Leonard Peltier's Denied Parole: A Controversial Decision Amidst Calls for Release and Allegations of Racism

Pine Ridge Reservation, South Dakota United States of America
FBI withheld ballistics report indicating bullets didn't come from Peltier's weapon.
Leonard Peltier denied parole after 50 years in prison for fatal shootings of FBI agents Jack Coler and Ronald Williams in 1975.
No physical evidence links Peltier to crime scene, but witnesses who could identify him as shooter were not presented at trial.
Peltier's lawyers argued for parole based on age and declining health, but Parole Commission denied request.
Supporters argue Peltier is symbol of racism and oppression against Native Americans, call on President Biden to intervene.
Leonard Peltier's Denied Parole: A Controversial Decision Amidst Calls for Release and Allegations of Racism

Leonard Peltier, a Native American activist, was denied parole on July 2, 2024 after serving nearly 50 years in prison for the fatal shootings of FBI agents Jack Coler and Ronald Williams in 1975. The U.S. Parole Commission made the decision despite calls from human rights advocates and indigenous leaders for his release.

Peltier, who is currently serving two life sentences at a federal prison in Florida, has maintained his innocence throughout his imprisonment. However, there is no physical evidence linking him to the crime scene. The FBI agents were on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation to arrest a man on a federal warrant when they came under fire in a shootout that lasted 10 minutes. Both men were fatally shot at close range.

Despite this, there have been concerns about the fairness of Peltier's trial. For instance, witnesses who could identify him as the shooter were not presented at his trial, and unknown to his defense lawyers, the federal government had withheld a ballistics report indicating that the fatal bullets didn't come from his weapon.

Peltier's lawyers have argued for parole based on several factors, including his age and declining health. However, the Parole Commission denied his request.

Supporters of Peltier argue that he is a symbol of racism and oppression against Native Americans by the US criminal justice system. They believe that he is being held as a political prisoner and have called on President Joe Biden to intervene and release him.

Biden's intervention could be Peltier's last hope for going home, as he has the authority to unilaterally release him at any time. However, the decision would be controversial given that some see Peltier as a dangerous criminal who killed two FBI agents in cold blood.



Confidence

85%

Doubts
  • The fairness of the trial process and withholding evidence from Peltier's defense team.
  • The potential political motivations behind keeping Peltier in prison.

Sources

77%

  • Unique Points
    • Leonard Peltier is serving two consecutive life sentences at a federal prison in Florida for the fatal shootings of FBI agents Jack Coler and Ron Williams in 1975
    • Coler and Williams were on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation to arrest a man on a federal warrant when they came under fire in a shootout that lasted 10 minutes, both men were fatally shot at close range
  • Accuracy
    • Leonard Peltier was denied parole on Tuesday, meaning there’s likely only one other way for him to be released: If President Joe Biden intervenes and commutes his sentence.
    • Leonard Peltier has been in prison since 1977 for the conviction of killing two FBI agents in a 1975 shoot-out on Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota.
    • There is no physical evidence that Leonard Peltier committed a crime. The FBI and U.S. attorney’s office never figured out who killed those agents.
    • Leonard Peltier is unlikely to live long enough to try for parole again due to his age and poor health.
    • Biden is likely Leonard Peltier’s last best hope for going home as he has the authority to unilaterally release him at any time.
  • Deception (30%)
    The author makes editorializing statements and uses emotional manipulation by stating 'this decision is a missed opportunity for the United States to finally recognize the misconduct of the FBI' and 'activists sympathetic to Peltier attempted to mislead the Commission and the public'. The article also engages in selective reporting by only mentioning that two co-defendants were acquitted without mentioning that they were acquitted due to self-defense. Additionally, there is no disclosure of sources.
    • This decision is a missed opportunity for the United States to finally recognize the misconduct of the FBI
    • activists sympathetic to Peltier attempted to mislead the Commission and the public
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The author makes an appeal to authority by quoting the FBI Director and the President of the FBI Agents Association in support of Peltier's conviction. This is a fallacy as it does not provide any logical reasoning for why Peltier's parole request should be denied based on the merits of his case.
    • ]The FBI Director praised the Parole Commission's decision, saying in a statement Tuesday that Peltier ‘has been afforded his rights and due process time and again, and repeatedly, the weight of the evidence has supported his conviction and his life sentence.’[
    • ‘Activists sympathetic to Peltier attempted to mislead the Commission and the public to secure release of this unremorseful murderer of FBI Special Agents Jack Coler and Ronald Williams,’ Bara said in a statement, adding that the association ‘will continue to counter these efforts, and we stand with the entire FBI family in our determination to ensure that Peltier serves his full sentence.’
  • Bias (90%)
    The author, Erik Ortiz, uses language that depicts the FBI and their association as extreme and unwilling to release a man who has maintained his innocence despite aging and declining health. The author also mentions the opposition from these groups without providing any counterargument or evidence to refute their stance.
    • Activists sympathetic to Peltier applauded the decision, while the FBI Agents Association and Director Christopher Wray praised the Parole Commission's decision to deny parole for Peltier.
      • Activists sympathetic to Peltier attempted to mislead the Commission and the public to secure release of this unremorseful murderer of FBI Special Agents Jack Coler and Ronald Williams.
        • But there has long been scrutiny surrounding how Peltier’s case was investigated and his trial was conducted.
          • The FBI has maintained his conviction was ‘rightly and fairly obtained’ and ‘has withstood numerous appeals to multiple courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court.’
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication

          90%

          • Unique Points
            • Leonard Peltier has been in prison since 1977 for the conviction of killing two FBI agents in a 1975 shoot-out on Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota.
            • There is no physical evidence that Leonard Peltier committed a crime. The FBI and U.S. attorney's office never figured out who killed those agents.
            • Biden is likely Leonard Peltier's last best hope for going home as he has the authority to unilaterally release him at any time.
            • Indigenous leaders and human rights advocates have been urging Biden to release Peltier, with the president of the National Congress of American Indians making it a 2024 election priority for the organization.
          • Accuracy
            • Leonard Peltier was denied parole on Tuesday.
            • Leonard Peltier has been in prison since 1977 for the conviction of killing two FBI agents.
            • Leonard Peltier is unlikely to live long enough to try for parole again due to his age and poor health.
          • Deception (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Fallacies (95%)
            The article contains several instances of appeals to authority and inflammatory rhetoric, but no formal or dichotomous fallacies are present. The author makes clear that Leonard Peltier's trial was marred by misconduct and that there is a lack of physical evidence against him. She also quotes various individuals expressing their opinions on the matter, including Kevin Sharp, Nick Tilsen, and Paul O'Brien. These individuals are presented as authorities in the context of this article due to their involvement with Peltier's case or their expertise in human rights issues.
            • ]The FBI continues to oppose Peltier’s release and is the main reason, if not the only reason, that he’s still in prison. But its stated reasons for opposing Peltier’s release are full of holes, outdated and remarkably easy to disprove.[
            • They denied parole to a survivor of genocidal Indian boarding schools and as he struggles to survive his unjust incarceration, they insist on holding him for a crime for which they have no physical evidence against him.
            • Paul O’Brien, executive director of Amnesty International USA, called Peltier’s prolonged imprisonment a human rights travesty.
          • Bias (80%)
            The author expresses a clear bias towards Leonard Peltier and his case, presenting him as an innocent man who has been unjustly imprisoned for nearly 50 years. The author also criticizes the FBI for its conduct in the case and implies that they have influenced the Parole Commission's decision to deny Peltier parole. The author quotes several individuals, including Peltier's attorney and Indigenous leaders, who express their support for Peltier and call for his release.
            • But his trial was full of misconduct, including federal prosecutors hiding evidence that exonerated Peltier and the FBI threatening and coercing witnesses into lying.
              • Indigenous leaders and human rights advocates have been stepping up their calls on Biden to release Peltier, too.
                • There is an argument to be made that Biden is uniquely positioned to be the president who finally lets Peltier go home.
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication

                73%

                • Unique Points
                  • Leonard Peltier was identified as the only person on the reservation in possession of the type of weapon that could fire the type of bullet that killed the agents
                  • No witnesses who could identify Peltier as the shooter were presented at his trial and unknown to his defense lawyers, the federal government had withheld a ballistics report indicating the fatal bullets didn’t come from his weapon
                • Accuracy
                  • FBI Director Christopher Wray praised the Parole Commission's decision and applauded by the FBI Agents Association
                  • Leonard Peltier is serving two consecutive life sentences at a federal prison in Florida for the fatal shootings of FBI agents Jack Coler and Ron Williams in 1975
                • Deception (0%)
                  The article by Michael Ruiz contains several examples of deceptive practices. Firstly, the author uses emotional manipulation by describing the 'brutal murders' and 'deep wound for the FBI family'. This is an attempt to elicit an emotional response from readers and sway their opinion towards Peltier's guilt. Secondly, there is selective reporting as only details that support Peltier's conviction are reported, while information that could potentially exonerate him or present a more nuanced view of the case are omitted. For instance, the article does not mention that two other men were acquitted at trial in 1976 and that Peltier's initial conviction was based on shoddy evidence and 'prosecutorial misconduct'. Thirdly, there is sensationalism as the title of the article implies that Peltier is a 'far-left activist' which may not be relevant to his crimes. Lastly, there are statements made by individuals other than Michael Ruiz (FBI Agents Association president Natalie Bara and FBI Director Christopher Wray) but these are quoted and do not constitute deception on the part of the author.
                  • The brutal murders of Special Agents Jack R. Coler and Ronald A. Williams remain a deep wound for the FBI family,
                  • Peltier was convicted of the brutal murder of FBI Special Agents Jack Coler and Ronald Williams at South Dakota’s Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in 1975.
                  • We believe this decision upholds justice for our fallen colleagues and their families.
                • Fallacies (75%)
                  The article contains an appeal to authority from the FBI and the FBI Agents Association. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing Peltier's crimes and lack of remorse. However, no formal or dichotomous fallacies were found in the text.
                  • The brutal murders of Special Agents Jack R. Coler and Ronald A. Williams remain a deep wound for the FBI family...
                  • We believe this decision upholds justice for our fallen colleagues and their families.
                  • The FBI remains resolute in our opposition to Leonard Peltier’s latest application for parole...
                • Bias (95%)
                  The author expresses a clear bias against Leonard Peltier, a far-left activist convicted for the murders of two FBI agents. The author uses language that depicts Peltier as an extremist and unremorseful criminal. The article also mentions that some prominent Democrats support his release, which is presented in a negative light.
                  • But he failed to have it overturned after more than a dozen appeals, including two that reached the Supreme Court.
                    • FAR-LEFT ACTIVIST CONVICTED IN EXECUTIONS OF 2 FBI AGENTS HEADED TO PAROLE HEARING WITH SUPPORT FROM DEMS
                      • Peltier's supporters fear he will die in prison and are now looking to President Biden to set him free.
                        • The FBI remains resolute in our opposition to Leonard Peltier’s latest application for parole.
                          • We believe this decision upholds justice for our fallen colleagues and their families.
                          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                            None Found At Time Of Publication
                          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                            None Found At Time Of Publication

                          95%

                          • Unique Points
                            • Leonard Peltier has never accepted responsibility or shown remorse for the incident, according to FBI Director Christopher Wray.
                          • Accuracy
                            • Leonard Peltier is serving two life sentences for a shootout between American Indian Movement activists and two FBI agents in 1975 on the Pine Ridge Reservation.
                            • FBI Director Christopher Wray stated that Leonard Peltier fatally shot Jack Coler and Ronald Williams during the incident.
                          • Deception (100%)
                            None Found At Time Of Publication
                          • Fallacies (100%)
                            None Found At Time Of Publication
                          • Bias (95%)
                            The author uses language that depicts Peltier's supporters as continuing to fight for his release despite 'no physical evidence' against him, and characterizes their efforts as a 'process' and a 'death sentence'. The author also quotes Ed Woods, a retired FBI agent who has fought to keep Peltier in prison for decades, using language that implies Peltier has not shown remorse or accepted responsibility for the incident. These examples demonstrate a bias towards portraying Peltier's supporters as extreme and unreasonable.
                            • As far as I’m concerned, justice spoke and continues.
                              • They have chosen to take a boarding school survivor, taking America’s longest serving political prisoner in American history that’s indigenous and keep him in prison for a crime that they have no physical evidence against him on
                              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                None Found At Time Of Publication
                              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                None Found At Time Of Publication