Samantha Camenzind received a marriage proposal from her boyfriend, Cole Bures, during a deer hunting trip.
The couple, who have been dating for three years, share a love for hunting and consume the meat of their kills.
The proposal came after Camenzind shot a large buck, which the couple had previously spotted on a trail camera.
The proposal was captured by a professional photographer.
Samantha Camenzind, a Nebraska woman, experienced a unique marriage proposal from her boyfriend, Cole Bures, during a deer hunting trip. The couple, who have been dating for three years, share a passion for hunting and consume the meat of their kills. The proposal came after Camenzind shot a large buck, which the couple had previously spotted on a trail camera. Bures allowed Camenzind to take the first shot at the buck, and after she successfully shot it, he proposed to her during a photo shoot with the deer. The proposal was captured by a professional photographer. Bures got the idea for the proposal from a friend who had done something similar. The couple is considering a wedding date next fall, outside of hunting season.
The couple's shared love for hunting and the unique proposal has garnered attention. The event was a celebration of both their love for each other and their shared interest in hunting. The couple's story serves as a reminder of the unique and personal ways in which people can express their love and commitment to each other, even in the context of a shared hobby or interest.
100%
No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication
95%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
95%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
95%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
95%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
96%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
95%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
The couple, who have been dating for three years, share a love for hunting and consume the meat of their kills. The proposal was captured by a professional photographer.
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
96%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
95%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
The proposal came after Camenzind shot a large buck, which the couple had previously spotted on a trail camera.
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
96%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
90%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
Bures got the idea for the proposal from a friend who had done something similar.
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)