On Sunday, April 1st, a group of thieves stole $30 million in cash from a money storage facility located in the San Fernando Valley area of Los Angeles.
The burglary was one of the largest cash heists in city history and surpassed any armored-car heist that has taken place previously. The theft occurred on Easter Sunday, when the building and safe were breached by an unknown group with sophisticated skills to evade detection.
On Sunday, April 1st, a group of thieves stole $30 million in cash from a money storage facility located in the San Fernando Valley area of Los Angeles. The burglary was one of the largest cash heists in city history and surpassed any armored-car heist that has taken place previously. The theft occurred on Easter Sunday, when the building and safe were breached by an unknown group with sophisticated skills to evade detection.
Tens of millions stolen from a money storage facility in what is being called one of the largest cash heists in Southern California.
The robbery happened on Easter Sunday at a GardaWorld facility.
Burglars breached the building as well as the safe where the facility stores money, Los Angeles Police Department Cmdr. Elaine Morales told the Los Angeles Times.
$30 million was reportedly taken, but multiple law enforcement sources familiar with the matter told NBC News they are trying to assess exactly how much money was taken.
The LAPD and FBI are conducting a joint investigation into the theft.
Accuracy
The theft was discovered on Monday after the burglary took place during Easter Sunday night
Burglars gained access to the building and entered the vault without setting off alarms
$30 million in cash was stolen from a money storage facility in Sylmar, Los Angeles
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author states that as much as $30 million was taken from the money storage facility but multiple law enforcement sources familiar with the matter told NBC News they are trying to assess exactly how much money was taken. This implies that there is a discrepancy between what has been reported and what actually happened which could be considered deceptive.
The Times reported that as much as $30 million was taken, but multiple law enforcement sources familiar with the matter told NBC News they are trying to assess exactly how much money was taken. This implies a discrepancy between what has been reported and what actually happened which could be considered deceptive.
An employee at GardaWorld said that thieves took 22 bags worth less than $10 million while others believe it was roughly $100 million. This contradicts the initial report of up to $30 million being taken.
Fallacies
(85%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The article reports on a cash heist that occurred at a money storage facility in Southern California. The heist resulted in the theft of tens of millions of dollars. GardaWorld, which is mentioned as providing security services for the facility, has financial ties to companies involved in private prisons and immigration detention centers.
GardaWorld provides security services for money storage facilities.
This was one of largest heists in Los Angeles history when it comes to cash
The theft has all markings well thought out job done by professional crew according Scott Selby author Flawless Inside Largest Diamond Heist History
Burglars breached both the building and safe where the money was stored
Accuracy
The theft was one of largest heists in Los Angeles history when it comes to cash
This was one of largest heists in Los Angeles history when it comes to cash, surpassing any armored-car heist in the city
Few individuals would have known huge sums of cash being kept in that safe according law enforcement sources
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the burglary occurred on Easter Sunday but does not mention if any of the people involved were arrested or charged for their involvement. Secondly, it mentions a break-in through the roof and side of the building but does not provide enough information to determine how they managed to breach these security measures without triggering alarms. Thirdly, it states that there was an effort to breach both sides of the cash holding facility which contradicts itself as only one side is mentioned in previous sentences. Lastly, it mentions a burglary crew but does not provide any information about their identity or motive.
The article claims that there was an effort to breach both sides of the cash holding facility, yet only mentions one side being breached later on in the same sentence. This is deceptive as it creates a false sense of security and suggests that all possible entry points have been secured when in fact they were not.
The article claims that thieves made off with $30 million in an Easter Sunday burglary at a San Fernando Valley money storage facility, yet no arrests have been made and the individuals involved are unknown. This is deceptive as it implies that the perpetrators were caught when in fact they remain unidentified.
The article states that thieves breached both sides of the cash holding facility but only mentions one side being breached later on in the same sentence. This is deceptive as it creates a false sense of security and suggests that all possible entry points have been secured when in fact they were not.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the burglary was among the largest in city history when it comes to cash and surpassed any armored-car heist in the city. However, this statement is not supported by evidence or data, making it a false claim. Additionally, there are several instances of inflammatory rhetoric used throughout the article such as
The burglary occurred Sunday night at a facility in Sylmar where cash from businesses across the region is handled and stored,
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Richard Winton has a conflict of interest on the topic of burglary and theft as he is reporting on a $30 million cash heist in Los Angeles. He also reports on several other cases involving theft and burglary that occurred in Los Angeles history.
Richard Winton reports on the burglary crew that broke into wine specialist in Venice and made off with about 800 bottles worth around $600,00
Richard Winton reports on the Laguna Niguel bank burglary that broke through reinforced roof of a bank and blew hole in the safe more than four decades ago
The article mentions Richard Winton's previous reporting on a $18.9 million theft from Dunbar Armored facility on Mateo Street, 1997
The article mentions Richard Winton's previous reporting on a rooftop bandits breaching series of banks across San Gabriel Valley, stole $16 million before five were caught by Los Angeles County sheriff's major crimes unit
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Richard Winton has a conflict of interest on the topic of burglary and theft as he reports on multiple high-value thefts in Los Angeles. He also mentions his previous reporting on a $18.9 million theft from Dunbar Armored facility and a $100 million jewels and valuables stolen from Brink's big rig at Grapevine truck stop, which could be seen as promoting the company he is covering.
He also reports on a rooftop bandits breached series of banks across San Gabriel Valley and made off with $16 million before five were caught by the LAPD's major crimes unit.
Richard Winton mentions his previous reporting on a $18.9 million theft from Dunbar Armored facility in 1997, which could be seen as promoting the company he is covering.
Richard Winton mentions multiple high-value thefts in Los Angeles including a burglary crew that stole about 800 bottles worth around $600,00
. It's being called one of the largest cash heists in Los Angeles history.
. On Easter Sunday, a burglary crew allegedly broke into a vault of a money storage facility in the San Fernando Valley and got away with up to $30 million.
. The burglars reportedly breached the building either through the side of the building or the roof and managed to open a vault where cash was being stored without setting off any alarms.
. GardaWorld has branches worldwide and over 132,000 employees. It specializes in cash services, which include ATM services and armored truck transport.
. According to its website, some of its clients are Fortune 500 companies and even U.S. and international government agencies.
Accuracy
. The burglars reportedly breached the building either through the side of the building or the roof and managed to open a vault to where cash was being stored without setting off any alarms.
Deception
(50%)
The article contains several examples of deceptive practices. Firstly, the title is misleading as it implies that the burglary crew stole $30 million in cash when they only got away with up to $30 million. Secondly, the author uses sensationalism by describing this heist as one of the largest in Los Angeles history without providing any context or comparison. Thirdly, there is no clear distinction between fact and opinion as the article contains statements such as 'It's being called one of the largest cash heists in Los Angeles history.' which are not backed up with evidence. Fourthly, there is selective reporting as the article only mentions GardaWorld without providing any information about other security companies that may have been involved or affected by this incident.
The title is misleading and does not accurately reflect the amount of money stolen in the heist.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it mentions that GardaWorld has branches worldwide and over 132,000 employees. This does not necessarily mean that the company is trustworthy or reliable. Additionally, the fact that some of its clients are Fortune 500 companies and even U.S. and international government agencies does not automatically make it a reputable source for cash services.
GardaWorld has branches worldwide and over 132,000 employees.
Bias
(75%)
The article contains a statement that the burglary crew allegedly broke into a vault of a money storage facility and got away with up to $30 million. This is an example of monetary bias as it implies that the thieves are only motivated by greed for financial gain.
On Easter Sunday, a burglary crew allegedly broke into a vault of a money storage facility in the San Fernando Valley and got away with up to $30 million.
Thieves in Los Angeles pulled off one of the largest cash heists in city history over the weekend.
The break-in unfolded at an unnamed facility in the Sylmar area of the San Fernando Valley that handles and stores cash from businesses across the region.
Burglars were able to enter without immediate detection and breached a safe, said Elaine Morales, a Los Angeles police department commander.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Los Angeles police department are investigating the incident.
> Few people knew of large amount of money held in safe.</p>
Accuracy
The burglars were able to enter without immediate detection and breach a safe.
Burglars gained access to the building and entered the vault without setting off alarms.
Deception
(80%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the burglars were able to enter without immediate detection and breached a safe. However, this contradicts itself later on when it says that police did not discover the theft until they opened the vault on Monday. This suggests that there was some form of security system in place which should have detected any intrusion or alarm triggered by the burglars entering through the roof. Secondly, it states that thieves entered into an area where money is stored but does not provide any details about how this happened without triggering alarms. This implies a level of expertise and planning on behalf of the burglars which contradicts itself later when it says that few people knew of the large amount of money held in the safe, suggesting that security measures were not as robust as they could have been. Lastly, while it states that this is one of the largest cash heists in city history and surpasses any armored-car heist in the city, there are no sources cited to support these claims.
The article contradicts itself when it says burglars were able to enter without immediate detection but police did not discover the theft until they opened the vault on Monday. This suggests that security measures were not as robust as they could have been.
Fallacies
(80%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it states that the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Los Angeles police department are investigating the incident. The author does not provide any evidence or information about these organizations' involvement in solving similar cases before.
]Thieves were able to enter without immediate detection[
The break-in was among the largest cash burglaries in Los Angeles history.
Bias
(75%)
The article contains a statement that the burglars were able to enter without immediate detection. This is an example of bias because it implies that the security measures in place at the facility were not effective enough to prevent or detect this crime.
> Burglars were able to enter without immediate detection
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author Dani Anguiano has a conflict of interest on the topic of Los Angeles as they are reporting on a cash heist that occurred in the city. The article mentions Elaine Morales who is an employee at the FBI and may have access to sensitive information related to this case.
The author Dani Anguiano reports on a cash heist that occurred in Los Angeles, where they mention Elaine Morales as being involved with the Federal Bureau of Investigation. This suggests that there is a potential conflict of interest between the FBI and their investigation into the theft.
Burglars stole $30 million in cash from a money storage facility in Sylmar, Los Angeles
The theft was discovered on Monday after the burglary took place during Easter Sunday night
A sophisticated group is suspected of carrying out the heist based on their ability to evade detection
Accuracy
Burglars breached both the building and safe where the money was stored
$18.9 million was stolen from a former site of Dunbar Armored facility in Los Angeles in 1997
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that this was a burglary when it was actually a theft. Secondly, the author claims that $30 million was stolen but does not provide any evidence to support this claim. Thirdly, the author quotes an unnamed source who says that investigators believe it is a sophisticated group based on their ability to evade detection without providing any details about how they were able to do so. Fourthly, the article mentions previous cash heists in Los Angeles but does not provide any context or comparison with this current incident.
The title implies that this was a burglary when it was actually a theft.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the FBI and Los Angeles Police Department are investigating one of the largest cash heists in history without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Secondly, there is a dichotomous depiction of burglars as sophisticated criminals who can evade detection, which may create an unfair stereotype. Thirdly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing the theft as one of the city's largest cash heists in history without providing any context for this claim or comparing it to other incidents. Lastly, there is a lack of evidence provided to support claims made about inside knowledge and whether it was an inside job.
The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the FBI and Los Angeles Police Department are investigating one of the largest cash heists in history without providing any evidence or context for this claim.
There is a dichotomous depiction of burglars as sophisticated criminals who can evade detection, which may create an unfair stereotype.
The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing the theft as one of the city's largest cash heists in history without providing any context for this claim or comparing it to other incidents.
There is a lack of evidence provided to support claims made about inside knowledge and whether it was an inside job.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement that implies the burglars had inside knowledge of the facility. This is an example of bias because it suggests that one side has more information than another and could be seen as unfair.
> Burglars gained access to the building and entered the vault without setting off alarms, indicating they may have had inside knowledge.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The article reports on a burglary at a Los Angeles money storage facility that resulted in the theft of $30 million. The authors have financial ties to law enforcement agencies involved in the investigation.
$28.9 million was stolen from the former site of the Dunbar Armored Inc. facility on Mateo Street.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of burglary and cash heists as they are reporting on a specific incident in Los Angeles involving $30 million in stolen cash. The article does not disclose any conflicts of interest.
$28.9 million was stolen from the former site of the Dunbar Armored Inc. facility on Mateo Street.
