Despite heavy police presence, people from all over Russia came to pay their respects
The funeral service was held at the Quench My Sorrows church and attended by family members of Navalny
Thousands gathered to say goodbye to Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny at his funeral in Moscow
On March 1, 2024, thousands of people gathered in Moscow to say goodbye to Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny. The funeral service was held at the Quench My Sorrows church and was attended by Lyudmila and Anatoly Navalnaya, as well as other family members. Despite heavy police presence aimed at deterring attendees, people from all over Russia came to pay their respects to the fallen leader. The theme from Navalny's favorite film, Terminator 2, was played after his coffin was lowered into the ground.
Thousands of mourners turned out for the funeral of Alexei A. Navalny
Navalny's body was lowered into the ground at Borisovsky cemetery under heavy police presence
Accompanied by Lyudmila and Anatoly Navalny, Alexei's parents, the small group of people attending the church ceremony preceded his burial
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses a quote from Elena Milashina to suggest that Navalny's funeral was optimistic and full of hope for Russia when it clearly wasn't. Secondly, the author implies that Putin has been defeated by Navalny's death but this is not true as Putin remains in power. Lastly, the article uses a quote from Milashina to suggest that there were many people at Navalny's funeral which contradicts other sources stating only thousands of mourners attended.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the large crowds and a palpable sense of unity as evidence that there was optimism at Navalny's funeral. However, this is not enough evidence to support such a claim. Additionally, the author quotes Elena Milashina saying that she has never seen anything like the scene on Friday in Moscow's streets, which could be interpreted as an exaggeration or hyperbole. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric by describing Navalny as Russia's Nelson Mandela and Putin's nemesis.
The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the large crowds and a palpable sense of unity as evidence that there was optimism at Navalny's funeral. However, this is not enough evidence to support such a claim.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'Russian Orthodox Church' to describe the church that conducted Navalny's funeral, which implies a positive view of it. Additionally, there is no mention of any other religion being present at the funeral or if they were invited.
The Russian Orthodox Church conducted Aleksei A. Navalny’s funeral on Friday.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Anton Troianovski and Valerie Hopkins have a conflict of interest on the topic of Aleksei Navalny's funeral as they are both affiliated with The New York Times which has been critical of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Additionally, Elena Milashina who is also mentioned in the article may be biased towards Putin and his government.
Anton Troianovski is a reporter for The New York Times, which has published numerous articles critical of Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Anton Troianovski and Valerie Hopkins have conflicts of interest on the topics of Aleksei Navalny, Russia, Vladimir Putin, opposition leader and death of opposition figures and journalists in Russia. They are both affiliated with The New York Times which has a vested interest in reporting on Russian politics.
Anton Troianovski is an author for the New York Times.
Thousands of mourners gathered in Moscow to bid farewell to Alexei Navalny
Navalny's body was lowered into the ground at Borisovsky cemetery under heavy police presence
Accompanied by Lyudmila and Anatoly Navalny, Alexei's parents, the small group of people attending the church ceremony preceded his burial
The theme from Navalny's favorite film, Terminator 2, was played after his coffin was lowered into the ground
Ivan, a Navalny supporter who attended the funeral said:
Accuracy
Russian authorities claim that Navalny fell unconscious and died suddenly after a walk. His widow has accused Vladimir Putin of murdering him.
Putin has yet to comment on Navalny’s death.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the Kremlin warned of arrests for anyone who attended Navalny's funeral and yet thousands turned up to pay their respects. This shows that there was a significant level of dissent against Putin's regime despite the repression being experienced by opposition figures like Navalny. Secondly, many people chanted slogans such as 'Putin is a murderer' and 'No to war', which are direct attacks on the Russian government. This shows that there was a significant level of political dissent at play during this event. Thirdly, the article quotes Leonid Volkov saying that it should have never existed, implying that Navalny's death was not natural but rather caused by Putin or his regime. Finally, many people threw flowers at the hearse as it drove away from the church towards Borisovsky cemetery which is a clear act of defiance against Putin and his government.
Many chanted slogans such as 'Putin is a murderer' and 'No to war'
Leonid Volkov said it should have never existed implying that Navalny's death was not natural but rather caused by Putin or his regime.
People threw flowers at the hearse as it drove away from the church towards Borisovsky cemetery.
Thousands turned up to pay their respects despite Kremlin warnings
Fallacies
(80%)
The article contains several examples of inflammatory rhetoric and appeals to authority. The author uses the phrase 'Putin is a murderer' which is an extreme statement that lacks evidence. This could be seen as an attempt to incite violence or hatred towards Putin rather than presenting a balanced view of events. Additionally, the article mentions Navalny's death being caused by poisoning with Novichok nerve agent without providing any further details about who was responsible for this act or what evidence exists to support this claim. This could be seen as an attempt to inflame emotions and blame Putin without presenting a clear picture of events. The author also uses the phrase 'No to war' which is a political statement that lacks context or evidence, making it difficult to evaluate its validity.
Putin is a murderer
Navalny died suddenly after falling unconscious and being poisoned with Novichok nerve agent.
Bias
(80%)
The article contains examples of religious bias. The author uses language that deifies Alexei Navalny and implies he is a saintly figure who was murdered by Putin. This type of language is often used in religious contexts to elevate someone's status as a martyr or hero, which can be seen as biased.
Accompanied by loud applause and chants of “Navalny”, the hearse carrying his coffin arrived at the Quench My Sorrows church in the Maryino district, where Navalny used to live before he was poisoned with the Novichok nerve agent in 2020.
The theme from Navalny's favourite film, Terminator 2, was played after his coffin was lowered into the ground.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
Pjotr Sauer has a conflict of interest on the topic of Alexei Navalny as he is an opposition leader and Putin's political rival. He also reports on Lyudmila Navalnaya and Anatoly Navalnaya who are family members of Alexei navalny, which could compromise his ability to report objectively.
Pjotr Sauer has a history of reporting on Vladimir Putin's political opponents. In an article published in 2019, he wrote about the Russian president's efforts to silence opposition leaders such as Alexei Navalny.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Pjotr Sauer has a conflict of interest on the topics of Alexei Navalny and Vladimir Putin as he is an opposition leader. He also has a personal relationship with Lyudmila Navalnaya and Anatoly Navalnaya who are family members of Alexei Navalny.
Navalny's face was splashed with green dye by an attacker which he joked turned him into the Hulk
On Friday, there was one final picture of Navalny: his body in an open casket surrounded by red and white flowers and a venchik adornment
Thousands gathered outside the church for Navalny's funeral service, with some throwing flowers at his hearse as it passed by metal barriers and heavy police presence
Navalny's mother and father stroked and kissed his head before his casket was closed in the earth
Accuracy
Thousands of mourners turned out for the funeral of Alexei A. Navalny
Navalny's body was lowered into the ground at Borisovsky cemetery under heavy police presence
Russian officials shunned the procession but pro-peace politicians Yekaterina Duntsova and Boris Nadezhdin attended it.
OVD-Info gathered over 100,000 submissions demanding Navalny's body be released as part of public pressure campaign that led Kremlin officials to cave in and allow the funeral to take place.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it uses sensationalism by describing Navalny as a 'firebrand protest leader' and saying that his death was an 'unexplained tragedy'. This implies that he was killed or died of natural causes without providing any evidence to support this claim. Secondly, the article quotes people expressing their grief over Navalny's death but also mentions some who are happy about it. For example, one person is quoted as saying 'I am glad he is dead'. This contradicts the overall tone of the article and creates a false impression that there was widespread support for his death. Thirdly, the article uses selective reporting by focusing on Navalny's funeral service while ignoring other aspects of his life and work. For example, it does not mention any of his political achievements or contributions to Russian society.
One person quoted in the article says they are happy that Navalny is dead, which contradicts the overall tone of the piece and creates a false impression about public opinion.
The article describes Navalny as a 'firebrand protest leader', which is an exaggeration that creates a false impression about him.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the death of Alexei Navalny as a 'final goodbye' and a 'tragic moment'. They also use an appeal to authority by stating that Mark Galotti, head of Mayak Intelligence consultancy, said that despite the intimidatory police presence and increasing thuggery of the state, thousands of Muscovites came out to say their farewells. The author uses dichotomous depiction when describing Navalny as a 'firebrand protest leader' with a bullhorn and then later as an opposition leader making heart gestures in court. Additionally, there are examples of inflammatory rhetoric used by the mourners such as chanting that Putin is a killer.
The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the death of Alexei Navalny
The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Mark Galotti said...
The author uses dichotomous depiction when describing Navalny as a 'firebrand protest leader' with a bullhorn and then later as an opposition leader making heart gestures in court.
Examples of inflammatory rhetoric used by the mourners such as chanting that Putin is a killer.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains multiple examples of religious bias. The author uses phrases such as 'a final confirmation' and 'see him to his final journey', which are heavily influenced by Christian beliefs. Additionally, the use of a traditional adornment for those who lived a righteous life is also indicative of religious bias.
a government critic whose face was splashed with green dye by an attacker, which he joked turned him into the Hulk. A smiling political prisoner making a heart with his hands as he gestured to his wife in a defendant's cage in court.
Navalny had often urged Russians never to give up.
Only a select few were allowed to pay their respects inside the Church of the Icon of the Mother of God Soothe My Sorrows, where Navalny's casket lay surrounded by candles. Thousands more lined the streets outside the church and towards the graveyard where Navalny's body was laid to rest.
Thousands of people defied the Kremlin and fears of a police crackdown to gather for the funeral of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny.
Russians throughout Russia, not just in Moscow and St. Petersburg, showed up at protests against Vladimir Putin despite heavy police presence aimed at deterring them.
Kremlin officials wanted to put Navalny's family through a world of hurt by keeping his body for more than a week before ultimately releasing it to his mother.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that thousands of people defied the Kremlin and fears of a police crackdown to gather for Navalny's funeral. However, this statement is misleading as it implies that these were peaceful protests when in reality there was heavy police presence aimed at deterring them. Secondly, the article quotes Dan Storyev stating that Russians throughout Russia continued protesting after the full-scale invasion and after ramping up repressions which contradicts official statements from Russian authorities about a decrease in political dissent following these events. Lastly, the author claims that Kremlin officials wanted to put Navalny's family through a world of hurt by keeping his body for more than a week before ultimately releasing it to his mother. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence and may be an attempt at sensationalism.
Thousands defied the Kremlin and fears of a police crackdown to gather for Navalny's funeral.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the opinions of experts and organizations without providing any evidence or context for their claims. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing Russian opposition protests as a 'stunning display of defiance' and accusing Kremlin officials of trying to pressure Navalny's family into agreeing to a secret burial. The article also contains an example of dichotomous depiction by stating that Russians throughout Russia were willing to show up for the funeral despite fears of police crackdown, which implies that there are only two options: either they showed up or they didn't. Finally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing Alexei Navalny as a 'larger-than-life symbol', which is not an objective statement and could be seen as an appeal to emotion.
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes those who disagree with Navalny's views, such as referring to them as 'horrific cost'. Additionally, the use of phrases like 'full-scale invasion' and 'ramping up repressions' implies a political agenda.
It's quite clear that the Kremlin still is concerned about public attention within Russia and outside of Russia.
Kremlin officials wanted to put Navalny's family through a world of hurt. They started doing this for a while now. This didn't start with them murdering Alexei Navalny.
The important thing to know is that, despite the horrific cost of actually showing up on the streets — you can be beaten, you can be imprisoned for many years — Russians throughout Russia, not just in Moscow and St. Petersburg, they were still willing to show up because they despise the war and they despise what the authoritarian Kremlin regime has done to Alexei Navalny.
