Meagan Good and Jonathan Majors: Overcoming Adversity Together on the Red Carpet

Los Angeles, California United States of America
Majors was guilty of assault in December 2023 and Good's acting career struggled.
Meagan Good and Jonathan Majors are a couple who have been together for some time.
They made their red carpet debut at the African-American Film Critics Association (AAFCA) Special Achievement Awards Luncheon hand-in-hand in Los Angeles in March 2024.
Meagan Good and Jonathan Majors: Overcoming Adversity Together on the Red Carpet

Meagan Good and Jonathan Majors are a couple who have been together for some time. They made their red carpet debut at the African-American Film Critics Association (AAFCA) Special Achievement Awards Luncheon hand-in-hand in Los Angeles in March 2024. The couple has been through a lot, including Majors' guilty verdict for assault in December 2023 and Good's acting career struggles. However, they are currently happy together and looking forward to what the future holds.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It is not clear if Meagan Good has any doubts about Jonathan Majors' guilt.

Sources

82%

  • Unique Points
    • Meagan Good and Jonathan Majors attend the NAACP Image Awards on March 16, 2024.
    • Good is in love with Majors and they are transitioning, healing, growing together.
    • The couple has a show that they both love called Harlem which was renewed for a third season coming sometime this year.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Good is the happiest she has been in a long time without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing Majors' legal issues as 'a crazy time'. There are also several examples of dichotomous depictions throughout the article, such as when Good describes her relationship with Majors as both exciting and peaceful at the same time.
    • The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Meagan Good is the happiest she has been in a long time without providing any evidence or context for this claim. For example: 'Meagan Good exclusively revealed to PEOPLE on the event's red carpet what space she’s in at this crazy time in her acting career and personal life.'
    • The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing Majors' legal issues as 'a crazy time'. For example: 'It is like a crazy time in general,' Good adds.
    • There are several examples of dichotomous depictions throughout the article, such as when Good describes her relationship with Majors as both exciting and peaceful at the same time. For example: 'Yeah, just a lot of things at once.'
    • The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Meagan Good is transitioning without providing any evidence or context for this claim. For example: 'Meagan Good exclusively revealed to PEOPLE on the event's red carpet what space she’s in at this crazy time in her acting career and personal life.'
    • The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Meagan Good is healing without providing any evidence or context for this claim. For example: 'Meagan Good exclusively revealed to PEOPLE on the event's red carpet what space she’s in at this crazy time in her acting career and personal life.'
    • The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Meagan Good is growing without providing any evidence or context for this claim. For example: 'Meagan Good exclusively revealed to PEOPLE on the event's red carpet what space she’s in at this crazy time in her acting career and personal life.'
    • The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Meagan Good is getting excited about what's next without providing any evidence or context for this claim. For example: 'Meagan Good exclusively revealed to PEOPLE on the event's red carpet what space she’s in at this crazy time in her acting career and personal life.'
    • The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Meagan Good is slated to star in Tyler Perry's Amazon movie Divorce without providing any evidence or context for this claim. For example: 'Meagan Good also discussed her mental health and self-care tactics during this crazy time and the chatter about their relationship amid his legal issues.'
    • The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Meagan Good is keeping her eyes on God without providing any evidence or context for this claim. For example: 'And I stay true to myself and I stay authentic. I know what I know that I know. And in time, everything else just catches up with what you know, if you’re true to yourself and you’re authentic.'
    • The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Meagan Good is moving in together with Jonathan Majors without providing any evidence or context for this claim. For example: 'Majors and Good recently moved in together in New York City's Greenwich Village neighborhood.'
  • Bias (85%)
    The author of the article is biased towards Meagan Good and her relationship with Jonathan Majors. The author uses language that deifies Good's relationship as a 'happy place', which could be seen as an attempt to make the reader feel good about their own relationships or to promote a particular lifestyle choice.
    • I have peace in my heart and I have joy in my heart
      • Meagan Good is in love, transitioning, healing and growing
        • They protect me. They're so gentle and wonderful
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        71%

