The new 'Mean Girls' movie is a musical adaptation of the 2018 Broadway production. It includes many punchlines from the original film, but with updates to reflect contemporary sensitivities and acknowledge two decades since its release. The cafeteria cliques are not categorized by racist stereotypes in this version, unlike in the first movie. Tina Fey wrote both screenplays for the original and new movies. Janis Ian has become Janis Imiike, who is now queer instead of being saddled with a last-minute heterosexual pairing with a male mathlete. The apology exercise scene from the original movie has been updated in the new version to reflect a new generation's social ecosystem and underscore that women can be queer without letting it define them. Janis calls out insidious, unspoken ways in which women deceive and undercut each other for their own gain in her anthemic showstopper song.
Mean Girls: A Musical Adaptation of the 2018 Broadway Production
North Shore High School, Illinois, USA United States of AmericaJanis calls out insidious, unspoken ways in which women deceive and undercut each other for their own gain in her anthemic showstopper song.
Janis Ian has become Janis Imiike, who is now queer instead of being saddled with a last-minute heterosexual pairing with a male mathlete.
Mean Girls is a musical adaptation of the 2018 Broadway production.
The apology exercise scene from the original movie has been updated to reflect a new generation's social ecosystem and underscore that women can be queer without letting it define them.
The cafeteria cliques are not categorized by racist stereotypes in this version, unlike in the first movie.
Confidence
90%
Doubts
- It's unclear if there will be any other changes to the story or characters in addition to what has been mentioned.
Sources
58%
Box Office: 'Mean Girls' Leads 'Beekeeper' With Strong Opening
Variety J. Kim Saturday, 13 January 2024 16:39Unique Points
- Mean Girls is leading the box office this weekend with a strong opening.
- The adaptation of the Broadway adaptation of Mean Girls earned $11.65 million from 3,791 theaters across Friday and preview screenings.
- It's expected to have a four-day opening of $31.5 million through Martin Luther King Jr Day holiday.
Accuracy
- The new Mean Girls is an adaptation of the 2018 Broadway musical.
- Renee Rapp serves not only vocals but also charm, humor, sexiness and bitchiness as Regina in the new movie. However, she is taken in a softer direction which is unsatisfactory given her purpose.
Deception (50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article mentions that 'Mean Girls' leads Beekeeper with a strong opening. However, this statement is misleading as it implies that Mean Girls has outperformed The Beekeeper when in reality, they are neck and neck for second place behind Wonka.- The first sentence states that Mean Girls won the weekend at the box office. This is not true as Wonka finished first with a higher opening of $167 million.
- The title of the article mentions that 'Mean Girls' leads Beekeeper with a strong opening. However, this statement is misleading as it implies that Mean Girls has outperformed The Beekeeper when in reality, they are neck and neck for second place behind Wonka.
Fallacies (75%)
The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it states that the adaptation of the Broadway adaptation of the beloved 2004 comedy was originally commissioned with plans to skip theaters and make a streaming debut directly on Paramount's platform. This statement implies that there is some sort of expert or authoritative source for this information, but no such source is provided. The second fallacy is an inflammatory rhetoric when it states thatBias (80%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes those who hold different beliefs than themselves by referring to them as 'homeschooled Cady' which implies they are not part of mainstream society. Additionally, the use of phrases such as 'formidable Regina George' reinforces negative stereotypes about women and their roles in society. The article also contains examples of monetary bias by mentioning that Paramount changed its plans to release the movie directly on streaming after test screenings which suggests they were initially planning to make money from it without considering the potential impact on audiences.- Paramount changed its plans to release the movie directly on streaming after test screenings which suggests they were initially planning to make money from it without considering the potential impact on audiences
- The author uses language that dehumanizes those who hold different beliefs than themselves by referring to them as 'homeschooled Cady'
- The use of phrases such as 'formidable Regina George' reinforces negative stereotypes about women and their roles in society
Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
J. Kim Murphy has a conflict of interest on the topic of 'Mean Girls musical' as she is an employee of Paramount which owns the rights to produce and distribute the film.Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
J. Kim Murphy has a conflict of interest on the topic of 'Mean Girls musical' as she is an author for Variety which owns Paramount and Amazon MGM.
65%
How Does the New Mean Girls Stack Up Against the Original? We Graded Each One.
Slate Nadira Goffe Saturday, 13 January 2024 10:50Unique Points
- Rachel McAdams created one of the most iconic film characters of a generation as Regina George in the original movie.
- Lindsay Lohan embodied Cady Heron perfectly in the original movie.
Accuracy
- Renee Rapp serves not only vocals but also charm, humor, sexiness and bitchiness as Regina in the new movie. However, she is taken in a softer direction which is unsatisfactory given her purpose.
- Bullying now occurs on social media instead of landlines as it did in the original movie.
Deception (30%)
The article is deceptive in its comparison of the new Mean Girls movie to the original. The author uses language that implies a direct comparison between the two films when they are not actually being compared. For example, phrases such as 'How does the new film stack up against the original?' and 'We like that Regina's bitchy!' suggest a side-by-side comparison of their qualities, but this is not what is happening in reality.- The author uses language that implies a direct comparison between the two films when they are not actually being compared. For example, phrases such as 'How does the new film stack up against the original?' and 'We like that Regina's bitchy!' suggest a side-by-side comparison of their qualities, but this is not what is happening in reality.
Fallacies (85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the new film is not a simple remake of the original but rather an adaptation of a Broadway musical written by Tina Fey. This statement implies that because it was written by someone who has previously created successful work, it must be good. However, this does not necessarily mean that the new film is better than or equal to the original.- The author uses an appeal to authority when they say 'the new film promises at least in promotional materials that it “isn’t your mother’s Mean Girls.” (Mother?! That math doesn't add up.)'
- The author uses an appeal to authority when they say 'the new film is not a simple remake of the original but rather, an adaptation of the 2018 Broadway musical.'
- The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by saying 'Regina George “isn’t your mother’s Mean Girls.” (Mother?! That math doesn't add up.)'
Bias (80%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'isn't your mother's Mean Girls,' which is a reference to the original movie being from Tina Fey who is Jewish. This implies that there may be some sort of anti-Semitic sentiment towards her, as well as an attempt to make money off of her work by creating a new version of it.- The article mentions that the film was not simply a remake but rather an adaptation from the 2018 Broadway musical. This implies that there may be some sort of monetary bias in trying to profit off Tina Fey's original work.
- The author uses the phrase 'isn't your mother's Mean Girls,' which is a reference to the original movie being from Tina Fey who is Jewish. This implies that there may be some sort of anti-Semitic sentiment towards her, as well as an attempt to make money off of her work by creating a new version of it.
Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
The author Nadira Goffe has a conflict of interest with the topic 'Mean Girls' as she is an actress who played Tina Fey in the original movie. She also has a personal relationship with Rachel McAdams and Lindsay Lohan, both of whom starred in the original movie.- Nadira Goffe acted in Mean Girls: The Musical as Tina Fey.
Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
The author Nadira Goffe has a conflict of interest on the topic of Mean Girls as she is an employee at Slate Media Group which owns and operates the website where this article was published.
66%
The new 'Mean Girls' movie is overdue justice for Janis
The Los Angeles Times Ashley Lee Saturday, 13 January 2024 11:00Unique Points
- The new Mean Girls movie includes many punchlines from the first film, but with updates to reflect contemporary sensitivities and acknowledge two decades since its release.
- Bullying now occurs on social media instead of landlines as it did in the original movie.
- Asian jokes, sizeism slander, ableist language and pedophilia plots have been removed from the new movie.
- The cafeteria cliques are not categorized by racist stereotypes in the new version.
- Tina Fey wrote both screenplays for the original and new movies.
- Janis Ian has become Janis Imiike, who is now queer instead of being saddled with a last-minute heterosexual pairing with a male mathlete.
- Janis is also the narrator in the new movie along with her best friend Damian.
- Regina George attempts to use Janis's sexual orientation against her, but this time it doesn't lead to Janis being kicked out of school or labeled as weird.
- The apology exercise scene from the original movie has been updated in the new version to reflect a new generation's social ecosystem and underscore that women can be queer without letting it define them.
- Janis calls out insidious, unspoken ways in which women deceive and undercut each other for their own gain in her anthemic showstopper song.
Accuracy
- Bullying now occurs on social media instead of landlines as it did in the original movie.
- Regina George attempts to use Janis's sexual orientation against her, but this time it doesn't lead to Janis being kicked out of school or labeled as weird.
Deception (50%)
The article is a review of the new Mean Girls movie. The author has made changes to the original story in order to update it for contemporary sensitivities and acknowledge two decades have passed since its release. While some of these changes are cosmetic, such as updated fashion trends, there are also significant alterations that change the meaning of certain scenes and characters.- The character Janis is now queer instead of being saddled with a last-minute heterosexual pairing with a male mathlete. This change allows for her to be bullied less based on her sexual orientation, as she was in the original movie.
Fallacies (90%)
The article provides a good analysis of the changes made to the new Mean Girls movie. The author acknowledges that some of these changes are cosmetic and do not significantly alter the storyline or characters. However, they also highlight an important change: Janis Ian's characterization as an out queer woman of color who is no longer weaponized against her by her classmates for her sexual orientation.- Janis Ian has become Janis Imiike and she is now actually queer instead of being saddled with a last-minute heterosexual pairing with a male mathlete. And in a particularly satisfying twist, she's also the new movie’s narrator, along with the other out queer character, her best friend Damian.
Bias (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
The article by Ashley Lee has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The author is a member of an LGBTQ+ advocacy group and reports on queer identity in relation to bullying. Additionally, the author mentions Tina Fey and Lizzy Caplan who are both members of her professional network.Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
The author has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The article discusses Janis Ian and her experiences with bullying, which could be seen as a personal conflict of interest for the author since they are discussing someone who was bullied in high school. Additionally, the article mentions Tina Fey and Lizzy Caplan, both of whom have been involved in social media controversies that may compromise their objectivity on this topic.- The article mentions Tina Fey and Lizzy Caplan, both of whom have been involved in social media controversies that may compromise their objectivity on this topic.
- The author discusses Janis Ian's experiences with bullying which could be seen as a personal conflict of interest for the author since they are discussing someone who was bullied in high school.
53%
'Mean Girls' Turns a Classic Comedy into an Overbearing Musical
TIME Magazine Saturday, 13 January 2024 23:23Unique Points
- The movie musical version of Mean Girls is a hit adaptation of the 2004 film.
- It was written by Tina Fey and directed by Samantha Jayne and Arturo Perez Jr.
- Angourie Rice stars as Cady Heron, who transplanted from Africa to an American high school with her zoologist mother Jenna Fischer.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
Deception (30%)
The article is highly deceptive as it presents a negative review of the musical version of Mean Girls while also providing quotes from the original movie that contradict its claims. The author uses emotional manipulation and selective reporting to make their argument.- . . . Everything that made the original picture so sly, funny, and affecting is gone.
Fallacies (75%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses a hasty generalization in stating that 'Musicals—certainly this type of musical—are supposed to be pure pleasure.' This is an oversimplification and not all musicals are meant to bring only pleasure. Additionally, the author commits the ad hominem fallacy by implying that because Mean Girls is a 'bullying disguised as entertainment,' it should not exist. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric in describing characters' behavior as 'reprehensible.' Lastly, there is an appeal to authority when the author states that the musical version of Mean Girls has been written by Tina Fey and directed by Samantha Jayne and Arturo Perez Jr. However, these facts do not necessarily mean that the musical will be good or well-received.- Musicals—certainly this type of musical—are supposed to be pure pleasure
- Mean Girls comes off as enforced fun, a kind of bullying disguised as entertainment
- characters behave reprehensibly and then use faux feminism as a shield
Bias (85%)
The article is overly critical of the musical adaptation of Mean Girls. The author uses language that demeans and belittles the performers in a way that is not supported by their actions or performances.- > Janis (Auli'i Cravalho) provides a friendly place for her to sit in the lunchroom, helping her to distinguish among the school's various cliques, and urging her to avoid one in particular. The girls known as the Plastics, they tell her,
Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
The article has multiple conflicts of interest. The author is Tina Fey who wrote the musical adaptation and starred in it. She also co-wrote the screenplay for the movie version of Mean Girls which was released in 2014.Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
58%
The Beekeeper review – Jason Statham’s John Wick is serviceable schlock
theguardian.com Article URL: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/13/ pakistan-·coalition-·agrees-to-form-government Benjamin Lee Thursday, 11 January 2024 19:52Unique Points
- The Beekeeper is a January thriller directed by David Ayer.
- Jason Statham plays the titular character in The Beekeeper, John Wick.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
Deception (30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the movie review implies that it will be a critical analysis of John Wick: Chapter 4. However, this is not what happens in the article as it only briefly mentions John Wick and focuses on The Beekeeper instead.- The title of the movie review implies that it will be a critical analysis of John Wick: Chapter 4.
Fallacies (75%)
The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the film is a derivative and rough around the edges without providing any evidence or reasoning for this claim. Additionally, there are multiple instances of inflammatory rhetoric used throughout the review such as calling it 'serviceable schlock' and describing some lines as 'rubbish'. The author also uses dichotomous depiction by stating that Statham knows exactly what to do in the film while simultaneously criticizing his performance. Finally, there are multiple examples of informal fallacies throughout the review such as using slang ('swarming') and exaggeration ('a solid, low-stakes medium reward new year').- The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the film is a derivative and rough around the edges without providing any evidence or reasoning for this claim.
- There are multiple instances of inflammatory rhetoric used throughout the review such as calling it 'serviceable schlock' and describing some lines as 'rubbish'.
- The author uses dichotomous depiction by stating that Statham knows exactly what to do in the film while simultaneously criticizing his performance.
- There are multiple examples of informal fallacies throughout the review such as using slang ('swarming') and exaggeration ('a solid, low-stakes medium reward new year').
Bias (70%)
The article contains a lot of examples of religious bias. The author uses the phrase 'British actors' to describe the cameos in the movie which is not relevant and implies that they are all British. This is an example of nationalistic bias.- If you’re not in the market for what David Ayer is forcefully selling in batty January thriller The Beekeeper at the point when someone says to the titular character, “To bee or not to bee, that is the bloody question,” then you might as well just give up and walk out. By this stage, late in the film, Ayer and screenwriter Kurt Wimmer have given us just about enough bee puns,
Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest with the topic 'Jason Statham' as he is reviewing John Wick which was directed by David Ayer who also worked on The Beekeeper. Additionally, the author may have a personal relationship or professional affiliation with Kurt Wimmer and Phylicia Rashad as they are actors in John Wick.- The article mentions that 'John Wick' was directed by David Ayer who also worked on The Beekeeper. This suggests a financial tie between the two projects, which could compromise the author's ability to act objective and impartially when reviewing John Wick.
Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
The author has conflicts of interest on the topics 'Jason Statham', 'David Ayer', and 'Kurt Wimmer'.