NBA Power Rankings for 2023-24 Season: Boston Celtics Still on Top, Minnesota Timberwolves Surge to Second Place

Indianapolis, Indiana United States of America
Denver Nuggets came out of the break in third place but are now three games behind first place.
The Boston Celtics remain atop the rankings, with Minnesota Timberwolves surging to second place following a strong performance during All-Star weekend.
The NBA Power Rankings for the 2023-24 season have been updated after the All-Star break.
NBA Power Rankings for 2023-24 Season: Boston Celtics Still on Top, Minnesota Timberwolves Surge to Second Place

The NBA Power Rankings for the 2023-24 season have been updated after the All-Star break. The Boston Celtics remain atop the rankings, with Minnesota Timberwolves surging to second place following a strong performance during All-Star weekend. Denver Nuggets came out of the break in third place but are now three games behind first place.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

95%

Doubts
  • It's possible that other teams could make significant improvements and move up the rankings as well.

Sources

82%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Power Rankings, Week 18: Celtics lead, Wolves surge after All-Star weekend

NBA.com Thursday, 22 February 2024 00:41
  • Unique Points
    • Boston holds the top spot in Power Rankings
    • Minnesota is on the rise to No. 2 after NBA All-Star 2024
    • Jayson Tatum, Jaylen Brown and the Celtics remain on top after All-Star weekend
    • Denver Nuggets came out of the All-Star break with a four-game lead in the loss column atop Western Conference but now three games behind first place Minnesota Timberwolves
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown remain on top after All-Star weekend when they were not mentioned as being part of the Celtics' success during the break. Secondly, it states that Denver Nuggets had a four-game lead atop the Western Conference last year but fails to mention their record or any other relevant information about their performance leading up to and during the All-Star break. Thirdly, it mentions several teams struggling in different ways without providing specific details on why they are struggling or what they need to do differently. Lastly, it includes a section comparing East vs West which is not related to the power rankings at all.
    • Denver Nuggets had a four-game lead atop the Western Conference last year but fails to mention their record or any other relevant information about their performance leading up to and during the All-Star break
    • Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown remain on top after All-Star weekend
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several logical fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Denver Nuggets came out of the All-Star break with a four-game lead in the loss column atop the Western Conference last year and assuming it will happen again this year.
    • The West is 167-127 (.568) against the East in interconference games after going 8-1 last week.
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains a statement that implies the defending champions are struggling to keep up with the first-place team. This is an example of monetary bias as it suggests that money or resources have played a role in their success.
    • > The defending champs come out of the break three games in the loss column behind...
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication

    80%

    The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
    (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

    A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

    NBA Power Rankings: Durant drives Suns in the West and Beverley begins with the Bucks

    NBA Nuggets (Mar 7, 2024) Game Recap - ESPN Issue of the Site: NBA Issues Of The Site. This is a sample name for this site. Unknown ESPN Thursday, 22 February 2024 00:43
    • Unique Points
      • In the West, the battle for the No. 1 seed is closer than ever with teams jostling for position and trying to hold on to a play-in spot.
      • The San Antonio Spurs did not acquire a significant point guard before the trade deadline to pair with Victor Wembanyama and will focus on his development for the rest of the season.
    • Accuracy
      • The battle for the No. 1 seed is closer than ever with teams jostling for position and trying to hold on to a play-in spot.
      • In the East, Boston Celtics are currently in first place and have separated themselves significantly from other teams in their conference.
    • Deception (50%)
      The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents the NBA Power Rankings as if they are objective and based on a panel's analysis of each team's performance. However, ESPN has a vested interest in promoting their own content and increasing viewership for their website. This means that they may be biased towards certain teams or players to drive traffic to their site. Secondly, the article uses sensationalism by highlighting the close race for the No. 1 seed in the West and emphasizing how significant it is that Boston has separated themselves from other teams in the East. Thirdly, ESPN quotes sources without disclosing them or providing any context about their credibility or bias.
      • The article presents NBA Power Rankings as if they are objective
      • ESPN quotes sources without disclosing them or providing any context about their credibility or bias
      • ESPN uses sensationalism to highlight close race for No. 1 seed in West and emphasize Boston's separation from other teams in East
    • Fallacies (85%)
      The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the panel is ranking all teams from top to bottom and providing their reasoning for each team's position. This statement implies that the panel has expertise in basketball analysis and should be trusted as a source of information, but it does not provide any evidence or credentials to support this claim. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that teams are
      • The Kristaps Porzingis era in Boston continues to go swimmingly,
    • Bias (85%)
      The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'the Kristaps Porzingis era in Boston continues to go swimmingly' which implies that Porzingis is a positive addition to the team despite his history with injuries and off-court issues. Additionally, there are multiple references to teams trying to hold on to a play-in spot, implying that these teams may not have enough money or resources compared to other teams in the league.
      • teams trying to hold on a play-in spot
        • the Kristaps Porzingis era in Boston continues to go swimmingly
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        75%

        The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
        (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

        A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

        NBA Power Rankings 2023-24: Warriors, Bucks have most to prove post-All-Star break

        NBC Bay Area News Sanjesh Singh Thursday, 22 February 2024 00:44
        • Unique Points
          • The NBA season is in its business stretch with the All-Star game over.
          • Teams have different goals for the end of the season based on their standing, such as developing young players or ending with momentum for a title run.
          • The Detroit Pistons are currently at the bottom of the rankings but may improve due to moves made during the trade deadline and Monty Williams' efforts in sorting things out.
        • Accuracy
          No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
        • Deception (30%)
          The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that there are different goals for different teams based on certain criteria such as making the playoffs or developing youngsters and hoping for a better draft pick. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence presented in the article.
          • The article does not provide any specific examples of how each team's goal differs from another.
        • Fallacies (75%)
          The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the NBA Power Rankings are a reliable source of information without providing any evidence or reasoning for this claim.
          • >Detroit been at the bottom for as long as we can remember this season, but somehow there's a chance it can rise up a spot in the next few weeks. They did well at the deadline to move on from Bojan Bogdanovic and Alec Burks, so now it's about Monty Williams sorting things out to provide optimism for the future.<br>The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Detroit has a chance of rising up in the rankings without providing any evidence or reasoning.
          • The Wizards have lost eight in a row and are in danger of becoming the league's worst team record-wise. And that's with Detroit's record losing streak earlier this season.<br>The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Washington is likely to become the league's worst team without providing any evidence or reasoning.
          • San Antonio didn’t acquire a needle-moving point guard to pair with Victor Wembanyama, so the rest of the season will be about his development and hoping for the best with its three projected first-round picks.<br>The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that San Antonio's lack of a needle-moving point guard is significant without providing any evidence or reasoning.
        • Bias (85%)
          The author has a clear bias towards the NBA and its teams. The article is about power rankings of NBA teams post-All Star break and it's written in an enthusiastic tone with phrases like 'business stretch', 'marquee goals', etc.
          • [
            • []
              • ]
              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication

              76%

              The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
              (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

              A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

              NBA Power Rankings: Dominant Celtics on top coming out of All-Star break

              The Athletic Zach Harper Tuesday, 20 February 2024 00:00
              • Unique Points
                • The NBA Power Rankings were updated coming out of the All-Star break
                • Teams were ranked based on their performance in each quarter, including clutch time
                • There are seven tiers of teams: Incomprehensibly bad, Not tanking but maybe someday, Looking to make the Play-In, Play-In Tournament teams or better, Playoff teams, On the brink of contention and Contenders
              • Accuracy
                No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
              • Deception (50%)
                The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that teams only played a couple of games last week as everyone prepared for All-Star Weekend. However, this statement is false as there were multiple games played during that time period.
                • All-Star Weekend means we don't have a ton of games to influence the Power Rankings.
              • Fallacies (100%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication
              • Bias (85%)
                The author has a clear bias towards the Boston Celtics and their dominance in the NBA. The article is titled 'NBA Power Rankings: Dominant Celtics on top coming out of All-Star break' which immediately implies that they are at the top. Additionally, throughout the article, there are multiple instances where Harper praises and highlights specific aspects of the Celtics such as their defense and offensive prowess.
                • Harper mentions multiple times how impressed he is with the Celtics, specifically praising their defense and offensive prowess.
                  • The title 'NBA Power Rankings: Dominant Celtics on top coming out of All-Star break' immediately implies that they are at the top
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                    Zach Harper has a conflict of interest with the NBA Power Rankings as he is an employee of The Athletic which covers the league extensively.
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                      Zach Harper has a conflict of interest on the topic of NBA Power Rankings as he is an employee of The Athletic which covers the league. He also has a personal relationship with Celtics players and may be biased towards them.