Over $1 billion worth of counterfeit goods were seized in Manhattan, marking the largest-ever seizure of its kind in U.S. history.
The defendants allegedly used a Manhattan storage facility as a distribution center for the counterfeit goods.
Two men, Adama Sow and Abdulai Jalloh, were arrested and charged with trafficking in the counterfeit goods.
In what is being described as the largest-ever seizure of counterfeit goods in U.S. history, federal authorities have confiscated over $1 billion worth of fake luxury items in Manhattan, New York. The operation led to the arrest of two men, Adama Sow and Abdulai Jalloh, who have been charged with trafficking in counterfeit goods.
The seized items, numbering over 219,000, included counterfeit bags, clothes, shoes, and other luxury products. The defendants allegedly used a Manhattan storage facility as a distribution center for the counterfeit goods, running a large-scale knockoff goods ring out of storage facilities in Manhattan from January through the end of October.
The two men charged could face up to 10 years in prison if convicted. The operation marks a significant achievement in the fight against counterfeit goods, which not only defraud consumers but also harm the brands being imitated and the broader economy.
100%
No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication
94%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
90%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
96%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
90%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
The defendants allegedly used a Manhattan storage facility as a distribution center for the counterfeit goods.
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
95%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
95%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
94%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
90%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
96%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
90%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
eNCA
Thursday, 16 November 2023 17:09
Unique
Points
Two men, Adama Sow and Abdulai Jalloh, have been charged with trafficking in the counterfeit goods, allegedly running a large-scale knockoff goods ring out of storage facilities in Manhattan from January through the end of October.
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)