Justin Timberlake Arrested for DWI: Attorney Disputes Intoxication Claims

Sag Harbor, New York United States of America
Appeared unable to divide attention, slowed speech, unsteady on feet
Justin Timberlake arrested for DWI in Sag Harbor Village, New York on June 18, 2024
Observed failing to stay in lane and not stopping at a stop sign
Performed poorly on all standardized field sobriety tests
Timberlake's attorney disputes intoxication claims
Justin Timberlake Arrested for DWI: Attorney Disputes Intoxication Claims

Justin Timberlake, the renowned singer and actor, found himself in legal trouble on June 18, 2024. According to multiple sources including CNN, Deadline, and Fox News, Timberlake was arrested for driving while intoxicated (DWI) in Sag Harbor Village, New York. However, his attorney Edward Burke disputes the claim that Timberlake was intoxicated at the time of the arrest.

The incident occurred when a police officer observed Timberlake's vehicle failing to stay in its lane and not stopping at a stop sign. Upon pulling him over, the officer reported that Timberlake appeared unable to divide his attention, had slowed speech, and was unsteady on his feet. The singer also performed poorly on all standardized field sobriety tests.

Despite these observations, Burke maintains that Timberlake was not intoxicated and should not have been arrested for DWI. He stated that the police made significant errors during their investigation, but did not provide further details.

Timberlake's career in entertainment began as a Disney Mouseketeer and later became a member of the successful boy band *NSYNC. He has racked up numerous hits including



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • Could there have been other explanations for Timberlake's observed behavior?
  • Was the police officer's observation of Timberlake's behavior definitive proof of intoxication?

Sources

96%

  • Unique Points
    • Timberlake told police he had one martini and followed friends home before the incident
    • Timberlake described as unable to divide attention, had slowed speech, was unsteady afoot and performed poorly on all standardized field sobriety tests
  • Accuracy
    • Timberlake told police he had one martini before driving and refused a breathalyzer test
    • Timberlake was unable to stay in the right lane, failed to stop at a stop sign, had bloodshot and glossy eyes, unsteady footing and slow speech during his arrest
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

77%

  • Unique Points
    • Justin Timberlake was unable to stay in the right lane, failed to stop at a stop sign
    • Timberlake told the officer he had one martini before driving and refused a breathalyzer test
    • The Sag Harbor police officer who pulled Timberlake over did not recognize him at the time of the arrest
  • Accuracy
    • Justin Timberlake was not intoxicated
    • Timberlake told the officer he had one martini and refused a breathalyzer test
    • The police made significant errors during their investigation of Timberlake
  • Deception (30%)
    The author makes editorializing statements by claiming that 'Justin was not intoxicated and should not have been arrested for DWI.' This is an opinion and goes beyond reporting the facts. The author also uses emotional manipulation by stating that 'But the fact remains, he was not intoxicated and they made an error in arresting him for it.' This implies that the reader should feel sympathy for Justin Timberlake and believe that he was wrongfully arrested.
    • But the fact remains, he was not intoxicated and they made an error in arresting him for it.
    • The most important fact to know about this case is that Justin was not intoxicated and should not have been arrested for DWI.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The author makes an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that the attorney's claim that the singer was not intoxicated should be accepted without question. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating 'significant errors' and 'mistakes' made by the police, but does not provide any evidence or specific examples of these errors.
    • ]The most important fact to know about this case is that Justin was not intoxicated and should not have been arrested for DWI.[
    • But the fact remains, he was not intoxicated and they made an error in arresting him for it.
  • Bias (95%)
    The author, Christina Dugan Ramirez, states that Justin Timberlake's attorney claims the singer 'should not have been arrested for DWI' and that there were 'significant errors' made by the police. This implies a bias towards exonerating Timberlake and casting doubt on the validity of his arrest.
    • But the fact remains, he was not intoxicated and they made an error in arresting him for it.
      • The most important fact to know about this case is that Justin was not intoxicated and should not have been arrested for DWI.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      96%

      • Unique Points
        • Justin Timberlake began his entertainment career as a Disney Mouseketeer and then became a member of the harmonizing, dancing teen-pop band ‘N Sync.
        • Timberlake racked up hits including ‘Cry Me a River’ and ‘SexyBack’ with an accessible sound straddling funk, pop and club music.
      • Accuracy
        • Justin Timberlake told the officer he had one martini and followed his friends home, but performed poorly on all standardized field sobriety tests and refused a breathalyzer test.
        • Timberlake was unable to stay in the right lane, failed to stop at a stop sign, had bloodshot and glossy eyes, unsteady footing and slow speech during his arrest.
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication