Houthi rebels claim responsibility for second explosion, one death
Israel Defense Forces initial investigation suggests falling aerial target caused first explosion
Large explosion in Tel Aviv overnight Thursday
One person dead from drone explosion in separate incident
A large explosion rocked Tel Aviv overnight Thursday amid the war with Hamas. Fox News foreign correspondent Trey Yingst was at the scene and shared video of him standing on broken glass that had shattered off a storefront across the street. Yingst reported that emergency crews were checking a partially residential area to see if anyone had been injured by the blast.
According to Israel's Defense Forces, an initial inquiry indicated that the explosion in Tel Aviv was caused by the falling of an aerial target, and no sirens were activated. The incident is under thorough review.
The explosion happened not far from the US embassy. A police spokesperson said: “A short while ago, a report was received by the police hotline about an explosion heard in a building in Tel Aviv. Large forces from the Tel Aviv District Police and police bomb disposal experts have arrived at the scene and are handling the situation.”
In a separate incident, Yemen's Houthi rebels claimed responsibility for a drone explosion over central Tel Aviv that struck buildings, leaving one person dead. The Israeli military said it believed the drone was Iranian-made and launched from Yemen. The Houthis claimed responsibility, saying their “UAV [unmanned aerial vehicle] force” attacked “one of the important targets in the occupied Jaffa region,
The Iran-backed Houthi militia claimed responsibility for a rare drone attack in central Tel Aviv that crashed into a building near the U.S. consulate early Friday, killing at least one person and wounding eight others.
A spokesman for the Houthi militia said the group had used a new drone that can get past Israel’s defense systems and is not detected by radar, but Admiral Hagari denied that the drone had stealth capabilities that enabled it to evade Israeli surveillance.
Accuracy
Israel did not appear at the session but filed a submission rejecting the validity of the proceedings as biased.
Deception
(30%)
The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support the author's position of the Houthi militia claiming responsibility for a drone attack in Tel Aviv. The article does not mention any potential alternative explanations or possible counter-narratives. Additionally, there is emotional manipulation through the use of phrases like 'rare drone attack', 'deadly explosion', and 'injured several people'.
A spokesman for the Houthi militia, Yahya Sarea, said in a televised statement that the group had targeted Tel Aviv and that it would continue to target the city.
The Iran-backed Houthi militia claimed responsibility for a rare drone attack in central Tel Aviv that crashed into a building near the U.S. consulate early Friday, killing at least one person and wounding eight others.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains fallacies of Dichotomous Depiction and Appeal to Authority. The author dichotomously depicts Israel as either being unaware or incompetent in detecting the drone, despite having one of the most advanced aerial defense systems in the world. Additionally, there is an appeal to authority when citing Admiral Hagari's statements about why Israel did not identify and intercept the drone.
The Iran-backed Houthi militia claimed responsibility for a rare drone attack in central Tel Aviv...
Israel’s defense systems had apparently picked up the drone but failed to register it as a threat, Admiral Hagari said.
A spokesman for the Houthi militia, Yahya Sarea, said in a televised statement that the group had used a new drone that can get past Israel’s defense systems and is not detected by radar...
Admiral Hagari denied that the drone had stealth capabilities that enabled it to evade Israeli surveillance.
Bias
(80%)
The article reports on a drone attack in Tel Aviv claimed by the Houthi militia. The authors describe the drone as a Samad-3, an Iranian model, and quote a spokesman for the Houthi militia claiming that their new drones can get past Israel's defense systems and are not detected by radar. However, Admiral Hagari denies these claims. The article also mentions that Iran-backed militants have been attacking ships along a vital route in the Red Sea since November and quotes a spokesman for the Houthi militia saying they will continue to target Tel Aviv. This could be seen as an attempt to demonize the Houthis and paint them as extremist or unreasonable, which is an example of bias.
A spokesman for the Houthi militia, Yahya Sarea, said in a televised statement that the group had targeted Tel Aviv and that it would continue to target the city.
The Houthis on Tuesday released a video that they said showed an attack on a commercial ship in the Red Sea the previous day.
Houthis claimed responsibility for a drone explosion over central Tel Aviv
One person was killed in the explosion
A man in his 50s was found dead with shrapnel wounds in a nearby building
Accuracy
Israeli military believed the drone was Iranian-made and launched from Yemen
Deception
(30%)
The article does not clearly state the author's opinions or assertions. It reports on the drone attack claimed by Yemen's Houthi rebels and includes information about Iranian involvement, Israeli military response, and previous attacks by the Houthis. The article also provides context about the security situation in Israel and quotes from various sources such as Israeli military statements, police, emergency services, and residents. However, there is no clear attempt to deceive readers through editorializing or emotional manipulation.
The Israeli military said it believed the drone was Iranian-made and launched from Yemen.
Fallacies
(95%)
The article contains some inflammatory rhetoric and an appeal to authority, but no formal or blatant logical fallacies are present. The author reports on the claims made by the Houthi rebels and Israeli military without making any false or misleading statements.
]The Houthis have also launched waves of maritime attacks targeting shipping through the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, causing major disruption and a precipitous drop in business at the port of Eilat.[
A large explosion occurred in Tel Aviv during the night.
The blast happened near a U.S. embassy branch office.
Accuracy
The cause of the explosion was determined to be a falling aerial target by the Israeli military (FoxNews)
The drone attack in central Tel Aviv was claimed by the Houthis (NYTimes and TheGuardian)
One person was killed in the explosion (NYTimes and TheGuardian)
Israeli military believed the drone was Iranian-made and launched from Yemen (NYTimes)
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(95%)
The article contains some instances of inflammatory rhetoric and appeals to authority, but no formal or blatant logical fallacies were found. The authors report on the explosion in Tel Aviv and provide details from the scene. They quote sources such as Israeli Defense Forces and a police spokesperson, but do not attribute any fallacious arguments to them.
][I'm being very careful about the details][/], Yingst said
Israel CONFIRMS STRIKE ON COMPOUND IN CIVILIAN AREA OF GAZA TARGETING OCT. 7 MASTERMIND
