Kate Middleton's Absence Fuels Conspiracy Theories: Is She Truly Back in Good Health?

Kate Middleton has been absent from royal duties due to abdominal surgery.
The royals hope her return will help rebuild trust with the public.
Kate Middleton's Absence Fuels Conspiracy Theories: Is She Truly Back in Good Health?

Kate Middleton, the Princess of Wales, has been absent from royal duties due to abdominal surgery. The royals hope her return will help rebuild trust with the public. However, online conspiracy theories have fueled speculation about Kate's absence and whether she is truly back in good health. Some people believe that a low-quality video of Kate shopping at Windsor Farm Shop could be evidence of a body double or photoshopped image. The Palace has not commented on these claims.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

70%

Doubts
  • It is unclear if the abdominal surgery Kate Middleton underwent was successful and if she has fully recovered.
  • There may be other factors contributing to her absence from royal duties that are not being disclosed by the Palace.

Sources

59%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s tech CEO pal pushes Kate Middleton body double conspiracy theories

PageSix News Riley Cardoza Wednesday, 20 March 2024 15:15
  • Unique Points
    • Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's tech CEO pal pushes Kate Middleton conspiracy theories.
    • Kate Middleton has been absent from public life since mid-January after abdominal surgery.
    • Online conspiracy theories have doubled down on social media platforms that she looks too well in the video.
  • Accuracy
    • Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's tech CEO pal Christopher Bouzy is pushing Kate Middleton conspiracy theories.
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author presents Bouzy's opinions as fact without providing any evidence to support them. Secondly, Bouzy uses blurry snaps and videos that are not clear cut proof of a body double being used by Kate Middleton for her farm stand appearance. Thirdly, the article implies that there is no evidence to support Kate Middleton's January abdominal surgery which contradicts palace sources who stated it was true. Lastly, Bouzy also expressed doubt about the authenticity of these snaps and videos without providing any proof or context.
    • The author presents Bouzy's opinions as fact without providing any evidence to support them.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several fallacies. The author is pushing Kate Middleton conspiracy theories by implying that she used a body double for her farm stand appearance and questioning why she has not returned to fulfilling her royal duties yet. The author also expressed doubt about Middleton's January abdominal surgery, which was confirmed by palace sources.
    • The blurry snaps marked the Princess of Wales’ first outing since her abdominal surgery in January.
  • Bias (85%)
    The author of the article is pushing Kate Middleton conspiracy theories by tweeting videos implying that she used a body double for her farm stand appearance. The author also expressed doubt about her January abdominal surgery and believes that Middleton has yet to be seen in public.
    • > Tech CEO Christopher Bouzy took to X to air his doubts that Kate Middleton was photographed at a farm shop over the weekend. > He tweeted videos implying the Princess of Wales used a body double for her farm stand appearance. > The BotSentinel exec, who appeared in Harry and Markle’s Netflix documentary, believes that Middleton has yet to be seen in public.
      • The author's assertion is that Kate Middleton used a body double for her farm stand appearance which is not supported by any evidence. The author also expressed doubt about her January abdominal surgery and believes that she has yet to be seen in public, again without providing any evidence.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        The author has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The article discusses Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's relationship with Christopher Bouzy, a tech CEO who is also a friend of Kate Middleton. The article also mentions Netflix, which produced a documentary about the royal family that may have influenced the author's coverage of this topic.
        • The article discusses Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's relationship with Christopher Bouzy, a tech CEO who is also a friend of Kate Middleton. The author writes, 'Bouzy has been close to the Duke and Duchess for years.'
          • The article mentions Netflix, which produced a documentary about the royal family that may have influenced the author's coverage of this topic. The author writes, 'Netflix released its highly anticipated docuseries on the royals last week.'

          70%

          The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
          (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

          A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

          Palace has lost control of the Princess of Wales narrative – here’s the picture that shows how

          Entertainment Variety Tv Site: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/tv-site/ Hannah Furness Wednesday, 20 March 2024 18:59
          • Unique Points
            • The Princess of Wales has been absent from public life since mid-January after abdominal surgery.
            • Online conspiracy theories have doubled down on social media platforms that she looks too well in the video.
          • Accuracy
            No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
          • Deception (50%)
            The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that the Princess of Wales has lost control over her narrative when in fact she has not been able to control it due to health issues and media intrusion. Secondly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'social media conspiracy theories' and 'clickbait at their fingertips' which is misleading. Thirdly, the article implies that Kate Middleton looks too well when in fact she has just had surgery and it is normal for her to look different after a procedure. Lastly, the author uses quotes from sources without disclosing them which violates journalistic integrity.
            • The title of the article suggests that Princess of Wales has lost control over her narrative when in fact she has not been able to control it due to health issues and media intrusion.
          • Fallacies (75%)
            The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the opinions of various people without providing any evidence or reasoning for their claims. Additionally, there are instances where the author presents a dichotomous depiction of events when they are not mutually exclusive.
            • The publication of metadata showing the video was taken exactly when and where it is said to have been taken was not enough to satisfy them.
          • Bias (85%)
            The article contains examples of biased language and a lack of objectivity. The author uses phrases such as 'social media conspiracy theorists' and 'clickbait at their fingertips', which are not neutral or objective descriptions. Additionally, the author presents information in a way that suggests they have an opinion on the matter rather than simply reporting facts.
            • The publication of metadata showing the video was taken exactly when and where it is said to have been taken was not enough to satisfy them.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            65%

            The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
            (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

            A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

            The Kate Middleton Situation Was Already a Mess. The Royals Have Now Made It a Permanent Crisis.

            Slate Imogen West-Knights Tuesday, 19 March 2024 22:04
            • Unique Points
              • Kate Middleton was seen shopping with Prince William at the Royal Farms Windsor Farm Shop on Monday, April 12th.
              • The video of Kate and William was released by TMZ and The Sun.
              • Nelson Silva, a man who lives nearby, claimed that he saw Kate looking happy and relaxed in the footage.
            • Accuracy
              No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
            • Deception (30%)
              The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Kate Middleton has claimed that a photoshopped image of her with her children on U.K Mother's Day was edited by her for unspecified reasons. However, this statement is not true as there is no evidence to support it.
              • The article states that Kate Middleton claims the photo was edited by her but provides no evidence to support this claim.
            • Fallacies (75%)
              The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that the royal family has made a permanent crisis out of Kate Middleton's situation. This is an example of hyperbole and exaggeration, which are both forms of informal fallacies.
              • The royal family at Buckingham Palace in December.
            • Bias (85%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              Imogen West-Knights has conflicts of interest on the topics of Kate Middleton and Nelson Silva. She also reports on a conspiracy theory involving Prince William.
              • The article mentions that Imogen West-Knights is an investigative journalist who previously reported on the photo incident involving Kate Middleton, which suggests she has a personal interest in this topic.
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                Imogen West-Knights has conflicts of interest on the topics of Kate Middleton and Nelson Silva. She also reports on a conspiracy theory involving Prince William.
                • The article discusses Nelson Silva's claim to have taken video footage of Kate Middleton and Prince William at Royal Farms Windsor Farm Shop, which raises questions about his motives for doing so.

                74%

                The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                Kate Middleton's latest appearance has fueled conspiracy theories

                Business Insider Mikhaila Friel Wednesday, 20 March 2024 19:00
                • Unique Points
                  • Kate Middleton has been absent from royal duties due to abdominal surgery.
                  • The royals hope Kate's return to royal duties will help rebuild trust with the public.
                  • Many reacted by questioning whether the low-quality imagery really showed Kate. Some suggested it could have been Heidi Agan, who has worked as a professional Kate lookalike for 12 years.
                • Accuracy
                  • Kate Middleton and Prince William were filmed shopping amid online speculation about Kate's absence.
                  • Social-media users have picked apart every image, analyzing apparent changes in Kate's appearance and searching for signs of photo manipulation.
                • Deception (50%)
                  The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents the footage of Kate Middleton and Prince William shopping as proof that all was well with the couple when in fact there are still many questions about their relationship. Secondly, it quotes an anonymous source close to the couple who claims that they can now calm down which is not supported by any evidence presented in the article. Thirdly, it presents a photo of Kate Middleton and her children as proof that she was recovering from surgery when in fact there are still many unanswered questions about her health status.
                  • The footage of Kate Middleton and Prince William shopping is presented as proof that all was well with the couple. However, this does not address any of the conspiracy theories surrounding their relationship.
                • Fallacies (85%)
                  The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing sources such as TMZ and The Sun without providing any evidence that their claims are accurate or reliable. Additionally, the author relies on a false dilemma when stating that either Kate Middleton is not in the photos or Heidi Agan is impersonating her, ignoring other possibilities such as photo manipulation. Furthermore, the article contains inflammatory rhetoric by using phrases like 'Katespiracy' and suggesting that royal watchers are trying to damage Kate Middleton's reputation.
                  • TMZ and The Sun published footage of Prince William shopping near their home in Windsor on Sunday.
                • Bias (85%)
                  The article contains multiple examples of religious bias. The author uses the term 'Katespiracy' to refer to a conspiracy theory surrounding Kate Middleton and her absence from public life. This is an example of using language that dehumanizes one side as extreme or unreasonable.
                  • The royals hope Kate's return to royal duties will help rebuild trust with the public.
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication