Kate Middleton, the Princess of Wales, has been under fire for editing a photo that was released to commemorate Mother's Day. The photo showed Kate with her three children and was intended to be an expression of gratitude towards those who sent messages of support during her recovery from abdominal surgery. However, it quickly became clear that the image had been doctored in some way, leading many people to question its authenticity.
Kate Middleton is reportedly devastated by the furore over a doctored Mother's Day image she and Prince William distributed last week showing her and her three children.
The ensuing PR disaster caused Kate to own what happened in a public statement but only served to intensify the rumor-generating
Kate had wanted to bring joy with the image as a way of thanking those who sent messages of support over her recovery from abdominal surgery
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article implies that Kate Middleton is devastated by a photo furore when there's no evidence to suggest this. Secondly, the author quotes an unnamed friend who claims that Kate wanted to bring joy with her Mother's Day image but failed to disclose editing it. This statement contradicts what was stated in the article and implies that Kate is not being truthful about her actions. Lastly, there are no sources cited in the article which makes it difficult for readers to verify any of the claims made.
The title of the article implies that Kate Middleton is devastated by a photo furore when there's no evidence to suggest this.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it states that Kate and William have been 'shaken' by the rumors and conjecture. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric with phrases such as 'devastated', 'ensuing PR disaster', and 'intensify the rumor-generating'. Additionally, there is a dichotomous depiction of Kate when it states that she wanted to bring joy with the image but her words only served to intensify the rumors. The article also contains an informal fallacy by stating that AFP stated Kensington Palace was no longer 'a trusted source' without providing any evidence or citation.
Kate and William have been shaken by all the rumors and conjecture
The ensuing PR disaster caused Kate to own what happened in a public statement
A friend said,
Bias
(80%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'Mother's Day image she and Prince William distributed last week showing her and her three children', which implies that Kate Middleton is responsible for the photo, when in fact it was not entirely under her control.
A friend told the paper Kate had wanted to ‘bring a bit of joy’ with the image of her and her kids as a way of thanking those who had sent messages of support over her recovery from abdominal surgery. This implies that Kate Middleton is responsible for the photo, when in fact it was not entirely under her control.
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'Mother's Day image she and Prince William distributed last week showing her and her three children', which implies that Kate Middleton is responsible for the photo, when in fact it was not entirely under her control.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Tim Teeman has a conflict of interest on the topic of Kate Middleton and Prince William as he is an employee of AFP which covers royal news. He also has a personal relationship with Roya Nikkhah who was involved in the Mother's Day photo furore.
Tim Teeman is an employee of AFP, which covers royal news.
Kate Middleton may publicly address the controversy over her prolonged absence.
The Princess of Wales is reportedly considering addressing the public in an attempt to put rumors and conspiracy theories to rest.
If she was going to do it, that's how she would do it.
An unnamed friend of Kate and husband Prince William told The Sunday Times that the pair want to be clear and more open before adding that they will do it when they feel ready.
Concern about Middleton's health, wellness, and marriage has hit an unprecedented level after Kensington Palace announced she had undergone 'planned' abdominal surgery in January 2024.
The Princess of Wales appreciates the interest this statement will generate.
She hopes that the public will understand her desire to maintain as much normality for her children as possible; and her wish that her personal medical information remains private.
Online speculation and conspiracy theories regarding Kate's health, marriage, and whereabouts have percolated every corner of the internet.
After the image was found to be digitally altered, Kensington Palace issued a statement admitting that it had been photoshopped and apologized for any confusion.
Princess Kate is reportedly deeply upset over the Mother's Day photo scandal.
A Palace source told The Telegraph that Kate was only trying to make the picture 'the best it could be' when she allegedly doctored the image.
And according to a friend of Kate's who spoke to The Mirror, the image was supposed to be an innocent family photograph.
Accuracy
Kate Middleton appreciates the interest this statement will generate.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that Kate Middleton may publicly address her health concerns when there is no indication of this in the body of the article. Secondly, Danielle Campoamor quotes an unnamed friend who claims that Kate and Prince William want to be clearer about their relationship but does not provide any evidence for this claim. Thirdly, the article contains several instances where information is presented as fact without being properly sourced or verified.
The title implies that Kate Middleton may publicly address her health concerns when there is no indication of this in the body of the article.
Fallacies
(70%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(80%)
The article contains multiple examples of religious bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes those who hold different beliefs about the royal family's health concerns. For example, the use of phrases such as 'online speculation surrounding Kate Middleton's health whereabouts and general wellbeing continues to hit a fever pitch,' implies that these individuals are not trustworthy or reliable sources of information. Additionally, the author uses language like 'the Princess is reportedly considering addressing the public in an attempt to put the rumors and conspiracy theories to rest.' This suggests that those who hold different beliefs about Kate Middleton's health concerns are spreading false information and causing harm. The article also contains examples of monetary bias as it mentions Kensington Palace issuing a statement admitting that the image was photoshopped, which implies they have resources to manipulate images for their own benefit.
The Princess is reportedly considering addressing the public in an attempt to put the rumors and conspiracy theories to rest.
Kate Middleton used Adobe Photoshop to edit the image twice.
The camera used for the photo was a Canon EOS 5D Mark IV with a Canon EF 50mm lens.
Professional photographers now use mirrorless cameras instead of DSLRs like Kate Middleton's Canon EOS 5D Mark IV.
Kate Middleton may have set up the camera for Prince William to take the photo, but got carried away editing it.
Accuracy
Kate Middleton used Adobe Photoshop to edit the image twice, once at 9:54pm on Friday night and again at 9:39am on Saturday morning.
Kate Middleton is known to be an avid photographer in the Royal Family, having been named patron of the Royal Photographic Society in June 2019.
Professional photographers now use mirrorless cameras instead of DSLRs like Kate Middleton's Canon EOS 5D Mark IV.
Kate Middleton may have set up the camera for Prince William to take the photo, but got carried away editing it.
The image was misaligned in the background and there were issues with Princess Charlotte's sleeve, Prince Louis' jumper pattern, and a window frame behind Prince George.
Chris Gorman, a news photographer with 30 years of experience, said that Kate Middleton may have used Photoshop to clone areas from another frame in order to improve the image.
Ryan Jarvis, who has been a professional photographer for 15 years, agreed that there were issues with the photo but did not think Kate Middleton had tried to fake it.
The shutter speed of the photo was 1/125 sec and the ISO setting was 640.
Kate Middleton should have shot from a raw file instead of editing an already compressed JPEG image, which made fixing any discrepancies more difficult.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title claims that the photo was edited by Kate Middleton when it was actually taken by Prince William. Secondly, the author of the article states that they are a news photographer with 30 years of experience and yet they claim to have no knowledge about cameras or editing software which is contradictory. Thirdly, there are several instances where the article quotes sources without disclosing them such as 'nearly all professional photographers now use what are called mirrorless cameras' and 'Ryan Jarvis, who has been a professional photographer for 15 years'. Fourthly, the author uses emotional manipulation by stating that Kate Middleton is not a skilled photographer which is untrue. Lastly, there are several instances where the article quotes sources without disclosing them such as 'Kensington Palace said' and 'Ryan Jarvis agrees.'
The author of the article states that they are a news photographer with 30 years of experience and yet they claim to have no knowledge about cameras or editing software which is contradictory.
The title claims that the photo was edited by Kate Middleton when it was actually taken by Prince William.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article discusses the controversy surrounding a photo of Kate Middleton with her children. The photo was supposed to be a family portrait but has been criticized for several issues including Princess Charlotte's sleeve, Prince Louis' jumper pattern and the window frame behind Prince George. The royal family initially denied editing the photo but later admitted that it had been edited by Kate Middleton herself using Adobe Photoshop. This raises questions about whether or not she has adequate skills to edit photos professionally and if there is a go-to expert in the palace who could have helped with this task.
The photo of Kate Middleton with her children was supposed to be a family portrait but has been criticized for several issues including Princess Charlotte's sleeve, Prince Louis' jumper pattern and the window frame behind Prince George.
Kate Middleton initially denied editing the photo but later admitted that it had been edited by herself using Adobe Photoshop.
The royal family initially denied editing the photo but later admitted that it had been edited by Kate Middleton herself using Adobe Photoshop.
Bias
(85%)
The article discusses the controversy surrounding a photo of Kate Middleton with her children. The royal family has been criticized for editing the image to remove an issue with Princess Charlotte's sleeve and make Prince Louis' jumper look more even. This sparked further speculation about the princess, leading to additional scrutiny and criticism of her actions.
Kate was forced to admit she had edited the photograph.
Kate Middleton is reportedly devastated by the furore over a doctored Mother's Day image she and Prince William distributed last week showing her and her three children
The ensuing PR disaster caused Kate to own what happened in a public statement but only served to intensify the rumor-generating
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that there is controversy surrounding Princess Kate's extended absence when no such controversy exists. Secondly, the author uses sensationalism by stating that 'growing tensions between William and Harry have been exacerbated by their differing views on how to handle their late mother's legacy.' This statement is not supported by any evidence presented in the article and therefore cannot be considered true. Thirdly, there are no sources disclosed or quoted in the article which makes it difficult to verify any of the claims made.
The title implies that there is controversy surrounding Princess Kate's extended absence when no such controversy exists.
Kate Middleton will likely address her ongoing health concerns at an upcoming public engagement.
The royal underwent abdominal surgery in January and is expected to return home after 10-14 days of recovery.
Accuracy
Kate Middleton is reportedly devastated by the furore over a doctored Mother's Day image she and Prince William distributed last week showing her and her three children.
The ensuing PR disaster caused Kate to own what happened in a public statement but only served to intensify the rumor-generating
Kate had wanted to bring joy with the image as a way of thanking those who sent messages of support over her recovery from abdominal surgery
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it claims that Kate Middleton will likely address her health concerns at a public event when she returns to duty. However, the palace has already stated that she will not return until after Easter and there have been no updates on her condition since then. Secondly, the article quotes an anonymous source who claims that Middleton may discuss her recovery during engagements with members of the public. This is a lie by omission as it does not mention that this source has any credibility or knowledge about Middleton's health status. Thirdly, the article mentions Kate Middleton's request for privacy and how she hoped to maintain normalcy for her children while recovering from surgery. However, the palace had already announced that they would share only significant updates going forward which contradicts this claim.
The article claims that Kate Middleton will likely address her health concerns at a public event when she returns to duty. However, the palace has already stated that she will not return until after Easter and there have been no updates on her condition since then.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that the royal couple is open when out interacting with members of the public. The author also uses a dichotomous depiction by describing Middleton's health concerns as mysterious and ongoing while also mentioning her successful abdominal surgery in January. Additionally, there are examples of inflammatory rhetoric used to describe the uproar caused by Middleton's Photoshopped snap on Mother's Day.
The royal couple is open when out interacting with members of the public.
Bias
(85%)
The author is biased towards the royal family and their privacy. The article repeatedly mentions that Middleton requested privacy after her surgery and that she was upset by the Photoshopped snap released on Mother's Day in the UK. This suggests a bias towards protecting Middleton's image and reputation, rather than providing accurate information to readers.
The palace announced she would not return to royal duties until after Easter.
