Former Vice President Mike Pence Announces He Will Not Endorse Donald Trump in 2024 Presidential Election

Washington, DC, District of Columbia United States of America
Former Vice President Mike Pence has announced that he will not endorse Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election.
Pence has been critical of Trump's handling of the January 6 riots and his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. He also expressed concern about Trump's continued attacks on democracy.
Pence's decision comes after a tumultuous relationship with Trump, which began with their falling out over claims of widespread voter fraud during the 2020 election and continued through Pence's refusal to send disputed electoral slates back to state legislatures in his role as president of the Senate.
Former Vice President Mike Pence Announces He Will Not Endorse Donald Trump in 2024 Presidential Election

Former Vice President Mike Pence has announced that he will not be endorsing Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election. This decision comes after a tumultuous relationship between the two men, which began with their falling out over Trump's claims of widespread voter fraud during the 2020 election and continued through Pence's refusal to send disputed electoral slates back to state legislatures in his role as president of the Senate. In a statement on Fox News, Pence cited his belief that Trump was not articulating an agenda that he could support, stating ✖It should come as no surprise,> Pence said in a statement. ✖The former vice president has been critical of Trump's handling of the January 6 riots and his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. He also expressed concern about Trump's continued attacks on democracy, stating ✖I believe that we need a leader who will put aside political differences and work together for the good of our country.</em Pence has been exploring his own presidential ambitions in recent years, but it is unclear if he plans to run himself. Trump's decision to announce his candidacy before any other major candidates have entered the race has raised questions about whether he will be able to maintain support from key Republicans and conservative voters.



Confidence

90%

Doubts
  • It is unclear if Pence plans to run himself.

Sources

76%

  • Unique Points
    • Pence announced on Friday that he would not be endorsing Trump in the 2024 election.
    • Cheney wrote on X that she knew of other former GOP vice presidents who opposed Trump as the party nominee, and shared a clip of her father Dick Cheney voicing his opposition to Trump.
    • Dick Cheney previously served as vice president under former President George W. Bush from 2001 to 2009.
    • Cheney faced major headwinds from the pro-Trump party base and from the former president himself during her reelection campaign in 2022.
  • Accuracy
    • Liz Cheney wrote on X that she knew of other former GOP vice presidents who opposed Trump as the party nominee.
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Pence's decision not to endorse Trump was due to his belief that Trump was not articulating a political agenda he could support. However, this contradicts what Pence said in his announcement where he explicitly stated that it was because of profound differences between him and President Trump on a range of issues. Secondly, the author quotes Cheney saying she knew other former GOP vice presidents who opposed Trump as the party nominee but does not provide any names or evidence to support this claim. Lastly, the article is biased towards Pence's decision and presents it in a positive light while also attacking Trump without providing any countering arguments.
    • The author claims that Pence's decision was due to his belief that Trump was not articulating a political agenda he could support. However, this contradicts what Pence said in his announcement where he explicitly stated it was because of profound differences between him and President Trump on a range of issues.
    • The article quotes Cheney saying she knew other former GOP vice presidents who opposed Trump as the party nominee but does not provide any names or evidence to support this claim.
  • Fallacies (70%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when Pence cites his belief that Trump's agenda is at odds with the conservative agenda they governed on during their time together. Additionally, there are examples of inflammatory rhetoric in Cheney and Dick Cheney's statements about Trump being a threat to the republic and a coward for lying to supporters.
    • Pence cited his belief that Trump was not articulating a political agenda that he could support. Pence himself ran for the nomination, but dropped out in October.
  • Bias (80%)
    The author of the article is Thomas Kika and he has a clear political bias. He uses language that dehumanizes Trump supporters by calling them 'white supremacists' and accuses Pence of not being able to support Trump's agenda because it is at odds with conservative values. The author also quotes Cheney, who clearly opposes Trump, which further supports his own biased perspective.
    • Pence is quoted as saying 'During my presidential campaign, I made it clear that there were profound differences between me and President Trump on a range of issues.'
      • The article uses the phrase 'white supremacists online celebrated the reference to the racist and antisemitic conspiracy.'
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      78%

      • Unique Points
        • Mike Pence has refused to endorse Donald Trump for president in 2024.
        • Pence's decision undercuts other Trump-skeptical Republicans who have suggested through their actions that there is no alternative.
      • Accuracy
        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
      • Deception (80%)
        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author presents a false premise that many prominent Republicans have come around to Trump as his presumptive nominee when in fact they are only doing so grudgingly and with reservations. The author then quotes these politicians making statements such as 'He's at least preferable to President Biden', which is clearly an attempt to deceive the reader by presenting a false choice between two equally undesirable options. Secondly, the article presents Pence's decision not to endorse Trump as a significant statement that undercuts other Trump-skeptical Republicans when in fact it was only one of many reasons why he made this decision. The author also fails to disclose any sources for his information and instead relies on quotes from politicians who are clearly biased towards Trump.
        • The article presents a false premise that many prominent Republicans have come around to Trump as his presumptive nominee when in fact they are only doing so grudgingly and with reservations. This is deceptive because it implies that these politicians support Trump, when in reality they do not.
        • The author quotes Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp saying 'I think he'd be better than Joe Biden', which is a false statement as both candidates are equally undesirable options for the American people.
      • Fallacies (80%)
        The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it states that many prominent Republicans have come around to Trump as the party's presumptive nominee. This statement implies that these individuals are experts in politics and their opinions should be taken at face value without any critical evaluation. Additionally, there is a dichotomous depiction of Trump being preferable to Biden when compared to other candidates who have suggested through their actions that there is no alternative.
        • A procession of prominent Republicans who wanted to guide their party away from Donald Trump in 2024 have come around to him as the former president became the party's presumptive nominee.
      • Bias (85%)
        Aaron Blake is hostile to the main stream media and news outlets that publish articles where the author demonstrates bias in their reporting. In this article, he takes great joy in exposing the bias of other Republicans who have come around to support Trump as his presumptive nominee for president. He uses direct quotations from these politicians to demonstrate how they are using Trump's candidacy as a way out of supporting Biden and that their justification is based on him being preferable over President Biden. Blake also notes the contrast between Pence's decision not to endorse Trump and other Republicans who have indicated through their actions that there is no alternative, such as Nikki Haley. He highlights how this could provide a permission structure for others whose endorsements are up in the air to hold off on endorsing Trump. Blake also notes that Pence's stated reasoning is notable because it does not view Trump as dangerous to democracy or upset over his attacking him for refusing to try and overturn the 2020 election, but instead focuses on issues such as abortion, national debt, and China/TikTok where he believes Trump falls short of conservative values. This demonstrates a clear bias towards conservative ideology.
        • A procession of prominent Republicans who wanted to guide their party away from Donald Trump in 2024 have come around to him as the former president became the party's presumptive nominee.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        67%

        • Unique Points
          • Mike Pence has declined to endorse Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election.
          • Pence announced on Friday that he would not be endorsing Trump in the 2024 election.
          • Former Vice President Mike Pence left people guessing about his intentions until this afternoon.
        • Accuracy
          No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
        • Deception (50%)
          The article is deceptive because it omits any mention of the author's sources or quotes that support his claims. The reader cannot verify if Pence actually said those things or not. This is a lie by omission and undermines the credibility of the article.
          • , I'm incredibly proud of the record of our administration. It was a conservative record that made America more prosperous, more secure and saw conservatives appointed to our courts in a more peaceful world.
        • Fallacies (85%)
          The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing Trump's comments without providing any evidence or context for his claims. This is a form of informal fallacy as it relies on the reader's trust in the source rather than presenting objective information. Additionally, there are instances where the author presents opposing viewpoints without clearly stating which one they agree with, leading to ambiguity and confusion for readers. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric when Pence criticizes Trump's comments about China and TikTok as a reversal of his previous stance. This is an example of a formal fallacy known as 'False Dilemma', which presents two options without considering all possible alternatives.
          • Trump said Monday that the Gallagher-Krishnamoorthi TikTok bill some have described as a "ban" would only empower Facebook parent company Meta, which he has warred with over allegations it censors conservatives and antiestablishment thought. "I consider Facebook to be an enemy of the people,' Trump told CNBC as part of his TikTok commentary.
          • Pence also underlined he would not in any scenario vote for President Biden. "How I vote when that curtain closes – that➟ll be for me,' he said.
        • Bias (85%)
          Charles Creitz has a clear political bias in his reporting. He consistently uses language that depicts Trump as shirking conservative values and pursuing policies at odds with the conservative agenda he governed on for four years. This is evident in his statements about Trump's comments regarding TikTok, where he implies that Trump's change of heart was motivated by financial interests rather than a shift in policy. Additionally, Creitz uses examples from Pence's announcement to support his claim of bias. For example, when discussing the differences between himself and Trump during his presidential bid, Pence repeats his contention that he did not have the right under the Electoral Count Act of 1887 to send disputed elector slates back to state legislators. This implies a clear political stance on an important issue, which is indicative of bias.
          • Pence said Trump's latest comments about China and opposing a ban to TikTok in the U.S. also depict a reversal of his strong opposition while president to the Chinese-controlled social media app.
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
            Charles Creitz has a conflict of interest on the topics of Mike Pence and Donald Trump as he is an editor at Fox News. He also has a conflict of interest on the topic of January 6 riots as his employer, Fox News, was found to have spread misinformation about the election results.
            • Charles Creitz is an editor at Fox News.
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
              Charles Creitz has conflicts of interest on the topics of Mike Pence, Donald Trump, January 6 riots and Electoral Count Act of 1887. He also has a conservative agenda.
              • Pence declines to endorse Trump
                • wont-back Biden

                93%

                • Unique Points
                  • Mike Pence announced that he will not be endorsing Donald Trump.
                  • Former Vice President Mike Pence left people guessing about his intentions until this afternoon.
                  • Pence's loyalties to Trump were practically limitless for four years, even though nothing ever is enough for the former president.
                • Accuracy
                  No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                • Deception (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Fallacies (85%)
                  The article contains an example of a false dilemma fallacy. The author presents the situation as if there are only two options: to endorse or not to endorse Donald Trump. However, this is not true as there may be other options available.
                  • ]It should come as no surprise,” the Indiana Republican said on Fox News, “that I will not be endorsing Donald Trump this year.”
                  • Almost immediately after Pence ended his own 2024 candidacy, Trump declared at a campaign event,
                • Bias (85%)
                  The author of the article is Mike Pence and he has expressed his intention not to endorse Donald Trump. The author also mentions other former Republican candidates who have endorsed Trump despite their previous criticisms or skepticism towards him. This shows a clear bias in favor of those who are critical of Trump, while presenting those who support him as disloyal.
                  • Most of the former Republican presidential candidates did something predictable upon ending their candidacies: They endorsed Donald Trump.
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication