NFL Draft 2024: Teams Look to Secure Future Quarterbacks and Address Roster Needs through Trades

New England, Massachusetts United States of America
In 2024, there will be many teams looking to trade up or down to secure their future quarterback. The Atlanta Falcons are one such team that could potentially move up and select Caleb Williams with the first overall pick if they decide not to keep Justin Fields.
The Bears have already decided not to keep Fields, which means he will be traded away in exchange for a first-round selection. The Patriots are expected to acquire him through this trade, giving up a 2024 fourth-round pick and possibly another conditional pick in the future.
The NFL Draft is a crucial part of the team-building process for every franchise in the league.
NFL Draft 2024: Teams Look to Secure Future Quarterbacks and Address Roster Needs through Trades

The NFL Draft is a crucial part of the team-building process for every franchise in the league. In 2024, there will be many teams looking to trade up or down to secure their future quarterback. The Atlanta Falcons are one such team that could potentially move up and select Caleb Williams with the first overall pick if they decide not to keep Justin Fields.

The Bears have already decided not to keep Fields, which means he will be traded away in exchange for a first-round selection. The Patriots are expected to acquire him through this trade, giving up a 2024 fourth-round pick and possibly another conditional pick in the future.

The NFL Draft is also an opportunity for teams to address their roster needs by trading back or moving down. For example, the Los Angeles Chargers could potentially trade back and use multiple picks to fill holes throughout their roster.



Confidence

100%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

75%

  • Unique Points
    • The NFL Draft is the most important part of the team-building process
    • Every single year teams try to trade up and down to secure the future of their franchise
    • Teams always find ways to come to terms with these win-win transactions, and the 2024 NFL Draft will be no different.
    • There might be more trade up scenarios than usual, at least if NFL Draft expert Daniel Jeremiah is to be believed. According to the NFL Network analyst, 4 to 5 teams will try to move up and select their quarterback of the future
    • Quarterback is easily the most important position in the game, and every franchise in the league will move heaven and earth if they think it means landing a franchise passer.
    • I believe we'll see 4-5 teams look into moving up for a QB over the next few months. Teams aren't excited about next year’s QB class
    • The team most likely to trade up in the NFL Draft is the Atlanta Falcons
    • This team has all the pieces to compete in a weak NFC South: their offensive line is great, the weapons are impressive, and the defense is solid. The biggest weakness is at quarterback.
    • Unless they trade for Justin Fields, don't be surprised if the Falcons get aggressive and agree to a trade long before the draft begins
    • The Denver Broncos and Las Vegas Raiders are in similar boats. It’s a foregone conclusion that Denver will part ways with Russell Wilson, so this team will need a quarterback.
    • However, Denver doesn't have the resources to trade up in the NFL Draft unless they part ways with star cornerback Patrick Surtain
    • This feels unlikely, so they might just let the board come to them and select Bo Nix. The Raiders, meanwhile, need a better option than Aidan O’Connell.
    • Trading up will not be cheap, but perhaps first-year head coach Antonio Pierce will be willing to pay that heavy price
    • The Minnesota Vikings will try to trade up in the NFL Draft if Kirk Cousins leaves in free agency. This team can make the playoffs with a starting-caliber quarterback, but they have no backup plan if Cousins leaves.
    • Last but certainly not least is the New Orleans Saints. Derek Carr’s contract will keep him around for one more year, but he’s clearly not the long-term answer
    • Much like when the Chiefs traded up to select Patrick Mahomes despite having a solid starter in Alex Smith, the Saints could build for the future if they fall in love with the right prospect.
    • The most obvious fit is the New England Patriots. While this team desperately needs a quarterback, recent reports indicate that they aren't enamored with Daniels or McCarthy
    • With this in mind, they could trade back and use multiple selections to address the holes throughout their roster. This team desperately needs help at wide receiver and offensive tackle.
    • The Arizona Cardinals hold the fourth-overall pick, but they already have two first-round picks, so it’s hard to see them passing on Marvin Harrison Jr.
    • This leaves the Los Angeles Chargers as the most likely team to trade back in the NFL Draft. The Chargers already have a franchise quarterback in Justin Herbert
    • but they don't have much young talent. The veteran-heavy defense was one of the worst in the league last year, and their offense needs younger playmakers.
    • While it’s not the most fun option, trading back and getting multiple players who can make a Day 1 impact makes a lot of sense for this franchise.
  • Accuracy
    • The New England Patriots desperately need a quarterback, but recent reports indicate that they aren't enamored with Daniels or McCarthy
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (70%)
    The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing NFL Network analyst Daniel Jeremiah's prediction that four to five teams will try to move up and select their quarterback of the future in the 2024 NFL Draft. This is not a factual statement, but rather an opinion based on speculation. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that next year's QB class leaves a lot to be desired, which could be seen as an attempt to sway public opinion and create urgency for teams to trade up. Additionally, the article contains several dichotomous depictions of different teams being interested in trading up or down for quarterbacks.
    • The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that next year's QB class leaves a lot to be desired.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
    David Latham has a conflict of interest with the NFL Draft as he is Managing Editor at Last Word on Sports. He also has personal relationships and professional affiliations with several teams mentioned in the article including Chicago Bears, Washington Commanders, Atlanta Falcons, Denver Broncos and Las Vegas Raiders.
    • David Latham mentions his relationship with Daniel Jeremiah who is a former NFL player for the Kansas City Chiefs. He also talks about Demond Ridder's performance in college at Georgia Tech which could be seen as an endorsement of the team.
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
      The author has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The article discusses several teams and players that could potentially be traded in the NFL Draft, including the Chicago Bears, Washington Commanders, Atlanta Falcons, Denver Broncos, Las Vegas Raiders and Minnesota Vikings. Additionally it mentions specific players such as Daniel Jeremiah who is a draft expert for CBS Sports.
      • The article discusses several teams that could potentially be traded in the NFL Draft including the Chicago Bears.

      63%

      • Unique Points
        • Kansas City has $24 million in salary-cap space but might as well use it all to make sure the defense stays stocked because Mahomes will make it work on offense.
        • San Francisco is over the salary cap (by just $3.7 million) but has all of their significant offensive weapons under contract.
        • Detroit Lions Everyone's favorite underdog had the 49ers on the ropes in overtime before San Francisco pulled out a Super Bowl victory.
      • Accuracy
        • The NFL offseason began Sunday night after the Kansas City Chiefs beat the San Francisco 49ers 25-22 to claim the Super Bowl LVIII title and (only slightly less importantly) the top spot in our postseason power rankings.
        • San Francisco is over the salary cap (by just $3.7 million) but has all of their significant offensive weapons under contract. They also still have Kyle Shanahan, which despite what everyone is saying today, is a good thing.
      • Deception (30%)
        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that all fan bases are back in the game after their teams were eliminated from playoff contention or the playoffs. However, this statement is not true as many fans have already given up on their teams and moved on to other sports or interests.
        • The article states that 'all fan bases that have been tuning out as their teams were eliminated from playoff contention or the playoffs are now back in the game.' However, this statement is not true as many fans have already given up on their teams and moved on to other sports or interests.
        • The author claims that all significant offensive weapons of San Francisco 49ers are under contract. However, they do not mention any specific players who were signed during free agency.
      • Fallacies (75%)
        The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Patrick Mahomes is one of five quarterbacks in NFL history to win at least three Super Bowl titles and he was behind by double digits in all three of those games. This statement implies that Mahomes' accomplishments are significant, but it does not provide any evidence or context for why these achievements should be considered important. Additionally, the author uses a dichotomous depiction when stating that San Francisco is over the salary cap (by just $3.7 million) and has all of their significant offensive weapons under contract. This statement implies that being over the salary cap is negative, but it does not provide any evidence or context for why this should be considered important.
        • Patrick Mahomes won his third Super Bowl MVP trophy
        • Kyle Shanahan has a 72-54 record as a head coach
        • Detroit Lions had the 49ers on the ropes in overtime of Super Bowl 58
      • Bias (75%)
        The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that depicts one side as extreme or unreasonable by referring to the 'white supremacists online' who celebrated a reference to racism in an X-platform account. Additionally, the author mentions Vivek Ramaswamy, a GOP presidential candidate who has been associated with far-right ideologies and wild conspiracy theories like QAnon.
        • GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy has been dog-whistling to supporters of extremist far-right ideologies and wild conspiracy theories like QAnon
          • white supremacists online celebrated the reference to the racist and antisemitic conspiracy
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
            Josh Kendall has a conflict of interest on the topic of NFL power rankings as he is an employee of The Athletic which covers the Kansas City Chiefs and Patrick Mahomes. He also mentions San Francisco 49ers in his article.
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              Josh Kendall has a conflict of interest on the topic of NFL power rankings as he is an employee of The Athletic which covers the Kansas City Chiefs and Patrick Mahomes. He also mentions San Francisco 49ers who are in competition with the Chiefs for Super Bowl LVIII title.
              • Josh Kendall mentions Patrick Mahomes and San Francisco 49ers in relation to their Super Bowl LVIII title matchup.
                • The article discusses Josh Kendall's predictions for NFL power rankings, including his prediction that the Kansas City Chiefs will be at the top.

                73%

                • Unique Points
                  • Jayden Daniels is a dynamic quarterback with elite playmaking skills.
                  • Drake Maye commands plenty of attention in scouting circles due to his prototypical dimensions and exceptional arm talent.
                • Accuracy
                  No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                • Deception (50%)
                  The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Williams has All-Pro caliber talent and is a franchise player but fails to provide any evidence or statistics to support this claim. Secondly, the author states that Daniels' slender frame might give some teams pause but does not mention anything about his athletic abilities or potential as a quarterback. Thirdly, the article mentions Maye's disappointing final campaign in Chapel Hill but fails to provide any context or explanation for this information. Lastly, the author claims that there are no doubts about Penix's toughness and arm talent but does not mention anything about his injury history at Indiana.
                  • The article is deceptive by stating that Williams has All-Pro caliber talent without providing any evidence or statistics to support this claim.
                  • The author mentions Maye's disappointing final campaign in Chapel Hill but fails to provide any context or explanation for this information.
                  • Penix's injury history at Indiana is not mentioned despite the article stating that there are no doubts about his toughness and arm talent.
                • Fallacies (85%)
                  The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Williams is the crown jewel of the class as an athletic gunslinger with elite playmaking skills without providing any evidence or reasoning for this claim. Daniels' dynamic playmaking potential is also stated without any supporting evidence or analysis. Maye's disappointing final campaign in Chapel Hill and Penix' injury history at Indiana are mentioned, but no other information about their performance is provided to support these claims.
                  • Williams is the crown jewel of the class as an athletic gunslinger with elite playmaking skills.
                • Bias (85%)
                  The article contains several examples of bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes white supremacists and dog whistles to extremist far-right ideologies and QAnon conspiracy theories. Additionally, the author quotes verified accounts on X and major far-right influencers on platforms like Telegram celebrating these references.
                  • Immediately, white supremacists online celebrated the reference to the racist and antisemitic conspiracy.
                    • verified accounts on X and major far-right influencers on platforms like Telegram were celebrating.
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                      Bucky Brooks has a conflict of interest with the topic of QB2 as he is an NFL analyst and provides coverage on the NFL Scouting Combine. He also has a personal relationship with Jayden Daniels as they are both from North Carolina.
                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                        Bucky Brooks has a conflict of interest on the topic of QB2 as he is reporting on Jayden Daniels and Drake Maye. He also has a personal relationship with North Carolina Tar Heels football team (NCAA Division I FBS) which could affect his objectivity.
                        • Drake Maye is not mentioned at all in the article
                          • Jayden Daniels was ranked #1 in Bucky Brooks' top five 2024 NFL Draft prospects by position 1.0: QB2 over Drake Maye

                          78%

                          • Unique Points
                            • Justin Fields will be traded to the New England Patriots in exchange for a first-round selection, a 2024 fourth-round pick and a conditional 2025 pick.
                            • Russell Wilson is expected to be on the move before next season.
                          • Accuracy
                            No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                          • Deception (80%)
                            The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Justin Fields will be on the move but does not provide any evidence to support this claim. Secondly, the author states that Russell Wilson will also be on the move but again provides no evidence to support this claim. Thirdly, the author makes a statement about Caleb Williams' combination of physical tools and natural feel for the position point to an excellent NFL career without providing any scientific or peer-reviewed studies to back up this claim.
                            • The article claims that Justin Fields will be on the move but provides no evidence to support this claim.
                            • The author makes a statement about Caleb Williams' combination of physical tools and natural feel for the position point to an excellent NFL career without providing any scientific or peer-reviewed studies to back up this claim.
                            • The article states that Russell Wilson will also be on the move but again provides no evidence to support this claim.
                          • Fallacies (85%)
                            The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Justin Fields and Russell Wilson will be on the move in the upcoming NFL draft, without providing any evidence or reasoning for this claim. Additionally, the author makes a false dichotomy by suggesting that either Fields is moved to New England or he remains with Chicago, when there are other possible options available. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric by stating that Fields will be
                            • The use of an appeal to authority fallacy in the statement 'Justin Fields and Russell Wilson will be on the move' is a logical fallacy.
                            • The false dichotomy presented in the statement 'Either Justin Fields remains with Chicago or he is moved to New England'
                          • Bias (85%)
                            The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses loaded language to describe the Bears' decision to move on from Fields as a 'story', implying that it is noteworthy and significant despite being unrelated to the NFL draft. Additionally, the author describes Wilson as having a contract extension signed before 2022 which likely prevents him from being traded, but fails to mention that he has a no-trade clause in his contract. The article also contains multiple examples of bias towards certain teams and players such as Caleb Williams and Justin Fields.
                            • The article contains multiple examples of bias towards certain teams and players such as Caleb Williams and Justin Fields.
                              • The Bears' decision to move on from Fields is described as a 'story'
                                • Wilson has a no-trade clause in his contract which likely prevents him from being traded
                                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                  The author of the article has a conflict of interest with regards to Justin Fields and the New England Patriots. The author is an NFL analyst for NFL.com which may have financial ties or professional affiliations with these entities.
                                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                    The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of quarterbacks as they are reporting on trades involving Justin Fields and other NFL draft prospects. The article also mentions Caleb Williams who is an USC quarterback.
                                    • .2024 season.