The case is being treated as a double homicide by the Vermont State Police.
The cause of death for both men was gunshot wounds to the head.
Two bodies found in Eden, Vermont have been identified as missing Massachusetts men Mark Pecora and Sean Ryan.
Two bodies discovered in Eden, Vermont, have been identified as two men from Massachusetts who had been reported missing. The bodies were found off a rural road in Eden, a town in northern Vermont. The men were identified as Mark Pecora, 32, and Sean Ryan, 31, both from Massachusetts. They were reported missing on October 18, 2023, and their bodies were discovered on October 26, 2023. The cause of death for both men was determined to be gunshot wounds to the head, according to the Vermont State Police. The police are treating the case as a double homicide and are actively investigating. No suspects have been identified at this time. The police are urging anyone with information about the case to come forward.
The discovery of the bodies followed a week-long search by the Vermont State Police, who were assisted by the Massachusetts State Police and the FBI. The search began after the men's families reported them missing. The families had not heard from the men since they left Massachusetts for Vermont. The men's vehicle was found abandoned in a parking lot in St. Johnsbury, Vermont, which led the police to expand their search to the surrounding areas. The bodies were eventually found in Eden, about 30 miles from where the vehicle was discovered.
95%
Doubts
There is no information on potential suspects or motives in the case.
98%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
85%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
VTDigger
Thursday, 26 October 2023 00:00
Unique
Points
The article provides detailed information about the investigation process.
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
98%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
90%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
The article includes a video report which provides additional context.
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
97%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
80%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
The article provides more information about the autopsies.
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
98%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
85%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
WHDH-TV
Thursday, 26 October 2023 00:00
Unique
Points
The article provides more context about the location where the bodies were found.
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
98%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
80%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
The article provides more details about the cause of death.
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)