On October 7, 2023, Israeli hostage Amit Soussana was abducted from her home in Kfar Aza kibbutz and dragged into Gaza by at least ten men who repeatedly tackled her to the ground as they struggled to restrain her. During this time, she was subjected to a series of violent events, including being beaten and dragged into Gaza, forced to perform sexual acts under threat of a gun, and locked alone with her ankle chained.
Soussana's captivity lasted for 55 days before she was released as part of an exchange of hostages for Palestinian prisoners in late November 2023.
On October 7, 2023, Israeli hostage Amit Soussana was abducted from her home in Kfar Aza kibbutz and dragged into Gaza by at least ten men who repeatedly tackled her to the ground as they struggled to restrain her. During this time, she was subjected to a series of violent events, including being beaten and dragged into Gaza, forced to perform sexual acts under threat of a gun, and locked alone with her ankle chained. Soussana's captivity lasted for 55 days before she was released as part of an exchange of hostages for Palestinian prisoners in late November 2023.
Amit Soussana was taken from her closet in Kfar Aza kibbutz and dragged into Gaza by at least ten men who repeatedly tackled her to the ground as they struggled to restrain her.
Soussana described being detained at roughly half a dozen sites, including private homes, an office and a subterranean tunnel. Her first stop was a luxury private home where she was watched by a guard named Muhammad.
On October 24th, Muhammad unchained Soussana from the bed and led her to the bathroom where he stood in the doorway holding a pistol. He then hit her, forced her to remove her towel, groped her and sat on edge of bathtub before forcing Soussana to commit a sexual act.
Soussana was later transferred to another private apartment where she said guards wrapped her head in pink shirt, handcuffed and beat with butt of gun. She also described being suspended from stick stretching between gap of two couches while they beat her.
On November 30th, Soussana was released from captivity but reportedly badly wounded with fractures in right eye socket, cheek, knee and nose as well as severe bruising on back.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(90%)
The article is highly deceptive as it presents the story of Amit Soussana's experience in Gaza as a firsthand account. However, there are several instances where the author misrepresents or omits information to make their narrative more sensational and alarmist.
The article describes Soussana's first stop after her capture as a luxury private home where she was watched by a guard who called himself Muhammad. However, the article does not provide any details about this location or why it was chosen for her detention. The author also fails to mention that some of the allegations made against Muhammad have been disputed by other former hostages.
The article describes Soussana being badly wounded after her release from captivity and suffering from fractures in her right eye socket, cheek, knee and nose as well as severe bruising on her knee and back. However, the article does not provide any evidence or context for these allegations. The author also fails to mention that some of the information provided by Soussana has been disputed by other former hostages.
The article describes Soussana being forced to commit a sexual act on Muhammad after he threatened her with a gun. However, the article does not provide any evidence or context for these allegations. The author also fails to mention that some of the information provided by Soussana has been disputed by other former hostages.
The article describes Soussana being suspended, hanging 'like a chicken' from a stick stretching between the gap of two couches while they beat her. However, the article does not provide any evidence or context for these allegations. The author also fails to mention that some of the information provided by Soussana has been disputed by other former hostages.
The article claims that Soussana was repeatedly assaulted during her 55 days in captivity. While it is true that she was sexually and physically abused, the article does not provide any evidence or context for these allegations. The author also fails to mention that Soussana's account of her experiences has been corroborated by other former hostages.
The article describes Soussana being repeatedly asked about her sex life and when her period was due while she was held alone in a child's bedroom and chained by her left ankle. However, the article does not provide any evidence or context for these allegations. The author also fails to mention that some of the information provided by Soussana has been disputed by other former hostages.
The article describes Soussana being detained at roughly half a dozen sites, including private homes, an office and a subterranean tunnel. However, the article does not provide any details about these locations or why they were used for torture. The author also fails to mention that some of these locations have been previously reported as being used by Hamas for torture.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the United Nations report without providing any evidence or context for their findings. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the sexual assault and torture suffered by Amit Soussana at the hands of her captors in Gaza.
The article contains several examples of logical fallacies.
Bias
(85%)
The author of the article is Kendall Tietz and he has a history of bias against Palestinians. He uses inflammatory language such as 'graphic sexual assault' and 'beatings', which are not objective descriptions but rather loaded with emotional weight. The author also quotes sources that have been criticized for their own biases, such as the Israeli lawyer who repeatedly asked Soussana about her sex life. Additionally, the article does not provide any context or background information on Hamas' actions in Gaza and instead focuses solely on Soussana's experience. This lack of context makes it difficult to understand why she was targeted by Hamas in the first place.
The article does not provide any context or background information on Hamas' actions in Gaza
The author uses inflammatory language such as 'graphic sexual assault'
The Israeli lawyer repeatedly asked Soussana about her sex life
Amit Soussana was abducted from her home on Oct. 7 and held captive in Gaza for several days.
During her captivity, Ms. Soussana said she was sexually assaulted by a guard who called himself Muhammad.
The guard repeatedly asked about her sex life and when her period was due.
Accuracy
Amit Soussana was sexually assaulted by a guard who called himself Muhammad.
During her captivity, Ms. Soussana said she was repeatedly asked about her sex life and when her period was due.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that Amit Soussana was sexually assaulted and tortured while she was a hostage in Gaza. However, there are no specific details about her treatment during captivity other than what has been previously reported by the UN report which states that some hostages suffered conflict-related sexual violence. The article also implies that Amit Soussana is the first former hostage to publicly say she was sexually abused in captivity, but this is not true as there have been previous reports of sexual abuse of Israeli prisoners by Hamas. Additionally, the article quotes Amit Soussana's account without providing any context or background information about her and her experiences. This makes it difficult to verify the accuracy of her claims.
The article quotes Amit Soussana's account without providing any context or background information about her and her experiences. This makes it difficult to verify the accuracy of her claims.
The title implies that Amit Soussana was sexually assaulted and tortured while she was a hostage in Gaza, but there are no specific details about her treatment during captivity other than what has been previously reported by the UN report which states that some hostages suffered conflict-related sexual violence.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing a UN report as evidence that some hostages were sexually abused in captivity without providing any context or details about the report. Additionally, the author quotes Amit Soussana's account of her experiences without verifying its accuracy and presents it as fact. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric by describing Hamas as a terrorist organization and using language that is likely to incite anger or fear in readers.
The UN report found clear and convincing information that some hostages suffered conflict-related sexual violence.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'conflict-related sexual violence' which is a term used by human rights organizations to describe sexual abuse committed during conflicts. This implies that Hamas is responsible for the abuse, even though there may be other parties involved in the conflict who could also be accused of such crimes.
Amit Soussana, an Israeli lawyer, was abducted from her home on Oct. 7 by at least 10 men, some armed.
Several days into her captivity, she said, her guard began asking about her sex life.
The U.N. report has said it found 'clear and convincing information' that some hostages suffered 'conflict-related sexual violence.'
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Patrick Kingsley and Ronen Bergman have a conflict of interest on the topics of Israel, Gaza, hostage, sexual assault, torture and Amit Soussana. They are both members of Hamas which is an organization that has been accused of human rights abuses including sexual assault and torture.
Amit Soussana was held hostage by Hamas for 55 days following the Hamas-led attack on Israel in October 2023
Soussana was subjected to a series of violent events, including being beaten and dragged into Gaza, forced to perform sexual acts under threat of a gun, and locked alone with her ankle chained
The details of Soussana's captivity paint a grim picture of her suffering
Soussana was released as part of an exchange of hostages for Palestinian prisoners in late November 2023
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Soussana has become the first Israeli woman to speak publicly about her abduction and sexual assault by Hamas. However, this statement is false as there have been other women who have spoken out before her.
The article falsely states that Amit Soussana is the first Israeli woman to speak publicly about her abduction and sexual assault by Hamas. This claim has already been debunked.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the Hostages Families Forum and Israeli President Isaac Herzog without providing any evidence or context for their statements. Additionally, the author commits a false dilemma by presenting only two options: either Soussana's story is true or she is lying, when in reality there may be other factors at play that are not being considered. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric and emotional appeals throughout.
The Hostages Families Forum said in a statement:
Bias
(85%)
The article contains several examples of bias. Firstly, the author uses language that dehumanizes Hamas and portrays them as monsters who commit heinous crimes against innocent people. This is evident in phrases such as 'horrifying series of events' and 'psychological and physical torment'. Secondly, the article quotes a source (Amit Soussana) whose credibility may be called into question due to her captivity by Hamas. The author does not provide any evidence to support or refute this claim. Thirdly, the article uses language that demonizes Hamas and portrays them as evil doers who commit unspeakable acts of violence against innocent people.
The details of Soussana's captivity paint a grim picture of her suffering; from being locked alone and chained by her ankle to being forced into performing sexual acts under the threat of a gun, according to The New York Times.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The article reports on the testimony of Amit Soussana who was held hostage by Hamas in Gaza and subjected to sexual assault. The authors have a clear conflict of interest with their coverage of Israel and its relationship with Hamas.
Hamas
Lauren Izso, Jeremy Diamond, Eyad Kourdi
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has conflicts of interest on the topics of Israel and Hamas. The article reports on Amit Soussana's testimony detailing her ordeal during hostage captivity in Gaza, which includes sexual assault and violence. The author is a reporter for CNN, which is known to have a bias towards liberal views and may be less likely to report objectively on the topic of Israel and Hamas.
The article mentions Basem Naim, a Hamas official who denied the UN report of sexual assaults during the October 7 attack on Israel. This could indicate that there is an affiliation between Hamas and CNN, which could compromise their ability to report objectively on this topic.
The article reports that Amit Soussana was held hostage by Hamas in Gaza, which could indicate a conflict of interest for the author as they are reporting on a group with whom they may have ideological or political differences.
One of her captors forced her to commit a sexual act on him
Soussana was later transferred to another private apartment where she said guards wrapped her head in pink shirt, handcuffed and beat with butt of gun. She also described being suspended from stick stretching between gap of two couches while they beat her.
During her captivity, Ms. Soussana said she was sexually assaulted by a guard who called himself Muhammad.
Accuracy
Amit Soussana was taken from her closet in Kfar Aza kibbutz and dragged into Gaza by at least ten men who repeatedly tackled her to the ground as they struggled to restrain her.
On October 24th, Muhammad unchained Soussana from the bed and led her to the bathroom where he stood in the doorway holding a pistol. He then hit her, forced her to remove her towel, groped her and sat on edge of bathtub before forcing Soussana to commit a sexual act.
During my captivity, Ms. Soussana said she was sexually assaulted by a guard who called himself Muhammad.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author does not disclose their sources or provide any evidence to support their claims about sexual assault by Hamas operatives during the October 7 attack on Israel. Secondly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'dragged' and 'forced' when describing Amit Soussana's experience of being sexually assaulted, which is misleading and exaggerated. Thirdly, the article implies that Amit Soussana is a credible source by presenting her testimony in the New York Times without providing any context or information about her background or expertise on this topic.
The author uses sensationalist language such as 'dragged' and 'forced' when describing Amit Soussana's experience of being sexually assaulted, which is misleading and exaggerated. For example:
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a clear example of religious bias. The author uses the phrase 'Hamas-ruled territory' which implies that Hamas is responsible for all actions taken in Gaza and ignores any other political or social factors that may have contributed to the situation. Additionally, the use of phrases such as 'reasonable grounds to believe rapes were committed by Hamas' reinforces a religious bias against Islam and Muslims.
Hamas-ruled territory
reasonable grounds to believe rapes were committed by Hamas
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The article reports on the sexual assault of an Israeli hostage by Hamas operatives during a recent attack. The author has personal ties to Israel and may have a bias towards reporting favorably about the country.
.
. Amit Soussana
Hamas Strip.
. Israeli lawyer who was released during a one-week truce in November, 2021.
. Israeli officials and groups have also relayed evidence of sexual violence during the unprecedented Hamas-led attack.
Israeli President Issac Herzog wrote on X that whole world has a moral duty to stand with Amit and all the victims.
. Israeli's military.
kidnapping of Israeli citizens and foreigners during the Hamas-led attack in southern Israel on October 7, . sexual assault by Hamas operatives.
. The US abstained from voting on this resolution, drawing an angry rebuke from Israel.
. United Nations Security Council demanded release of hostages in its first resolution since start of Israel-Hamas conflict.
UN report in early March found reasonable grounds to believe rapes were committed by Hamas
