Assange had been wanted by the US for over a decade on charges related to publishing classified information
Assange's legal team and supporters argue that he is a journalist acting in the public interest, while critics claim his actions put lives at risk and undermined national security
Assange spent seven years living inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London before being arrested and later transferred to Belmarsh Prison
Julian Assange reached a plea deal in a US court on June 26, 2024
Under the terms of his plea deal, Assange will not spend any time behind bars in the US and is expected to travel to Australia
Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, made headlines once again on June 26, 2024, as he walked out of a US courtroom in Saipan after reaching a plea deal with the US government. Assange had been wanted by the US for over a decade on charges related to publishing classified information. The controversial figure rose to prominence in 2010 when WikiLeaks released classified documents related to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, including footage of a US military helicopter attack that killed civilians in Iraq.
Assange spent seven years living inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London before being arrested by British police acting on an extradition warrant from the US Justice Department. He was later transferred to Belmarsh Prison, where he served five years while fighting extradition to the US.
Under the terms of his plea deal, Assange will not spend any time behind bars in the US. Instead, he is expected to travel to Australia, where he holds citizenship. The specifics of the deal have not been disclosed.
Assange's legal team and supporters argue that he is a journalist who was acting in the public interest by publishing classified information. Critics claim that his actions put lives at risk and undermined national security.
The case against Assange has been closely watched around the world, with many seeing it as a test of press freedom and government power. The outcome remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: Julian Assange's story is far from over.
Julian Assange walked free from UK prison on Monday after a US judge signed off on his plea deal.
Assange had long held a deep mistrust of the US and was hesitant about stepping foot in the continental US for the proceedings.
Assange rose to global prominence after WikiLeaks released classified information related to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, including a video showing a US military helicopter firing on and killing civilians in Iraq.
Assange served five years in London’s Belmarsh prison while fighting extradition to the US. He will not spend any time behind bars in the US as part of his plea deal.
Assange sought political asylum within the Ecuadorian embassy in London for almost seven years before being arrested by British police acting on an extradition warrant from the US Justice Department.
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange reached a plea deal in a U.S. court in the Northern Mariana Islands, pleading guilty to one criminal count of conspiracy to obtain documents, writing and notes connected with the U.S. national defense and communicating these materials.
Assange spent seven years in self-exile in the Ecuadorian embassy in London and the last five years at Belmarsh Prison before walking free.
Assange was wanted in the U.S. on 18 charges, including 17 under the Espionage Act and one under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. He faced up to 175 years in prison after WikiLeaks published hundreds of thousands of leaked confidential military files and diplomatic documents related to the Afghanistan and Iraq wars.
WikiLeaks gained international prominence in 2010 when the website released footage from a 2007 U.S. helicopter attack that killed two Reuters news staff and several others in Iraq’s capital, Baghdad, followed by publishing hundreds of thousands of other classified files.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(95%)
The article contains an appeal to authority when the author quotes Barry Pollack stating that 'unfortunately, that violates the terms of the Espionage Act'. This is a fallacy because it assumes that just because someone in a position of authority (in this case, a lawyer) states something, it must be true. However, this does not mean that Assange's actions do indeed violate the terms of the Espionage Act. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing WikiLeaks as an organization that 'gained international prominence in 2010, when the website released footage from a 2007 U.S. helicopter attack that killed two Reuters news staff and several others in Iraq’s capital, Baghdad'. This is not a logical fallacy but it is worth noting as it may influence the reader's perception of WikiLeaks and its actions.
unfortunately, that violates the terms of the Espionage Act
Julian P. Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, pleaded guilty to conspiring with Chelsea Manning to obtain and disclose classified documents relating to national defense.
Assange publicly disclosed hundreds of thousands of documents Manning had taken without authorization on WikiLeaks’ website.
Assange and WikiLeaks released many raw classified documents without removing personally identifying information, placing individuals at risk.
Accuracy
Assange received a court-imposed 62-month sentence reflecting the time he served in U.K. prison.
Assange was charged with conspiring with Manning, a Top Secret U.S. security clearance holder, to illegally download and transmit classified documents to WikiLeaks.
Deception
(50%)
The article is highly deceptive in its portrayal of the actions and intentions of Julian Assange. It omits any context or background for Assange's actions, instead presenting them as purely malicious. The article also implies that the release of unredacted documents directly caused harm to individuals named in those documents, without providing any evidence to support this claim.
The guilty plea concludes a criminal matter that dates back to March 2018, when Assange was first indicted in the Eastern District of Virginia.
Fallacies
(0%)
The author makes several appeals to authority throughout the article. For example, they mention that 'Assange was detained in the United Kingdom based on the U.S. charges for the last 62 months' and 'The FBI Washington Field Office investigated the case'. These statements are not fallacies in and of themselves, but they do serve to lend credibility to the author's claims without providing any additional evidence or reasoning. Additionally, there are several instances of inflammatory rhetoric used to describe Assange's actions, such as 'Assange publicly disclosed via the WikiLeaks website hundreds of thousands of documents that Manning had taken without authorization and given to him' and 'Assange even acknowledged in public statements that he knew that publicly disclosing unredacted classified documents containing the names and other identifying information of people who had shared information with the U.S. government in confidence could put those people at risk of harm'. These statements are not objectively true or false, but they do serve to paint Assange in a negative light and may influence readers' perceptions of the situation.
]Assange was detained in the United Kingdom based on the U.S. charges for the last 62 months[
The FBI Washington Field Office investigated the case
Assange publicly disclosed via the WikiLeaks website hundreds of thousands of documents that Manning had taken without authorization and given to him
Assange even acknowledged in public statements that he knew that publicly disclosing unredacted classified documents containing the names and other identifying information of people who had shared information with the U.S. government in confidence could put those people at risk of harm
At least five people have been killed in Nairobi due to new tax laws.
Doctors must be legally bound to tell the truth according to a man whose daughter’s death was examined by an inquiry which found there had been a ‘cover-up’.
Julian Assange received a hero's welcome in Australia after pleading guilty to a felony charge of violating the US Espionage Act.
Kevin Rudd, the former prime minister of Australia, joined Assange in the US courtroom during his plea hearing.
Assange published classified military and diplomatic documents revealing secret details about US spycraft and civilian killings during wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Assange was a divisive figure then, seen as a brave journalist by some and a reckless anarchist by others.
During the 2016 presidential election, WikiLeaks published thousands of emails from Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee stolen by Russian hackers.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(80%)
The author presents a balanced view of Julian Assange's case, acknowledging the different perspectives on him as a journalist and criminal. However, there is an appeal to authority when mentioning Kevin Rudd's statement without questioning its validity. Additionally, there is an example of inflammatory rhetoric in describing Assange's transformation into a figure 'more appealing for Australians', implying a negative view of the public's perception.
But after five years in a British prison, where he had married and became the father of two children, Mr. Assange had turned into a figure more appealing for Australians. Somewhere along the way, he became the underdog forced to endure superpower pique, and in a land settled by convicts, a rebellious bloke who had done his time and deserved to return home.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
