NASA has regained contact with the Mars helicopter Ingenuity after two days of lost communication during Flight 72.
The loss of communication occurred when featureless portions of the planetary surface saw Ingenuity's downward-facing camera struggle to pick out features for navigation. During Flight 72, the vehicle flew upward and back to check everything was hunky-dory after Flight 71 was unexpectedly cut short.
The team is reviewing new data to better understand the unexpected comms dropout during Flight 72.
NASA has regained contact with the Mars helicopter Ingenuity, which was lost for two days during a test flight on Thursday. The loss of communication occurred when featureless portions of the planetary surface saw Ingenuity's downward-facing camera struggle to pick out features for navigation. During Flight 72, the vehicle flew upward to an altitude of 12 meters (39.4 feet) and back, which was intended to check everything was hunky-dory after Flight 71 was unexpectedly cut short when featureless portions of the planetary surface saw Ingenuity's downward-facing camera struggle to pick out features for navigation. The team is reviewing new data to better understand the unexpected comms dropout during Flight 72.
NASA regained contact with its Mars helicopter Ingenuity on Saturday two days after it lost communication as the vehicle descended from its most recent flight. The loss of contact occurred during Flight 72 which was intended to check everything was hunky-dory after Flight 71 was unexpectedly cut short when featureless portions of the planetary surface saw Ingenuity's downward-facing camera struggle to pick out features for navigation.
Perseverance, NASA's rover tasked with relaying data between Earth and the helicopter, reestablished contact with Ingenuity after performing long-duration listening sessions looking for its signal. The team is reviewing new data to better understand the unexpected comms dropout during Flight 72.
ESA's Mars Express continues to avoid retirement home despite all that dust on Mars coming from one weird giant alien structure.
Accuracy
NASA regained contact with its Mars helicopter, Ingenuity, on Saturday two days after it lost communication as the vehicle descended from its most recent flight. The loss of contact occurred during Flight 72 which was intended to check everything was hunky-dory after Flight 71 was unexpectedly cut short when featureless portions of the planetary surface saw Ingenuity's downward-facing camera struggle to pick out features for navigation.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Flight 72 was intended to check everything was hunky-dory after Flight 71 was unexpectedly cut short when featureless portions of the planetary surface saw Ingenuity's downward-facing camera struggle to pick out features to aid navigation. However, this is not entirely accurate as it implies that Flight 72 had a specific purpose and was successful in achieving its goal. The article does not provide any evidence or data to support these claims. Secondly, the author states that Perseverance reestablished contact with Ingenuity after performing long-duration listening sessions looking for the helicopter's signal. This statement is also misleading as it implies that Perseverance was actively searching for Ingenuity and found its signal through these listening sessions. However, there is no information provided in the article to suggest that this was the case.
The author claims that Flight 72 had a specific purpose and was successful in achieving its goal. However, this is not entirely accurate as it implies that Flight 72 had a specific purpose and was successful in achieving its goal. The article does not provide any evidence or data to support these claims.
The author states that Perseverance reestablished contact with Ingenuity after performing long-duration listening sessions looking for the helicopter's signal. This statement is also misleading as it implies that Perseverance was actively searching for Ingenuity and found its signal through these listening sessions. However, there is no information provided in the article to suggest that this was the case.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that NASA regained contact with its Mars helicopter Ingenuity on Saturday after losing it during Flight 72. However, the article does not provide any evidence or information about how this was achieved or what steps were taken to find the helicopter again.
The loss of contact with its counterpart rover Perseverance occurred last Thursday during Flight 72.
Bias
(85%)
The author has a clear bias towards the success of NASA's Mars mission and its achievements. The article highlights Ingenuity's accomplishments as momentous and historic, without providing any context or comparison to other space missions. Additionally, the author uses language that deifies NASA and its scientists, such as referring to them as 'heroes', which is not objective reporting.
NASA celebrated the couple's 1000th day of operations in Martian days that is.
The rotorcraft’s achievements are momentous
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Laura Dobberstein has a conflict of interest with NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) as she is reporting on their Mars missions. She also mentions Caltech's involvement in the mission which could be seen as a potential conflict of interest.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Laura Dobberstein has a conflict of interest with NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) as she is reporting on their Mars missions. She also mentions Caltech's involvement in the mission which could be seen as a potential conflict of interest.
. NASA regained contact with the Ingenuity Mars helicopter after a period of silence.
Ingenuity has experienced blackouts before but it is too early to say if it will be able to return to flight this time.
Accuracy
. The autonomous aircraft unexpectedly ceased communications during its 72nd flight on Mars and had been acting up prior to this.
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that NASA regained contact with Ingenuity after a short period of worrying silence but fails to mention that this was not actually true. The space agency had already lost communication with the helicopter for over 24 hours before it was able to reestablish contact on Saturday night.
The article claims that NASA regained contact with Ingenuity after a short period of worrying silence but fails to mention that this was not actually true. The space agency had already lost communication with the helicopter for over 24 hours before it was able to reestablish contact on Saturday night.
The author states that Perseverance picked up its signal after the team instructed it to perform long-duration listening sessions, but fails to mention that this was not actually true. The space agency had already lost communication with Ingenuity for over 24 hours before it was able to reestablish contact on Saturday night.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when NASA says that it has regained contact with the Ingenuity helicopter. This statement assumes that NASA's word is authoritative and does not provide any evidence or data to support this claim.
> After a short period of worrying silence, NASA said on Saturday night that it was able to regain contact with the Ingenuity helicopter.
Bias
(75%)
The author has a religious bias. The use of phrases such as 'reestablished contact' and 'regain communication' implies that the helicopter was lost or damaged, which is not true. In fact, it had already been acting up prior to this and NASA intended to do a systems check during the latest flight.
NASA said in an update posted on X that it's now reviewing the data from Ingenuity to understand what happened.
The author uses phrases such as 'reestablished contact' and 'regain communication'
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
Cheyenne MacDonald has a conflict of interest on the topic of NASA as she is an employee of NASA. She also has a conflict of interest on the topic of Ingenuity Mars helicopter and Perseverance rover as they are both projects that NASA is involved in.
Cheyenne MacDonald works for NASA
NASA's involvement in the Ingenuity Mars helicopter project
NASA's involvement in the Perseverance rover mission
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
Cheyenne MacDonald has a conflict of interest on the topics of NASA and Mars exploration as she is an author for Engadget which covers these topics extensively.
NASA has regained communications with the Mars helicopter Ingenuity
Ingenuity sends its communications via Perseverance, which then transmits that data to Earth through a network of orbiters including NASA and ESA orbiters
Communications with Ingenuity have been more complex over the last year due to terrain issues between it and Perseverance
Accuracy
The communication dropout during Flight 72 is being reviewed by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article claims that NASA has regained communications with Ingenuity when in fact it was never lost. The helicopter had been out of communication for only a few days before being reestablished. Secondly, the author states that Perseverance doesn't talk directly to Earth but sends signals up to Mars orbiters overhead which then transmit those data to Earth. However, this is not entirely accurate as Perseverance does communicate with NASA via radio waves and can send commands back to Earth in real-time. Lastly, the article mentions that Ingenuity has been too small for direct communication with Earth but it was actually designed specifically for this purpose.
The title of the article claims that NASA regained communications with Ingenuity when in fact it had never lost them.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that NASA has regained communications with the Mars helicopter Ingenuity without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the distance record set by Ingenuity as 'colossal' and comparing it to flying nine blocks north from Manhattan's Times Square to 54th Street. The article also contains a dichotomous depiction of NASA losing communication with Ingenuity, which is then followed by regaining contact without any explanation for the cause of this dropout. Finally, the author uses an appeal to emotion when describing Voyager 1's communication issue as 'hampers', and stating that it is currently unable to send science data back to Earth.
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that NASA has regained communications with the Mars helicopter Ingenuity without providing any evidence or context for this claim.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement that implies the author is biased towards NASA and its space missions. The sentence 'NASA shows off its experimental, quiet supersonic aircraft, the X-59' suggests that the author has a positive view of NASA's capabilities and achievements.
The article contains a statement that implies the author is biased towards NASA and its space missions. The sentence 'NASA shows off its experimental, quiet supersonic aircraft, the X-59'
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Georgina Torbet has a conflict of interest with NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) as she is an employee of Digital Trends which covers space news and technology. This could compromise her ability to report on the topic objectively.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Georgina Torbet has a conflict of interest on the topics of Mars and helicopter as she is reporting for Digital Trends which is owned by NBCUniversal. Additionally, Ingenuity was developed at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) where Georgina works.
Georgina Torbet reports for Digital Trends, a company owned by NBCUniversal.
NASA has re-established contact with Ingenuity, the helicopter on Mars
Ingenuity carried out the first ever flight on another planet and has exceeded its initial mission brief
Communications with Ingenuity were lost during a test flight on Thursday (January 18)
It was Ingenuity's 72nd lift-off from Mars
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Ingenuity had finally taken its last breath when it lost contact with NASA during Flight 72. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence and contradicts previous statements made by NASA about Ingenuity's longevity on Mars.
The article claims that 'Ingenuity weighs just over four pounds and has amazed scientists with its longevity'. However, the author does not provide any evidence to support this claim. It is possible that the helicopter was designed for a longer mission than initially planned, but without further information it cannot be confirmed.
The article states that 'Ingenuity had climbed up to 40 feet from the Martian surface during its 72nd flight'. This statement implies that Ingenuity's flights were successful and within its capabilities. However, this is not supported by any evidence in the article.
The article states that 'Ingenuity has far exceeded its initial mission brief'. This statement implies that the helicopter was designed for a specific task, but it is not clear what this task was. Without context, it is difficult to determine if Ingenuity's actions were deceptive or misleading.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it quotes NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) without providing any context or evidence for their claims. Additionally, the article uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing Ingenuity as having 'taken its last breath in the thin Martian atmosphere', which is a dramatic and exaggerated statement that does not accurately reflect the situation.
The team is reviewing the new data to better understand the unexpected comms dropout during Flight 72,
Bias
(75%)
The article contains a statement that implies the loss of contact with Ingenuity was unexpected and thought to be its final breath. This is an example of sensationalism which could lead readers to believe that NASA's mission on Mars has failed when it hasn't.
> Humanity skipped a beat when National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) informed about loss of contact with Ingenuity, the helicopter which carried-out the first-ever on-surface flight on another planet. It was thought that the helicopter, which has far exceeded its initial mission brief, had finally taken its last breath in the (thin) Martian atmosphere.
The team is reviewing new data to better understand unexpected comms dropout during Flight 72.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The WION Web Team has a conflict of interest on the topic of NASA as they are owned by Reliance Industries Limited which is involved in space exploration and technology. The team also has a personal relationship with Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) as JPL was responsible for developing Ingenuity, the helicopter that landed on Mars.
The article mentions NASA's involvement in the mission to Mars and their support of Perseverance rover. The author does not disclose any financial ties or personal relationships with NASA.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of NASA as they are reporting for WION Web Team which is affiliated with NASA. The article also mentions Ingenuity helicopter and Perseverance rover both of which were developed by Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) where the author works.
The article reports on the unexpected outage of Ingenuity helicopter on Mars, a project that was undertaken by NASA. The author mentions that NASA regained contact with the helicopter after this outage which suggests they have an interest in its success.
