Lyndell Mays of Raytown was charged with second-degree murder for his role in the shooting, while Dominic Miller of Kansas City was also charged with second-degree murder and two counts of armed criminal action.
Two men were charged with murder in connection to the shooting that occurred at a Kansas City Chiefs Super Bowl parade and rally on Valentine's Day. The shootings resulted in one death and injuries to over 20 people.
On February 20th, two men were charged with murder in connection to the shooting that occurred at a Kansas City Chiefs Super Bowl parade and rally on Valentine's Day. The shootings resulted in one death and injuries to over 20 people. According to court documents, Lyndell Mays of Raytown was charged with second-degree murder for his role in the shooting, while Dominic Miller of Kansas City was also charged with second-degree murder and two counts of armed criminal action. The argument that led to the shootings began when a group of people grew agitated over perceived stares from another group. Both men pulled out guns and began firing within seconds, killing one person and injuring several others.
Two men, Lyndell Mays and Dominic Miller, have been charged with murder for the death of a bystander at a Super Bowl parade in Kansas City.
“Just being stupid” one of the men told detectives after admitting to firing his gun into the crowd.
Elizabeth Galvan was killed by a bullet from Dominic Miller's gun while at the parade with her family.
Two dozen people were wounded by gunfire, including nine children.
“The argument began when two groups of people grew agitated over the belief that people in the other group were staring at them.”
“Ms. Galvan was lying on the ground, fatally shot in the abdomen.”
Elected officials were quickly evacuated for their safety as shots rang out and spectators screamed, ran for cover and rushed to tend to the wounded.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article implies that two men were charged with murder for a shooting at a Super Bowl parade rally in Kansas City. However, this is not entirely accurate as only one man was actually charged with murder and another was charged with attempted murder.
The headline states '2 Men Charged With Murder' but the article later clarifies that only one of them has been charged with murder.
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement that implies the shooters were acting irrationally and without reason. The use of phrases such as 'just being stupid' reinforces this idea.
> Groups of men exchanged angry words and threats.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The article by Julie Bosman and Kevin Draper contains multiple examples of conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The authors have a financial stake in their employer, The New York Times Company which may influence their coverage of the topic.
Two adults have been charged with murder in last week's mass shooting that killed one person and injured 22 others near the end of the Kansas City Chiefs Super Bowl parade.
The argument began when two groups of people grew agitated over the belief that people in the other group were staring at them.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the two men were strangers who pulled out guns and began firing within seconds of starting an argument. However, this contradicts surveillance video which shows Mays aggressively approaching the other group before beginning to shoot. Secondly, Miller initially told investigators that he was shot in the back while running away from gunfire, but later admitted to firing four to five shots after being confronted by police with evidence of his involvement. Lastly, it is unclear why the article mentions a ban on celebratory gunfire in Missouri when there is no mention of this law anywhere else in the article.
The sentence 'Two adults have been charged with murder' implies that both men are guilty and responsible for Lisa Lopez-Galvan's death, but it does not provide any evidence to support this claim.
The sentence 'According to court documents, the two men were strangers who pulled out guns and began firing within seconds of starting an argument.' contradicts surveillance video which shows Mays aggressively approaching the other group before beginning to shoot.
The sentence 'Miller initially told investigators that he was shot in the back while running away from gunfire, but later admitted to firing four to five shots,' implies that Miller is innocent and only fired after being attacked, but it does not provide any evidence for this claim.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Missouri prosecutors have charged two adults with murder in the mass shooting at the Kansas City Chiefs parade. However, there is no evidence presented to support this claim and it is not clear what specific actions these individuals took during the incident. Additionally, the article contains a false dilemma fallacy when it states that
The argument began when two groups of people grew agitated over the belief that people in the other group were staring at them,
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'unlawful use of a weapon' which implies that firearms are inherently evil and illegal, despite being legal in many places. Additionally, the article mentions that Missouri prosecutors have charged two adults with murder for their actions during an argument over staring at each other, implying that this is not a serious crime or justification for violence. The author also uses language such as 'strangers who pulled out guns and began firing' which implies that firearms are inherently dangerous and should be avoided.
The article mentions Missouri prosecutors charging two adults with murder for their actions during an argument over staring at each other, implying that this is not a serious crime or justification for violence
The phrase 'unlawful use of a weapon' used by the author implies that firearms are inherently evil and illegal
Two local men, Dominic M. Miller and Lyndell Mays, have been charged with second-degree murder in connection with the homicide of Elizabeth 'Lisa' Lopez-Galvan during a shooting at the Kansas City Chiefs Super Bowl victory parade and rally on Valentine's Day.
The defendants attended the Super Bowl parade and rally on February 14th, 2024, and were armed with firearms. A verbal altercation occurred that escalated into gunfire hitting Chiefs Super Bowl rally attendees.
Charging documents indicate that Mays pulled a gun first after the argument, and others then pulled firearms including Miller.
Accuracy
The title of the article is different from other sources.
The facts in this article are not consistent with those provided by other sources. For example, the fact that Miller pulled a gun first after an argument and others then followed suit is not mentioned in any of the other articles.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the two men charged with murder and additional felonies are 'local'. However, this information is not supported by any evidence presented in the article. Secondly, it claims that a verbal altercation occurred before the gunfire broke out but does not provide any details about what was said or who initiated it. This lack of clarity makes it difficult to determine whether there were other factors at play that may have contributed to the shooting. Thirdly, while the article mentions four people being charged in total, only two are named and described as 'local'. The identities of the other two individuals remain unknown which could potentially lead readers to believe they are not important or relevant to the case.
The statement that 'two local men' were charged with murder is deceptive because it implies a connection between them and Kansas City, but no evidence supports this claim.
Only two of the four individuals charged are named and described as 'local', leaving readers unaware of who else is involved in the case.
The article does not provide any details about what was said during the verbal altercation which could have contributed to the shooting.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several logical fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Jean Peters Baker has provided a major update on the investigation without providing any evidence or context for her credibility. Secondly, there is inflammatory rhetoric used in describing the shooting as a 'massacre' and 'gunfire that broke out', which could be seen as sensationalist language to garner sympathy from readers. Thirdly, there are several instances of dichotomous depiction where the article portrays both Miller and Mays as being armed with firearms but then later states that they did not know one another, suggesting a contradiction in their actions. Lastly, there is an example of inflammatory rhetoric used when describing Lopez-Galvan's death as 'a beloved mother of two and Kansas City community radio DJ', which could be seen as emotionally charged language to garner sympathy from readers.
The article uses an appeal to authority by stating that Jean Peters Baker has provided a major update on the investigation without providing any evidence or context for her credibility.
Inflammatory rhetoric is used in describing the shooting as a 'massacre' and 'gunfire that broke out', which could be seen as sensationalist language to garner sympathy from readers.
There are several instances of dichotomous depiction where the article portrays both Miller and Mays as being armed with firearms but then later states that they did not know one another, suggesting a contradiction in their actions.
An example of inflammatory rhetoric used when describing Lopez-Galvan's death as 'a beloved mother of two and Kansas City community radio DJ', which could be seen as emotionally charged language to garner sympathy from readers.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement that implies the two men charged with murder and additional felonies were armed during the shooting. This is an example of monetary bias as it suggests that owning firearms leads to violence.
> The defendants attended the Super Bowl parade and rally on Feb. 14, 2024, and were armed with firearms.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
Connor Hills has conflicts of interest on the topics of Super Bowl parade, Kansas City Chiefs, rally shooting and Elizabeth Lopez-Galvan.
The article mentions that Connor Hills is a reporter for KMBC News. The author's employer may have financial ties to the Kansas City Chiefs as they are one of the teams covered by KMBC Sports.
Two men have been charged with murder in the deadly shooting at last week's Kansas City Chiefs parade, prosecutors announced Tuesday.
Evidence indicated that Dominic Miller's gun was the one that allegedly killed Lisa Lopez-Galvan
A witness told police that a group of four males approached Mays in an aggressive manner before pulling out their guns and allegedly starting to shoot at him.
Accuracy
One of the suspects, Lyndell Mays, had an argument with another person at the rally and allegedly drew a handgun. Others pulled out their guns as well.
Evidence indicated that Dominic Miller's gun was the one that allegedly killed Lisa Lopez-Galvan, who was in a crowd of people near where Miller was firing.
Miller told investigators at a hospital that he fired four or five shots from his 9 mm handgun but wasn't certain if he hit the man he was shooting at. He also said someone had been shooting at him and returned fire.
Mays, who was shot in the chaos as well, allegedly drew his gun because he thought one of the people in the group said 'I'm going to get you.'
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that one of the suspects had an argument with another person at the rally and this escalated into a shooting. However, there is no evidence to support this claim as surveillance video shows Miller pulling out his gun from several feet away and chasing after someone in the argument before starting to shoot randomly. Secondly, it states that Lopez-Galvan was killed by Miller's gun but there is no mention of any other weapon being used during the shooting. This implies that only one person was responsible for her death when evidence suggests otherwise as two people were charged with murder in connection with the shooting. Lastly, it mentions a witness who told police that Mays started to approach a group of four males before pulling out his gun but there is no mention of any other witnesses or surveillance footage supporting this claim.
The article states that one of the suspects had an argument with another person at the rally and this escalated into a shooting. However, surveillance video shows Miller pulling out his gun from several feet away and chasing after someone in the argument before starting to shoot randomly.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the prosecution of two men charged with murder in a shooting at last week's Kansas City Chiefs parade is evidence that justice will be served for Lisa Lopez-Galvan and other victims. However, this statement does not provide any evidence or facts to support it. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that the argument between Lyndell Mays and another person at the rally escalated into a deadly shooting, which is an exaggeration of events. Additionally, the article contains several dichotomous depictions such as
Bias
(85%)
The article contains language that dehumanizes the suspects by referring to them as 'two men charged with murder'. The author also uses loaded words such as 'escalated' and 'allegedly', which implies a level of guilt without evidence. Additionally, the use of phrases like 'one of the suspects' and 'the other suspect charged' creates an imbalance in language that favors one side over another.
Miller told investigators he drew his gun because someone in the group said,
The prosecutor said evidence indicated Miller’s gun was the one that allegedly killed the fatal victim, identified as Lisa Lopez-Galvan
Two men have been charged with murder in the deadly shooting at last week’s Kansas City Chiefs parade
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Alex Sundby has a conflict of interest on the topic of 'Kansas City parade shooting' as he is an employee of CBS News which owns the Kansas City Chiefs. He may have financial ties to the team or its owners and therefore his reporting could be biased towards them.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of 'Kansas City parade shooting' as they are reporting for CBS News which is owned by ViacomCBS. The company also owns National Football League (NFL) and Kansas City Chiefs.
