Israel received its first-ever sovereign downgrade from Moody's Investors Service
The primary driver of the decision was an assessment that ongoing military conflict with Hamas materially raises political risk for Israel and weakens its executive and legislative institutions and fiscal strength.
There is no clarity on whether negotiations underway to secure hostage release will result in a temporary ceasefire or more humanitarian aid into Gaza.
On February 9, Israel received its first-ever sovereign downgrade from Moody's Investors Service. The primary driver of the decision was an assessment that ongoing military conflict with Hamas materially raises political risk for Israel and weakens its executive and legislative institutions and fiscal strength. There is no clarity on whether negotiations underway to secure hostage release will result in a temporary ceasefire or more humanitarian aid into Gaza. The Israeli economy is strong, but the downgrade was not connected to it.
Israel received its first-ever sovereign downgrade
The primary driver of Moody's decision was an assessment that ongoing military conflict with Hamas materially raises political risk for Israel and weakens its executive and legislative institutions and fiscal strength.
There is no clarity on whether negotiations underway to secure hostage release will result in a temporary ceasefire or more humanitarian aid into Gaza.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that Israel's credit rating will rise once it wins a war. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence presented in the article and may be misleading to readers who are unaware of Moody's downgrade decision.
The Times of Israel liveblogged Friday’s events as they unfolded.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when the Prime Minister of Israel claims that the Israeli economy is strong and that a credit rating downgrade by Moody's is not connected to the economy but rather due to Israel being in a war. This statement assumes that Moody's has no expertise or knowledge about Israel's economic situation, which is false. The second fallacy found in this article is inflammatory rhetoric when Netanyahu predicts that he will win the war and the credit rating will rise back at that moment. This type of language incites violence and creates a hostile environment for any peaceful resolution to the conflict.
The Israeli economy is strong.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that implies the credit rating downgrade is due to Israel being in a war. This statement suggests an ideological bias towards prioritizing military success over economic stability.
> The Israeli economy is strong. The rating downgrade is not connected to the economy, it is entirely due to the fact that we are in a war,
Israel received its first-ever sovereign downgrade
The Israeli economy is strong. The rating downgrade is not connected to the economy, it is entirely due to the fact that we are in a war
There is no clarity on whether negotiations underway to secure hostage release will result in a temporary ceasefire or more humanitarian aid into Gaza.
Moody's warned that there is significant risk of an escalation of the current conflict, including potential involvement of Hezbollah and posing a bigger risk to Israel's territory.
Accuracy
Moody's expects Israel's defense spending to be nearly double the level of 2022 by the end of 2024 and potentially rise even higher in coming years.
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that Israel has never received a downgrade before when in fact this is not true. Secondly, the author uses sensationalism by stating 'Israel gets first-ever rating downgrade ever' which exaggerates and misrepresents the facts.
The author uses sensationalism by stating 'Israel gets first-ever rating downgrade ever' which exaggerates and misrepresents the facts.
The article states 'Israel received its first-ever sovereign downgrade as Moody’s Investors Service lowered its credit rating, citing the impact of the ongoing military conflict with Hamas on its finances.' However, this is not entirely accurate. According to a report by Reuters, Israel has had several downgrades in the past.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by citing Moody's Investors Service as the source of information. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the ongoing military conflict with Hamas as having a negative impact on Israel's finances.
>Israel received its first-ever sovereign downgrade as Moody’s Investors Service lowered its credit rating, citing the impact of the ongoing military conflict with Hamas on its finances. <
The nation was cut by one notch to A2, the sixth-highest investment grade and on par with Poland and Chile.
Bias
(75%)
The author uses language that dehumanizes the Palestinians by referring to them as 'Hamas'. This is an example of religious bias.
> The ongoing military conflict with Hamas on its finances. <br> > Moody's changed the outlook to negative, concluding a review that it started in October.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The article discusses the downgrade of Israel's credit rating by Moody's Investors Service. The authors have a conflict of interest as they are both employees of Bloomberg News which is owned by Michael Bloomberg who has financial ties to Israel through his philanthropic foundation.
The article discusses the downgrade of Israel's credit rating by Moody's Investors Service. The authors have a conflict of interest as they are both employees of Bloomberg News which is owned by Michael Bloomberg who has financial ties to Israel through his philanthropic foundation.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Israel and Hamas as they are both involved in military conflicts. The author also has a financial tie to Moody's Investors Service which is mentioned in the article.
Israel's prolonged war with Hamas is going to become a significant economic and political burden for the country over the long haul.
Moody's downgraded Israel's credit rating from A1 to A2 on Friday, underscoring the economic damage of the country’s war with Hamas.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(80%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that Israel's credit rating was downgraded because of its war with Hamas when it was actually due to a projected higher budget deficit caused by increased military spending. Secondly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'prolonged war', 'thousands of human casualties', and 'stoked geopolitical tensions around the world' to create an emotional response in readers rather than providing factual information about Israel's credit rating downgrade. Thirdly, Moody's Investors Service does not disclose any sources or provide evidence for their assessment that the ongoing military conflict with Hamas raises political risk for Israel and weakens its executive and legislative institutions and fiscal strength.
The author uses sensationalist language such as 'prolonged war', 'thousands of human casualties', and 'stoked geopolitical tensions around the world' to create an emotional response in readers rather than providing factual information about Israel's credit rating downgrade.
Moody's Investors Service does not disclose any sources or provide evidence for their assessment that the ongoing military conflict with Hamas raises political risk for Israel and weakens its executive and legislative institutions and fiscal strength.
The title implies that Israel's credit rating was downgraded because of its war with Hamas when it was actually due to a projected higher budget deficit caused by increased military spending.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing Moody's Investors Service as the source of information about Israel's credit rating downgrade. However, this does not necessarily mean that Moody's is a reliable or unbiased source of information. Additionally, the article contains inflammatory rhetoric when it describes Hamas as an
The primary driver of its decision was an assessment that the ongoing military conflict with Hamas,
Bias
(85%)
The article is biased towards Israel's credit rating being downgraded due to its prolonged war with Hamas. The author uses language that dehumanizes the conflict and portrays it as a significant burden for Israel. Additionally, the author quotes Moody's Investors Service directly without providing any context or analysis of their reasoning.
CNN — Israel’s prolonged war with Hamas is going to become a significant economic and political burden for the country over the long haul, Moody’s said Friday.
- CNN’s Matt Egan contributed reporting.
In a Friday statement, Moody’s said the primary driver of its decision was an “assessment that the ongoing military conflict with Hamas, its aftermath and wider consequences materially raise political risk for Israel as well as weaken its executive and legislative institutions and its fiscal strength, for the foreseeable future.”
Moody's also warned of the “significant” risk of an escalation of the current conflict, including the potential involvement of Hezbollah, an Islamist group with paramilitary forces to the north of Israel.
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Israel’s debt rating from A1 to A2 on Friday, underscoring the economic damage of the country’s war with Hamas, which has resulted in thousands of human casualties and stoked geopolitical tensions around the world.
On Friday, the credit ratings agency said its decision was based on Israel’s projected higher budget deficit due to increased military spending, saying it expects Israel’s defense spending to be nearly double the level of 2022 by the end of 2024 and potentially rise even higher in the coming years.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Samantha Delouya has a conflict of interest on the topics of Israel and Hamas as she is reporting for CNN which has a vested interest in these topics due to its coverage.
Rishi Sunak notched capital gains of ➣1.8mn in 2943
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(0%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy. The author cites the S&P 500 index as a source of information without providing any context or analysis.
]Subscribe to unlock this article Try unlimited access Only $1 for 4 weeks Then $75 per month. Complete digital access to quality FT journalism on any device. Cancel anytime during your trial. Explore more offers Standard Digital Essential digital access to quality FT journalism on any device Pay a year upfront and save 20%. Standard Digital Complete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders Pay a year upfront and save 20% Billed Quarterly at $199. Complete digital access plus the FT newspaper delivered to your home or office Monday-Saturday Explore our full range of subscriptions Why the FT? See why over a million readers pay to read the Financial Times Find out why
