used the space as an electrical supply room
              • UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini said that UNRWA had no knowledge of the facility's underground, but found out about it through this discovery
            • Deception (80%)
              The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that Hamas has been discovered tunneling under UNRWA headquarters when in fact it was Israeli forces who found the tunnel network. Secondly, the author claims that Hamas militants have evacuated due to heavy Israeli barrages and sustained winter rains but does not provide any evidence for this claim. Thirdly, the article quotes an anonymous source claiming that Hamas has been working with UNRWA which is a false statement as there is no credible evidence to support it.
              • The title implies that Hamas has been discovered tunneling under UNRWA headquarters when in fact it was Israeli forces who found the tunnel network. This is an example of deceptive reporting by omission.
            • Fallacies (85%)
              The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the discovery of Hamas tunnels under UNRWA headquarters as 'new evidence' and calls it a 'Hamas command tunnel'. This is an example of a hasty generalization, as there is no concrete proof that these tunnels were used for military purposes. The author also uses emotional appeals by stating that Israeli forces discovered the tunnels and calling them a threat to UNRWA headquarters. Additionally, the article contains several examples of appeal to authority when citing statements from Israeli officials without providing any context or evidence to support their claims.
              • The discovery of Hamas tunnels under UNRWA headquarters is 'new evidence' of Hamas militants burrowing under the main relief agency for Palestinians.
            • Bias (85%)
              The article contains a clear example of bias in the form of an Israeli military tour through a tunnel that was discovered under UNRWA headquarters. The author presents this as evidence of Hamas militants burrowing under the main relief agency for Palestinians and implies that they were using it to conduct their operations. However, there is no mention or context given about why these tunnels exist in the first place or what other activities might be happening within them.
              • Israeli Army engineers took reporters with foreign news outlets through the tunnel passages.
              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication

              78%

              • Unique Points
                • The Israeli military has revealed that the Hamas terror group hid a top secret data center beneath the Gaza Strip headquarters of UNRWA
                • Israel had previously operated in, dismantled the local Hamas battalion and withdrew its troops from Gaza City's upscale Rimal neighborhood where UNRWA's headquarters is located
                • New intelligence primarily emerging from Shin Bet interrogations of captured terrorists helped pinpoint the location of the data center
              • Accuracy
                • Hamas militants used the space as an electrical supply room
              • Deception (30%)
                The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that UNRWA's Gaza headquarters was directly involved in hiding the Hamas data center when it was actually built beneath it. Secondly, the author claims that Israel had previously operated in Rimal neighborhood and dismantled a local Hamas battalion but fails to mention any evidence of this or why they chose not to target the data center at that time. Lastly, there is no clear indication of how UNRWA colluded with Hamas or if it was involved in the October 7 massacre.
                • The author claims that Israel had previously operated in Rimal neighborhood and dismantled a local Hamas battalion but fails to mention any evidence of this or why they chose not to target the data center at that time.
                • There is no clear indication of how UNRWA colluded with Hamas or if it was involved in the October 7 massacre.
                • The title implies that UNRWA's Gaza headquarters was directly involved in hiding the Hamas data center when it was actually built beneath it.
              • Fallacies (85%)
                The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Israel has accused UNRWA staff of taking part in the October 7 massacre without providing any evidence or citation for this claim. Secondly, the author makes a false dilemma by suggesting that either UNRWA is colluding with Hamas or it is not operating in Gaza and elsewhere in the Middle East due to funding freezes. This oversimplifies a complex issue and ignores other factors that may be contributing to these problems. Thirdly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing Hamas as a
                • Bias (85%)
                  The article contains examples of religious bias and ideological bias. The author uses language that depicts Hamas as a terrorist organization and implies that UNRWA is colluding with them. Additionally, the location of the data center under UNRWA's headquarters suggests an intentional effort to hide it from Israeli forces.
                  • The subterranean data center was built precisely under the location where Israel would not consider looking initially, let alone target in an airstrike.
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication

                  81%

                  • Unique Points
                    • Israel unveils tunnels underneath Gaza City headquarters of UN agency for Palestinian refugees
                    • Hamas militants used the space as an electrical supply room
                    • The Israeli military claims that at least a portion of the tunnel ran underneath the facility's courtyard and supplied it with electricity
                  • Accuracy
                    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                  • Deception (50%)
                    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the Israeli military claims to have found tunnels under UNRWA's Gaza headquarters without providing any evidence of their existence or how they were discovered. This claim is not supported by any quotes from experts or independent sources and therefore cannot be verified as true. Secondly, the article reports that Hamas stored electrical supplies in these alleged tunnels and that UNRWA supplied them with electricity, which implies a direct connection between UNRWA and Hamas's activities. However, this claim is not supported by any quotes from experts or independent sources either. Thirdly, the Israeli military claims to have found weapons inside rooms of the UNRWA building in Gaza City without providing any evidence of their origin or how they got there. This claim is also unsupported and therefore cannot be verified as true.
                    • The article reports that Israel has discovered tunnels under UNRWA's Gaza headquarters, but no evidence is provided to support this claim.
                  • Fallacies (85%)
                    The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Israel has found tunnels under UNRWA's Gaza headquarters without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Secondly, the author presents a dichotomous depiction of UNRWA as both being responsible for supplying weapons and electrical supplies to Hamas while also being an international organization mandated to provide aid to Palestinians. This creates confusion and contradicts itself by suggesting that UNRWA is complicit in violence against Israelis, yet it is also a humanitarian agency providing assistance. Thirdly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when stating that nine people who worked for UNRWA were fired after being implicated in Hamas attacks on Israel. This statement creates an emotional response and suggests that UNRWA is responsible for these actions without providing any evidence or context.
                    • Israel has found tunnels under the Gaza headquarters of the United Nations agency
                    • UNRWA provided electrical supplies to Hamas through a network of tunnels
                    • Nine people who worked for UNRWA were fired after being implicated in Hamas attacks on Israel
                  • Bias (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication

                  72%

                  • Unique Points
                    • Israel allegedly strikes deep in Lebanon
                    • Moody lowered Israel's credit rating to A2 due to war against Hamas
                    • IDF finds Hamas command tunnel under UNRWA Gaza HQ
                    • UNRWA Headquarters is in Gaza City, among northern areas that Israeli troops and tanks overran early in the four-month-old war against the governing Islamist faction Hamas
                  • Accuracy
                    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                  • Deception (50%)
                    The article contains several examples of deceptive practices. Firstly, the author claims that Israeli forces have discovered a tunnel network running partly under UNRWA's Gaza headquarters. However, this claim is not supported by any evidence presented in the article and appears to be based solely on statements from IDF spokespeople without providing any context or perspective for readers.
                    • The author claims that Israeli forces have discovered a tunnel network running partly under UNRWA's Gaza headquarters. However, this claim is not supported by any evidence presented in the article and appears to be based solely on statements from IDF spokespeople without providing any context or perspective for readers.
                    • The Palestinians have accused Israel of falsifying information to tarnish UNRWA, which employs 13,000 people in the Gaza Strip and has been a lifeline for the aid-dependent population for years. However, this claim is not supported by any evidence presented in the article and appears to be based solely on statements from Palestinians without providing any context or perspective for readers.
                  • Fallacies (85%)
                    The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it states that the IDF found a tunnel network under UNRWA's Gaza headquarters. This statement implies that the IDF has some sort of expertise in tunneling and should be trusted as a source of information, but there is no evidence provided to support this claim. Additionally, the article uses inflammatory rhetoric when it describes Hamas as
                    • Bias (85%)
                      The article contains multiple examples of bias. Firstly, the author uses language that dehumanizes Hamas by referring to them as a terrorist organization and their actions as 'terrorism'. Secondly, the article quotes Israeli officials who make accusations against UNRWA without providing any evidence or context for these claims. This creates an imbalance in the reporting and suggests that Israel's perspective is being given more weight than Hamas's. Thirdly, the author uses language that demonizes Palestinians by referring to them as 'aid-dependent'. Finally, the article contains a statement from Moody's lowering Israel's credit rating due to their war against Hamas which creates an ideological bias.
                      • Israeli officials make accusations against UNRWA without providing any evidence or context for these claims
                        • Moody's lowering Israel's credit rating due to their war against Hamas creates an ideological bias
                          • The author refers to Hamas as a terrorist organization and their actions as 'terrorism'
                            • The author uses language that demonizes Palestinians by referring to them as 'aid-dependent'
                            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                              The article reports on the Israel-Hamas War and specifically discusses day 127 of the conflict. The author mentions that Israeli forces discovered a tunnel under UNRWA headquarters in Gaza City. This raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest between Hamas and UNRWA as well as between Israel and Lebanon, given Moody's Investors Service is mentioned in relation to Lebanon.
                              • [REUTERS](https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east-north-africa/israeli-forces-discover-%E2%80%9Ctunnel-%E2%80%9Dsaid_rcna17b653c)
                                • The article reports on the discovery of a tunnel under UNRWA headquarters in Gaza City. This raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest between Hamas and UNRWA as well as between Israel and Lebanon, given Moody's Investors Service is mentioned in relation to Lebanon.
                                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication