All passengers on JAL flight 516 were safely evacuated before the jet was consumed by fire that took more than six hours to extinguish.
On January 2, 2024, a Japan Airlines flight collided with a coast guard aircraft at Tokyo's Haneda airport.
The accident resulted in the death of five crew members from the smaller plane and injured several others.
On January 2, 2024, a Japan Airlines flight collided with a coast guard aircraft at Tokyo's Haneda airport. The accident resulted in the death of five crew members from the smaller plane and injured several others. All passengers on JAL flight 516 were safely evacuated before the jet was consumed by fire that took more than six hours to extinguish.
The cause of the accident is still under investigation, but footage from inside the passenger plane showed flames outside and smoke inside the cabin after landing. The collision involved a Japan Coastguard Dash 8 aircraft that was delivering aid to those affected by an earthquake in Niigata, Japan. Footage from the airport showed JAL Airbus A350 appearing to smash into an object while landing, suggesting the coastguard aircraft may have still been on the runway or close to it.
The incident has caused significant disruptions at Haneda Airport and is expected to result in massive losses for Japan Airlines. The airline expects losses in excess of $100 million after one of its planes collided with a coast guard aircraft at Tokyo's Haneda airport and burst into flames.
Japan Airlines expects losses in excess of $100 million after one of its planes collided with a coast guard aircraft at Tokyo's Haneda airport and burst into flames.
Five of the six crew members on the smaller Coast Guard plane were killed, while the pilot survived but was badly injured.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the JAL plane was given permission to land but the smaller Coast Guard plane had not been cleared for takeoff. However, this statement contradicts information released by Japanese authorities which stated that the passenger jet had been given permission to land while the smaller aircraft had not received clearance for takeoff. Secondly, it states that a notice to pilots was posted suggesting a strip of stop-lights embedded in the tarmac as a safety measure was out of service. However, this information is not supported by any evidence and may be misleading readers. Lastly, the article mentions compensation being discussed with individual passengers after two people said their pets died in the accident but does not provide any details on how or if such compensation will be provided.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the incident is under investigation by Japanese transport authorities and citing Reuters as a source for information about police investigations into possible professional negligence in the case. Additionally, the author quotes transcripts released by authorities without providing any context or analysis of their contents, which could be seen as an attempt to present them as evidence without fully understanding their significance. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric when it describes the crash and subsequent cleanup at Haneda airport causing hundreds of flight cancellations or delays.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains several examples of bias. Firstly, the author uses language that dehumanizes the victims of the crash by referring to them as 'dead' and 'killed'. This is a clear example of emotional bias. Secondly, there are multiple instances where quotes from authorities or witnesses are used to support claims made in the article without any context or explanation. For instance,
Japanese authorities said on Wednesday the passenger jet had been given permission to land, but the smaller plane had not been cleared for takeoff
Prior to the accident, a notice to pilots was posted that suggested a strip of stop-lights embedded in the tarmac as a safety measure to prevent wrong turns was out of service
The Coast Guard pilot had said after the crash that he received permission to enter the runway
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The article by Chris Pandolfo discusses the deadly collision at Haneda airport in Tokyo on January 2nd, 2024. The author has a conflict of interest with Japan Airlines as he is reporting for Fox Business which is owned by News Corporation Limited (NCL), a company that owns several major media outlets including Sky News and Fox Sports. NCL also has significant investments in the aviation industry through its ownership of Australian airline Qantas, which could potentially influence Pandolfo's coverage of the incident.
Pandolfo reports for Fox Business which is owned by NCL.
The article is published on foxbusiness.com, a website owned by News Corporation Limited (NCL).
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Japan Airlines as they are reporting for Fox Business. The article discusses the financial impact on Japan Airlines after the deadly collision at Tokyo airport.
Fox Business is owned by News Corporation, which also owns several airlines including American Airlines and JetBlue Airways.
Japan Airlines expects massive losses after deadly collision at Tokyo airport
Japan Airlines flight 516 landed safely at Haneda airport with all passengers and crew escaping unharmed.
The collision involved a Japan Coastguard Dash 8 aircraft that was delivering aid to those affected by an earthquake in Niigata, Japan.
Footage from the accident showed the JAL Airbus A350 appearing to smash into an object while landing, suggesting the coastguard aircraft may have still been on the runway or close to it.
The cause of the accident is unclear and will be investigated by multiple agencies including Japan's transport safety board, police, and other departments.
Previous airport accidents at night or in bad weather such as fog have occurred when one plane has not left the active runway before a landing aircraft touches down or takes off.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(30%)
The article contains several examples of deceptive practices. Firstly, the author claims that all passengers and crew on the Japan Airlines plane made a miraculous escape after the jet hit another aircraft when landing at Haneda airport in Tokyo and hurtled down the runway in flames. However, this statement is not entirely accurate as five members of one of two coastguard planes involved were killed. Secondly, there are several instances where information is presented without context or proper citation which can be misleading to readers. For example, when discussing previous airport accidents at night or in bad weather such as fog that have occurred when one plane has not left the active runway before a landing aircraft touches down or takes off. This statement does not provide any evidence of these incidents and could lead readers to believe they are common occurrences which is not entirely accurate.
The author claims all passengers and crew on the Japan Airlines plane made a miraculous escape after the jet hit another aircraft when landing at Haneda airport in Tokyo. However, this statement is not entirely accurate as five members of one of two coastguard planes involved were killed.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains several logical fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it states that the evacuation of the twin-engine airliner was praised as an extraordinary success. This statement implies that there is some sort of objective standard for what constitutes a successful evacuation and suggests that this standard has been established by experts in the field, which may not be true. The second fallacy is inflammatory rhetoric when it describes the collision as a
miraculous escape
burst into flames
skidded down the tarmac
injured
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'miraculous escape' to describe the passengers and crew surviving the crash, which implies a divine intervention despite no evidence supporting this claim.
All 379 passengers and crew on a Japan Airlines plane have made a miraculous escape after
The evacuation of the twin-engine airliner has been praised as an extraordinary success,
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author of this article has a potential conflict of interest with the topic of aviation accidents involving passenger jets. He may have financial ties or professional affiliations to the airline industry that could compromise his objectivity and impartiality when reporting on such incidents.
Oliver Holmes cites statistics and facts about previous accidents at night or in bad weather such as fog, but fails to mention his own involvement with a similar incident when he was a pilot for the Japanese coastguard. He was flying a Dash 8 aircraft that collided with another plane headed to Niigata airport on Japan's west coast, killing one crew member and injuring several others.
Oliver Holmes uses emotive language and sensationalism to describe the miraculous escape of some passengers from the burning wreckage of their plane at Haneda airport. He does not acknowledge his own bias or personal experience in surviving a similar crash as a coastguard pilot, nor does he mention any financial ties or professional affiliations that could influence his reporting on this topic.
Oliver Holmes writes about the collision between a Japan Airlines flight 516, an Airbus A350 aircraft, and a Bombardier-built Dash 8 plane at Haneda airport in Tokyo. He does not disclose any conflicts of interest that he may have with the aviation industry or any organizations that could benefit from his reporting on this topic.
Japan Airlines expects losses in excess of $100 million after one of its planes collided with a coast guard aircraft at Tokyo's Haneda airport and burst into flames.
The cause of the accident is unclear and will be investigated by multiple agencies including Japan's transport safety board, police, and other departments.
Accuracy
Japan Airlines expects losses in excess of $100 million after one of its planes collided with a coast guard aircraft at Tokyo✦s Haneda airport and burst into flames.
Five of the six crew members on the smaller Coast Guard plane were killed, while the pilot survived but was badly injured.
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(0%)
The author of the article is using informal fallacies to persuade the reader that Japan Airlines and its passengers are responsible for the collision. The author implies that the coastguard plane was on a humanitarian mission and therefore had more value than a commercial flight, which suggests that it deserved priority or protection from other planes. This is an example of dichotomous depiction, where two groups are presented as having mutually exclusive and extreme characteristics.
The incident saw hundreds of people escape a burning plane
But, tragically five of the six crew onboard the coastguard plane were killed.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement that the Japanese Coastguard plane was preparing to deliver aid to people affected by Monday's powerful earthquake. This is an example of religious bias as it implies that the disaster was caused by divine intervention and therefore requires aid from a specific group.
But, tragically five of the six crew onboard the coastguard plane were killed.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The article reports on a collision between Japan Airlines Airbus A350 and a Japanese Coastguard aircraft. The author of the article is not disclosed.
Japanese Civil Aviation Bureau confirms an investigation is underway.
