New Evidence Exonerates Missouri Woman Sandra Hemme after 43 Years in Prison for a Murder She Didn't Commit

St. Joseph, Missouri United States of America
Hemme was convicted based on her confessions while a psychiatric patient, but these confessions were made under heavy medication and did not match crime scene evidence.
Holman's truck was spotted near the crime scene and Jeschke's earrings were found in his apartment. He was also being investigated for insurance fraud and burglaries at the time of her murder.
Important evidence was not disclosed to Hemme's defense during her trial, including the fact that Holman had a history of insurance fraud and burglaries.
Judge Horsman noted that the failure to respond to the FBI's request for clearer palm prints of Holman resulted in an unfair trial and a verdict unworthy of confidence.
Judge Horsman's ruling came after Hemme's legal team presented evidence linking the killing of Patricia Jeschke to local police officer Michael Holman.
Missouri woman Sandra Hemme, who spent 43 years in prison for a murder conviction that is now overturned, was ruled innocent by Judge Ryan Horsman on June 15, 2024.
New Evidence Exonerates Missouri Woman Sandra Hemme after 43 Years in Prison for a Murder She Didn't Commit

A Missouri woman, Sandra Hemme, who spent 43 years in prison for a murder conviction that is now overturned, was ruled innocent by Judge Ryan Horsman on June 15, 2024. The judge's ruling came after Hemme's legal team presented evidence that directly ties the killing of Patricia Jeschke to a local police officer named Michael Holman, who died in 2015.

Hemme was convicted of the November 13, 1980 killing based on her confessions while she was a psychiatric patient. However, her attorneys argued that these confessions were made under heavy medication and did not match the crime scene evidence. They also pointed out that Holman had a history of insurance fraud and burglaries and used Jeschke's credit card to buy photography equipment on the day her body was found.

The judge agreed with Hemme's legal team, stating that there is clear and convincing evidence of her innocence. He also noted that Hemme had ineffective legal counsel during her trial and that important evidence was not disclosed to the defense.

Hemme's attorneys plan to seek her immediate release from prison. The case marks the longest time a woman has been incarcerated for a wrongful conviction in US history.

The investigation into Holman's involvement in Jeschke's death began when detectives discovered that his truck was spotted near the crime scene and earrings belonging to Jeschke were found hidden in his apartment. He was also being investigated for insurance fraud and burglaries at the time of her murder.

Despite this evidence, Holman's case against Hemme proceeded, with no further investigation into his involvement in Jeschke's death. The judge noted that the failure to respond to the FBI's request for clearer palm prints of Holman was a significant oversight that resulted in an unfair trial and a verdict unworthy of confidence.

Hemme, who is now 64 years old, has spent her entire adult life in prison. It remains to be seen whether prosecutors will seek a retrial or dismiss the case.



Confidence

91%

Doubts
  • It's unclear why Hemme's legal team didn't present this evidence during her original trial.
  • The evidence linking Holman to the crime is circumstantial.

Sources

98%

  • Unique Points
    • Authorities ignored Hemme’s contradictory statements and suppressed evidence implicating Michael Holman, a then-police officer who tried to use the victim’s credit card.
    • No evidence connects Hemme to the crime scene, but there is direct evidence that ties Holman to the crime.
  • Accuracy
    • Sandra Hemme spent 43 years in prison for a murder she claims she did not commit.
    • Holman tried to use Jeschke’s credit card at a camera store in Kansas City on the same day her body was found.
    • During a search of Holman’s home, police found jewelry stolen from another woman during a burglary earlier that year and a pair of gold horseshoe-shaped earrings that the victim’s father recognized as belonging to his daughter.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (95%)
    The article contains several potential fallacies, but the most egregious one is an appeal to authority. The author states that 'no evidence whatsoever outside of Ms. Hemme’s unreliable statements connects her to the crime.' However, this statement is not supported by any actual evidence presented in the article. Instead, it is based on a judge's ruling that Holman was directly tied to the crime and no evidence connects Hemme to it. This is an appeal to authority fallacy because the author is relying on a third party (the judge) as an authority figure rather than providing any actual evidence or reasoning of their own. Additionally, there are several instances of inflammatory rhetoric used throughout the article, such as 'grave injustice' and 'wildly contradictory statements.' However, these do not rise to the level of fallacies on their own and do not significantly impact the overall score.
    • 'no evidence whatsoever outside of Ms. Hemme’s unreliable statements connects her to the crime.',
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

99%

  • Unique Points
    • Sandra Hemme spent 43 years in prison for a murder she claims she did not commit.
    • New evidence was found that overturned Sandra Hemme's conviction for a 1980 murder.
    • The judge ruled that there is clear and convincing evidence that Hemme was innocent of the killing.
  • Accuracy
    • No evidence connects Hemme to the crime scene, but there is direct evidence that ties Holman to the crime.
    • Holman used Jeschke’s credit card on the day her body was found to buy photography equipment in Kansas City.
    • Earrings belonging to Patricia Jeschke were found in Michael Holman’s apartment.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

98%

  • Unique Points
    • Sandra Hemme was ordered for release or retrial by a judge.
    • Judge Ryan W. Horsman concluded that evidence establishing Hemme’s innocence is clear and convincing.
    • Police ignored evidence that pointed to officer Michael Holman as likely responsible for Jeschke’s death.
    • Holman used Jeschke’s credit card on the day her body was found to buy photography equipment in Kansas City.
    • His truck was spotted near the crime scene and earrings were found hidden in his apartment.
    • The court filing agrees that Hemme had ineffective legal counsel, important evidence was not disclosed at her trial, and she meets legal innocence standards.
  • Accuracy
    • Sandra Hemme was convicted of a 1980 murder in St. Joseph, Missouri.
    • Patricia Jeschke was found dead inside her apartment at the age of 31.
    • Hemme is represented by attorneys from the Innocence Project who are requesting a bond hearing to free her.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (95%)
    No direct logical fallacies found in the author's statements. However, there are some concerns with inflammatory rhetoric and appeals to authority. The article includes quotes from the attorney that express shock and horror at the way Sandra Hemme was treated by police but does not present a balanced view of law enforcement's actions or evidence. Additionally, the article references past misconduct of officer Michael Holman without clarifying whether this conduct is directly related to the case in question. This could lead readers to make false assumptions about Holman's involvement in Patricia Jeschke's murder.
    • ]This case is a really shocking one. And anyone who learns about it whether they are an attorney or just a person in the community is really horrified to know that someone in Sandy’s condition would have been questioned repeatedly- over and over again when she was clearly so unwell and so malleable and vulnerable.
    • ]The jury that convicted Ms. Hemme heard only a small portion of the evidence that undermined the State’s case against her, and no evidence that the SJPD chose to end their investigation into Holman before it was complete, including the failure to respond to the FBI’s request for clearer palm prints of Holman’s. The nondisclosure of that evidence resulted in a trial that was fundamentally unfair, resulting in a verdict unworthy of confidence.
    • ]Sandra Hemme.(Innocence Project) “This case is a really shocking one. And anyone who learns about it whether they are an attorney or just a person in the community is really horrified to know that someone in Sandy’s condition would have been questioned repeatedly- over and over again when she was clearly so unwell and so malleable and vulnerable.
    • ]Holman was being investigated for insurance fraud and burglaries. He eventually left the department went to another state and ended up in prison. He died in 2015.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

100%

  • Unique Points
    • Sandra Henee is the longest serving woman in US history for a wrongful conviction.
    • Former Saint Joseph police officer Michael Holman is suspected of committing the murder based on physical evidence.
    • Earrings belonging to Patricia Jeschke were found in Michael Holman’s apartment.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

99%

  • Unique Points
    • Sandra Hemme spent 43 years in prison for a murder conviction that has been overturned.
    • ,
  • Accuracy
    • Sandra Hemme spent 43 years in prison for a murder she claims she did not commit.
    • No evidence connects Hemme to the crime scene, but there is direct evidence that ties Holman to the crime.
    • Holman used Jeschke’s credit card on the day her body was found to buy photography equipment in Kansas City.
    • Earrings belonging to Patricia Jeschke were found in Michael Holman’s apartment.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication