NYCB Loses 7% of Deposits in One Month After New Investor Group Infuses $1 Billion

New York, United States United States of America
New investor group led by Steve Mnuchin infused $1 billion into NYCB earlier this week
NYCB lost 7% of its deposits over the last month
Total deposits dropped to $77.2 billion as of March 5, compared with $83 billion on Feb. 5
NYCB Loses 7% of Deposits in One Month After New Investor Group Infuses $1 Billion

New York Community Bancorp (NYCB) lost 7% of its deposits over the last month, highlighting challenges faced by a new investor group led by Steve Mnuchin that infused $1 billion into the troubled lender earlier this week. The bank's total deposits dropped to $77.2 billion as of March 5, compared with $83 billion on Feb. 5.



Confidence

90%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

67%

  • Unique Points
    • New York Community Bank received a $1 billion cash infusion led by former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin
    • The bank's shares jumped after executives provided new information about the company and details of its rescue plan
    • `Flagstar', a mortgage servicer, is among the brands run by New York Community Bank
  • Accuracy
    • The bank received a $1 billion cash infusion led by former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin
    • NYCB lost 7% of its deposits in the past month
    • Moody's Investors Service cut NYCB's credit ratings to junk on Feb. 5
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article suggests that New York Community Bank has successfully reassured markets after a $1 billion rescue. However, this is not entirely accurate as the bank's stock price still down by about 60% since January and its bonds were downgraded by credit-rating agencies.
    • The title of the article suggests that New York Community Bank has successfully reassured markets after a $1 billion rescue. However, this is not entirely accurate as the bank's stock price still down by about 60% since January and its bonds were downgraded by credit-rating agencies.
    • Analysts at Fitch called the cash injection 'a positive near-term development', but warned about ongoing ambiguity related to the firm's strategic direction and business mix.
  • Fallacies (70%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (85%)
    The article is biased towards the New York Community Bank and its efforts to reassure investors after a $1 billion rescue. The author uses language that portrays the bank as struggling and in need of help, while also highlighting the success of the new management team and their plans for improvement. Additionally, there are multiple quotes from executives at the bank discussing their financial situation and future plans, which further reinforces this bias.
    • Analysts at Fitch, a rating agency that recently downgraded the bank, called the cash injection 'a positive near-term development'
      • Mr. Otting said on a call with analysts and investors that the bank's balance sheet will be 'fortified'
        • The company's leaders said that deposits had fallen over the past month by more than $4 billion
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          J. Edward Moreno has a financial tie to the topic of New York Community Bank as he is reporting on their $1 billion rescue plan and their commercial real estate market exposure reduction plans.
          • The article mentions that J. Edward Moreno was involved in securing funding for the bank through his connections with Steven Mnuchin, which could be seen as a financial tie to the topic of New York Community Bank's rescue plan.
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
            J. Edward Moreno has a conflict of interest on the topic of New York Community Bank as he is reporting on their $1 billion rescue plan and the commercial real estate market exposure reduction plans.
            • Moreno's reporting may not provide an objective viewpoint as it is focused solely on New York Community Bank's rescue plan and its impact on the stock market. This could be seen as biased or favorable to the bank.
              • > The article mentions that Steven Mnuchin provided a cash injection to fortify New York Community Bank's balance sheet. This suggests that Moreno may have financial ties with Mnuchin or other individuals involved in the rescue plan.<br> > The article also reports on the commercial real estate market exposure reduction plans, which could be of interest to investors and stakeholders in the industry. As a reporter, Moreno should disclose any potential conflicts of interest he has on this topic.

              68%

              • Unique Points
                • NYCB lost 7% of its deposits in the past month
                • The bank had $83 billion in deposits as of Feb. 5, down from $77.2 billion on March 5
                • Moody's Investors Service cut NYCB's credit ratings to junk on Feb. 5
              • Accuracy
                No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
              • Deception (50%)
                The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that NYCB lost 7% of its deposits in the past month when actually it was only a loss of $1 billion-plus capital injection from investors led by former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin's Liberty Strategic Capital. Secondly, the article claims that this is due to concerns about the bank's loan book and deposit base but fails to mention any specific issues or evidence supporting this claim. Thirdly, it states that NYCB slashed its quarterly dividend for the second time this year when in fact it was only an 80% drop from a previous dividend of 5 cents per share to 1 cent per share. Lastly, the article quotes Mnuchin stating that he started looking at NYCB 'a long time ago' and that there are great opportunities for turning the bank into an attractive regional commercial bank but fails to disclose any specific details about his investment or plans for the bank.
                • The statement
              • Fallacies (85%)
                The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Mnuchin's Liberty Strategic Capital is leading the investment in NYCB without providing any evidence of their expertise or qualifications in banking. Secondly, there are two instances where the author quotes a statement from someone else and presents it as if it were their own, which constitutes plagiarism. Thirdly, there is an example of inflammatory rhetoric when the author describes NYCB's stock price drop as
                • The bank had $83 billion in deposits on Feb 5th and lost 7% of its deposits by March 5th.
                • <p>NYCB also said it’s slashing its quarterly dividend for the second time this year, to <strong>1 cent per share</strong>, from <strong>5 cents</strong>, an <em>80% drop.</em>. </p>
              • Bias (85%)
                The article contains several examples of bias. Firstly, the author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes New York Community Bank (NYCB) by describing it as a 'turbulent' bank with a 'negative news cycle'. This is an example of emotional language that attempts to sway public opinion rather than provide objective information. Secondly, the article quotes former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin using loaded language such as calling NYCB's loan book and deposit base 'perceived risks', which implies that there may be no actual risk involved. This is an example of ideological bias where the author presents a particular perspective without providing evidence to support it. Thirdly, the article quotes incoming CEO Joseph Otting stating that NYCB will look to strengthen its capital and liquidity levels and reduce its concentration in commercial real estate loans, which implies that these actions are necessary for the bank's survival. This is an example of monetary bias where the author presents a particular perspective without providing evidence to support it.
                • Former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin uses loaded language such as calling NYCB's loan book and deposit base 'perceived risks'
                  • Incoming CEO Joseph Otting states that NYCB will look to strengthen its capital and liquidity levels and reduce its concentration in commercial real estate loans
                    • The article describes NYCB as a 'turbulent' bank with a 'negative news cycle'
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                      There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest in this article. The author has a financial stake in the company they are reporting on as he is an employee at Liberty Strategic Capital which led the private equity investment into NYCB. Additionally, Mnuchin who was mentioned in the article and served as Trump's Treasury Secretary also has a financial stake with Liberty Strategic Capital.
                      • Mnuchin is an employee at Liberty Strategic Capital
                        • The author Hugh Son works for Liberty Strategic Capital which led the private equity investment into NYCB
                        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                          The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of New York Community Bank (NYCB) as they are reporting on their capital injection and loss of deposits. The article mentions Liberty Strategic Capital, which is an investor in NYCB's $1 billion-plus capital raise.
                          • The author reports that private equity investors led by Liberty Strategic Capital participated in the $1 billion-plus capital raise for NYCB.

                          63%

                          • Unique Points
                            • Embattled New York Community Bancorp announced a lifeline of more than $1 billion from a group of investors on Wednesday.
                            • The bank's shares were sent on a wild ride. New York Community Bancorp lost nearly half of its market value Wednesday on rumors that it was seeking cash, then jumped toward its best day in nearly a year on news of the capital infusion.
                            • Under the deal, which still needs finalization of definitive documentation and regulatory approvals, the bank would get investments from Liberty Strategic Capital ($450 million), Hudson Bay Capital ($250 million) and Reverence Capital ($200 million). Cash from other institutional investors and some of the bank's managers will take the total over $1 billion.
                            • The investors will receive stock in the company valued at $2 per share, along with convertible preferred stock that could pay dividends every three months.
                            • NYCB was a relatively unknown bank until last year, when it bought the assets of Signature Bank at auction on March 19 for $2.7 billion.
                            • The sudden increase in size for NYCB meant it had to face increased regulatory scrutiny.
                            • Pressure rose further on the bank after credit agencies cut NYCB's rating.
                          • Accuracy
                            No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                          • Deception (30%)
                            The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that New York Community Bancorp (NYCB) lost nearly half of its market value on rumors that it was seeking cash. However, this statement is misleading as the bank's stock had already been declining for months before these rumors surfaced. Secondly, the article reports that NYCB received investments from Liberty Strategic Capital and Hudson Bay Capital but fails to disclose how much each investor contributed or their total investment amount. This information is crucial in understanding the magnitude of the infusion and its impact on NYCB's financial situation. Lastly, while it mentions that Joseph Otting will become NYCB's CEO, it does not provide any details about his qualifications or experience in banking management.
                            • The statement 'New York Community Bancorp lost nearly half of its market value on rumors that it was seeking cash'
                          • Fallacies (75%)
                            The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by mentioning the names of Steven Mnuchin and Joseph Otting as new directors for New York Community Bancorp. This implies that their expertise will help the bank overcome its challenges, but it does not provide any evidence or reasoning to support this claim. Additionally, the article contains a dichotomous depiction by stating that NYCB's stock immediately erased losses and jumped 18% after news of the $1 billion investment, only to give up those gains and then swivel between losses and gains. This creates a false sense of hope for investors who may have been misled into thinking that the bank was turning around when it was not. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric by stating that NYCB's troubles appear unique to the bank, downplaying the risk of contagion in the banking sector. This is an example of a false dilemma fallacy as it presents only two options: either all banks are at risk or none are.
                            • The article mentions Steven Mnuchin and Joseph Otting as new directors for New York Community Bancorp, implying that their expertise will help the bank overcome its challenges. This is an example of an appeal to authority fallacy.
                          • Bias (75%)
                            The article is biased towards the investors who are providing a lifeline to New York Community Bancorp. The author mentions that four new directors will be added to NYCB's board and provides details about their backgrounds, including Steven Mnuchin and Joseph Otting. This gives an impression of the investors as being powerful figures in the financial industry who are able to influence decisions at NYCB.
                            • The article mentions that four new directors will be added to NYCB's board, including Steven Mnuchin and Joseph Otting.
                            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                              There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest in this article. The author has financial ties to the companies mentioned as investors in New York Community Bancorp and Hudson Bay Capital. Additionally, Joseph Otting, CEO of New York Community Bancorp and former comptroller of the currency is also a board member at Liberty Strategic Capital.
                              • Hudson Bay Capital
                                • Steven Mnuchin, Liberty Strategic Capital
                                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication

                                70%

                                • Unique Points
                                  • NYCB lost 7% of its deposits over the last month
                                  • The bank's total deposits dropped to $77.2 billion as of March 5, compared with $83 billion on Feb. 5.
                                  • Roughly 80% of its deposits are currently backstopped by insurance from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), while 20% are uninsured.
                                  • NYCB lost $7.8 billion in uninsured deposits over the last month.
                                • Accuracy
                                  No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                                • Deception (50%)
                                  The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that NYCB lost 7% of its deposits over the last month but fails to mention that this loss was due to a one-time event - the sale of $1 billion worth of securities by Mnuchin's group. This information is crucial for understanding the true nature of NYCB's financial situation and should have been disclosed in order to avoid misleading readers. Secondly, the article quotes Otting as saying that deposits are down only 5% compared with the level at the beginning of the year but fails to mention that this figure includes both insured and uninsured deposits. This is deceptive because it gives a false impression of NYCB's financial stability when in fact, its uninsured deposit losses have been significant. Lastly, while Fitch Ratings did say that the capital infusion was a positive development for creditors and could limit downside ratings momentum, this statement is not supported by any evidence presented in the article. Therefore, it cannot be considered as an example of deception.
                                  • The sale of $1 billion worth of securities by Mnuchin's group was a one-time event and should have been disclosed to give readers a true understanding of NYCB's financial situation.
                                • Fallacies (85%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                                • Bias (80%)
                                  The article reports on the financial challenges faced by New York Community Bancorp (NYCB) after losing a significant portion of its deposits in one month. The author cites sources and facts to support his claims, but also uses some language that depicts the situation as worse than it might be. For example, he says NYCB is facing "the challenges" of a new rescue, implying that there are many obstacles and difficulties ahead. He also quotes Fitch Ratings saying that the capital infusion from Mnuchin's group could limit downside ratings momentum, suggesting that NYCB is still at risk of further decline in its credit rating. Additionally, he uses phrases like "dramatic attempt to regain investor confidence" and "not a great day" to emphasize the negative tone of the article. However, he also provides some positive information from Fitch Ratings that the capital infusion is a near-term development for creditors and could help NYCB recover. He does not editorialize or express his own opinion on whether Mnuchin's group is a good or bad investor for NYCB.
                                  • New York Community Bancorp (NYCB) said Thursday it lost 7% of its deposits over the last month, highlighting the challenges facing a new investor group led by Steve Mnuchin that infused $1 billion into the troubled lender earlier this week.
                                    • Roughly 80% of its deposits are currently backstopped by insurance from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, while 20% are uninsured. NYCB lost $7.8 billion in uninsured deposits over the last month.
                                      • The bank disclosed in an investor presentation that its total deposits dropped to $77.2 billion as of March 5, compared with $83 billion on Feb. 5.
                                      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                        None Found At Time Of Publication
                                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                        None Found At Time Of Publication

                                      65%

                                      • Unique Points
                                        • Customers of New York Community Bank (NYCB) pulled $6 billion worth of deposits between February 5 and March 5
                                        • The bank's deposit base is now 7% lower than it was before the pullout began
                                        • NYCB has been in crisis mode since reporting a surprise loss of $252 million last quarter
                                      • Accuracy
                                        • The bank's deposit base is now 7% lower than it was before the period in question
                                      • Deception (50%)
                                        The article is deceptive because it does not provide a clear and accurate picture of the bank's financial situation. It uses emotional language such as 'bank run', which implies that customers are panicking and withdrawing their money en masse, when in fact they are pulling out $6 billion over a period of three weeks. This is misleading because it suggests that there is a widespread loss of confidence in the bank, while ignoring the fact that deposits have returned to normal levels after the investment announcement. It also does not explain why NYCB reported a surprise loss last quarter or how it plans to deal with its credit rating downgrade and reserve requirements. These are important details that potential investors would want to know before deciding whether to trust the bank with their money.
                                        • The article uses emotional language such as 'bank run' without defining what constitutes a bank run or providing any evidence of panic among customers. This is deceptive because it creates a false impression of urgency and danger that may influence readers to view the situation more negatively than it actually is.
                                      • Fallacies (75%)
                                        The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Silicon Valley Bank tried withdrawing $42 billion in one day over fears they wouldn't be able to access their funds if the bank failed. However, this is not a reliable source of information and should not be used as evidence for any claims made about NYCB. Secondly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that customers are pulling their cash from NYCB, which could create fear in readers and potentially lead to further panic withdrawals. Thirdly, the article contains a dichotomous depiction of depositors at Silicon Valley Bank trying to withdraw $42 billion in one day over fears they wouldn't be able to access their funds if the bank failed, while NYCB customers are pulling $6 billion worth of deposits between February 5 and March 5. This creates a false sense of urgency for readers and could lead them to believe that NYCB is facing imminent failure when it may not be. Lastly, the author uses an informal fallacy by stating that there were significant changes in the bank's level of deposits before identifying material weaknesses in its controls. This implies a causality between two unrelated events and should not be used as evidence for any claims made about NYCB.
                                        • The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Silicon Valley Bank tried withdrawing $42 billion in one day over fears they wouldn't be able to access their funds if the bank failed. However, this is not a reliable source of information and should not be used as evidence for any claims made about NYCB.
                                        • The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that customers are pulling their cash from NYCB, which could create fear in readers and potentially lead to further panic withdrawals.
                                      • Bias (70%)
                                        The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that depicts the bank as being in crisis mode due to its recent loss of $252 million and downgrade to junk status by credit rating agencies. This implies a negative view towards the bank's financial stability, which could be seen as an attack on their religious beliefs or ideology.
                                        • NYCB has been in crisis mode since the regional lender reported a surprise loss of $252 million last quarter
                                          • The looming concern from an investor standpoint is how aggressive the Long Island-based bank will be when it comes to setting aside more reserves and estimating how much it expects to lose from soured loans.
                                          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                            None Found At Time Of Publication
                                          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                            None Found At Time Of Publication