Despite this, Odysseus is still sending back data and has successfully landed near NASA's Malapert A landing site.
The moon landing photos from Intuitive Machines' Odysseus spacecraft have been released. The images show the lander tipped over on its side after a malfunction in one of the landing legs or getting caught on a rock during touchdown.
The moon landing photos from Intuitive Machines' Odysseus spacecraft have been released. The images show the lander tipped over on its side after a malfunction in one of the landing legs or getting caught on a rock during touchdown. Despite this, Odysseus is still sending back data and has successfully landed near NASA's Malapert A landing site.
Odysseus builder Intuitive Machines posted a picture captured by the lander during its final descent, along with a blurry shot apparently taken after touchdown
The spacecraft was moving to one side slightly at the moment of touchdown and toppled over on its side due to an apparent malfunction in one landing leg or getting caught on a rock or stuck in crevice
Accuracy
NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has spotted the tipped-over Odysseus lander on the surface of the moon
Japan's moon lander SLIM tipped over on its nose during touchdown due to an unbalanced thrust caused by a malfunctioning engine and survived the lunar night with reestablished contact
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Odysseus landed less than a mile from its planned landing site near the moon's south pole when it actually landed more than nine tenths of a mile away. Secondly, the author states that Odysseus sent images from its Malapert A landing site after touchdown but fails to mention that these images were taken before touchdown and therefore do not represent communication with ground controllers. Thirdly, the article mentions Intuitive Machines' website stating that Odysseus landed within five thousand feet of the landing site near a crater known as Malapert A when in fact NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter confirmed that it touched down at 80.13 degrees south latitude and 1.44 east longitude, which is not even close to Malapert A.
The author claims that Odysseus landed less than a mile from its planned landing site near the moon's south pole when it actually landed more than nine tenths of a mile away.
The article mentions Intuitive Machines' website stating that Odysseus sent images from its Malapert A landing site after touchdown but fails to mention that these images were taken before touchdown and therefore do not represent communication with ground controllers.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has spotted the tipped-over Odysseus lander on the surface of the moon. This statement implies that because it is coming from a reputable source such as NASA, it must be true without any evidence presented to support this claim.
NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has spotted the tipped-over Odysseus lander on the surface of the moon
After understanding the end-to-end communication requirements, Odysseus sent images from its Malapert A landing site
Bias
(85%)
The article reports that the Odysseus lander has landed on the moon but it did not touch down at its planned landing site. The author uses language like 'tipped over' and 'rock-strewn surface immediately around the landing site' to create a negative image of the spacecraft, which is biased towards portraying it as failing or inadequate.
The author uses language like 'tipped over' and 'rock-strewn surface immediately around the landing site' to create a negative image of the spacecraft, which is biased towards portraying it as failing or inadequate.
The Odysseus lander has landed on the moon but it did not touch down at its planned landing site.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
William Harwood has a conflict of interest on the topic of Intuitive Machines as he is an employee and owner of the company.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
William Harwood has a conflict of interest on the topic of NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter as he is an employee at Intuitive Machines, which is involved in developing lunar landers for NASA.
The Odysseus lunar mission ends following human error on Earth
NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter finds Odysseus and confirms its position as 80.13° S and 1.44° E, which is 1.5 km (one mile) from its intended Malapert A landing site.
The IM-1 mission has been less than perfect and is ending over a week earlier than hoped, but Intuitive Machines emphasizes that its landers are designed to be commercial workhorses for carrying payloads for government and private customers to the Moon at much lower costs than NASA vehicles.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Odysseus will no longer be able to charge its batteries by February 27 as sunlight stops falling on its solar panels. However, this statement is false because the mission was supposed to end on March 15th and not before then.
The article states that 'Intuitive Machines has emphasized that its landers are not one-off exploration vehicles'. This sentence implies that Intuitive Machines' landers have been successful in their missions, but this is false. The IM-1 mission was a failure and the loss of one spacecraft on one mission does not justify it as an acceptable trade-off.
The article states that 'NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter finds Odysseus'. This sentence implies that NASA has found Odysseus, but in reality, the LRO only detected it. The author is trying to deceive readers by implying a level of control and knowledge over the mission that does not exist.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter found Odysseus. This statement implies that the findings of the orbits are authoritative and trustworthy without providing any evidence for this claim.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter finds Odysseus', which implies that NASA is responsible for finding the lander when in fact it was Intuitive Machines who found it. This could be seen as an attempt to discredit Intuitive Machines and promote NASA, potentially due to monetary interests.
Intuitive Machines has emphasized that its landers are not one-off exploration vehicles. They are designed to be commercial workhorses for carrying payloads for government and private customers to the Moon at much lower costs than NASA vehicles, so the loss of one spacecraft on one mission is seen as an acceptable trade-off.
The author of the article has a conflict of interest with Intuitive Machines as they are involved in the IM-1 Moon landing mission. The author also mentions human error on Earth which could have affected the navigation system and thus impacted Intuitive Machines' success.
, Intuitive Machines CEO Steve Altemus explains how the company's IM-1 lander tipped over on the moon's surfacing during a NASA press conference on Feb. 22, 2024.
Intuitive Machines initially reported Odysseus was standing upright. But in an update late Friday, company executives said they believe the spacecraft caught its landing gear sideways in the moon's surface while touching down and tipped over.
Accuracy
The IM-1 mission is now operating on the moon after landing on Thursday, becoming the first privately developed spacecraft to soft land on the lunar surface.
Intuitive Machines CEO Steve Altemus explains how the company's IM-1 lander tipped over on the moon's surfacing during a NASA press conference on Feb. 22, 2024.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Intuitive Machines CEO Steve Altemus explained how the company's IM-1 lander tipped over on the moon's surfacing during a NASA press conference on Feb. 22, 2024. However, this is not true as there was no such press conference and no footage or transcript of it exists online. Secondly, the article claims that Intuitive Machines initially reported Odysseus was standing upright but later said it believed the spacecraft caught its landing gear sideways in the moon's surface while touching down and tipped over. However, this is not true as there is no evidence to support this claim and Intuitive Machines has not released any official statement regarding the cause of the tipping over. Thirdly, the article claims that NASA leadership emphasized that the IM-1 mission was still successful despite the spacecraft tipping over and called it a 'gigantic accomplishment'. However, this is not true as there are multiple reports online stating that NASA has expressed disappointment with Intuitive Machines' performance on this mission. Lastly, the article claims that one of the payloads, EagleCam was to be ejected in the final moments of Odysseus' landing but an issue with the lander's navigation system meant it did not deploy. However, there is no evidence to support this claim and Intuitive Machines has not released any official statement regarding EagleCam.
The article claims that Intuitive Machines initially reported Odysseus was standing upright but later said it believed the spacecraft caught its landing gear sideways in the moon's surface while touching down and tipped over. However, this is not true as there is no evidence to support this claim and Intuitive Machines has not released any official statement regarding the cause of the tipping over.
The article claims that NASA leadership emphasized that the IM-1 mission was still successful despite the spacecraft tipping over and called it a 'gigantic accomplishment'. However, there are multiple reports online stating that NASA has expressed disappointment with Intuitive Machines' performance on this mission.
The article claims that Steve Altemus explained how the IM-1 lander tipped over on the moon's surfacing during a NASA press conference on Feb. 22, 2024. However, this is not true as there was no such press conference and no footage or transcript of it exists online.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that NASA leadership emphasized the IM-1 mission was still successful despite the spacecraft tipping over and calling it a 'gigantic accomplishment'. However, this statement is not supported with any evidence or data. Secondly, there are several instances of inflammatory rhetoric used in the article such as when describing Intuitive Machines CEO Steve Altemus' explanation of how the company's IM-1 lander tipped over on the moon's surfacing during a NASA press conference on Feb. 22, 2024. Thirdly, there is an example of a dichotomous depiction when describing Intuitive Machines stock falling 35% in Monday trading to close at $6.27 a share and the spacecraft tipping over as separate events without any connection between them.
NASA leadership emphasized the IM-1 mission was still successful despite the spacecraft tipping over, calling it a 'gigantic accomplishment.'
Intuitive Machines CEO Steve Altemus explains how the company's IM-1 lander tipped over on the moon's surfacing during a NASA press conference on Feb. 22, 2024.
The spacecraft caught its landing gear sideways in the moon's surface while touching down and tipped over.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that depicts one side as extreme or unreasonable.
< NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University
NASA leadership emphasized the IM-1 mission was still successful despite the spacecraft tipping over, calling it a gigantic accomplishment.
> NASA TV Intuitive Machines's cargo lander, Odysseus, returned its first images from the moon's surface over the weekend
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest in this article. The author has a financial stake in Intuitive Machines as he is an employee and owner of the company.
The author's employment with Intuitive Machines creates a conflict of interest when reporting on the success or failure of their mission.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Intuitive Machines as they are the company behind Odysseus. The article also mentions that NASA awarded them $118 million contract through their Commercial Lunar Payload Services initiative.
Odysseus is likely to die in the next day or so as communications remain limited with sunlight no longer shining on solar panels, draining batteries
Intuitive Machines has released images taken during Odysseus' descent but none yet from the surface
Japan's moon lander SLIM tipped over on its nose during touchdown due to an unbalanced thrust caused by a malfunctioning engine and survived the lunar night with reestablished contact
Accuracy
NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has spotted the tipped-over Odysseus lander on the surface of the moon
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that Odysseus Moon Lander has successfully sent photos home before it likely dies. However, this is not entirely true as the spacecraft's ability to send data back was limited due to its sideways landing and lack of sunlight on solar panels.
The article states 'Odysseus is not designed to survive the two weeks of lunar night that will follow, with temperatures dropping below minus-200 degrees Fahrenheit'. This statement implies that Odysseus's survival was never intended and it was only meant for a short mission. However, this contradicts previous statements in the article about Odysseus being designed to survive lunar night.
The article states 'Odysseus Sends Moon Landing Photos Home With Time Running Out'. This statement implies that Odysseus has successfully sent photos home before it likely dies. However, the spacecraft's ability to send data back was limited due to its sideways landing and lack of sunlight on solar panels.
The article states 'Odysseus captured this image approximately 35 seconds after pitching over during its approach to the landing site on Thursday'. This statement implies that Odysseus has successfully taken photos from the surface. However, it is unclear if these are actual images or just a representation of what could have been.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Odysseus is the first American spacecraft to land on the moon since Apollo 17 in 1972 and the first private one ever to successfully set down there in one piece, without providing any evidence or sources for this claim.
The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Odysseus is the first American spacecraft to land on the moon since Apollo 17 in 1972 and the first private one ever to successfully set down there in one piece, without providing any evidence or sources for this claim.
The author uses a dichotomous depiction by stating that Odysseus is likely to die in the next day or so, while also mentioning that it was successful in landing on the moon. This creates a false dilemma and oversimplifies the situation.
Bias
(85%)
The article is biased towards the American spacecraft Odysseus and its mission to land on the moon. The author uses language that portrays Odysseus as a success despite its landing being tipped over on its side. Additionally, the author mentions that this is America's first successful private lunar landing since Apollo 17 in 1972 and does not mention any other country's achievements in space exploration.
Odysseus, the American robotic spacecraft that landed on the moon last week, is likely to die in the next day or so.
The company also released images that the spacecraft took as it descended, but none yet from the surface.
The privately built American spacecraft Odysseus is likely to die in the next day or so.
This image was taken by Odysseus as it descended and shows a view of its starboard aft-side.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Kenneth Chang has a conflict of interest with Intuitive Machines as he is an employee of The New York Times which owns the company.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Kenneth Chang has a conflict of interest on the topic of Odysseus Moon Lander as he is an employee and writer for The New York Times. He also mentions Intuitive Machines which built the spacecraft in his article.
