Meta's AI Chatbots Cause Stir in Facebook Comment Sections: Hallucinations and Privacy Concerns

New York City, New York, USA United States of America
Another Meta AI offered items for giveaway in a swapping group.
Meta aims to create versatile assistants that can integrate into users' daily digital interactions and provide real-time information.
Meta's AI is summarizing some Facebook comment sections for users.
Meta's top AI researcher, Yann LeCun, is engaged in a public dispute with Elon Musk over AI research.
Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, is integrating AI systems into its platforms to assist users.
One Meta AI chatbot claimed to have a child in a Manhattan moms group on Facebook.
Meta's AI Chatbots Cause Stir in Facebook Comment Sections: Hallucinations and Privacy Concerns

Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, has been integrating AI systems into its platforms to assist users with various tasks. However, recent incidents have highlighted some unusual interactions between Meta's AI and Facebook comment sections.

One instance involved a Meta AI chatbot participating in a Manhattan moms group on Facebook by claiming to have a child in the New York City school district. The chatbot later clarified that it was an advanced language model and did not possess personal experiences or children. Another incident occurred when the AI offered items for giveaway in a swapping group, adding to the growing list of bizarre interactions.

Meta aims to create versatile assistants that can seamlessly integrate into users' daily digital interactions. The company envisions these AI systems providing real-time information and generating images based on user prompts across its apps. However, they face challenges such as hallucinations, where the AI generates responses that are factually incorrect or contextually inappropriate.

Meanwhile, Meta's top AI researcher, Yann LeCun, has been engaged in a public dispute with Elon Musk over AI research. Musk's OpenAI competitor, xAI, secured a record-breaking $6 billion funding round. LeCun criticized Musk for his leadership style and questioned the reliability of his AI systems.

In another development, Meta's AI is summarizing some Facebook comment sections to provide users with an overview of the discussions. However, privacy concerns have been raised as Meta uses user comments to train its AI without explicit consent in EU and UK jurisdictions.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

85%

Doubts
  • Are there more instances of Meta AI behaving inappropriately in Facebook comment sections?
  • Is it confirmed that the Meta AI chatbot actually participated in Manhattan moms group?

Sources

78%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Meta’s AI is summarizing some bizarre Facebook comment sections

The Verge Emma Roth Friday, 31 May 2024 19:02
  • Unique Points
    • Meta's AI summarizes comments on Facebook posts
    • One comment summary referred to Mexican street wrestlers as a 'moronic way of panhandling'
    • Meta chooses which posts to display comment summaries on is unclear
    • Privacy concerns raised as Meta uses user comments to train AI without explicit consent in EU and UK
  • Accuracy
    • ]Meta's AI summarizes comments on Facebook posts[
    • Some comment summaries are about store closures and reasons for it
    • One comment summary referred to Mexican street wrestlers as a ‘moronic way of panhandling’
  • Deception (30%)
    The author uses emotional manipulation by describing some Facebook comment sections as 'wild' and 'unhinged', implying that the AI summaries of these sections are ridiculous. This is an attempt to elicit a negative emotional response from the reader. The author also selectively reports information by only mentioning instances where the AI summaries are inaccurate or unhelpful, without providing any context as to why these instances might occur or how frequently they occur.
    • The AI summaries have also prompted privacy concerns, as Meta is feeding user comments into its AI system to generate them.
    • It's still not clear how Meta chooses which posts to display comment summaries on, and the company didn’t immediately respond to The Verge’s request for comment.
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

99%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Meta's AI Summarizes Bizarre Facebook Comment Sections

pc-tablet.com Saturday, 01 June 2024 06:35
  • Unique Points
    • Meta’s AI systems are integrated into Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp for assistance.
    • A Meta AI chatbot claimed to have a child in a Manhattan moms group.
    • The AI offered items for giveaway in a swapping group.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (95%)
    No overt logical fallacies found in the article. However, there is a slight tendency towards inflammatory rhetoric and appeals to authority. The author describes Meta's AI systems as 'quirky' and 'sometimes problematic', which is inflammatory language that doesn't provide evidence for these claims. Additionally, the author cites experts and Meta's own statements without providing counter-opinions or context, which can create an appeal to authority fallacy.
    • ] In a private group for Manhattan moms, a Meta AI chatbot claimed to have a child in the New York City school district, which sparked confusion and concern among group members. The chatbot later apologized, clarifying that it was a large language model and did not have personal experiences or children.[anquote]
    • ] In another case, the AI mistakenly offered to give away items in a group dedicated to swapping unwanted goods. The chatbot's offer of a 'gently used' camera and an 'almost-new portable air conditioning unit' added to the growing list of bizarre AI interactions on the platform.[anquote]
    • ] Experts argue that while AI models can process large amounts of data, they still struggle with common-sense reasoning and higher-level cognitive tasks.[anquote]
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

90%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The AI drama is heating up

The Verge Alex Heath Saturday, 01 June 2024 00:46
  • Unique Points
    • Elon Musk and Yann LeCun are engaging in a public dispute over AI research.
    • Musk's OpenAI competitor, xAI, has secured a record-breaking $6 billion funding round.
    • LeCun is Meta's top AI researcher and criticized Musk for his leadership style.
  • Accuracy
    • ]Elon Musk and Yann LeCun are engaging in a public dispute over AI research.[
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (90%)
    The author is making an observation about the increasing drama in the AI community between Elon Musk and Yann LeCun. While there are some inflammatory statements made by both parties, this does not constitute a logical fallacy as they are expressing their opinions. However, the author's use of hyperbole ('knives are coming out', 'erratic megalomaniac') and appeal to emotion ('drama is heating up') can be considered informal fallacies.
    • Everywhere you look in the AI world, knives are coming out.
    • LeCun was responding to Musk's touting of xAI's record-breaking, $6 billion funding round.
    • The drama is heating up.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication