New Editors Appointed at The Washington Post: Matt Murray from Wall Street Journal and Robert Winnett from Telegraph Media Group Take Over

Washington D.C., District of Columbia United States of America
Both editors have a history of successful investigative journalism and Pulitzer Prize wins
Matt Murray appointed as new editor-in-chief of The Washington Post from Wall Street Journal
New direction expected with shorter, spicier content and restructuring into three newsrooms: Core (reporting team), Opinion, and Service/Social
Robert Winnett appointed as new deputy editor from Telegraph Media Group
Will Lewis, publisher and CEO, made the appointments after Sally Buzbee's exit in June 2024
New Editors Appointed at The Washington Post: Matt Murray from Wall Street Journal and Robert Winnett from Telegraph Media Group Take Over

Two prominent journalists, Matt Murray from the Wall Street Journal and Robert Winnett from Telegraph Media Group, have been appointed as new editors at The Washington Post by its publisher and CEO, Will Lewis. The appointments come after the sudden exit of Sally Buzbee in June 2024.

Matt Murray spent 29 years at the Wall Street Journal, serving as editor-in-chief for the last five years before leaving in 2023. He was praised by his colleagues for his deep involvement in investigations and championing ambitious journalism. During his tenure, he urged staff to survey financial disclosures of all federal employees following a successful investigation on conflicts of interest among federal judges, which won a Pulitzer Prize in 2023.

Robert Winnett has spent his career in Britain and is currently the deputy editor of Telegraph Media Group. He played a pivotal role in investigations into the 'cash for honors' scandal and misuse of expense accounts by members of Parliament. Winnett also oversaw a leak to The Telegraph of more than 100,000 private WhatsApp messages between government ministers during the covid-19 pandemic.

The appointments are expected to bring a new direction to The Washington Post, with some speculating that the newspaper's content will become shorter and spicier with a sharper approach to news reporting. Lewis has also restructured the paper into three newsrooms: Core (reporting team), Opinion, and Service/Social (focused on audience building).

The changes come as The Washington Post faces significant financial losses, having lost over $70 million in 2023 and experiencing a 50% decrease in audience during that period. Staff buyouts were implemented to prevent mass layoffs, with several top editors among those who took the buyouts. Sour mood has reportedly been present in The Washington Post newsroom since Buzbee took over as top editor.

Despite the changes, some staff members remain skeptical and raised concerns about strategy, timing, and cronyism during a meeting with Lewis on Monday.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

91%

Doubts
  • Are there any potential conflicts of interest or biases that could impact Murray and Winnett's reporting?
  • Is the reported shift in content strategy a response to financial losses or audience decline, or both?

Sources

77%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

WaPo boss sounds alarm over dwindling audience in heated staff meeting: 'People are not reading your stuff'

Fox News Media Joseph Wulfsohn Tuesday, 04 June 2024 12:47
  • Unique Points
    • Washington Post publisher and CEO William Lewis addressed the staff in a tense meeting on Monday.
    • Sally Buzbee, executive editor of The Washington Post, was abruptly let go from her position effective immediately.
    • Matt Murray, former Wall Street Journal editor-in-chief, is expected to replace Buzbee as temporary replacement for the 2024 election cycle.
    • The Washington Post is being restructured into three newsrooms: Core (reporting team), Opinion, and Service/Social (focused on audience building).
    • William Lewis warned the newsroom about the need for change due to large financial losses and decreasing audience.
    • The Washington Post lost over $70 million in 2023 and had lost 50% of its audience during that period.
    • Staff buyouts were implemented in the final quarter of 2023 to prevent mass layoffs, with several top editors among those who took the buyouts.
    • Sour mood has reportedly been present in The Washington Post newsroom since Buzbee took over as top editor.
  • Accuracy
    • Sally Buzbee was abruptly let go from her position effective immediately.
    • Matt Murray is expected to replace Buzbee as temporary replacement for the 2024 election cycle.
  • Deception (30%)
    The author makes editorializing statements about the current state of The Washington Post and its audience, implying that the paper is losing money and has lost half of its audience in recent years. However, no specific data or sources are provided to support these claims.
    • > By creating three, strong, journalism functions we are taking a definitive step away from the ‘one size fits all’ approach and moving towards meeting our audiences where they are.
    • > We are losing large amounts of money. Your audience has halved in recent years. People are not reading your stuff.
  • Fallacies (80%)
    The author makes an appeal to authority when quoting Lewis stating 'We are losing large amounts of money. Your audience has halved in recent years. People are not reading your stuff.' This statement is used to justify the need for change and restructuring within the Washington Post.
    • 'We are losing large amounts of money. Your audience has halved in recent years. People are not reading your stuff.',
  • Bias (80%)
    The author, Joseph Wulfsohn, states that 'People are not reading your stuff' in reference to the Washington Post. This is an example of monetary bias as it implies that the lack of readership equates to a financial loss and a need for change.
    • We are losing large amounts of money. Your audience has halved in recent years. People are not reading your stuff.
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication

    97%

    The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
    (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

    A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

    Washington Post Newsroom Reacts to Sally Buzbee Exit

    The Name Of The NZ Prefix. I PWA NZI.P.Was Dropped. Benjamin Mullin, Monday, 03 June 2024 15:51
    • Unique Points
      • Sally Buzbee chafed at a major reorganization by the newspaper's chief executive, Will Lewis.
      • Sally Buzbee told managers on a conference call that she couldn’t continue working under this new structure.
      • Ms. Buzbee was asked to run one of the newly created divisions but chafed at the idea.
    • Accuracy
      • Sally Buzbee was asked to run one of the newly created divisions but chafed at the idea.
      • Matt Murray is expected to replace Buzbee as temporary replacement for the 2024 election cycle.
      • The Washington Post lost over $70 million in 2023 and had lost 50% of its audience during that period.
    • Deception (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Fallacies (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Bias (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication

    100%

    The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
    (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

    A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

    New Post editors Matt Murray, Robert Winnett praised for tough journalism

    The Fixing Site: A Summary of the Article. Jeremy Barr, Monday, 03 June 2024 21:51
    • Unique Points
      • Matt Murray spent 29 years at the Wall Street Journal, the last five as editor in chief before leaving in 2023.
      • Robert Winnett is deputy editor of Telegraph Media Group and has spent his career in Britain.
      • Murray was praised by former colleagues for his deep involvement in investigations and being a champion for ambitious journalism.
      • Murray urged staff to survey financial disclosures of all federal employees after successful investigation on conflicts of interest among federal judges, which won a Pulitzer Prize in 2023.
      • Winnett played pivotal role in investigations into ‘cash for honors’ scandal and misuse of expense accounts by members of Parliament.
      • Winnett oversaw leak to Telegraph of more than 100,000 private WhatsApp messages between government ministers during covid-19 pandemic.
    • Accuracy
      No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
    • Deception (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Fallacies (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Bias (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication

    76%

    The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
    (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

    A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

    New CEO of 'The Washington Post' puts former colleagues in power

    National Public Radio (NPR) David Folkenflik Monday, 03 June 2024 00:00
    • Unique Points
      • In November, another former colleague will permanently take the helm of the newsroom.
      • Murray was praised by former colleagues for his deep involvement in investigations and being a champion for ambitious journalism.
      • Winnett played a pivotal role in investigations into ‘cash for honors’ scandal and misuse of expense accounts by members of Parliament.
      • Winnett oversaw leak to Telegraph of more than 100,000 private WhatsApp messages between government ministers during covid-19 pandemic.
    • Accuracy
      • Will Lewis became publisher and CEO of The Washington Post in January.
      • Sally Buzbee was abruptly let go from her position as executive editor effective immediately.
      • The Washington Post lost over $70 million in 2023 and had lost 50% of its audience during that period.
    • Deception (30%)
      The article exhibits selective reporting and emotional manipulation. The author focuses on the fact that the new CEO, Will Lewis, has hired two former colleagues to high-ranking positions within The Washington Post newsroom. This is presented as a negative thing and implies cronyism. However, the article fails to mention that both of these individuals have impressive journalistic backgrounds and have made significant contributions to their respective fields. Additionally, the author uses emotional language when describing the staff's reaction to Lewis' decisions, implying that they are deeply skeptical and dismayed. This is an attempt to manipulate the reader's emotions.
      • It ran for about 40 minutes.
      • The publisher of The Washington Post introduced the paper’s new top editor – for the next few months – on Monday to a deeply skeptical staff that peppered him with questions about strategy, timing, and cronyism.
    • Fallacies (80%)
      The author makes an appeal to authority by mentioning the accomplishments and awards of Matt Murray and Rob Winnett. He also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the financial situation of The Washington Post and its audience.
      • “We are losing large amounts of money. Your audience is halved. People are not reading your stuff.”
      • “It needs turning around.”
      • “The cynical interpretation is that it sort of feels like you chose two of your buddies.”
    • Bias (80%)
      The author, David Folkenflik, demonstrates ideological bias by focusing on the fact that the new CEO of The Washington Post has hired former colleagues to fill key positions in the newsroom. He does not provide any context as to why these individuals were chosen or if they are qualified for their roles. Instead, he implies that this is a negative thing and suggests that it may be an example of cronyism.
      • Gone was the soothing, smooth presence during Lewis’ first meeting with colleagues last fall after his own appointment became public. Lewis instead frequently sounded defensive and combative.
        • It sort of feels like you chose two of your buddies.
          • The publisher of The Washington Post introduced the paper’s new top editor – for the next few months – on Monday to a deeply skeptical staff that peppered him with questions about strategy, timing, and cronyism.
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication

          80%

          The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
          (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

          A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

          The Rupert Murdoch-ization of the Washington Post

          Politico News Site Name: POLITICO Full Legal Name of News Site: Politico LLC Location of News Site: Washington D.C., USA Monday, 03 June 2024 00:00
          • Unique Points
            • Rupert Murdoch's team is being assembled to lead the Washington Post.
            • The new team members, including Matt Murray, Suzi Watford, Karl Wells and Martin Winnett have all worked with Rupert Murdoch before at either the Wall Street Journal or the UK Telegraph.
            • The changes are expected to make the newspaper’s content shorter and spicier with a sharper approach to news reporting.
            • Post owner Jeff Bezos is covering the paper’s losses which hit $77 million over the last year. He has reloaded the chambers for the paper’s next volleys, be it a Wall Street Journal-inspired smart tabloid or something else.
          • Accuracy
            • Matt Murray and Robert Winnett have been appointed as editors at The Washington Post.
            • William Lewis warned the newsroom about the need for change due to large financial losses and decreasing audience.
          • Deception (50%)
            The article makes editorializing statements about the expected changes to the Washington Post under new leadership. The author implies that these changes will result in a 'Wall Street Journal-ification and Rupert Murdoch-ization' of the paper, suggesting a negative outcome. This is an opinionated statement and an attempt to manipulate readers' emotions by implying that British leadership is inherently bad for the Post.
            • But it doesn’t take much in the way of divination to predict that the team Lewis has assembled will Wall Street Journal-ify and Rupert Murdoch-ize the Washington Post, and that the remodeled newspaper will be guided by British attitude and experience.
            • In addition to shorter articles, be on the lookout for spicier headlines that bring a sharper, intelligent approach to newspapering Murdoch applied to the Wall Street Journal.
          • Fallacies (85%)
            The author makes an appeal to authority by mentioning the track records of Lewis' new lieutenants and quoting Dick Tofel's opinion. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating 'Only a xenophobe would object to the Britification of the Post.'
            • Based on the lengthy track record of Lewis’ new lieutenants, look for the paper to abandon the flabby storytelling that plagues most of its A-section stories. In addition to shorter articles, be on the lookout for spicier headlines that bring a sharper, intelligent approach to newspapering Murdoch applied to the Wall Street Journal.
            • Many observers (including your narrator) predicted that Murdoch would apply his reverse-Midas touch to the Wall Street Journal with his tabloid ways and destroy one of America’s great newspapers when he bought it from the Bancroft family back in 2007. But he proved us wrong as he merely changed the paper into a tighter read, and edited it more for a general audience than a pure business one.
            • Only a xenophobe would object to the Britification of the Post.
          • Bias (95%)
            The article expresses a clear bias towards the hiring of British journalists and editors to lead the Washington Post. The author implies that this is a positive change and dismisses concerns about lack of diversity in leadership as unfounded.
            • But it doesn’t take much in the way of divination to predict that the team Lewis has assembled will Wall Street Journal-ify and Rupert Murdoch-ize the Washington Post, and that the remodeled newspaper will be guided by British attitude and experience.
              • Look for the paper to abandon the flabby storytelling that plagues most of its A-section stories. In addition to shorter articles, be on the lookout for spicier headlines that bring a sharper, intelligent approach to newspapering Murdoch applied to the Wall Street Journal.
                • None of the new Lewis crew seem to tilt that way, not even Murray when he ran the news pages of the Journal.
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication