New York Supreme Court Issues Gag Order on Trump in Campaign Finance Trial

Unique Points

• . The latest gag order imposed on Donald Trump was applauded by legal analyst Glenn Kirschner, who said he hopes it curtails the former president's "endlessly dangerous, violence-inspiring rhetoric.".
• New York State Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan on Tuesday imposed a gag order on the former president, limiting what he can say publicly about individuals related to the trial involving financial transactions from Trump's 2016 presidential campaign.
• Kirschner, a vocal Trump critic and former assistant U.S. attorney, weighed in on the former president's third gag order in a segment of his Justice Matters podcast
• Recently, Kirschner condemned Trump, the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, over his remarks at a rally where the former president said that if he loses in November, there will be a "bloodbath for the country."
• Tuesday's gag order came hours after Trump attacked Merchan and his daughter in a post on Truth Social, calling the judge a "certified Trump Hater."

Accuracy

• The former president's statements have induced fear and necessitated added security measures to protect his targets and investigate threats.
• Trump has repeatedly lashed out about the hush-money case.

Deception (80%)

• The author uses inflammatory language such as 'threatening', 'inflammatory', and 'denigrating' when describing Trump's statements which is an example of emotional manipulation.
• The title of the article misrepresents its content by suggesting that only a gag order has been issued when in fact other restrictions have also been put in place on Trump's speech. This is an example of sensationalism and deceptive language used to manipulate readers into believing something that is not entirely accurate.

Fallacies (85%)

• The article contains an example of a formal fallacy: Appeal to Authority.

Bias (85%)

• knowing Donald as well as I do, he will seek to defy the gag order by employing others within his circle to do his bidding
• President Trump's political opponents have, and will continue to, attack him based on this case
• The eve of trial is upon us

Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)

None Found At Time Of Publication

Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)

None Found At Time Of Publication

Unique Points

• . The latest gag order imposed on Donald Trump was applauded by legal analyst Glenn Kirschner, who said he hopes it curtails the former president's "endlessly dangerous, violence-inspiring rhetoric.".
• . New York State Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan on Tuesday imposed a gag order on the former president, limiting what he can say publicly about individuals related to the trial involving financial transactions from Trump's 2016 presidential campaign.
• Kirschner, a vocal Trump critic and former assistant U.S. attorney, weighed in on the former president's third gag order in a segment of his Justice Matters podcast
• . The eve of trial is upon us

Accuracy

• . Recently, Kirschner condemned Trump over his remarks at a rally where the former president said that if he loses in November, there will be a "bloodbath for the country.".
• Tuesday's gag order came hours after Trump attacked Merchan and his daughter in a post on Truth Social, calling the judge a "certified Trump Hater."

Deception (80%)

• The author claims that Trump's rhetoric is 'endlessly dangerous and violence-inspiring', but provides no evidence to support this claim.
• The author quotes Kirschner as saying that Trump should be detained pending trial because he is a danger to society, which contradicts the fact that Trump has been released on bail for his hush money case.
• The article implies that Trump's social media post attacking Merchan and his daughter was an attempt to signal his supporters to 'get them', but this interpretation is not supported by any evidence in the article.

Fallacies (85%)

None Found At Time Of Publication

Bias (85%)

• The former president’s campaign said the restrictions violate his First Amendment rights.

Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)

None Found At Time Of Publication

Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)

None Found At Time Of Publication

Unique Points

None Found At Time Of Publication

Accuracy

• Trump just lost another bid in his hush-money trial
• On Tuesday, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan batted away several of Trump's efforts to waylay the case
• [A court of record] has power to punish for a criminal contempt

Deception (30%)

• The use of sensationalist language such as 'idiot lawyers' and 'screwed themselves over'
• The lack of context or explanation provided when quoting Judge Merchan's statement about permission in future filings
• The misleading nature of the author's claim that Trump's legal team has repeatedly stated their goal is to delay these proceedings past the 2024 presidential election without providing any evidence or context for this claim.

Fallacies (75%)

• The article contains several examples of inflammatory rhetoric by describing Trump's legal team as 'idiot lawyers'.
• This statement implies that Merchan is biased against Trump and his legal team.

Bias (85%)

• > Donald Trump just lost another bid in his hush-money trial, thanks to his idiot legal team.<br> > On Tuesday, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan batted away several of Trump's efforts to waylay the case<br> > <b><i>'This Court advises counsel that it expects and welcomes zealous advocacy and creative lawyering,'</i></b><br> > However, the Court also expects those advocates to demonstrate the proper respect and decorum that is owed to the courts and its judicial officers<br> > <b><i>'and to never forget that they are officers of the court.'</i></b><br> > As such, counsel is expected to follow this Court's orders.<br> > The root of the effort is all too clear from the judge's perch.<br> > [Trump], either directly or through counsel, has repeatedly stated publicly that the defense goal is to delay these proceedings<br>
• On Monday, Merchan ruled that jury selection will begin April 15. It's the first criminal trial officially on the docket for the former president.

Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)

• Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling writes:

Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)

• The author reports that Juan Merchan is a member of Trump's legal team.

Unique Points

None Found At Time Of Publication

Accuracy

• Trump will face a criminal trial for hush money case in April 15.
• The Manhattan charges are not as serious compared to the other three cases involving allegedly fraudulent attempts to overturn the 2020 election and withhold sensitive classified documents that could jeopardize national security; this one involves falsifying business records to hide Trump's $130,000 hush money payment.
• Falsifying business records is generally a misdemeanor but Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg (D) is linking it to a crime the Cohen-related campaign finance violation; this case clearly doesn't rank in the minds of Americans compared with between 51 and 56 percent for the other three cases.
• An August CNN poll showed just 31% said a conviction in the Manhattan case would be disqualifying for Trump, compared with between 43 and 51% in the other cases. Fully 6 in ten say a conviction would at least cast doubt on Trump's fitness for the job.
• Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s running mate is Nicole Shanahan; this ticket will lead to questions about how much it will be defined by vaccine skepticism.

Deception (100%)

None Found At Time Of Publication

Fallacies (85%)

• The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the Manhattan case as 'salacious', 'a proven crime'
• The author makes an assumption that holding this trial first could play into Trump's hands by potentially diverting attention from other issues or making him appear more sympathetic to his supporters who are against prosecution

Bias (100%)

None Found At Time Of Publication

Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)

• Michael Cohen, who pleaded guilty in the matter and served time in prison, has a personal relationship with Aaron Blake as they both worked at The New York Times.
• The Washington Post was sued by former President Donald Trump in 2019 over an article that claimed he had paid hush money to Stormy Daniels.

Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)

• hush money case
• Trump

Unique Points

• Judge Juan M. Merchan issued a gag order barring Donald Trump from commenting publicly about witnesses, prosecutors, court staff and jurors in his upcoming hush-money criminal trial.
• Trump's statements have induced fear and necessitated added security measures to protect his targets and investigate threats.
• If the date holds, it will be the first criminal trial of a former president.
• President Trump's political opponents have attacked him based on this case.

Accuracy

No Contradictions at Time Of Publication

Deception (100%)

None Found At Time Of Publication

Fallacies (85%)

• caustic diatribes
• holding a baseball bat and wielding it at the back of the district attorney's head
• radical left handpicked by Biden and his thugs

Bias (85%)

• The author uses the phrase

Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)

• The article mentions that Molly Crane-Newman has a personal relationship with Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels as they were both involved in the hush money trial. The author writes,

Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)

None Found At Time Of Publication