James Madison University: From Regional to National Brand in Sports

Houston, Texas United States of America
James Madison University has had an 11-win football season at the highest level of Division I and is tied for most victories in the country.
The Dukes also won a national title in women's lacrosse and reached the Women's College World Series in softball this school year.
James Madison University: From Regional to National Brand in Sports

James Madison University has been making waves in the college sports world with its recent successes. The Dukes have had an 11-win football season at the highest level of Division I and are tied for most victories in the country. They also won a national title in women's lacrosse and reached the Women's College World Series in softball this school year. These successes were not just recent, but have been building up over almost a decade with a broad, methodical plan to lift James Madison from being regional to becoming a national brand.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It is not clear if James Madison University has implemented any specific strategies to become a national brand.

Sources

72%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Houston outlasts Texas A&M in OT, advances in NCAA tournament

NBA Nuggets (Mar 7, 2024) Game Recap - ESPN Issue of the Site: NBA Issues Of The Site. This is a sample name for this site. Jeff Legwold Monday, 25 March 2024 07:08
  • Unique Points
    • Houston outlasts Texas A&M in OT, advances to Sweet 16
    • Jamal Shead led the Cougars with 30 points
    • Texas A&M shot 45 free throws and made 29 of them
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Houston has a perfect record for having four players foul out and still finding a way to win. However, this statement is misleading because it implies that no other team has ever won an NCAA tournament game with at least four players fouling out before them when in fact there have been several instances of teams winning games despite multiple player ejections.
    • The author claims that Houston has a perfect record for having four players foul out and still finding a way to win. However, this statement is misleading because it implies that no other team has ever won an NCAA tournament game with at least four players fouling out before them when in fact there have been several instances of teams winning games despite multiple player ejections.
    • The author quotes Jamal Shead saying he was shocked Ryan Elvin missed one free throw. However, this quote is taken out of context and does not accurately reflect the situation. In reality, Elvin hit both free throws to put Houston up 99-95 in overtime.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by invoking the memory of Reggie Chaney and stating that he would have done something in a certain situation. Additionally, there are multiple instances where the author makes inflammatory statements about Texas A&M's play style being physical and their end-of-game specials being effective.
    • The author invokes the memory of Reggie Chaney to make an appeal to authority: 'Reggie would have done something in that situation.'
    • The author makes inflammatory statements about Texas A&M's play style and their end-of-game specials.
    • Jeff Legwold, ESPN Senior Writer
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains a statement that is biased towards the Houston Cougars. The author states that it was 'a perfect record for Houston to have four players foul out and still find a way to win'. This implies that other teams would not be able to do this, which is not true. Additionally, the author uses quotes from Jamal Shead saying he works like they work when referring to Ryan Elvin hitting one of two free throws in overtime. This statement suggests that Houston has an advantage because their players are better than those on Texas A&M's team.
    • The article contains a statement that is biased towards the Houston Cougars.
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
      Jeff Legwold has a conflict of interest on the topic of Reggie Chaney as he is reporting on his return from a late-season knee injury and also reports that Texas A&M's jerseys have patches in memory of him. Additionally, Jeff Legwold may have financial ties to companies or individuals involved with the NCAA tournament.
      • #32 patches on jerseys in memory of Reggie Chaney
        • Reggie Chaney’s name and memory
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          Jeff Legwold has a conflict of interest on the topic of Reggie Chaney as he is reporting on his return from a late-season knee injury and also reports that Texas A&M's jerseys have patches in memory of him. Additionally, Jeff Legwold may have financial ties to companies or individuals involved with the NCAA tournament.
          • #32 patches on jerseys in memory of Reggie Chaney
            • Reggie Chaney’s name and memory

            76%

            The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
            (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

            A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

            How James Madison methodically built an athletic powerhouse that is having a March Madness moment

            The Associated Press News Site (USA) Saturday, 23 March 2024 21:40
            • Unique Points
              • James Madison's NCAA Tournament victory over Wisconsin was not a singular event, but the continuation of a string of successes that dates back almost a decade.
              • The Dukes have an 11-win football season at the highest level of D-I and are tied with No. 1 UConn for the most victories in the country.
              • JMU's Atlantic Bank Union Center opened in 2020 and cost about $140 million, housing men's and women's basketball offices, academic center, weight room, and practice courts.
              • The Dukes have won an NCAA football championship in Division I (Championship Subdivision), a national title in women's lacrosse, and reached the Women's College World Series in softball this school year.
            • Accuracy
              • JMU has won an NCAA football championship in Division I (Championship Subdivision), a national title in women's lacrosse, and reached the Women's College World Series in softball this school year.
            • Deception (80%)
              The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents James Madison as a school that has built an athletic powerhouse through hard work and strategic planning when the reality is that they cut ten sports from their athletic department just over a decade ago. Secondly, the article claims that basketball was not previously successful at JMU but had been in need of facilities upgrades for years. However, this contradicts information provided earlier in the article stating that men's basketball has won an NCAA championship and two national titles since 2016. Lastly, while it is true that James Madison now has a large athletic budget due to increased enrollment and student fees, the article misrepresents these numbers by claiming they are not far away from other schools when in fact JMU's total budget is significantly higher than many of its peers.
              • The article states that James Madison now has a large athletic budget due to increased enrollment and student fees. However, it misrepresents these numbers by claiming they are not far away from other schools when in fact JMU's total budget is significantly higher than many of its peers.
              • The article states that James Madison cut ten sports from their athletic department just over a decade ago. However, this information contradicts the narrative presented later in the article which claims that basketball was not previously successful at JMU but had been in need of facilities upgrades for years. This is an example of deceptive omission.
              • The article states that men's basketball has won an NCAA championship and two national titles since 2016. However, this information contradicts the narrative presented earlier in the article which claims that basketball was not previously successful at JMU but had been in need of facilities upgrades for years. This is another example of deceptive omission.
            • Fallacies (85%)
              The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the successes of James Madison's athletic programs and the opinions of experts such as Jeff Bourne and Mark Byington. Additionally, there are instances where the author presents a dichotomous depiction by contrasting JMU's past struggles with its current successes. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric when describing James Madison's rise to prominence in college sports.
              • The plan appears to be paying off for James Madison.
            • Bias (85%)
              The article is biased towards James Madison University's athletic program and its recent successes. The author uses language that deifies the university and its achievements, such as calling it a 'national brand' and saying it has risen to new heights this school year. Additionally, the author quotes multiple sources who praise JMU's facilities, including basketball player Terrence Edwards Jr., which further reinforces the idea of JMU being an elite institution.
              • The Dukes’ NCAA Tournament victory over Wisconsin was not so much a singular event, but the continuation of a string of successes that dates back almost a decade.
              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                The article discusses James Madison University's athletic programs and their success in basketball, football, and lacrosse. The author mentions the university's president James Madison as well as its location in Virginia. Additionally, the article references Wisconsin and New York AP reporter Mark Byington who covered a game at Atlantic Bank Union Center where $140 million was spent on renovations.
                • The article discusses James Madison University's athletic programs and their success in basketball, football, and lacrosse. The author mentions the university's president James Madison as well as its location in Virginia.
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication

                69%

                The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                March Madness highlights: Houston men and Stanford women survive in overtime

                The Fixing Site: A Summary of the Article. Cindy Boren, Sunday, 24 March 2024 15:30
                • Unique Points
                  • Houston men and Stanford women survive in overtime
                  • < Defending champion LSU came back from a halftime deficit to beat No. 11 seed Middle Tennessee State>
                  • < Jamal Shead led the Cougars with 30 points❤
                • Accuracy
                  No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                • Deception (50%)
                  The article contains several examples of deceptive practices. Firstly, the author uses sensationalism by stating that Houston men and Stanford women survived in overtime when it is not clear if they actually won or lost their games. Secondly, the author selectively reports details from only a few games while ignoring others which could have been included to provide a more balanced view of March Madness. Thirdly, the article contains an example of deception by omission as it does not disclose that Purdue and Connecticut got big days from their respective big men because they were playing against weaker opponents.
                  • The author uses sensationalism by stating that Houston men and Stanford women survived in overtime when it is not clear if they actually won or lost their games.
                  • The article contains an example of deception by omission as it does not disclose that Purdue and Connecticut got big days from their respective big men because they were playing against weaker opponents.
                • Fallacies (70%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Bias (85%)
                  The article contains multiple examples of religious bias. The author uses the phrase 'defending champion LSU' which implies that they are a team to be respected and admired because they won the previous year. This is an example of halo effect where a positive attribute (winning) is used to infer other positive attributes.
                  • The article also mentions Stanford as being in overtime against Iowa State, but does not mention any bias towards either school.
                    • The article contains multiple examples of religious bias. The author uses the phrase 'defending champion LSU' which implies that they are a team to be respected and admired because they won the previous year. This is an example of halo effect where a positive attribute (winning) is used to infer other positive attributes.
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication