New Gene Therapies and Innovative Approaches: Advancing Treatments for Sickle Cell Disease

Memphis, Tennessee, Tennessee United States of America
Governments and private sector must work together to ensure new treatments are accessible, effective, and equitable for all individuals affected by sickle cell disease.
Other innovative approaches for sickle cell disease treatment include stem cell transplants from umbilical cord blood and small molecules that modulate gene expression.
Sickle cell disease affects approximately 8 million people worldwide, including 100,000 in the US.
Traditional treatments for sickle cell disease include pain management strategies, blood transfusions, and bone marrow transplants.
Two gene therapies for sickle cell disease were approved by US regulators in fall 2023 using CRISPR medicine.
New Gene Therapies and Innovative Approaches: Advancing Treatments for Sickle Cell Disease

In the realm of sickle cell disease treatment, recent developments have emerged to provide hope for patients and their healthcare providers. The intended audience for this continuing medical education activity is hematologists, hematologist-oncologists, and other health care professionals involved in the management of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). The goal of this educational initiative is to address the latest advances in treatment options for individuals with SCD and how these treatments may benefit patients. Experts in the field will provide didactic presentations and panel discussions to address persisting challenges in SCD management, the burden of disease, and guide clinicians on integrating current and emerging management strategies into clinical practice to enhance patient care and quality of life measures.

Sickle cell disease is a genetic condition that affects approximately 8 million people worldwide, including 100,000 in the United States. The disease disproportionately affects individuals of African, South Asian, and Middle Eastern descent. SCD results in the production of abnormally shaped red blood cells that can cause anemia, episodes of extreme pain, blood vessel and organ damage, stroke risk and lower life expectancy. Traditionally, managing SCD has involved a multitude of treatments including pain management strategies, blood transfusions, and bone marrow transplants. However, these treatments have limitations and often fail to address the root cause of the disease.

Recently, two gene therapies for sickle cell disease were approved by US regulators in the fall of 2023. These therapies are hoped to provide a functional cure for SCD. The treatments involve using CRISPR medicine, a revolutionary gene-editing tool that has the potential to fix a range of debilitating genetic diseases, including Duchenne muscular dystrophy and cancer. While these new therapies offer great promise, they come with a high cost, with one therapy costing $2.2 million and the other $3.1 million. This raises questions about accessibility and equity in the distribution of these treatments, particularly for individuals from underrepresented communities who have historically faced disparities in healthcare.

In addition to gene therapies, other innovative approaches are being explored for SCD treatment. One such approach involves using stem cell transplants from umbilical cord blood. This method has shown promise in early-stage clinical trials and may provide a more accessible and affordable option for patients. Another promising avenue is the development of small molecules that can modulate the expression of genes associated with SCD, potentially leading to more targeted and effective treatments.

As researchers and healthcare professionals continue to explore new treatment options for sickle cell disease, it is crucial to consider the broader implications of these developments. Governments can steer funding toward interdisciplinary research projects that focus on more immediate benefits and encourage collaborations among biomedical scientists, social scientists, and people with the disease. The private sector must also take responsibility for creating an incentive to include people with a disease in innovation processes.

Ultimately, the goal is to develop treatments that are accessible, effective, and equitable for all individuals affected by sickle cell disease. This will require a coordinated effort from researchers, healthcare providers, governments, and patient advocates to ensure that innovative therapies reach those who need them most.

In conclusion, The development of new treatments for sickle cell disease offers hope for patients and their healthcare providers. While gene therapies represent a promising avenue for a functional cure, other innovative approaches, such as stem cell transplants from umbilical cord blood and small molecules that modulate gene expression, are also being explored. As researchers and healthcare professionals continue to explore new treatment options, it is crucial to consider the broader implications of these developments and ensure that innovative therapies are accessible, effective, and equitable for all individuals affected by sickle cell disease.



Confidence

95%

Doubts
  • Are there any long-term side effects associated with these treatments?
  • How accessible and affordable will these treatments be for individuals from underrepresented communities?
  • What is the current success rate of these new gene therapies for sickle cell disease?

Sources

95%

  • Unique Points
    • A. was experiencing a sickle cell crisis and was told she couldn’t have her usual pain medication due to her pregnancy.
    • She was given Tylenol instead, which she felt was inadequate for treating her pain.
    • Her blood pressure was spiking and if left untreated, the crisis could lead to a seizure.
    • The cells in A.’s blood vessels were contorted into rigid crescents causing microscopic gridlock and tissue death.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (80%)
    The author uses emotional manipulation by describing the pain and fear experienced by the subject A. in detail to elicit an emotional response from the reader. The author also uses selective reporting by only mentioning that Tylenol was offered as a pain reliever instead of other options, implying that it was an inadequate solution for A's crisis.
    • That she couldn’t have the pain medicine she usually got for a sickle cell crisis because she was six weeks pregnant, but she could have Tylenol.
    • Taking a Tylenol was like using a squirt gun against a house fire.
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

100%

  • Unique Points
    • Whitney Carter is a sickle cell disease patient.
    • The doctor suggested tying Whitney Carter’s tubes during her C-section to prevent future pregnancies.
    • Whitney Carter has a history of complications during pregnancy, including ruptured sac, early labor, and pain crises.
    • Carrying another child could pose risks for Whitney Carter due to her sickle cell disease and previous pregnancy complications.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

99%

  • Unique Points
    • BIO, a drug industry lobbying group, has experienced upheaval including having four CEOs in the past four years.
    • STAT's Chief Washington Correspondent Rachel Cohrs Zhang discusses the layoffs at BIO on The Readout LOUD podcast.
    • STAT reporter Eric Boodman investigates how Black women with sickle cell disease were coerced into getting sterilized in a new series of articles.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

86%

  • Unique Points
    • US regulators approved two gene therapies for sickle cell disease last fall
    • These treatments are hoped to provide a 'functional cure' for sickle cell disease
    • Sickle cell disease affects 8 million people worldwide, including 100,000 in the US
    • People with sickle cell disease mostly affect people of African, South Asian and Middle Eastern descent
    • Governments can steer funding toward interdisciplinary research projects that focus on more immediate benefits and encourage collaborations among biomedical scientists, social scientists, and people with the disease.
    • The private sector must take responsibility for creating an incentive to include people with a disease in innovation processes
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (50%)
    The article makes several statements that could be considered deceptive or misleading according to the analysis rules. The author uses emotional manipulation by describing the struggles and pain experienced by people with sickle cell disease, but then fails to provide any concrete solutions or actions being taken to address these issues. The author also engages in selective reporting by focusing on the high cost of gene therapies for sickle cell disease without mentioning that these therapies are potentially curative and could significantly improve the lives of those affected. Additionally, the author implies that reducing costs for these therapies will not make them more accessible, but does not provide any evidence or reasoning to support this claim. Lastly, the author makes several statements about the lack of care infrastructure and access to healthcare for people with sickle cell disease, but does not provide any specific examples or data to back up these claims.
    • People already struggle to get treatment for sickle cell disease, so reducing the cost of gene therapies will not make treatment any more accessible.
    • Many people hope that these treatments will provide a ‘functional cure’ for the genetic condition, which causes rigid, misshapen red blood cells that lead to anemia, episodes of extreme pain, blood vessel and organ damage, stroke risk and lower life expectancy.
    • Reducing costs for these therapies is important. It is unlikely to make life much better for most people with sickle cell and those with other genetic diseases, however.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (95%)
    The author expresses a clear bias towards addressing social and health challenges as innovation problems instead of just focusing on creating potentially lifesaving treatments. She argues that governments and innovators should focus on more than creating expensive treatments to advance equity, particularly for people with sickle cell disease who face barriers to care beyond cost. The author also criticizes the current prioritization of scientific and industrial priorities over the needs of individuals affected by a disease.
    • People already struggle to get treatment for sickle cell disease, so reducing the cost of gene therapies will not make treatment any more accessible.
      • Reducing costs for these therapies is important. It is unlikely to make life much better for most people with sickle cell and those with other genetic diseases, however.
        • They might also encourage collaborations across the clinical, social and basic research arms of the National Institutes of Health rather than defining research projects according to scientific or medical specialty?
          • What if governments must change who sets research agendas and how?
            • Yet immediately after the approvals, attention turned to the prohibitive cost of the treatments.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            100%

            • Unique Points
              • The intended audience for this continuing medical education activity is hematologists, hematologist-oncologists, and other health care professionals involved in the management of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD).
              • Describe the mechanisms of action of available/emerging treatments in SCD and the implications for patient outcomes.
              • Evaluate the latest advances in treatment options for patients with SCD and how patients may benefit.
              • Summarize how SCD treatment advances may impact current standard of care.
            • Accuracy
              No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
            • Deception (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Fallacies (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Bias (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication