Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer and Kept it a Secret from the White House, Pentagon Officials, and even his closest advisers.

Washington, D.C., District of Columbia United States of America
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin has been diagnosed with prostate cancer.
He kept his diagnosis a secret from the White House, Pentagon officials, and even his closest advisers.
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer and Kept it a Secret from the White House, Pentagon Officials, and even his closest advisers.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin has been diagnosed with prostate cancer and kept it a secret from the White House, Pentagon officials, and even his closest advisers. The news of his diagnosis was revealed on January 1st after he underwent surgery in December 2023. Despite being a Cabinet officer who sacrificed privacy for public service, Austin failed to notify anyone about his condition until days later when the information became public knowledge. This has led to criticism and calls for impeachment from Republicans.



Confidence

70%

Doubts
  • It is unclear if there were any potential risks associated with keeping his diagnosis a secret.

Sources

70%

  • Unique Points
    • Lloyd Austin erred in not promptly notifying the White House and the public of his ongoing treatment for prostate cancer.
    • Being a Cabinet officer, he has sacrificed the right of privacy enjoyed by ordinary patients.
    • Republicans are now adding Austin's name to the long line of officeholders they want to impeach.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (30%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'political and press pile-on' to make it seem like Lloyd Austin has committed a grave mistake when he failed to promptly notify the White House of his ongoing treatment for prostate cancer. This statement is misleading because there was no law or regulation that required him to do so, and he had already informed Congress about his condition before being appointed Defense Secretary. Secondly, the author quotes several politicians who are calling for Austin's resignation without providing any evidence of wrongdoing on his part. These calls are politically motivated and not based on facts. Thirdly, the article implies that there was a gap in national command authorities during Austin's hospitalization when there wasn't one according to Ryder, the Pentagon press secretary. The author also fails to provide any evidence of a risk to national security during this time.
    • The use of sensationalist language such as 'political and press pile-on'
  • Fallacies (80%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it states that Republicans are now adding Austin's name to the long line of officeholders they want to impeach. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that this is a 'shocking defiance of the law' and says it further erodes trust in the Biden administration, which is an example of a dichotomous depiction.
    • Republicans are now adding Austin's name to the long line of officeholders they want to impeach.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
    Max Boot has a conflict of interest on the topics of Lloyd Austin and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin as he is an advocate for increased military spending.
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
      Max Boot has a conflict of interest on the topics of Lloyd Austin and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin. He is critical of Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) for calling for an impeachment trial against President Biden, but he does not disclose his own political affiliations or financial ties to any politicians mentioned in the article.
      • Max Boot criticizes Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) for calling for an impeachment trial against President Biden, saying it is unfair and politically motivated.

      56%

      • Unique Points
        • Lloyd Austin received treatment for prostate cancer surgery in late December 2023.
        • Austin returned to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center about a week later due to post-surgery complications and was transferred to the intensive care unit where he was monitored by doctors and hospital staff for days.
        • Nobody in the building got around to informing the National Security Council or White House staff about Austin's situation and whereabouts until days later, including Congress.
      • Accuracy
        • President Joe Biden didn't know about Austin's cancer diagnosis for weeks.
      • Deception (30%)
        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Austin's circumstances are different from those of other government officials because they involved a personal matter and not sources or methods. However, this is false as Austin holds an important position in the chain-of-command and makes operational decisions during times of war.
        • The article states that 'the defense secretary was transferred to the intensive care unit' but fails to mention who made this decision.
      • Fallacies (85%)
        The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the defense secretary was quick to take responsibility and promised to do better in the future without providing any evidence of this promise being kept or if it has been fulfilled.
        • > Austin's circumstances are a bit different since they involved a personal matter. U.S. defense officials weren’t keeping information close to the vest because of sources and methods, but rather they thought Austin was entitled to privacy.
      • Bias (85%)
        The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses inflammatory language such as 'perplexing', 'massive failure of communication' and 'borderline outrageous'. They also use loaded words like 'dishonest' to describe the actions of Secretary Austin without providing any evidence for this claim. Additionally, the article contains a personal attack on Lloyd Austin by suggesting that he is not an average American going into the doctor's office which is irrelevant to the topic at hand.
        • The article contains a personal attack on Lloyd Austin by suggesting that he is not an average American going into the doctor's office
          • The author uses inflammatory language such as 'perplexing'
            • The author uses loaded words like 'dishonest' without providing any evidence for this claim
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
              Daniel R. DePetris has a conflict of interest on the topic of Lloyd Austin as Defense Secretary and Pentagon leadership due to his personal relationship with White House chief of staff Jeff Zients.
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                Daniel R. DePetris has conflicts of interest on the topics of Lloyd Austin, Defense Secretary, Pentagon leadership and chain-of-command.

                90%

                • Unique Points
                  • Lloyd Austin erred in not promptly notifying the White House and the public of his ongoing treatment for prostate cancer.
                  • Being a Cabinet officer, he has sacrificed the right of privacy enjoyed by ordinary patients.
                  • Republicans are now adding Austin's name to the long line of officeholders they want to impeach.
                • Accuracy
                  No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                • Deception (80%)
                  The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author concealed his cancer diagnosis from the White House and Pentagon officials for weeks despite knowing it was important to inform them. This shows a lack of judgment and responsibility on behalf of Lloyd Austin as Defense Secretary. Secondly, there are conflicting statements about why he kept his diagnosis secret which raises questions about his integrity. Some sources claim that he made a deliberate decision not to share something so important at minimum with the POTUS while others say it was due to poor communication and lack of information sharing within the department. Lastly, Austin's failure to properly disclose his hospitalization is also deceptive as it led senior officials and even members of his own team being in the dark about his condition for days.
                  • Lloyd Austin concealed his cancer diagnosis from the White House and Pentagon officials for weeks despite knowing it was important to inform them.
                  • There are conflicting statements about why he kept his diagnosis secret which raises questions about his integrity.
                • Fallacies (80%)
                  The article contains several examples of the appeal to authority fallacy. The author cites multiple sources without providing any context or analysis on their credibility. Additionally, there are instances where the author uses quotes from unnamed officials as evidence for his claims.
                  • On Tuesday, they were shocked to hear of Austin’s early December diagnosis
                  • A second DOD official said the defense secretary’s team “respects his privacy” and that “we all trust him.
                  • Some in the GOP have called for Austin to quit or be fired.
                • Bias (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication