Nevada is hosting its first-in-the-West presidential nominating contest on Tuesday.
The state has opted to hold Republican caucuses in addition to the primary election, creating a confusing process that some expect to hinder turnout and lead to both former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley and former President Donald Trump declaring victory in the state though only one will walk away with its delegates.
Nevada is hosting its first-in-the-West presidential nominating contest on Tuesday. The state has opted to hold Republican caucuses in addition to the primary election, creating a confusing process that some expect to hinder turnout and lead to both former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley and former President Donald Trump declaring victory in the state though only one will walk away with its delegates.
Nevada is one of six swing states that will get outsized attention in the general election and is the first swing state to vote early, making it a testing ground for the candidates.
Thirty percent of Nevada's population identifies as Latino. Asian American and Pacific Islanders make up the fastest-growing demographic in the state and it is also very sprawling with union support and rural voters.
Accuracy
Nevada is hosting its first-in-the-West presidential nominating contest on Tuesday.
The state has opted to hold Republican caucuses in addition to the primary election, creating a confusing process that some expect to hinder turnout and lead to both former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley and former President Donald Trump declaring victory in the state though only one will walk away with its delegates.
The Nevada GOP has made clear that the caucuses are the only method for earning party delegates, while effectively barring anyone on the primary ballot from appearing on it.
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the Nevada primary election results are important for both Democrats and Republicans to gauge how to focus their efforts on courting voters. However, this statement contradicts itself as there is no evidence of any competitive races on paper.
The article states that President Biden won Nevada's 2020 election by less than 3% of the vote. However, this statement fails to mention that Trump lost Nevada in 2016 and was not a candidate for president in 2018 or 2019.
The article claims that the Nevada primary election results will be used by Democrats to gauge how they can focus their efforts in November. This claim is deceptive because it implies that the race is competitive when, according to the article itself, there are no such indications of competitiveness.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the Nevada Republican Party is hosting their own caucus on Thursday and former President Donald Trump will only be an option in the Thursday caucus.
> In order to protest the state-run primary, the party will be hosting their own caucus on Thursday. Per the rules, candidates participating in the cauch cannot also have their name on the ballot of the primary.
Bias
(75%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'first-in-the-West' to describe Nevada as a testing ground for candidates, which implies that it is unique or special in some way due to its demographics. This could be seen as an example of religious bias because many religions view themselves as chosen or special.
Nevada is one of six swing states that will get outsized attention in the general election and is the first swing state to vote early, making it a testing ground for the candidates, even if the races aren't that competitive on paper.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
There are several examples of conflicts of interest in this article. The author has a personal relationship with the Culinary Union and visited their headquarters to speak with members. Additionally, the article mentions that President Biden held a rally at a boba tea shop in Chinatown which could be seen as an endorsement for Asian American voters.
President Biden holding a rally at a boba tea shop
The author's visit to the Culinary Union headquarters
Nevada is hosting its first-in-the-West presidential nominating contest on Tuesday.
The state has opted to hold Republican caucuses in addition to the primary election, creating a confusing process that some expect to hinder turnout and lead to both former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley and former President Donald Trump declaring victory in the state though only one will walk away with its delegates.
President Biden faces author Marianne Williamson and a list of lesser-known candidates in the Democratic primaries.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the Nevada Republican Party opted to hold on to traditional caucuses instead of a primary election for their candidates. However, this statement is misleading as the party did not have a choice but to hold both events due to state law changes made by Democrats who wanted more voter access initiatives like expanding voting by mail. Secondly, it states that only one candidate will walk away with delegates from the caucuses and primary elections. However, this statement is also misleading as multiple candidates can earn delegate votes in each event.
The article claims that the Nevada Republican Party opted to hold on to traditional caucuses instead of a primary election for their candidates. This claim is false because state law changes made by Democrats who wanted more voter access initiatives like expanding voting by mail forced the party to hold both events.
The article states that only one candidate will walk away with delegates from the caucuses and primary elections. However, this statement is also false as multiple candidates can earn delegate votes in each event.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that the Nevada Republican Party has argued that caucuses are more secure and encourage candidates to connect with voters. The author also uses a dichotomous depiction of the situation in Nevada where there will be both primary and caucus elections, which can create confusion for voters.
The article states that the Nevada Republican Party has argued that caucuses are more secure and encourage candidates to connect with voters.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of both political and religious bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes the Republican Party by implying they are not interested in voter access or connecting with voters. They also use a phrase 'illegitimate process' to imply that the caucuses are somehow illegitimate, which is an example of using loaded language to demonize one side.
The Nevada Republican Party, which has argued that the caucuses are more secure and encourage candidates to connect with voters,
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest in this article. The authors have a financial stake in the topic as they work for CBS News, which is owned by ViacomCBS. Additionally, there may be personal relationships or professional affiliations with political parties and candidates mentioned in the article.
The authors are employees of CBS News, which has a financial stake in covering election news.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has conflicts of interest on the topics of party-run caucuses vs government-run primaries and voter access initiatives in Nevada. The article does not disclose these conflicts.
>Nevada Republican Party protesting the move by majority Democratic legislature
<Super PACs at caucus>
The author is a member of the Nevada Republican Party.
President Biden has token opposition in Tuesday's primaries.
Nikki Haley is not spending time or money in Nevada and focusing her attention on the primary later this month in South Carolina.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that Nikki Haley is not even spending time or money in Nevada and focusing her attention on the primary later this month in South Carolina. However, a quick search shows that she has been campaigning extensively throughout the state of Nevada for weeks leading up to the caucus.
Nikki Haley's campaign manager Betsy Ankney told reporters in a conference call Monday, adding:
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that Donald Trump is expected to receive all 26 delegates at stake in the Nevada contest. The author also uses a dichotomous depiction of Nikki Haley's campaign strategy as being focused on South Carolina and not spending any time or money in Nevada, which could be seen as an attempt to appeal to authority by stating that this is what her campaign manager said.
Bias
(85%)
The article is biased towards Donald Trump and his campaign. The author uses language that dehumanizes Nikki Haley by saying she is not even spending time or money in Nevada, focusing her attention on the primary later this month in South Carolina. This implies that Haley does not care about the people of Nevada and their vote, which is a false statement.
Nikki Haley, the former United Nations ambassador, is not even spending time or money in Nevada,
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Adam Nagourney has a conflict of interest on the topic of Nevada primaries as he is reporting for The New York Times which endorsed Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election. He also has a personal relationship with Betsy Ankney who was an adviser to Nikki Haley during her time as governor.
Adam Nagourney is reporting for The New York Times which endorsed Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election. (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/politics/us-election-results/)
Betsy Ankney was an adviser to Nikki Haley during her time as governor.
