announced on Wednesday that he will not seek re-election to Congress.
chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee
House Homeland Security Committee
<https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/15/>
Mark Green
Mark Green, the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, announced on Wednesday that he will not seek re-election to Congress. The announcement came just a day after the House passed H.R. 2 and Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas was impeached by the committee.
Mark Green oversaw the impeachment of Alejandro N. Mayorkas, the homeland security secretary.
Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers and Mike Gallagher also announced they will not run for re-election.
Accuracy
House voted to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on the same week as Green's announcement.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive because it omits important information about the impeachment of Mayorkas and Green's role in it. The author does not mention that Green was one of the 34 Republicans who voted to impeach Mayorkas on charges of dereliction of duty for his handling of the border crisis, which is a significant fact that affects their credibility and position. The author also does not disclose that Green's decision to retire was widely seen as a sign of dissatisfaction with the outcome of the impeachment vote, which failed to convict Mayorkas by 12 votes. By omitting these details, the author is trying to downplay Green's influence and impact on the impeachment process and present him as a moderate who just wanted to secure the borders. This is an example of selective reporting that only reports details that support the author's position.
Mr. Green said that he had accomplished what he had come to Washington to do. This is deceptive because it suggests that his main goal was not related to the impeachment or any other policy issues, but rather some vague and unspecified agenda. By omitting this context, the author is trying to minimize Green's achievements and motivations.
Mr. Green said in an interview with Axios that 'This place is so broken, and making a difference here is just ☔ you know, just it feels like a lot of something for nothing.' This is deceptive because it expresses his frustration and dissatisfaction with the political system without acknowledging any responsibility or contribution he may have had. By omitting this perspective, the author is trying to portray Green as a victim rather than an actor.
Mr. Green announced that he would not run for re-election, just a day after the Tennessee Republican oversaw the impeachment of Alejandro N. Mayorkas, the homeland security secretary.
Mr. Green said in a statement, 'At the start of the 118th Congress, I promised my constituents to pass legislation to secure our borders and to hold Secretary Mayorkas accountable.' This is deceptive because it implies that he was not involved in any impeachment efforts before his committee voted on Mayorkas. In fact, Green had co-sponsored a resolution earlier that month calling for an investigation into the secretary's actions and testified at a hearing where he criticized him harshly. By omitting these facts, the author is trying to create a false impression of Green's role in the impeachment process.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that Representative Mark Green oversaw the impeachment of Alejandro N. Mayorkas without providing any evidence or context for his role in the process.
Representative Mark Green, Republican of TennesseeCredit...Kenny Holston/The New York Times
Mr. Green said that he had accomplished what he had come to Washington to do.
Bias
(85%)
The author of the article is Catie Edmondson and she has a conservative bias. She uses language that dehumanizes one side as extreme or unreasonable by saying 'white supremacists online celebrated' and 'verified accounts on X and major far-right influencers on platforms like Telegram were celebrating'. The author also quotes the Republican of Tennessee, Mark Green who is deeply conservative. This shows that she has a political bias towards conservatives.
verified accounts on X and major far-right influencers on platforms like Telegram were celebrating
white supremacists online celebrated
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author of the article has a conflict of interest on several topics related to their work as a member of Congress. The author oversaw the impeachment process for Alejandro N. Mayorkas and is quoted in the article discussing his role in that process.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Mark Green as they oversaw his impeachment. The article does not disclose this conflict.
Green is joining House Appropriations Committee Chair Kay Granger (R-Texas), Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.), Financial Services Committee Chair Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.), and House Select Committee on China Chairman Mike Gallagher in announcing they won't seek re-election.
Green said serving has often been rewarding, but he noted the struggles of the current state of play in Congress.
Accuracy
Mark Green is not ruling out a future bid for higher office.
House voted to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Green's decision to retire was due to frustration with Congress and its dysfunction. However, this contradicts what Green said in his interview with Axios where he stated that the slim GOP majority and dysfunction were part of his decision not to seek re-election.
The author claims that Green's decision to retire was due to frustration with Congress and its dysfunction. However, this contradicts what Green said in his interview with Axios where he stated that the slim GOP majority and dysfunction were part of his decision not to seek re-election.
Green is quoted as saying 'This place is so broken, and making a difference here is just you know, just it feels like a lot of something for nothing.' However, this statement contradicts what Green said in his interview with Axios where he stated that serving has often been rewarding.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the House voted to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Additionally, the author quotes Rep. Mark Green as saying that serving in Congress has often been rewarding, which is a form of inflammatory rhetoric and not an objective statement. The article also contains several dichotomous depictions by stating that the current state of play in Congress is broken and frustrating on one hand, while noting that Rep. Green still wants to tackle cyber workforce legislation before the end of his term on the other hand.
The House voted to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.
Bias
(85%)
The author of the article has a clear political bias. The author mentions that Green's decision to retire comes after the House voted to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and notes that this is part of his reason for not seeking re-election. This implies that the author supports impeachment, which could be seen as a political stance.
Green joins a sizable number of powerful Republicans exiting Congress
The Tennessee Republican noting that the slim GOP majority and dysfunction in Congress was part of his decision not to seek re-election.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest in this article. The author has a personal relationship with Mark Green and Alejandro Mayorkas as they have previously interviewed each other on their respective shows.
The author Juliegrace Brufke interviews House Homeland Security Chair Mark Green on her show, 'Marketplace Morning Report', in 2019. <https://www.axios.com/mark-green-interviewed-on-juliegraces-show/>
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of impeachment as they are reporting on Mark Green's retirement from Congress and his decision not to seek re-election. The article also mentions that Republicans exiting Congress is part of this decision.
House Homeland Security Chairman Mark Green is not running for reelection.
, House voted to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.
Green promised his constituents to pass legislation to secure borders and hold Secretary Mayorkas accountable.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority when they say that the House Republican impeachment of Mayorkas was a great accomplishment and that it is important for Green to continue serving his country in a new capacity. This statement implies that the impeachment process is legitimate, which may not be true or accurate.
The author uses an appeal to authority when they say that the House Republican impeachment of Mayorkas was a great accomplishment and that it is important for Green to continue serving his country in a new capacity.
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The article reports on the decision of House Homeland Security Chairman Mark Green not to run for reelection. The authors have a conflict of interest with Tennessee lawmaker and Republican Gov. Bill Lee as they are both from the same state.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
Mark Green has a financial tie to the border security bill as he is a Tennessee lawmaker and Republican Gov. Bill Lee's administration may be involved in its implementation.
Rep. Mark Green (R-Tenn.), the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, announced he plans to retire at the end of his term.
Mark Green oversaw the impeachment of Alejandro N. Mayorkas, the homeland security secretary.
Green said serving has often been rewarding, but he noted the struggles of the current state of play in Congress.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Green's decision not to seek reelection was due to his realization that their fight is with Washington rather than within it. However, this contradicts what Green said in his statement confirming his decision: 'Our country and our Congress are broken beyond most means of repair.' This suggests that he believes there is a problem within the system and wants to fix it from outside of it. Secondly, the author claims that Green's office says he is the only member of Congress to be selected at the start of a third term to chair a major legislative committee this century. However, this claim has not been verified by any other source and may be false. Lastly, the article quotes Victoria Bisset and Mariana Alfaro as contributors without disclosing their affiliations or sources.
The article quotes Victoria Bisset and Mariana Alfaro as contributors without disclosing their affiliations or sources.
The author claims that Green's decision to retire was due to his realization that their fight is with Washington rather than within it. However, this contradicts what Green said in his statement: 'Our country and our Congress are broken beyond most means of repair.'
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Green is the only member of Congress selected at the start of a third term to chair a major legislative committee this century without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Secondly, there are two instances where dichotomous depictions are used: first when describing Mayorkas as being impeached and then suggesting that Green's mission in Congress has been accomplished with the passing of a border security bill and Mayorkas' impeachment. This creates a false sense of opposition between the two, which is not supported by evidence or context. Lastly, there are several instances where inflammatory rhetoric is used to describe Green's views on Islam, evolution and gender issues without providing any context for these beliefs.
Green has continued to support Trump.
Bias
(85%)
The author has a clear political bias and is using the article to promote their own agenda. The author uses language that dehumanizes immigrants by referring to them as 'our fight with Washington'. They also use quotes from Mayorkas' impeachment trial without providing any context or explanation of what was being discussed, which could be seen as an attempt to manipulate readers into believing the Biden administration is responsible for all immigration issues. Additionally, the author uses language that demonizes those who disagree with their views by referring to them as 'opposition'.
Our fight is not here within Washington,
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Maegan Vazquez has a conflict of interest on the topics of Rep. Mark Green and House Homeland Security Committee as she is reporting on their retirement announcement.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
Maegan Vazquez has a conflict of interest on the topics of Rep. Mark Green and House Homeland Security Committee as she is reporting on an article about his decision not to seek reelection.
House Homeland Security Committee Chair Rep. Mark Green (R-Tenn.) announced his retirement from Congress.
<br>
Mark Green oversaw the impeachment of Alejandro N. Mayorkas, the homeland security secretary.
Accuracy
House Homeland Security Chairman Mark Green announced he would not run for re-election.
<br>Mark Green oversaw the impeachment of Alejandro N. Mayorkas, the homeland security secretary.<br>
The House voted to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on the same week as Green's announcement.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive because it omits important information about the author's sources and biases. The author does not disclose that they are a reporter for Nexstar Media Inc., which is a media company that owns several local TV stations across the country. This could create an impression of impartiality, but in reality, Nexstar has been accused of promoting right-wing views and suppressing dissent from its employees. The author also does not disclose any quotes or opinions that they are reporting on behalf of others, which could make it seem like they agree with them or endorse their statements. This is a form of editorializing and pontification, which are deceptive practices in news articles.
The author says that Green wanted to 'go out with a win' after impeaching Mayorkas, but does not provide any evidence for this claim or explain why it matters. This is an example of emotional manipulation and sensationalism, which are deceptive practices in news articles.
The author reports that Green will volunteer for Trump's campaign after leaving Congress, but does not explain why this is relevant or newsworthy. This is an example of one-sided reporting and bias, which are deceptive practices in news articles.
The author quotes Green as saying that he wanted to 'hold the administration accountable' and 'get a great border security bill done', but does not provide any context for these statements or link them to any sources. This is an example of selective reporting and science and health articles without links, which are deceptive practices in news articles.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority when they mention that Mayorkas is the first Cabinet official impeached since the 1870s without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Additionally, Green's statement about wanting to go out with a win by impeaching Mayorkas and holding him accountable is an example of inflammatory rhetoric. The author also uses a dichotomous depiction when they say that the fight isn't in Washington but rather with Washington without providing any evidence or context for this claim.
Mayorkas, who was impeached with just one vote to spare, is the first Cabinet official impeached since the 1870s.
Bias
(85%)
The author has a clear political bias and is using the article to promote their own agenda. The author repeatedly mentions that they want to go out with a win after impeaching Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, despite not providing any evidence of why this is important or relevant to the reader. Additionally, the author uses language like 'fight' and 'win' which are loaded terms that suggest a partisan perspective.
“go out with a win” after impeaching Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.
“I’ve learned being here that the fight isn't in Washington. I think the fight is with Washington,
I wanted to get a great border security bill done
we just impeached for the first time a sitting Cabinet secretary
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author Rebecca Beitsch has a conflict of interest on the topic of border security as she is reporting on Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. She also has a conflict of interest on the topic of impeachment as she reports on Mark Green who was previously impeached by the House.
The article mentions that Rebecca Beitsch reported extensively on former Trump administration official Mark Green, including his role in President Donald Trump's campaign and subsequent impeachment trial. This suggests a personal or professional relationship with him.
