New CDC Rules for Dog Importation: Keeping America Rabies-Free

Not applicable, Not applicable United States of America
Dogs entering the US must be healthy, at least 6 months old, microchipped, and have a completed CDC Dog Import Form.
Four cases of rabid dogs entering the US since 2015 and concerns over fraudulent documentation.
New CDC rules for dog importation aim to keep America rabies-free.
Rabies was eliminated in dogs within the US in 2007 but unvaccinated canines can still contract it from wildlife.
These regulations apply to all dogs including those born in the US but returning from abroad.
New CDC Rules for Dog Importation: Keeping America Rabies-Free

In an effort to prevent the spread of rabies in the United States, new rules have been implemented by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for bringing dogs into the country. These regulations aim to keep America free of canine rabies, a viral disease that ravages the nervous system and is often fatal in animals and humans.

Effective August 1, all dogs entering the US must meet certain requirements. They must appear healthy upon arrival, be at least six months old, have a microchip implanted under their skin for identification purposes, and possess a CDC Dog Import Form that has been completed online two to ten days before arrival.

These new rules apply to all dogs entering the US, including those born in the country but returning from abroad. The suspension of importation of dogs from over 100 countries where rabies is still prevalent will expire when these regulations take effect.

Rabies was eliminated in dogs within the United States in 2007; however, unvaccinated canines can still contract the disease from rabid wildlife such as raccoons, skunks, or bats. Dogs were once common carriers of the rabies virus in America but were eliminated through vaccinations during the 1970s.

Four cases of dogs with rabies have been identified entering the US since 2015. The CDC is concerned that more might make it through, especially given an increase in fraudulent documentation and puppies denied entry due to insufficient vaccination.

These new rules are a response to these challenges and aim to strengthen the existing regulations last updated in 1956. They address the growing number of people traveling internationally with their pets, as well as rescue groups and breeders setting up operations overseas.

Angela Passman, owner of a Dallas company that helps people move their pets country-to-country, supports these new rules. She acknowledges that they may require more work from pet owners but ultimately believe the end result is beneficial.

However, Jennifer Skiff from Animal Wellness Action argues that some of the changes are unwarranted and too costly for organizations importing animals on behalf of diplomats and military personnel. She believes these new rules could force some owners to leave their dogs behind.



Confidence

91%

Doubts
  • Are there any recent studies or data that suggest these new regulations will significantly reduce the number of rabid dogs entering the US?
  • Is there evidence that fraudulent documentation is a major issue in dog importation?

Sources

99%

  • Unique Points
    • New government rules require all dogs entering the US to be at least 6 months old, microchipped, and vaccinated against rabies.
    • Dogs must complete a new CDC import form and there may be additional restrictions based on where the dog was in the previous six months.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (95%)
    The article contains some instances of appeals to authority and dichotomous depictions, but overall the author's assertions are factual and do not contain any egregious fallacies. The author quotes experts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to provide context and background information on the new rules for bringing dogs into the U.S., making this an appeal to authority. However, this is a valid use of an appeal to authority as it comes from a recognized expert in the field. The article also presents two opposing viewpoints on the new rules, one from Emily Pieracci, a rabies expert at the CDC who supports the new rules and another from Jennifer Skiff, who works for Animal Wellness Action and believes some of the changes are unwarranted. This dichotomous depiction is not fallacious as it accurately represents different perspectives on the issue.
    • ][The new rules require all dogs entering the U.S. to be at least 6 months, old enough to be vaccinated if required and for the shots to take effect; have a microchip placed under their skin with a code that can be used to verify rabies vaccination; and have completed a new CDC import form.][] Emily Pieracci, a rabies expert at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention who was involved in drafting the updated regulations, said
    • []Some of the changes are unwarranted and too costly.[] Jennifer Skiff, who works for Animal Wellness Action, a Washington group focused on preventing animal cruelty that helps organizations import animals, said
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

100%

  • Unique Points
    • The CDC issued new rules aimed at preventing dogs with rabies from coming into the United States.
    • All dogs entering the U.S. must appear healthy, be at least six months old, receive a microchip, and their owner must verify either they have a valid rabies vaccine or have not been in a country where rabies is endemic in the last six months.
    • Dogs coming from a country that is considered at high risk for rabies and who received a rabies vaccine from another country must meet additional criteria, including getting a blood test before leaving the other country to show immunity against rabies, physical examination upon arrival, and getting a U.S. rabies vaccine.
    • If the dog doesn’t have proof of immunity through blood tests, it must be quarantined for 28 days.
    • Rabies was eliminated in dogs in the United States in 2007; however, unvaccinated canines can still contract the disease from rabid wildlife such as raccoons, skunks or bats.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

99%

  • Unique Points
    • The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has updated regulations for bringing dogs into the United States in an effort to keep the country free of canine rabies.
    • , Starting August 1, all dogs entering the US must appear healthy upon arrival, be at least 6 months old, be microchipped and have a CDC Dog Import Form receipt that was filled out online two to 10 days before arrival.
    • Dog rabies was eliminated in the United States in 2007, but the virus remains endemic in over 100 countries.
    • Unvaccinated dogs can still contract the disease from wildlife in the US, where rabies is mostly found in wild animals such as bats, raccoons, skunks and foxes.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (95%)
    There are a few informal fallacies present in this article. The author uses an appeal to authority from the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) to support the new rules without providing counter-opinions or evidence. Additionally, there is a dichotomous depiction of the new rules as either an overreach or necessary for public health, without exploring nuanced perspectives. Lastly, there are inflammatory rhetorical devices such as using phrases like 'overreach' and 'excessive and costly requirement' to describe the new rules.
    • . . . the CDC is mandating serology titers.
    • Jennifer Skiff, director of international at the animal advocacy group Animal Wellness Action, called the new rules an overreach.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

100%

  • Unique Points
    • Dogs must complete a new CDC import form.
    • Rabies is a viral disease typically transmitted through biting that ravages the nervous system and is often fatal in animals and humans. Once symptoms begin, rabies has no cure.
    • The suspension of importation of all dogs from more than 100 countries where rabies is still a problem will expire when the updated regulation goes into effect on August 1, 2024.
    • Dogs were once common carriers of the rabies virus in the US but the type that normally circulates in dogs was eliminated through vaccinations in the 1970s.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

100%

  • Unique Points
    • Dogs coming into the US from other countries must be at least six months old and microchipped to help prevent the spread of rabies.
    • New government rules require vaccination for dogs that have been in countries where rabies is common.
    • The update applies to dogs brought in by breeders or rescue groups as well as pets traveling with their US owners.
    • Four rabid dogs have been identified entering the US since 2015, and officials worried more might get through.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication