MIT Students Arrested for Pro-Palestinian Encampment: Ongoing Disputes and Calls for University Divestment

Cambridge, Massachusetts United States of America
Approximately 10 students remained inside when it was dismantled by police
Dozen people arrested during peaceful operation
MIT President Sally Kornbluth called removal of encampment a 'last resort'
MIT students set up pro-Palestinian encampment in violation of clear guidelines
Over 2,000 arrests made during clashes between protesters and police on over 400 campuses nationwide
Students called for university to cut ties with Israeli military
MIT Students Arrested for Pro-Palestinian Encampment: Ongoing Disputes and Calls for University Divestment

Protests and arrests have erupted at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge, Mass., as students set up a pro-Palestinian encampment on campus. The encampment, which began on April 21, was in violation of MIT's clear guidelines and resulted in several clashes between police and demonstrators.

Approximately 10 people remained inside the encampment when it was dismantled by police early on Friday morning. Quinn Perian, an undergraduate MIT student and organizer for MIT Jews for Ceasefire, stated that ‘They can't arrest the movement. We are going to continue and won't back down until MIT agrees to cut ties with the Israeli military.”

Pro-Palestinian demonstrators have set up encampments on over 400 campuses nationwide, calling on their universities to divest from Israeli companies or companies that supply weapons to Israel. Over 2,000 arrests have been made during clashes between police and protesters.

The tensions at MIT escalated after several students were arrested earlier in the week for blocking access to a parking garage. The university had set a Monday deadline for protesters to vacate the encampment or face suspension, but tensions increased when some students who defied the deadline received notices of suspension.

MIT President Sally Kornbluth called the encampment's removal by police “a last resort” and said that ongoing disruption had made its continuing presence “increasingly untenable.” About a dozen people were arrested during the operation, which appeared largely peaceful.

The development mirrors what's happening at colleges across the country. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators have set up encampments on more than 400 campuses, calling on their universities to divest from Israeli companies or companies that supply weapons to Israel.

It is important to note that all sources used in this article were analyzed for potential biases and factual accuracy. The overall score for each source was taken into consideration when deriving the story. Sources with higher scores were given more weight in the final article.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

90%

Doubts
  • Is the number of arrests nationwide accurate?
  • Were all sources analyzed for potential biases and factual accuracy?

Sources

92%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Pro-Palestine Students Reject Harvard President’s Proposal to End Encampment | News | The Harvard Crimson

The Harvard Crimson Friday, 10 May 2024 14:02
  • Unique Points
    • Members of the pro-Palestine encampment rejected a proposal from interim University President Alan M. Garber to end their occupation and avoided receiving involuntary leave notices.
    • HOOP did not accept Garber’s counterproposal, instead choosing to remain in the encampment.
    • Harvard spokesperson confirmed the Wednesday meeting which included Dean of the College Rakesh Khurana and two faculty observers in addition to Garber and HOOP representatives.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains a few instances of inflammatory rhetoric and appeals to authority. The use of phrases like 'the most forceful action', 'first Harvard president in recent memory to suspend students en masse for protesting', and 'threatened us, refused to negotiate with us' can be seen as inflammatory. Additionally, there is an appeal to authority when the article states Garber's reaffirmation of the University's commitment not to divest its endowment from Israel. However, no formal fallacies are present in the text.
    • The most forceful action
    • first Harvard president in recent memory to suspend students en masse for protesting
    • threatened us, refused to negotiate with us
    • Garber's reaffirmation of the University's commitment not to divest its endowment from Israel
  • Bias (80%)
    The article reports on a dispute between Harvard University and pro-Palestine student protesters over the University's investments in Israel. The author does not express any bias towards either side in the reporting of facts. However, there are instances where the language used by the author could be perceived as biased towards one side due to its emotional tone and choice of words. For example, when describing HOOP's counterproposal to Garber's proposal, the author writes 'The breakdown in negotiations makes it almost certain that dozens of students who participated in the encampment will soon be placed on involuntary leave from their schools.' This language could be perceived as biased towards HOOP as it implies that they are being unfairly treated by the University. Additionally, when describing Garber's response to HOOP's demands, the author writes 'Garber ignored us, threatened us, refused to negotiate with us.' This language could be perceived as biased against Garber and could give readers a negative impression of him. However, it is important to note that these are just perceptions and do not necessarily reflect actual bias on the part of the author. The author's primary role is to report the facts accurately and impartially, which they have done in this article.
    • Garber ignored us, threatened us, refused to negotiate with us.
      • The breakdown in negotiations makes it almost certain that dozens of students who participated in the encampment will soon be placed on involuntary leave from their schools.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      96%

      The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
      (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

      A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

      Police Arrest M.I.T. Protesters After Suspensions Ramp Up Tension

      The Name Of The NZ Prefix. I PWA NZI.P.Was Dropped. Matthew Eadie, Friday, 10 May 2024 01:10
      • Unique Points
        • Police arrested 10 demonstrators at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.) early on Friday.
        • Encampment at M.I.T.'s Cambridge campus was cleared by police after escalating tensions.
        • Students were given a 15-minute warning to leave the encampment before arrests occurred.
      • Accuracy
        • Protests had been ongoing for several days, with some students facing suspension for defying a Monday deadline to vacate the area.
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      91%

      The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
      (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

      A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

      Police dismantle pro-Palestinian encampment at MIT; 10 protesters arrested

      WCVB-TV Boston News Division Todd Kazakiewich Friday, 10 May 2024 12:06
      • Unique Points
        • Police cleared a pro-Palestinian encampment on the campus of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology early Friday.
        • Protesters demanded that MIT cut financial and research ties with Israel.
        • Officers surrounded the perimeter of the camp at 4 a.m. and urged protesters to leave.
        • Ten people who refused to leave the encampment were arrested.
        • The encampment began on April 21 and was in violation of clear institute guidelines well known to the student organizers.
      • Accuracy
        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
      • Deception (70%)
        The article does not provide any direct evidence of deception by the author. However, there are several examples of selective reporting and emotional manipulation that suggest a bias towards one side of the issue.
        • `We are not going to stop acting. We are not going to stop letting the institution know that there is no life as normal  ‐ there is no life as normal in Gaza. We are going to continue showing everyone that this complicity in a genocide is not acceptable,`
      • Fallacies (85%)
        The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by quoting student Quinn Perian's statement 'We are not going to stop acting. We are not going to stop letting the institution know that there is no life as normal in Gaza. We are going to continue showing everyone that this complicity in a genocide is not acceptable.' This statement contains strong language and an accusation of genocide, which can be considered inflammatory and emotionally charged. The author also quotes Marilyn Meyers' statement 'It seems to me like they think they’ve taken control of campus and they can do whatever they want,' which could be seen as an appeal to authority if it is implied that the speaker represents a larger group or institution. However, without further context, it is unclear if this is the case.
        • We are not going to stop acting. We are not going to stop letting the institution know that there is no life as normal in Gaza. We are going to continue showing everyone that this complicity in a genocide is not acceptable.
        • It seems to me like they think they’ve taken control of campus and they can do whatever they want.
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      97%

      The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
      (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

      A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

      Pro-Palestinian encampment dismantled at MIT

      The Hill News Site: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate-seethe-republicans-call-for-israeli-elections/ Lauren Irwin Friday, 10 May 2024 11:38
      • Unique Points
        • Protesters set up a pro-Palestinian encampment on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) campus in Cambridge, Mass.
        • Approximately 10 people were inside the encampment when it was dismantled
        • Quinn Perian, an undergraduate MIT student and organizer for MIT Jews for Ceasefire, stated ‘They can’t arrest the movement. We are going to continue and won’t back down until MIT agrees to cut ties with the Israeli military'
        • Pro-Palestinian demonstrators have set up encampments on over 400 campuses nationwide
        • Over 2,000 arrests have been made during clashes between police and protesters
      • Accuracy
        • Police dismantled the encampment early morning on April 25, 2024
        • Students were given a 15-minute warning to leave the encampment before arrests occurred.
        • Encampment at M.I.T.'s Cambridge campus was cleared by police after escalating tensions.
        • MIT administration cleared Kresge lawn encampment with riot gear and state police.
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Bias (95%)
        The author uses language that depicts the protesters as being unyielding and unwilling to back down, implying a negative bias towards them. The author also mentions the number of arrests made and suspensions given without providing any context or perspective, which could be seen as an attempt to sway readers' opinions.
        • “They can’t arrest the movement.”
          • “We are going to continue and won’t back down until MIT agrees to cut ties with the Israeli military.”
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication

          95%

          The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
          (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

          A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

          MIT protests encampment ends with riot gear, state police clear out

          The Boston Globe Friday, 10 May 2024 00:00
          • Unique Points
            • MIT administration cleared Kresge lawn encampment with riot gear and state police.
            • Protesters had been given four warnings to leave the encampment before arrests were made.
            • The protest movement gained momentum after Columbia University pro-Palestine protesters’ arrests a month ago.
          • Accuracy
            • 10 protesters were arrested and charged, their identities and charges are yet to be disclosed.
            • The encampment was a site of protests against Israeli military action in Gaza for the past two weeks.
          • Deception (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Fallacies (85%)
            The author uses an appeal to authority fallacy by quoting MIT President Susan Hockfield justifying the removal of the encampment based on campus safety and obligations to the community. The author also uses a dichotomous depiction by describing the protesters as jeopardizing campus safety and making it impossible for everyone to express their views and do their work, while ignoring that these actions were peaceful protests taking place on a public university campus.
            • “As president, my responsibility is to the whole community: to make sure that the campus is physically safe and functioning for everyone, that our shared spaces and resources are available for everyone, and that everyone feels free to express their views and do the work they came here to do.”
            • “The presence of the encampment increasingly made it impossible to meet all these obligations.”
          • Bias (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication