Kate Middleton, the Princess of Wales, has been in the news recently due to a photo scandal that links her palace to North Korea and Iran. The photo was released by Agence France-Presse (AFP) but it turned out to be manipulated which led AFP to issue a kill notice for the picture.
This incident raises questions about trustworthiness of sources, as well as bias in news reporting.
Kate Middleton, the Princess of Wales, has been in the news recently due to a photo scandal that links her palace to North Korea and Iran. The photo was released by Agence France-Presse (AFP) but it turned out to be manipulated which led AFP to issue a kill notice for the picture. This incident raises questions about trustworthiness of sources, as well as bias in news reporting.
Kate Middleton has not been seen in public since she underwent abdominal surgery earlier this year
AFP is no longer a trusted source of information after it released a manipulated picture of Kate Middleton and her three children
The photo was released partly to quell online conspiracy theories about the whereabouts and well-being of Kate, but it only fueled the rumor mill as several news agencies pulled it from circulation after finding that it had been manipulated
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the opinion of AFP's global news director without providing any evidence or context for their expertise in this matter. Additionally, the author quotes a statement from Kate Middleton that is not directly related to the topic at hand and therefore does not provide any useful information.
The article contains several logical fallacies.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement from the author that Kensington Palace is no longer a trusted source of information after it released a manipulated picture of Kate Middleton and her three children. The author also states that AFP issued a kill notice for the photo, which is very rarely done and usually only with content originating from Iranian and North Korean state media sources. This statement implies that Kensington Palace has been associated with these countries in some way.
Kensington Palace is no longer a trusted source of information after it released a manipulated picture of Kate Middleton and her three children.
Kate Middleton shared a photo on Mother's Day in the U.K.
The photo was processed twice in Adobe Photoshop
Multiple global news agencies retracted the photo due to manipulation concerns
Kate signed off on the message personally
The apology did not quell the controversy
Accuracy
The first processing occurred on March 8, at 9:54 p.m., local time and the second processing occurred on March 9, at 9:39 a.m., local time
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the original photo was processed twice in Adobe Photoshop which raises questions about its authenticity and integrity. Secondly, multiple global news agencies retracted the photo due to manipulation concerns without providing any evidence of such manipulation or clarification on what exactly constituted 'manipulated'. Thirdly, Kate's apology did not address the issue at hand and only added fuel to conspiracy theories about her health and well-being. Lastly, there is no disclosure of sources in the article.
The photo was processed twice in Adobe Photoshop which raises questions about its authenticity and integrity.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that the Associated Press retracted the photo without providing any evidence or explanation for their decision. Additionally, there is a dichotomous depiction of Kate Middleton's health and well-being as some people question whether her face was edited into the photo from another photo shoot.
The Associated Press retracted the photo without providing any evidence or explanation for their decision.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes the royal family and implies they are hiding something by not commenting on the topic. They also use a quote from an anonymous source to make it seem like there is more going on than what has been reported.
The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes the royal family and implies they are hiding something by not commenting on the topic.
They also use a quote from an anonymous source to make it seem like there is more going on than what has been reported.
Kate Middleton has not been seen in public since she underwent abdominal surgery earlier this year
AFP is no longer a trusted source of information after it released a manipulated picture of Kate Middleton and her three children
The photo was processed twice in Adobe Photoshop
Accuracy
Multiple global news agencies retracted the photo due to manipulation concerns
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article implies that Kensington Palace is not a trusted source after an edited photo was released by Prince William and Kate Middleton. However, this statement contradicts itself as it states that AFP no longer considers Kensington Palace trustworthy due to their actions regarding the photoshopped image. Secondly, the article quotes Phil Chetwynd stating that Kensington Palace cannot be viewed as a trusted source after being let down by them. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence presented in the article and appears to be an opinion rather than factual information.
The title of the article implies that Kensington Palace is not a trusted source after an edited photo was released by Prince William and Kate Middleton.
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The article by Nicki Gostin in Pagesix.com reports on the controversy surrounding a Mother's Day photo of Kate Middleton and Prince William that was taken at Kensington Palace. The author claims that AFP has said that Kensington Palace is not a trusted source after the photoshop fail, which raises concerns about conflicts of interest between AFP and the royal family.
The article reports on a controversy surrounding a Mother's Day photo taken at Kensington Palace. The author claims that AFP has said that Kensington Palace is not a trusted source after the photoshop fail, which raises concerns about conflicts of interest between AFP and the royal family.
Kate Middleton has undergone abdominal surgery and is recovering.
The public speculation about Kate Middleton's health and whereabouts has gotten intense.
Catherine, Princess of Wales, is being treated with extreme deference compared to her sister-in-law Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in its portrayal of the supposed rivalry between Meghan Markle and Kate Middleton. The author uses language that implies a racial divide between the two women, casting Catherine as an 'English rose' and her sister-in-law as a dangerous, trashy newcomer. This is not supported by any evidence presented in the article.
The author describes Meghan Markle as a biracial woman who has been cast as a dangerous, trashy newcomer to the royal family.
Fallacies
(85%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The article by Zeynep Tufekci contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that depicts one side as extreme or unreasonable, which is an example of ideological bias. Additionally, the author mentions a conspiracy theory without providing any evidence to support it, which could be seen as an attempt to manipulate readers' emotions for financial gain.
The way it’s playing out however and the contrast with the way controversies about Meghan Markle play out is rooted in how we have been conditioned, by the monarchy and its allies, to think about them.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Zeynep Tufekci has conflicts of interest on the topics of Kate Middleton and Meghan Markle as she is a member of a paparazzi agency that photographs them. She also has an opinion piece published in The New York Times which could be seen as promoting her own interests.
The article discusses Zeynep Tufekci's opinion on the scandal surrounding Kate Middleton and her relationship with Prince Harry.
Zeynep Tufekci is the founder of Papamobile, a company that provides photographic services to celebrities including Kate Middleton and Meghan Markle.
