NFL Bans Hip-Drop Tackle: Controversial Technique No More

United States of America
The league's competition committee voted unanimously in favor of banning the technique during its annual meeting.
The NFL has banned the hip-drop tackle, a controversial technique used by some players to bring down an opponent.
NFL Bans Hip-Drop Tackle: Controversial Technique No More

The NFL has banned the hip-drop tackle, a controversial technique used by some players to bring down an opponent. The league's competition committee voted unanimously in favor of banning the technique during its annual meeting.



Confidence

100%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

80%

  • Unique Points
    • The hip-drop tackle is officially illegal.
    • Owners banned the hip-drop tackle on Monday morning during the Annual League Meeting in Orlando, Fla.,
    • Penalty for a Hip-Drop Tackle: Loss of 15 yards and an automatic first down.
    • NFL executive vice president of football operations Troy Vincent reiterates hip-drop tackle is something they want to get out of the game
    • The decision makes life more difficult for defenders, many of whom decried the ban as a further obstacle to their work.
    • Rich McKay, NFL Competition Committee chairman said Monday that this isn't the elimination of hip-drop, it's an elimination of a swivel technique that doesn't get used very often and is incredibly injurious to the runner - The runner is purely defenseless. I’ve heard defenders say before and I hear them – ‘Hey, you're putting me in a really tough spot, you're saying I can't hit here and what do I do? My response has always been, Well, you can't do that.’ That’s just because the guy you’re hitting is defenseless. Has no way to protect himself.
    • The NFL approved two other rule changes: Amends Rule 15, Section 1, Article 1 and Amends Rule 14, Section 5, Article 2
    • Expect more fines than flags in the first season of the ban as the league works with coaches on techniques that will make the game safer.
    • The NFL did not vote on kickoff rule change proposal yet.
  • Accuracy
    • NFL executive vice president of football operations Troy Vincent reiterates that the tackling technique is something they want to get out of the game
    • Rich McKay clarified that Monday's rule change doesn't eliminate the hip-drop tackle -- only the swivel technique that isn’t used very often.
    • The NFL Competition Committee was unanimous in their voice that this tackle was one they wanted out of the game.
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that owners banned the hip-drop tackle on Monday morning during the Annual League Meeting in Orlando, Fla., but there is no evidence to support this claim. The only information provided about a vote on tackling rules was from an NFL Competition Committee meeting held earlier in 2019. Secondly, the author quotes Troy Vincent as saying that hip-drop tackle is something the league wants out of the game, but it's not clear if he actually said this or if this quote has been taken out of context. Thirdly, there are several instances where the article uses sensationalist language to describe injuries caused by hip-drop tackles and how they have led to discussions surrounding their use in football. This is misleading as it implies that all hip-drop tackles cause severe injuries when this is not necessarily true.
    • The author claims that owners banned the hip-drop tackle on Monday morning during the Annual League Meeting in Orlando, Fla., but there is no evidence to support this claim. This statement is deceptive as it implies that a vote was taken and a decision made when none of these details are provided.
    • The article uses sensationalist language to describe injuries caused by hip-drop tackles and how they have led to discussions surrounding their use in football. For example, the author states 'This is something the league wants out of the game' which implies that all hip-drop tackles cause severe injuries when this is not necessarily true.
    • The article quotes Troy Vincent as saying that hip-drop tackle is something the league wants out of the game, but it's not clear if he actually said this or if this quote has been taken out of context.
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains a statement from NFL Competition Committee Chairman Rich McKay that the hip-drop tackle is something the league wants to get out of the game. This implies a bias towards banning this technique and suggests that it may be seen as dangerous or harmful by those in charge of regulating football.
    • The NFL's Competition Committee was unanimous in their voice that the tackle was one the league wanted out of the game. Owners agreed.
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication

    72%

    • Unique Points
      • The hip-drop tackle is officially illegal.
      • NFL executive vice president of football operations Troy Vincent discussed player safety and insisted that the hip-drop tackle is something they want to get out of the game.
      • Mark Andrews #89 of the Baltimore Ravens was tackled by Logan Wilson #55 of the Cincinnati Bengals during a game at M&T Bank Stadium on Nov. 16, 2023 in Baltimore.
    • Accuracy
      No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
    • Deception (50%)
      The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article implies that NFL owners have banned all forms of hip-drop tackling when in fact they only banned a subset of it. Secondly, ESPN News Services reports that two other proposals were approved but does not provide any details about these proposals or their potential impact on players and teams. Thirdly, the article quotes several sources including Troy Vincent and Rich McKay without disclosing where these quotes came from which is in violation of the analysis rules.
      • The title of the article implies that NFL owners have banned all forms of hip-drop tackling when in fact they only banned a subset of it. This is an example of deceptive reporting.
    • Fallacies (85%)
      The article contains an example of a fallacy known as 'appeals to authority'. The author cites Troy Vincent's statement that the rule change is likely to be enforced similarly to the use of helmet rule without providing any evidence or reasoning for this claim. This statement implies that Vincent has some sort of expertise on the matter, but it is not clear what his qualifications are.
      • Troy Vincent's statement that the rule change is likely to be enforced similarly to the use of helmet rule without providing any evidence or reasoning for this claim.
    • Bias (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication

    70%

    • Unique Points
      • The NFL has officially made the hip-drop tackle illegal.
      • NFL executive vice president of football operations Troy Vincent discussed player safety and insisted that the hip-drop tackle is something they want to get out of the game.
      • Mark Andrews #89 of the Baltimore Ravens is tackled by Logan Wilson #55 of the Cincinnati Bengals during a game at M&T Bank Stadium on Nov. 16, 2023 in Baltimore.
    • Accuracy
      No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
    • Deception (50%)
      The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that the NFL has banned hip-drop tackles due to safety reasons when it was actually a rule change made by owners during their meetings. Secondly, the author quotes Troy Vincent stating that players who use this technique have a 20-25 times higher injury rate and cites player durability as an issue. However, there is no evidence provided in the article to support these claims or any other safety concerns related to hip-drop tackles. Thirdly, the author quotes Rich McKay stating that not all hip-drops will be prohibited which contradicts Vincent's statement and creates confusion for readers. Lastly, the article does not disclose sources of information used in their reporting.
      • The league announced Monday that owners banned the hip-drop tackle due to safety reasons during the NFL owners meetings in Orlando, Fla.
    • Fallacies (80%)
      The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority when citing NFL executive vice president Troy Vincent and Rich McKay as sources for their opinions on the hip-drop tackle. Additionally, the author presents a dichotomy by stating that player safety is important but also acknowledging that some players may find it difficult or confusing to play with defenders who use this technique. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric when describing the severity and frequency of injury caused by hip-drop tackles.
      • The NFL Competition Committee was reportedly unanimous on the decision to ban the hip-drop tackle, citing severity and frequency of injury.
    • Bias (80%)
      The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes the NFLPA by implying they are putting money over player safety.
      • > Conversely, the NFLPA has been vocal about opposing the rule-change. <br> > The official rule is stated below, per NFL.com: <br> > ARTICLE 18. HIP-DROP TACKLE. It is a foul if a player uses the following technique to bring a runner to the ground: (a) grabs the runner with both hands or wraps the runner with both arms; and (b) unweights himself by swiveling and dropping his hips and/or lower body, landing on and trapping the runner's leg(s) at or below the knee. <br> > Penalty: For a Hip-Drop Tackle: Loss of 15 yards and an automatic first down.
        • The NFL Competition Committee was reportedly unanimous on the decision to ban the hip-drop tackle, citing severity and frequency of injury. <br> > The answer was yes, NFL Competition Committee chairman Rich McKay said on Monday. <br> > This will be a hard one to call on the field, you have to see every element of it. We want to make it a rule so we can deal with discipline during the week.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        83%

        • Unique Points
          • The radical change being proposed to NFL kickoffs has the support of one of the league's best coaches.
          • “It’s going to be interesting and exciting, if it passes. I like the idea. I’m for it,” Reid said.
          • The Competition Committee has presented a proposal in which 10 players on each team line up only five yards apart as a rule that will simultaneously reduce injuries and increase excitement.
        • Accuracy
          • The Competition Committee has presented the proposal, in which 10 players on each team line up only five yards apart, as a rule that will simultaneously reduce injuries and increase excitement.
        • Deception (50%)
          The article is deceptive in that it presents Andy Reid's support for the new kickoff rule as a fact without providing any context or evidence to back up his statement. The author also uses sensationalism by describing the change as 'radical', which could be interpreted as implying that it is inherently bad, even though there are no facts presented in the article to suggest this.
          • Chiefs head coach Andy Reid told reporters at today's league meeting that he's in favor of the low-impact kickoff rule, similar to what has been tried in the XFL.
          • The radical change being proposed to NFL kickoffs has the support of one of the league's best coaches.
        • Fallacies (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Bias (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        81%

        • Unique Points
          • The NFL made a significant rule change on Monday that will significantly impact defensive players and anyone else trying to make a tackle during games during the 2024 season and beyond. The league's competition committee voted at the annual league meeting to ban hip-drop tackles.
          • One of the main examples being used for the hip-drop is former San Francisco 49ers safety Jimmie Ward's tackle during the 2022 postseason against then-Dallas Cowboys running back Tony Pollard. Ward's tackle forced Pollard to suffer an ankle injury that eventually needed surgery to repair.
          • The NFL found that hip-drop tackle injuries are 25 times more likely than the standard tackle injury rate.
        • Accuracy
          • The hip-drop tackle is officially illegal.
          • NFL executive vice president of football operations Troy Vincent reiterates that the technique is something they want to get out of the game
          • Mark Andrews suffered a significant injury against Cincinnati Bengals due to this tackling style
        • Deception (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Fallacies (85%)
          The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the NFL competition committee voted unanimously in favor of banning hip-drop tackles and penalizing anyone who uses them during play. However, this does not necessarily mean that the decision is correct or based on sound reasoning. Additionally, the article contains a false dilemma fallacy when it states that there are only two options: either allow hip-drop tackles to continue or ban them entirely. This oversimplifies a complex issue and ignores other potential solutions. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that the tackle has caused numerous injuries, which may be true but is not necessarily evidence of its inherent danger.
          • The article states that hip-drop tackles have been a hot topic around the league and have caused injuries to numerous players. However, this does not provide any specific examples or data to support these claims.
        • Bias (85%)
          The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses inflammatory language such as 'controversial' and 'hot topic around the league'. They also use quotes from sources that are not cited in the body of the text to support their claims. Additionally, they make assumptions about Commissioner Goodell without providing any evidence or context for those assumptions.
          • Commissioner Roger Goodell has led the way for the rule to be voted on.
            • The tackle has caused injuries to numerous players
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              Ryan Gaydos has a conflict of interest with the NFL as he is an employee of Fox News which owns and operates multiple teams in the league. The article discusses rule changes related to hip-drop tackles, injuries sustained by players such as Mark Andrews and Tony Pollard, and Roger Goodell's role in enforcing these rules.
              • Ryan Gaydos is an employee of Fox News which owns multiple teams in the NFL.
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication