Louisiana's Controversial New Law: Mandating Ten Commandments Display in Schools

Baton Rouge, Louisiana United States of America
Civil liberties organizations plan to file lawsuit against the new law next week
Gov. Jeff Landry intends to defy Supreme Court precedent and be sued over the issue
House Bill 71 requires poster-size display in every classroom from kindergarten to university level
Legal scholar argues against such displays in classrooms, stating they have no impact on students' lives and serve no secular purpose
Louisiana becomes first state to mandate Ten Commandments display in schools
Supporters argue displaying Ten Commandments serves a secular purpose and has historical significance
Supreme Court precedent set by Stone v. Graham (1980) struck down similar Kentucky law
Louisiana's Controversial New Law: Mandating Ten Commandments Display in Schools

The Ten Commandments Controversy in Louisiana: A Battle of Laws and Beliefs

Louisiana has recently become the first state to require that the Ten Commandments be displayed in every public school classroom, making it a subject of controversy and debate.

According to a report by CNN, Louisiana State Representative Lauren Ventrella is one of the co-authors of House Bill 71. This bill mandates that a poster-size display of the Ten Commandments be in every classroom at schools that receive state funding, from kindergarten through the university level.

However, this law goes against precedent set by the Supreme Court in Stone v. Graham (1980), which struck down a Kentucky law requiring the posting of the Ten Commandments in every public school classroom. The ruling stated that such displays violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

Despite this, Gov. Jeff Landry expressed his intention to defy this precedent and has even stated that he cannot wait to be sued over the issue.

The New York Times published an opinion piece by a legal scholar who argued against such displays in classrooms, stating that they have no impact on students' lives and serve no secular purpose. The scholar also noted that efforts to infuse religion into government entities, including public schools, have increased as the Supreme Court has sided with those seeking fewer restrictions on religion.

The Washington Post reported that lawyers from various civil liberties organizations plan to file a lawsuit against the new law next week. Some experts are unsure about how courts will view Louisiana's law due to uncharted legal territory following recent Supreme Court rulings.

Despite these controversies, supporters of the bill argue that displaying the Ten Commandments in classrooms serves a secular purpose and has historical significance. They also point out that schools have until January 1, 2025, to comply with the law and that state funds will not be used for implementation.

The debate over this issue highlights the ongoing tension between religious freedom and the separation of church and state in American public life.



Confidence

85%

Doubts
  • Is there a clear secular purpose for displaying the Ten Commandments in schools?
  • What impact will this have on students and teachers?
  • Will this law withstand legal challenges given Supreme Court precedent?

Sources

80%

  • Unique Points
    • ]Louisiana's law requiring the Ten Commandments in every classroom will test the new legal climate created by the Supreme Court.
    • ]The law signed by Gov. Jeff Landry (R) is the first one of its kind since 1980, when a more moderate Supreme Court ruled a similar Kentucky law unconstitutional.
    • ]Schools have until Jan. 1 to display the Ten Commandments on a poster or framed document in every classroom.
    • ]The commandments' display must be the central focus and printed in a large, easily readable font according to the law.[
    • ]Lawyers from the Freedom From Religion Foundation, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, and the ACLU plan to file a lawsuit next week against the new law.
    • ]Some experts are unsure about how courts will view Louisiana's law due to uncharted legal territory following recent Supreme Court rulings.[
    • ]Efforts to infuse religion into government entities, including public schools, have increased as the high court has sided with those seeking fewer restrictions on religion.
    • ]The Louisiana law is part of a new crop of measures stemming from a 2022 Supreme Court ruling in favor of a high school football coach whose contract was not renewed because of his postgame prayers at the 50-yard line.[
    • ]The Lemon test, which asked questions to determine if a law violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, has been replaced by judges looking at history and tradition.
    • ]The ACLU argues that the state mandating the Ten Commandments and specifying a particular Protestant text based on the King James Bible is a violation of religious freedom.[
    • ]Some argue that putting Ten Commandments in classrooms does not infringe on separation of church and state as it has historical significance and serves a secular purpose.[
    • ]The Supreme Court's recent rulings have shifted the balance of church and state in the US, with some seeing it as righting past wrongs in separating church and state.
  • Accuracy
    • Louisiana’s law requiring the Ten Commandments in every classroom will test the new legal climate created by the Supreme Court.
    • The commandments’ display must be the central focus and printed in a large, easily readable font according to the law.
    • Gov. Jeff Landry of Louisiana expressed his intention to defy a Supreme Court ruling against mandatory displays of the Ten Commandments in public classrooms.
  • Deception (30%)
    The article contains selective reporting and emotional manipulation. The authors quote various experts expressing their opinions on the new Louisiana law requiring the Ten Commandments in every classroom. However, they only present quotes from those who oppose the law and omit any quotes or mention of those who support it, creating a biased perspective. Additionally, the authors use emotive language to describe some of these experts' statements as 'worrying' and 'excited', manipulating readers' emotions towards the topic.
    • Some outside experts on church-state law sounded less sure.
    • The lawyers from the Freedom From Religion Foundation, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, and the ACLU said they planned to file a lawsuit next week against the new law.
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (80%)
    The authors express their personal opinions and interpretations of the Supreme Court's ruling in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, which could be seen as a form of ideological bias. They also quote various religious leaders and experts who hold opposing views on the issue, but the authors do not attempt to hide their own stance or provide equal weight to both sides.
    • It’s our foundational law. Our sense of right and wrong is based off of the Ten Commandments.
      • The new law calls for a particular Protestant text based on the King James Bible, which differs from versions used by Catholics, Jews and others.
        • The Supreme Court has been captured under Trump but my hope is it’s not ready to go that far.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        98%

        • Unique Points
          • Louisiana State Representative Lauren Ventrella is a co-author of House Bill 71
          • House Bill 71 mandates that a poster-size display of the Ten Commandments be in every classroom at schools that receive state funding, from kindergarten through the university level
        • Accuracy
          No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
        • Deception (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Fallacies (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Bias (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        96%

        • Unique Points
          • Gov. Jeff Landry of Louisiana expressed his intention to defy a Supreme Court ruling against mandatory displays of the Ten Commandments in public classrooms.
          • Louisiana law requiring the display of the Ten Commandments in every public classroom goes against this precedent, resulting in potential legal action.
        • Accuracy
          • Gov. Jeff Landry's comments included a statement that to respect the rule of law, one must start with Moses as the original lawgiver.
          • Louisiana law requiring the display of the Ten Commandments in every public classroom goes against Supreme Court precedent.
          • Efforts to expand standing doctrine to limit access to the abortion pill have faltered.
        • Deception (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Fallacies (95%)
          The author makes an appeal to authority when quoting Gov. Jeff Landry's statements and the Supreme Court ruling in Stone v. Graham. However, no formal or informal fallacies were found beyond these appeals to authority.
          • Gov. Jeff Landry: 'I can’t wait to be sued.'
          • Supreme Court ruling in Stone v. Graham
        • Bias (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        76%

        • Unique Points
          • Louisiana is the first state to require the Ten Commandments to be displayed in every public school classroom
          • The displays must be in place by 2025 and will be paid for through donations, not state funds
        • Accuracy
          • In 1980, the Supreme Court ruled that a similar Kentucky law was unconstitutional
        • Deception (30%)
          The article engages in selective reporting by only mentioning the Ten Commandments and not other historical documents that are also being mandated to be displayed. The author does not provide any editorializing or pontification, but the title itself is sensational and emotional manipulation as it implies that this law is a controversial and divisive issue when it may not be seen as such by all parties involved.
          • Louisiana has become the first state to require that the Ten Commandments be displayed in every public school classroom.
          • Similar bills requiring that the Ten Commandments be displayed in classrooms have been proposed in Texas, Oklahoma, Utah and other states. However, with threats of legal battles over the constitutionality of such measures, no state besides Louisiana has made the bills law.
        • Fallacies (85%)
          The author makes an appeal to history and constitutionality without providing any concrete evidence or reasoning. They quote the opponents' statements but do not provide any counterargument or refutation. The author also uses inflammatory language such as 'blatantly unconstitutional' and 'conservative agenda'.
          • ]The law violates the separation of church and state and is blatantly unconstitutional.[
          • Politicians have no business imposing their preferred religious doctrine on students and families in public schools.
        • Bias (90%)
          The article reports on a new law in Louisiana requiring the Ten Commandments to be displayed in every public school classroom. While the author does not express any bias towards or against the law itself, they do include quotes from opponents of the law who question its constitutionality and label it as 'blatantly unconstitutional'. The author also mentions that similar bills have been proposed in other states but no state besides Louisiana has made them law due to legal battles over their constitutionality. These quotes and statements from opponents could be perceived as biased against the law, even though they are simply reporting on the opposing viewpoint.
          • Politicians have no business imposing their preferred religious doctrine on students and families in public schools.
            • the law violates the separation of church and state and is blatantly unconstitutional.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication