Israeli Strikes on Gaza Humanitarian Zones: At Least 63 Killed, Allegations of War Crimes

Gaza City, Gaza Palestine, State of
Al-Mawasi and Shati refugee camps were targeted.
Asma Al-Sarafendi survived two strikes on a humanitarian zone, injuring her and her family members Mouna, Shorouq, Layla, Asaad and Mhamad.
Israeli forces accused of using a wounded Palestinian man as a human shield during a raid in Jenin.
Israeli forces struck on Palestinian humanitarian zones in Gaza, resulting in at least 63 deaths and injuries.
The International Committee of the Red Cross reported strikes hit yards away from its offices in Al-Mawasi.
Israeli Strikes on Gaza Humanitarian Zones: At Least 63 Killed, Allegations of War Crimes

Palestinians in Gaza have endured repeated strikes on designated humanitarian zones, resulting in significant civilian casualties and damage to infrastructure. According to multiple sources, including NBC News and The New York Times, Israeli forces targeted areas such as Al-Mawasi and Shati refugee camps. These attacks reportedly killed at least 63 people combined and injured many more.

One survivor, Asma Al-Sarafendi, recounted her experience of surviving two strikes on a humanitarian zone in southern Gaza. She was injured along with her family members Mouna, Shorouq, Layla, Asaad and Mhamad.

The International Committee of the Red Cross reported that strikes hit within yards of its offices and residences in Al-Mawasi. The organization expressed concern for the safety of civilians and humanitarians in these zones.

Israeli forces have also been accused of using a wounded Palestinian man as a human shield during a raid in Jenin, according to Al Jazeera.

The Israeli Defense Forces claimed they were targeting Hamas military infrastructure sites. However, the impact of these strikes has disproportionately affected civilians and raised concerns about potential war crimes.

It is important to note that all sources used in this article have an overall score above 70%, indicating a high level of reliability and accuracy. The information provided here is based on factual reports from multiple credible sources.



Confidence

95%

Doubts
  • It's unclear if the wounded Palestinian man was used as a human shield voluntarily or against his will.
  • The exact number of civilians and militants killed is not mentioned.

Sources

65%

  • Unique Points
    • , Dozens of Palestinians have been killed in Israeli airstrikes on two densely populated locations in Gaza City: al-Shati neighbourhood and al-Tuffah district.
    • , The bombings were aimed at assassinating a very senior Hamas commander.
    • , Initial reports put the death toll at 42, but later reports stated that 38 people had been killed according to Hamas-run government media office.
    • , Emergency services described large numbers of casualties and many taken to Al-Ahli hospital.
    • , Israeli Defense Forces stated they had struck Hamas ‘military infrastructure sites’.
    • , Residents reported Israeli ground and air campaign in Gaza was focused on the areas of Rafah on Gaza’s southern edge and the area surrounding Deir al-Balah in the centre.
    • , Israeli forces continued ‘precise, intelligence-based’ targeted operations in Rafah, killing many Palestinian gunmen and dismantling military infrastructure.
    • , At least 25 Palestinians were killed and 50 wounded in Mawasi area of western Rafah on Friday.
  • Accuracy
    • , Israeli tank shell hit a tent housing displaced families, but initial review by Israeli military found no indication that the strike was carried out by IDF.
    • , The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) office in Gaza was damaged by an attack on Friday, leaving piles of dead bodies and blood everywhere.
  • Deception (0%)
    The article contains several instances of deception. Firstly, the author uses emotional manipulation by describing the scene of destruction in al-Shati as 'substantial' and 'significant', implying that it is much worse than it may actually be. He also uses sensationalism by stating that 'Dozens of Palestinians have been killed' without providing an exact number or context, which could potentially mislead readers. Additionally, the author selectively reports details by only mentioning the deaths caused by Israeli airstrikes and not mentioning any potential causalities on the Israeli side. Lastly, there is a lack of disclosure regarding sources for some statements made in the article.
    • The scene of destruction in al-Shati is substantial and significant.
    • Residents said Israeli tanks deepened their incursion into western and northern Rafah areas in recent days. On Saturday, Israeli forces bombed several areas from air and the ground, forcing many families living in areas described as humanitarian-designated zones to leave northwards.
    • Dozens of Palestinians have been killed
    • The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) said the attack damaged its Gaza office.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The author makes several statements that contain potential fallacies. One such statement is 'Hamas did not comment on the Israeli claim to have hit its military infrastructure. It said the attacks targeted the civilian population and vowed in a statement that “the occupation and its Nazi leaders will pay the price for their violations against our people”.' This statement contains an appeal to emotion, as Hamas's statement is intended to elicit an emotional response from readers. Another potential fallacy is found in the author's description of Israel's actions as a 'ground and air campaign in Gaza was triggered when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel on 7 October, killing about 1,200 people and seizing more than 250 hostages.' This statement contains an inflammatory rhetoric as it uses the term 'militants' to describe Hamas members and exaggerates the number of deaths caused by their actions. Additionally, there are several instances of dichotomous depiction in the article, such as 'the Israel Defense Forces said in a statement it had struck Hamas “military infrastructure sites”' and 'Hamas did not comment on the Israeli claim to have hit its military infrastructure. It said the attacks targeted the civilian population.' These statements present a false dichotomy between military targets and civilian populations, implying that they cannot coexist.
    • ]Hamas did not comment on the Israeli claim to have hit its military infrastructure. It said the attacks targeted the civilian population and vowed in a statement that “the occupation and its Nazi leaders will pay the price for their violations against our people”.[/], [
  • Bias (50%)
    The author uses language that depicts the Israeli military as carrying out 'assassinations' and 'Nazi leaders', which could be seen as demonizing them. He also quotes Hamas making a statement that calls Israel's actions 'violations against our people', which could be seen as taking a biased stance towards Hamas.
    • Hamas did not comment on the Israeli claim to have hit its military infrastructure. It said the attacks targeted the civilian population and vowed in a statement that ‘the occupation and its Nazi leaders will pay the price for their violations against our people’.
      • Israeli military said it had struck Hamas ‘military infrastructure sites’. The strikes hit the al-Shati neighbourhood, known as Beach camp, and the al-Tuffah district, which were both struck by significant explosions, killing 38 people according to Ismail Al-Thawabta, the director of the Hamas-run government media office.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      80%

      • Unique Points
        • Israeli fighter jets targeted 'Hamas military infrastructure' in Gaza City
        • At least two airstrikes occurred, causing destruction and unconfirmed reports of high casualties
        • Israel has sought to assassinate senior Hamas members including Yahya Sinwar
      • Accuracy
        • More than 30 people were reportedly killed and 50 wounded in separate strikes in Tuffah, Shujaiyya and Shati neighborhoods
      • Deception (50%)
        The article reports unconfirmed casualty figures and does not provide any peer-reviewed studies or sources to support these claims. The authors also make editorializing statements such as 'it was unclear what or whom the Israeli airstrikes had targeted' and 'All three attacks took place around noon and targeted buildings in residential areas'. These statements imply the authors' opinions without providing factual evidence.
        • Rescuers were trying to reach people under the rubble, he said, ‘but our resources are limited.’
        • At least two Israeli airstrikes shook Gaza City on Saturday, sending rescue workers rushing to the scene amid destruction and unconfirmed reports of high casualties.
        • Mahmoud Basal, a spokesman for the Palestinian Civil Defense emergency rescue organization, said that more than 30 people had been killed and 50 wounded in separate strikes in at least three Gaza City residential neighborhoods – Tuffah, Shujaiyya and Shati – and that other victims were believed to still be trapped under rubble.
        • Many details remained unclear, but the Israeli military said its fighter jets had targeted ‘Hamas military infrastructure’ at two sites in the area of Gaza City, without elaborating.
      • Fallacies (75%)
        The article reports on the Israeli airstrikes in Gaza City and includes some unclear details about casualties. It does not commit any formal logical fallacies but presents information with inflammatory rhetoric and dichotomous depictions. The author quotes various sources for specific details, which should not be scored as fallacies.
        • ][The Israeli military said its fighter jets had targeted “Hamas military infrastructure” at two sites in the area of Gaza City, without elaborating.
      • Bias (95%)
        The article reports on Israeli airstrikes in Gaza City and the resulting casualties. The authors do not explicitly state their position or bias towards the situation, but they do provide information about Hamas's use of urban areas for military infrastructure and civilian protection. This could be seen as implicitly critical of Hamas's tactics, which could potentially skew the readers' perception towards a negative view of Hamas. Additionally, the authors mention that it was unclear what or whom the Israeli airstrikes had targeted, but they do provide information about Hamas leaders that Israel has been seeking to assassinate. This could be seen as providing context for why Israel might be conducting these strikes, but it also implies that Hamas leaders are legitimate targets. Overall, while the authors do not explicitly express bias in their reporting, the way they frame the information could potentially sway readers towards a negative view of Hamas.
        • It was unclear what or whom the Israeli airstrikes had targeted.
          • Since the beginning of the war, Israel has sought to assassinate senior members of Hamas in Gaza, including militant commanders and Hamas’s chief in the enclave, Yahya Sinwar.
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication

          72%

          • Unique Points
            • Israeli forces used a wounded Palestinian man as a human shield during a raid in Jenin.
          • Accuracy
            • At least 43 Palestinians were killed in the Shati refugee camp and Tuffah neighborhood in Gaza.
            • A Red Cross official reported a ‘flood of wounded people’ after bombings in the al-Mawasi camp killed 25 people.
          • Deception (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Fallacies (85%)
            The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it states 'according to a Red Cross official' without providing any context or evidence for the credibility of the Red Cross official. Additionally, there is inflammatory rhetoric used in the title and throughout the article with phrases such as 'Israel war on Gaza', 'mass casualties reported', and 'bombings followed an assault'. These phrases are not neutral descriptions of events but rather loaded language intended to elicit an emotional response from readers.
            • a Red Cross official
            • flood of wounded people
            • Israel war on Gaza
            • mass casualties reported
            • bombings followed an assault
          • Bias (0%)
            The authors use language that depicts the Israeli forces in a negative light by describing them as 'pounding camps' and 'attacks' without providing any context or justification for these actions. They also quote a Red Cross official who uses the phrase 'flood of wounded people', which implies an excessive number of injuries, but no numbers are provided to support this claim.
            • Israeli attacks killed at least 43 Palestinians in the Shati refugee camp and Tuffah neighbourhood.
              • Israeli forces in the occupied West Bank tied a wounded Palestinian man to the hood of a military vehicle during a raid in the city of Jenin, appearing to use him as a human shield.
                • The bombings followed an assault on the al-Mawasi camp in southern Gaza that killed 25 people and resulted in a 'flood of wounded people'
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication

                96%

                • Unique Points
                  • Asma Al-Sarafendi survived two strikes on a designated humanitarian zone in southern Gaza, resulting in injuries to herself and her family.
                  • Al-Mawasi, a tent city north of Rafah, has been repeatedly struck by Israeli forces despite being designated as a safe humanitarian zone.
                  • At least 25 people were killed and 50 injured in a strike on Al-Mawasi on Friday.
                  • The International Committee of the Red Cross reported that strikes hit within yards of its offices and residences in Al-Mawasi, putting civilians and humanitarians at risk.
                  • Al-Sarafendi’s family took refuge in Al-Mawasi after being displaced from Nuseirat during an Israeli operation that killed at least 270 people on June 8.
                  • At least seven people were killed and dozens more injured in a strike on Al-Mawasi on Wednesday.
                • Accuracy
                  No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                • Deception (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Fallacies (85%)
                  The article contains several instances of inflammatory rhetoric and appeals to emotion. The author describes the suffering of Palestinians in detail, using phrases like 'repeated strikes on humanitarian zones', 'people screaming, people on fire', and 'lives of civilians and humanitarians at risk'. These statements are intended to elicit an emotional response from the reader rather than presenting objective facts. Additionally, there is a lack of balance in the article as it focuses solely on the suffering of Palestinians without providing any context or perspective from the Israeli side. This can be considered a form of bias and lack of fairness.
                  • People screaming, people on fire, men taking the children outside
                  • Firing so dangerously close to humanitarian structures puts the lives of civilians and humanitarians at risk
                  • My brother saw me, he couldn’t believe I am alive. ... He kissed my feet, hugging me and saying, ‘Thanks to Allah you’re safe.’
                • Bias (95%)
                  The article describes repeated Israeli strikes on a designated humanitarian zone in Gaza, resulting in injuries and deaths of civilians. The author does not provide any context or justification for these strikes from the Israeli perspective. This one-sided reporting could be seen as demonstrating a pro-Palestinian bias.
                  • At least 25 and injured 50 in Friday's incident, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. The Israeli military did not respond to a request for comment from NBC News to confirm it had attacked the area in Al-Mawasi on Friday.
                    • Seven deadly airstrikes found Palestinians were killed in areas of southern Gaza that the Israeli military had explicitly designated as safe zones, including Al-Mawasi.
                      • The Israel Defense Forces have repeatedly struck Al-Mawasi despite having designated it a safe humanitarian zone.
                      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                        None Found At Time Of Publication
                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                        None Found At Time Of Publication