Israeli Hostages Rescued in Gaza, but at What Cost? One Palestinian Civilian Killed and Another Injured

Palestine, State of
Abedelraof Meqdad's grandson, a 12-year-old boy, was killed and another grandson survived after being shot during the operation.
Four Israeli hostages, Andrey Kozlov, Shlomi Ziv, Almog Meir Jan, and Noa Argamani, were rescued in Gaza on June 8, 2024.
Israeli forces interrogated civilians in a neighborhood during the raid and exchanged gunfire with Hamas militants.
One Palestinian civilian was killed and another was injured during the rescue operation.
The United Nations accused both Israel and Hamas of committing war crimes during the conflict.
Israeli Hostages Rescued in Gaza, but at What Cost? One Palestinian Civilian Killed and Another Injured

Four Israeli hostages, Andrey Kozlov, Shlomi Ziv, Almog Meir Jan, and Noa Argamani, were rescued in a daring military operation in central Gaza on June 8, 2024. The hostages had been held captive by Hamas since the deadly Oct. 7 attacks. However, the rescue mission came at a cost as it resulted in the death of one Palestinian civilian and injuries to another.

Abedelraof Meqdad, a merchant from Gaza City, recounted his experience during the raid. He described how Israeli forces interrogated civilians in his neighborhood and demanded information about the hostages' whereabouts. During the operation, gunfire was exchanged between Hamas militants and Israeli forces.

Meqdad shared that one of his grandsons, a 12-year-old boy, was killed during the raid. Another grandson, aged 16 years old, survived after being shot. The family's apartment was riddled with bullets and damaged by sound grenades from Israeli military vehicles.

The United Nations has since released a report accusing both Israel and Hamas of committing war crimes during the conflict. Secretary of State Antony Blinken criticized Hamas for obstructing negotiations for a cease-fire deal and releasing hostages, while Biden administration officials discussed the possibility of negotiating a unilateral deal with Hamas to secure the release of American hostages if current talks failed.

The rescue operation left over 270 people dead, including children, according to health authorities in Gaza. The families of more than 100 remaining hostages, including Carmel Gat, cousin of Gil Dickmann, continue to wait for their loved ones' safe return.



Confidence

85%

Doubts
  • It is unclear if all four hostages were present during the rescue operation.
  • The exact cause of death for the Palestinian civilian is unknown.

Sources

97%

  • Unique Points
    • Mother of rescued hostage Andrey Kozlov described ‘very strange rules’ imposed by Hamas terrorists.
    • Andrey Kozlov was required to follow unusual rules such as not sitting with legs towards terrorists and being punished for getting wrong water or from wrong place.
    • Terrorists used derogatory terms towards hostages and taught them Arabic swear words.
  • Accuracy
    • Andrey Kozlov remained convinced he would return to Israel at some point.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

98%

  • Unique Points
    • Four Israeli hostages were rescued from Gaza and described as malnourished and traumatized.
    • Andrey Kozlov was told by his captors that his family had given up on him.
    • Doctor Itai Pessach reported that all four hostages had suffered physical and psychological mistreatment while in captivity.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (95%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when Hamas claims they have treated the hostages well compared to Israel's treatment of Palestinian prisoners. This is a false equivalence and an attempt to deflect criticism from their own actions.
    • Hamas says it has treated the hostages well compared with Israel’s treatment of Palestinian prisoners, a claim that Israeli officials deny.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

81%

  • Unique Points
    • Four hostages, including Noa Argamani, Almog Meir Jan, Andrey Kozlov, and Shlomi Ziv, were rescued in a military operation in central Gaza.
    • More than 100 hostages remain held by Hamas including Gil Dickmann’s cousin Carmel Gat.
    • The rescue operation left over 270 people dead, including children, according to health authorities in Gaza.
    • Secretary of State Antony Blinken blamed Hamas for holding up negotiations for a cease-fire deal and releasing hostages.
    • Biden administration officials discussed the possibility of negotiating a unilateral deal with Hamas to secure the release of American hostages if current talks fail.
  • Accuracy
    • Hamas claimed hostages were killed in the operation but did not provide evidence or identify the victims.
    • Doctor Itai Pessach reported that all four hostages had suffered physical and psychological mistreatment while in captivity.
  • Deception (35%)
    The article does not explicitly deceive the reader, but it does present a one-sided view of the situation by only reporting details that support Israel's position. The author does not disclose sources and presents the story as if it is solely about innocent Israeli victims without providing context or acknowledging Hamas' perspective or motivations. There is also an implication that Hamas killed hostages during the rescue operation, but no evidence is provided to support this claim.
    • Hamas said hostages were also killed in the operation, but did not identify them or provide any evidence to support the claim...
    • But it also left a trail of death and destruction in its wake, with more than 270 people killed...
    • The more than 100 hostages who remain held by Hamas...
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The author makes an appeal to emotion when describing the feelings of families whose loved ones have been rescued and those who are still being held captive. This is a form of informal fallacy known as 'appeal to emotion'. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing Hamas' actions, such as 'leaving a trail of death and destruction in its wake' and 'the most horrible things are happening to her in any given moment'. These statements are not based on facts and can be considered an informal fallacy known as 'inflammatory language'.
    • But for the dozens of families whose relatives remain captive, the news brought mixed feelings: joy for those finally reunited with their loved ones after eight long months since they were taken in Hamas’ Oct. 7 attacks, but also despair that their own loved ones weren’t among those saved.
    • It frightens me terribly that they’re going to hurt them and we won’t even know anything.
    • Around 250 people were taken hostage in Hamas’ Oct. 7 attacks, in which some 1,200 people were killed, according to Israeli officials. More than 100 people are thought to remain held hostage in Gaza, with at least a quarter of them believed to be dead.
  • Bias (95%)
    The article reports on the rescue of hostages held by Hamas and the mixed feelings of relief and despair for families whose loved ones are still being held. The author does not express any bias towards Hamas or Israel, but there is a clear emphasis on the suffering of those whose family members are still captive. However, there is also a mention that more than 270 people were killed in the operation, which could be seen as an attempt to depict Hamas negatively by highlighting the death and destruction caused by the rescue mission. This could potentially skew the reader's perception of Hamas and their actions. Therefore, this example demonstrates a subtle bias against Hamas.
    • more than 270 people were killed, including children
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication

    77%

    • Unique Points
      • Israeli special forces carried out a hostage rescue mission on June 8, 2024
      • Four hostages - Andrey Kozlov, Shlomi Ziv, Almog Meir, and Noa Argamani - were being held captive
      • The raid resulted in the death of one of Meqdad’s grandsons (12 years old)
      • Another grandson (16 years old) was shot and survived
      • Israeli forces interrogated civilians during the raid, including Abedelraof Meqdad
    • Accuracy
      No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
    • Deception (30%)
      The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support the Palestinian perspective and omits important context about the hostage situation. For example, it fails to mention that the hostages were being held in a building used by Hamas as a weapons storage facility and that Israeli forces gave repeated warnings for civilians to evacuate before carrying out the raid. Additionally, there is emotional manipulation through descriptions of the aftermath of the operation and quotes from Palestinian eyewitnesses, such as 'women and children were screaming' and 'it's the smell of burning flesh'. The article also implies facts without providing sources in regards to Hamas casualty numbers.
      • The Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry says 274 people were killed in the rescue operation,
      • He told them, ‘shut up or I will shoot you and them.’
      • What’s been less visible, however, is the aftermath of that operation, and the Palestinian civilians who survived it.
    • Fallacies (80%)
      The authors use inflammatory rhetoric by stating that 'Israel disputes that number and says casualties are the fault of Hamas, for surrounding the hostages with civilians.' This is an appeal to blame the victim and a way to evoke emotions against Hamas. They also quote James Elder saying 'It's the smell of burning flesh - it's very hard to get out of one’s head.' This is an example of inflammatory language that does not add any value to the analysis and is meant to evoke emotions.
      • ]Israel disputes that number and says casualties are the fault of Hamas, for surrounding the hostages with civilians.[
      • It's the smell of burning flesh - it's very hard to get out of one’s head.
    • Bias (80%)
      The authors use language that depicts the Israeli military as engaging in violent and aggressive actions towards Palestinian civilians during the hostage rescue raid. They also quote a Palestinian eyewitness who describes being threatened by Israeli soldiers and having family members injured during the operation.
      • Abedelraof Meqdad gestures as he speaks with CBS News inside his home in the central Gaza Strip, June 13, 2024, five days after he says Israeli special forces burst in and interrogated him and his family amid a raid to rescue hostages.
        • He was shot right next to me, in the stomach and the leg.
          • It's the smell of burning flesh – it's very hard to get out of one’s head.
            • What's been less visible, however, is the aftermath of that operation, and the Palestinian civilians who survived it.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            100%

            • Unique Points
              • Hostages suffered from severe malnutrition during captivity
              • They received only a tenth of the necessary calories and no protein
              • Their bodies broke down muscle tissue for energy
              • Internal organs such as heart, stomach, and diaphragm also lost muscle mass
              • Vitamin supplements were necessary due to lack of sun exposure
            • Accuracy
              No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
            • Deception (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Fallacies (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Bias (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication