New York's 16th Congressional District Primary: Bowman vs. Latimer - A Battle Over Israel and Party Divisions

Mount Vernon, New York, New York United States of America
Bowman focuses on helping working-class people and engaging young people in politics. Latimer emphasizes his district knowledge and relationships.
Bowman is a progressive Democrat who has been critical of Israel's actions in Gaza.
In New York's 16th Congressional District primary, Jamaal Bowman and George Latimer are in a close race.
Latimer is a centrist Democrat with decades of local politics experience.
The United Democracy Project, tied to AIPAC, has spent nearly $15 million on ads to support Latimer.
New York's 16th Congressional District Primary: Bowman vs. Latimer - A Battle Over Israel and Party Divisions

In the 16th Congressional District of New York, a hard-fought primary battle is taking place between Representative Jamaal Bowman and George Latimer. The race, which has seen significant spending from various political groups, has highlighted the deep divisions within the Democratic Party over Israel and its conflict with Hamas in Gaza.

Representative Jamaal Bowman, a progressive Democrat, has been a vocal critic of Israel's actions in Gaza and called for a permanent cease-fire early on in the conflict. His stance has attracted support from figures such as Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

However, Bowman's position on Israel has also drawn significant opposition. The United Democracy Project, a super PAC tied to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), has spent nearly $15 million on ads to oust Bowman and elect George Latimer. Latimer, a centrist Democrat and Westchester County executive, has spent more than three decades in local politics.

Latimer has emphasized his knowledge of the district and relationships there that would allow him to be an effective member of Congress. Bowman, on the other hand, focuses on helping working-class people in the district and engaging young people in politics.

The race has also seen endorsements from various political figures. Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez, Clinton, Mondaire Jones, Hakeem Jeffries and Josh Gottheimer have all endorsed either Bowman or Latimer.

Bowman has accused AIPAC of attempting to buy democracy with their spending in the race. Latimer has denied that his success is solely due to AIPAC's spending, stating that he was ahead at the outset of the campaign.

The primary election on Tuesday, June 25th, 2024, will determine which candidate will represent the Democratic Party in the general election for New York's 16th Congressional District.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

85%

Doubts
  • Has AIPAC spent $15 million solely on ads for Latimer, or have they supported his campaign in other ways?
  • Is it accurate to say that Bowman's stance on Israel has attracted only support from progressive figures?

Sources

59%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Rep. Jamaal Bowman fights for political survival in race exposing deep Democratic divisions

NBC News Digital Tuesday, 25 June 2024 12:24
  • Unique Points
    • Rep. Jamaal Bowman is a progressive Democrat running for re-election in New York’s 16th District.
    • Bowman has been a fierce critic of Israel and called for a permanent cease-fire early on in the Israel-Hamas war.
    • The United Democracy Project, a super PAC tied to AIPAC, has spent nearly $15 million on ads to oust Bowman and elect George Latimer.
    • Latimer is a centrist Democrat and Westchester County executive who has spent more than three decades in local politics.
    • Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez, Clinton, Mondaire Jones, Hakeem Jeffries and Josh Gottheimer have endorsed Bowman or Latimer in the race.
    • Bowman has accused AIPAC of attempting to buy democracy with their spending in the race.
    • Latimer has denied that his success is solely due to AIPAC’s spending, stating that he was ahead at the outset of the campaign.
  • Accuracy
    • Rep. Jamaal Bowman has been outspoken about his support for Palestinians amid the Israel-Hamas war and has charged Israel with genocide.
    • AIPAC, a pro-Israel group, is supporting Latimer and has spent roughly $14 million on his campaign.
    • Bowman used profanities during a rally in the Bronx, New York City.
  • Deception (30%)
    The article contains selective reporting and emotional manipulation. The author presents the race between Rep. Jamaal Bowman and George Latimer as a redux of the 2016 presidential primary with much of the familiar vitriol, implying that there is deep division in the Democratic Party over Israel-Hamas war. However, they only report details that support Bowman's position and omit any context or counterarguments from Latimer. For instance, when Latimer says 'We had some internal polling data before a dime was spent on this race and the initial positive-negative comparisons that I had and the incumbent ... had me ahead at the outset.', this information is not reported by the author. Instead, they focus on Bowman's allegations of AIPAC funding Latimer's campaign and portray it as a national race with deep Democratic divisions. This selective reporting creates an emotional response in readers, manipulating them to take a particular stance without providing all the facts.
    • Bowman, one of the fiercest critics of Israel in Congress, is fighting for his political life as he tries to fend off an onslaught of attack ads and win a third term.
    • Tuesday’s election between progressive Rep. Jamaal Bowman, D-N.Y., and centrist challenger George Latimer has re-exposed fault lines from that bitterly fought race eight years ago and highlighted the gaping divide in the Democratic Party over the Israel-Hamas war.
  • Fallacies (70%)
    The article contains several examples of inflammatory rhetoric and appeals to authority. Rep. Jamaal Bowman fights for his political survival in a House primary race against centrist challenger George Latimer that has attracted unprecedented amounts of money due to Bowman's stance on the Israel-Hamas war. The article highlights the deep divide within the Democratic Party over this issue, with United Democracy Project, a super PAC tied to AIPAC, pouring nearly $15 million into ads to oust Bowman and elect Latimer. Additionally, Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton have endorsed opposing candidates in this race. These factors contribute to the inflammatory nature of the article.
    • Rep. Jamaal Bowman, D-N.Y., is fighting for his political life as he tries to fend off an onslaught of attack ads and win a third term.
  • Bias (15%)
    The article demonstrates clear political bias towards Rep. Jamaal Bowman and against his opponent George Latimer. The author uses language that depicts Bowman as a hero of the left and a fighter for democracy, while Latimer is described as a career politician funded by right-wing Republican billionaires. The article also mentions the significant spending by AIPAC to elect Latimer, which is presented negatively and used to question his authenticity. Additionally, there are multiple quotes from Bowman using strong language against AIPAC and the billionaire class.
    • My opponent and AIPAC are the ones destroying democracy.
      • They’re trying to hang onto any claim they can, to try to make me something that I’m not.
        • We’re going to show f---ing AIPAC the power of the mother f---ing South Bronx.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        75%

        The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
        (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

        A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

        'Squad' member faces ouster from Congress as New York, Colorado and Utah hold primaries on Tuesday

        Fox News Media Paul Steinhauser Tuesday, 25 June 2024 12:25
        • Unique Points
          • Jamaal Bowman is the first House member of either party to be defeated by a primary challenger this cycle
          • Bowman has been outspoken about his support for Palestinians amid the Israel-Hamas war and has charged Israel with genocide
          • Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are supporting Bowman in the primary
          • Bowman used profanities during a rally in the Bronx, New York City
        • Accuracy
          • New York, Colorado and Utah hold primaries on Tuesday
          • 'Squad' member faces ouster from Congress by George Latimer in New York's 16th Congressional District primary
          • Bowman is the first House member of either party to be defeated by a primary challenger this cycle
          • >$25 million has been spent by outside groups and the two campaigns to run ads in New York's pricey media market
          • AIPAC, a pro-Israel group, is supporting Latimer and has spent roughly $14 million on his campaign
        • Deception (30%)
          The article contains emotional manipulation through the use of words like 'contentious', 'deep divisions', and 'record-breaking'. The author also uses sensational language such as 'most expensive congressional primary in the nation's history' and 'ultimate many versus the money race'. The article selectively reports details, focusing on Bowman's controversial statements and actions while omitting any context or counterarguments. Additionally, there is no disclosure of sources for some of the information presented.
          • Rep. Jamaal Bowman greets Sen. Bernie Sanders while he campaigns in the Bronx, New York City, on June 22, 2024.
          • An increasingly contentious Democratic Party battle between a member of the far-left ‘Squad’ in Congress and his more moderate challenger that spotlights the party’s deep divisions over the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza is taking center stage on Tuesday as New York, Colorado and Utah hold primaries.
          • The event was anything but a PG-rated spectacle as Bowman repeatedly used profanities.
        • Fallacies (80%)
          The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by quoting Rep. Jamaal Bowman's use of profanities during a rally. However, the author does not commit this fallacy himself and is simply reporting on it.
          • We are going to show f---ing AIPAC the power of the motherf---ing South Bronx!
        • Bias (80%)
          The author uses language that depicts one side as extreme or unreasonable by describing Bowman's language at the rally as 'inappropriate' and 'PG-rated spectacle'. The author also mentions that Bowman has been criticized for his verbal warfare with Republicans and pulling a fire alarm in a House office building, implying that these actions are extreme or unreasonable.
          • He's been criticized for his verbal warfare with Republicans and for pulling a fire alarm in a House office building last year during a vote over government funding.
            • The event was anything but a PG-rated spectacle as Bowman repeatedly used profanities.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            92%

            The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
            (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

            A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

            The progressive left digs in for besieged New York Rep. Jamaal Bowman in Democratic primary clash

            CNN News Site: In-Depth Reporting and Analysis with Some Financial Conflicts and Sensational Language Gregory Krieg, Sunday, 23 June 2024 15:00
            • Unique Points
              • Rep. Jamaal Bowman is facing a challenging primary against George Latimer in the 16th Congressional District of New York.
              • New York Democrats are experiencing a hard-fought, high-priced primary campaign.
              • Pro-Israel groups have spent heavily on advertising to support George Latimer’s campaign.
              • Bernie Sanders has rallied for Jamaal Bowman, expressing concern about the potential influence of the billionaire class in Democratic primaries.
            • Accuracy
              • The race has become particularly contentious due to divisions within the Democratic Party over Israel’s war in Gaza.
              • Bowman has been outspoken about his support for Palestinians amid the Israel-Hamas war and has charged Israel with genocide
              • AIPAC, a pro-Israel group, is supporting Latimer and has spent roughly $14 million on his campaign
            • Deception (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Fallacies (80%)
              The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy in the section discussing the influence of pro-Israel groups on George Latimer's campaign. The author states that 'the fortunes being spent by the pro-Israel lobby, including AIPAC and Democratic Majority for Israel, to boost Latimer have contributed to the end-of-days vibe around the race.' This implies that the spending by these groups is a significant factor in determining the outcome of the election. Additionally, there is an example of inflammatory rhetoric in Bernie Sanders' statement: 'Look what they did to Bowman in the Bronx.' This comment suggests that there is some nefarious intent behind the campaign against Bowman, without providing evidence to support this claim.
              • The fortunes being spent by the pro-Israel lobby, including AIPAC and Democratic Majority for Israel, to boost Latimer have contributed to the end-of-days vibe around the race.
              • Look what they did to Bowman in the Bronx.
            • Bias (95%)
              The article demonstrates a clear ideological bias towards the progressive left and Jamaal Bowman. The authors use language that depicts the pro-Israel groups as extremist and portrays their advertising outlay as 'nastier' and contributing to a 'chilling effect'. They also quote Bernie Sanders making statements that further the narrative of the article, which is sympathetic towards Bowman and critical of his opponents.
              • Defending Bowman, now considered the most endangered Democrat of this primary season, has become more than a political necessity. The fortunes being spent by the pro-Israel lobby, including AIPAC and Democratic Majority for Israel, to boost Latimer have contributed to the end-of-days vibe around the race.
                • In an interview with CNN days earlier, Bowman argued the race transcended the factional fights Democrats have become accustomed to since Sanders’ first presidential run in 2016.
                  • What has followed, though, has been something much nastier. Fraught debates over race and class, papered over for years in this diverse but largely segregated district, have exploded into a referendum on the nature – and future – of the party.
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication

                  59%

                  The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                  (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                  A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                  Opinion | Jamaal Bowman’s Political Malpractice

                  The Name Of The NZ Prefix. I PWA NZI.P.Was Dropped. Michelle Goldberg Tuesday, 25 June 2024 00:27
                  • Unique Points
                    • Bowman was horrified by his encounter with Israel’s occupation during a congressional trip in 2021 and believes Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.
                    • Bowman apologized for claiming reports of Israeli women being raped on Oct. 7 were propaganda.
                  • Accuracy
                    • Rep. Jamaal Bowman is a progressive Democrat running for re-election in New York’s 16th District.
                    • The most expensive House primary race in American history is taking place in New York’s 16th Congressional District between Representative Jamaal Bowman and George Latimer.
                    • Bowman has been outspoken about his support for Palestinians amid the Israel-Hamas war and has charged Israel with genocide
                    • AIPAC, a pro-Israel group, is supporting Latimer and has spent roughly $14 million on his campaign
                  • Deception (30%)
                    Michelle Goldberg's article 'Opinion | Jamaal Bowman’s Political Malpractice' contains several examples of deceptive practices. The author makes editorializing statements and uses emotional manipulation to sway the reader's opinion against Representative Jamaal Bowman. She also engages in selective reporting by focusing on negative aspects of Bowman while ignoring his positive accomplishments and qualifications. Furthermore, Goldberg implies that George Latimer is more moderate than President Biden and Senator Chuck Schumer, despite Latimer's refusal to criticize Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel. This misrepresentation can be considered a lie by omission.
                    • Bowman was never going to do that; he was horrified by his encounter with Israel’s occupation during a congressional trip in 2021, and he’s been anguished by the mass death and suffering of Palestinians in Gaza, where he believes Israel is committing a genocide.
                    • This contest is probably the most important congressional primary this year.
                    • To be clear, Bowman isn’t the only one showing a lack of sensitivity. The campaign against him has been ugly and sometimes frankly racist.
                  • Fallacies (80%)
                    The author makes an appeal to authority by quoting Senator Bernie Sanders and stating that a Bowman loss could serve as a warning to other politicians about the cost of breaking with Washington's pro-Israel political consensus. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the high stakes of the election and stating that it could tear at the longtime progressive alliance between Black people and Jews.
                    • This is, in my view, one of the most important elections in the modern history of this country.
                    • It's setting a precedent for big money interference in local politics and tearing at the longtime progressive alliance between Black people and Jews. It could intimidate into silence Democrats who have qualms about Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians, or if Bowman manages an upset, it could embolden them.
                    • Given that the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s super PAC has poured over $14.5 million into the race, a Bowman loss will probably serve as a warning to other politicians about the cost of breaking with Washington’s pro-Israel political consensus.
                  • Bias (15%)
                    The author demonstrates religious bias by using the term 'genocide' to describe the situation in Gaza without providing evidence or context that would support such a strong claim. This is an example of hyperbole and emotional language used to depict one side as extreme or unreasonable.
                    • he’s been anguished by the mass death and suffering of Palestinians in Gaza, where he believes Israel is committing a genocide.
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication

                    80%

                    The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                    (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                    A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                    Rep. Jamaal Bowman faces tough challenge from George Latimer in Democratic primary in NY suburbs

                    The Associated Press News Tuesday, 25 June 2024 04:36
                    • Unique Points
                      • Rep. Jamaal Bowman accused Israel of committing genocide in Gaza.
                      • AIPAC's allied super PAC has spent nearly $15 million on the primary to oppose Bowman.
                      • Bowman has been endorsed by progressive figures such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders, while Latimer has received endorsement from former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
                      • Latimer has portrayed himself as a staunch supporter of Israel and believes that Hamas cannot negotiate a cease-fire due to its status as a terrorist organization.
                      • Bowman defended his position on Israel and called for a cease-fire in the current conflict, while condemning Hamas for their Oct. 7 attack in Israel.
                      • The race is seen as a case study of where Democratic voters might stand on Israel and has exposed tensions between liberals and centrists within the party.
                      • Latimer emphasized his knowledge of the district and relationships there that would allow him to be an effective member of Congress, while Bowman focuses on helping working-class people in the district and engaging young people in politics.
                    • Accuracy
                      • AIPAC spent nearly $15 million on the primary to oppose Bowman.
                    • Deception (50%)
                      The article contains selective reporting and emotional manipulation. The author focuses on the amount of money spent by AIPAC in the race against Bowman and portrays it as an attempt to buy the race, implying that this is a negative thing. However, they do not mention that Bowman has also received significant campaign contributions or that Latimer has also received endorsements from notable figures like Hillary Clinton. This selective reporting creates an imbalanced view of the situation and manipulates emotions by painting AIPAC in a negative light without providing all relevant information.
                      • The cash paid for a torrent of ads attacking Bowman...
                      • An exorbitant amount of money, mostly tied to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, has flooded into the race to oppose Bowman...
                    • Fallacies (85%)
                      The article contains several instances of Appeals to Authority fallacies. The author mentions the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and its allied super PAC spending nearly $15 million on the primary to oppose Bowman, implying that this spending is significant and influential in determining the outcome of the election. However, this does not necessarily mean that AIPAC's position or stance is correct or valid. Additionally, the author mentions several political figures endorsing either Bowman or Latimer, which can also be considered an Appeal to Authority fallacy as their endorsements do not automatically make their positions correct.
                      • An exorbitant amount of money, mostly tied to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, has flooded into the race to oppose Bowman...
                      • Some major progressive figures have rushed to Bowman’s defense... Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders...
                      • Latimer pulled in the endorsement of former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
                    • Bias (80%)
                      The article demonstrates a clear monetary bias towards the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) as it mentions their involvement and spending in the race multiple times. The author also uses language that depicts Bowman's opposition to Israel as extreme or unreasonable by stating 'Bowman accused Israel of committing genocide in Gaza'. This is an example of bias.
                      • An exorbitant amount of money, mostly tied to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, has flooded into the race to oppose Bowman
                        • Bowman has accused the influential pro-Israel lobbying group of trying to buy the race
                          • The cash paid for a torrent of ads attacking Bowman
                          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                            None Found At Time Of Publication
                          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                            None Found At Time Of Publication