        • Unique Points
          • Meagan Good is feeling happier than ever despite the past two years she has had.
          • Jonathan Majors was found guilty of one count of assault and one count of harassment in December 2023 after a weeks-long domestic violence trial with his ex, Grace Jabbari. He was also acquitted on one count of intentional assault in the third degree and one count of aggravated harassment in the second degree.
          • Meagan Good stood by Jonathan Majors during his trial and was visibly upset after the verdict was read in December 2023.
          • Jonathan Majors gave his first interview post-guilty verdict with Good Morning America in January 2024, where he insisted that he never struck Grace Jabbari.
          • Meagan Good and Jonathan Majors made their red carpet debut at the African-American Film Critics Association (AAFCA) Special Achievement Awards Luncheon hand-in-hand in Los Angeles in March 2024.
          • Jonathan Majors is facing up to a year in jail for the third-degree assault he was convicted of.
        • Accuracy
          • Meagan Good stood by Jonathan Majors during his trial and was visibly upset after the verdict was read in December 2023.
        • Deception (50%)
          The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Meagan Good is feeling happier than ever despite the recent events surrounding her boyfriend Jonathan Majors' assault trial and conviction. However, this statement contradicts other statements made by Good during the interview where she acknowledges that these past two years have been a crazy time for her and expresses gratitude towards God for what has happened to her. Secondly, the author quotes Meagan Good as saying that she stood by Jonathan Majors during his trial and was visibly upset after the verdict was read in December. However, this statement is not accurate as it contradicts other statements made by Good earlier in March where she expressed support for him but also acknowledged that he has been banned from working with Disney and Marvel due to his actions. Lastly, the author quotes Jonathan Majors praising Meagan Good's support during his trial and aftermath, including referencing Coretta Scott King as an angel who held him down like a Coretta. However, this statement is not accurate as it implies that Meagan Good played a significant role in supporting him during his trial when she did not publicly comment on the case until January 2023.
          • The author quotes Jonathan Majors praising Meagan Good's support during his trial and aftermath, including referencing Coretta Scott King as an angel who held him down like a Coretta. However, this statement is not accurate as it implies that Meagan Good played a significant role in supporting him during his trial when she did not publicly comment on the case until January 2023.
          • The author quotes Meagan Good as saying that she stood by Jonathan Majors during his trial and was visibly upset after the verdict was read in December. However, this statement is not accurate as it contradicts other statements made by Good earlier in March where she expressed support for him but also acknowledged that he has been banned from working with Disney and Marvel due to his actions.
          • The author claims that Meagan Good is feeling happier than ever despite recent events surrounding her boyfriend Jonathan Majors' assault trial and conviction. However, this statement contradicts other statements made by Good during the interview where she acknowledges that these past two years have been a crazy time for her.
        • Fallacies (70%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Bias (80%)
          The author has a clear bias towards the subject of their article. The title and body both use language that is overly positive about Meagan Good's happiness despite her recent relationship with Jonathan Majors being in the news for his assault trial and conviction. Additionally, there are multiple instances where the author uses phrases such as 'crazy', 'blessed', and 'incredible' to describe their feelings towards the situation.
          • I am happy, you know? It’s really crazy. I mean, so much is going on. These past two years have been a crazy two years for me, but I'm happier than I've been in a long time
            • It feels great
              • Meagan Good is feeling happier than ever despite the crazy last two years she has had
              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                Meagan Good has a conflict of interest on the topic of Jonathan Majors as she stood by him during his assault trial and conviction. She also praised him in an interview.
                • Meagan Good said, 'I wish to God I knew.'
                  • > Meagan Good stood by Jonatha
                    • <p>Majors praised Grace Jabbari for standing up to her</p>

                    60%

                    • Unique Points
                      • Meagan Good and Jonathan Majors made a glam appearance at the NAACP Image Awards in Los Angeles over the weekend.
                      • Good is in love with Majors and they are transitioning, healing, growing together.
                      • The couple has a show that they both love called Harlem which was renewed for a third season coming sometime this year.
                    • Accuracy
                      No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                    • Deception (30%)
                      The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Meagan Good's relationship with Jonathan Majors marks her first major awards show outing as a couple since his guilty verdict for assault in December 2023. However, this information is incorrect as there are no records of any charges or convictions against him at that time. Secondly, the author quotes Meagan Good saying that she's transitioning and healing while also expressing excitement about what's next. This contradicts each other and creates a false narrative of her being in a positive state despite facing challenges in her acting career and personal life. Lastly, the article uses sensationalism by portraying Meagan Good as gushing over joy in romance with Jonathan Majors.
                      • Meagan Good expresses excitement about what's next while also stating that she's transitioning and healing. This contradicts each other and creates a false narrative of her being in a positive state despite facing challenges in her acting career and personal life.
                      • The author claims that Meagan Good's relationship with Jonathan Majors marks her first major awards show outing as a couple since his guilty verdict for assault in December 2023. However, this information is incorrect as there are no records of any charges or convictions against him at that time.
                    • Fallacies (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Bias (85%)
                      The author has a clear bias towards the subject of Meagan Good's relationship with Jonathan Majors. The article is focused on their appearance at the NAACP Image Awards and how they are happy together despite Majors' guilty verdict for assault in December 2023. The author also quotes Good extensively, emphasizing her love for him and expressing excitement about their future together.
                      • Good expressed, Speaking exclusively to PEOPLE on the red carpet, the 42-year-old actress opened up about her current state amidst the challenges in her acting career and personal life.
                        • Good shared her excitement for her role in Tyler Perry's upcoming Amazon movie.
                          • "I'm the happiest I’ve been in a long time."
                            • In her statement, good emphasized self-love and embraced the journey of growth, affirming her confidence in herself and the opportunities unfolding in her career.
                              • Meagan Good gushes over joy in romance with Jonathan Majors.
                                • "Yeah, just a lot of things at once. But what I can say is, I’m the happiest I’ve been in a long time."
                                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication