Olivia Munn was diagnosed with breast cancer in April 2023.
She underwent a double mastectomy as part of her treatment for the cancer and has had four surgeries in total over the past 10 months.
Olivia Munn, the 43-year-old actress known for her roles in 'X-Men: Apocalypse' and 'The Predator', has revealed that she was diagnosed with breast cancer in April 2023. Munn took a genetic test in February of that year which came back negative for all 90 different cancer genes, but her doctor calculated her Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Score, which led to further testing.
An MRI found Luminal B cancer, an aggressive and fast-moving form of the disease, in both breasts. Munn underwent a double mastectomy as part of her treatment for the cancer and has had four surgeries in total over the past 10 months.
Munn kept her diagnosis private for some time before sharing the news with fans on Instagram, where she posted photos and videos of herself being treated at a hospital. She urged women to calculate their own Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Score, stating that it 'saved my life'.
The actress has been in a relationship with comedian John Mulaney since 2021 and they have a son together. Munn thanked her doctors, family, and friends for their support during this time.
She underwent a double mastectomy after the diagnosis
Her doctor calculated her Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Score which saved her life
Munn had four surgeries in the past 10 months including a double mastectomy 30 days after the biopsy
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author does not disclose their sources and only quotes Olivia Munn's statements without any context or verification. Secondly, the article implies that a genetic test can predict cancer with certainty when it cannot. Thirdly, the article uses sensationalism by portraying Munn as lucky for catching her cancer early despite having negative results on a genetic test.
The author does not disclose their sources and only quotes Olivia Munn's statements without any context or verification.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when Olivia Munn states that her doctor calculated her Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Score and it saved her life. This implies that the score is a reliable indicator of breast cancer risk, which may not be entirely accurate or applicable to all individuals.
Olivia Munn stated 'My doctor decided to calculate my Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Score and that saved my life.'
The article suggests that the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Score is a reliable indicator of breast cancer risk, which may not be entirely accurate or applicable to all individuals.
Bias
(75%)
The article is biased towards the author's personal experience and does not provide a balanced view of breast cancer risk assessment. The author uses their own positive outcome to urge others to calculate their own risk assessment without providing any information on what factors led to their negative genetic test result or how it was determined that they had an aggressive form of cancer in both breasts.
Munn said she took a genetic test in February 2023 that checks for 90 different cancer genes and was negative for all.
Olivia Munn has revealed that she was diagnosed with breast cancer and underwent a double mastectomy, thanking her doctors and urging fans to calculate their own risk assessment.
Recording a high score, Munn got a biopsy, which found she had an aggressive form of cancer in both breasts.
Olivia Munn was diagnosed with breast cancer shortly after a normal mammogram in February 2023.
Munn underwent four surgeries, including a double mastectomy, and has learned more about cancer treatment and hormones than she ever imagined.
The Ob-Gyn detected her cancer by calculating her Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Score which led to an MRI, ultrasound, and biopsy.
Luminal B is an aggressive, fast moving cancer but women with luminal B tumors tend to have fairly high survival rates.
Accuracy
Munn counts herself as 'lucky' because she caught her cancer early enough that she had options.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that Olivia Munn was diagnosed with breast cancer shortly after a normal mammogram which is not true. The author states that she had a normal mammogram two months before her diagnosis but does not mention anything about it being abnormal or any other test results leading to her diagnosis.
The article mentions that the Ob-Gyn detected Olivia Munn's cancer by calculating her Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Score which is misleading. The score is just one factor in determining a woman's risk of developing breast cancer and does not guarantee a diagnosis.
The title implies that Olivia Munn was diagnosed with breast cancer shortly after a normal mammogram which is not true. The author states that she had a normal mammogram two months before her diagnosis but does not mention anything about it being abnormal or any other test results leading to her diagnosis.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that women with luminal B tumors tend to have fairly high survival rates without providing any evidence or citation for this claim. Secondly, the author makes a false dilemma by suggesting that there are only two options for breast cancer patients: either they catch it early enough and have options or they don't. This oversimplifies the complexities of breast cancer treatment and ignores other factors such as stage at diagnosis, individual patient health, and available resources. Lastly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing luminal B cancer as an aggressive, fast-moving cancer without providing any context or evidence for this claim.
The article states that women with luminal B tumors tend to have fairly high survival rates without providing any evidence or citation for this claim. This is a false statement and an appeal to authority fallacy.
Bias
(85%)
The author uses the phrase 'proactive about my health' to describe Olivia Munn's decision to take a genetic test. This implies that she is taking charge of her own health and making an effort to prevent cancer before it occurs. However, this language can be seen as promoting a false sense of control over one's health and downplaying the role of luck in preventing or developing certain diseases.
Olivia Munn has gone public with her breast cancer diagnosis.
Olivia Munn has been diagnosed with breast cancer.
The 43-year-old actress has been battling the disease since April 2023.
MRI found Luminal B cancer, an aggressive and fast moving cancer in both breasts.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the opinions of medical professionals without providing any evidence or context for their expertise. Additionally, the author commits a false dilemma by presenting only two options: either Munn is proactive about her health and gets tested, or she is not proactive and does not get tested. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric when describing Munn's cancer as
The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the opinions of medical professionals without providing any evidence or context for their expertise.
<p>Surprisingly, I<sup>ve</sup> only cried twice,
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement that implies the author has an agenda to promote breast cancer awareness and early detection. The author mentions their own experience with breast cancer and encourages readers to get tested for genetic markers related to the disease. This suggests that they are trying to persuade people of the importance of getting screened, which could be seen as biased.
Olivia Munn revealed she has been diagnosed with breast cancer.
Olivia Munn was diagnosed with breast cancer and underwent a double mastectomy.
She took a genetic test in February 2023 that checked for 90 different cancer genes and was negative for all. Her doctor decided to calculate her Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Score, which saved her life.
Recording a high score, Munn got a biopsy which found she had an aggressive form of cancer in both breasts.
She kept it private for some time before sharing with fans on Instagram.
Accuracy
She had four surgeries in the past 10 months including a double mastectomy 30 days after the biopsy.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title and body of the article suggest that Olivia Munn has been diagnosed with breast cancer and underwent a double mastectomy. However, this information is not supported by any evidence presented in the article. The only mention of her health status comes from an Instagram post made by Munn herself which does not provide any details about her diagnosis or treatment. Secondly, the article quotes Munn as saying that she took a genetic test and was negative for all cancer genes, but it is unclear if this test was done before or after her biopsy. This creates confusion and suggests that the results of the genetic test are not reliable. Thirdly, while Munn mentions her partner John Mulaney in her Instagram post as being there for her during surgery, she does not provide any details about his involvement in her treatment or how he supported her through this difficult time.
The title and body of the article suggest that Olivia Munn has been diagnosed with breast cancer and underwent a double mastectomy. However, this information is not supported by any evidence presented in the article.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that Olivia Munn's doctor decided to calculate her Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Score and that it saved her life. This implies that the score is a definitive measure of risk assessment and should be followed without question.
The article states, 'Even so, her doctor decided to calculate my Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Score'.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement from the author that implies they are biased towards women's health and cancer awareness. The author also uses language such as 'I want the same for any woman who might have to face this one day,' which suggests an emotional bias towards supporting other women with breast cancer.
Olivia Munn has revealed that she was diagnosed with breast cancer and underwent a double mastectomy, thanking her doctors and urging fans to calculate their own risk assessment. The author uses language such as 'I want the same for any woman who might have to face this one day,' which suggests an emotional bias towards supporting other women with breast cancer.
The article contains a statement from the author that implies they are biased towards women's health and cancer awareness. The author also uses language such as 'I want the same for any woman who might have to face this one day,' which suggests an emotional bias towards supporting other women with breast cancer.
Olivia Munn was diagnosed with an aggressive form of breast cancer in April 2023.
Munn had a double mastectomy as part of her treatment for the cancer.
The actress has been in a relationship with John Mulaney since 2021 and they have a son together.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Olivia Munn had a negative result on a test that checked for 90 cancer genes. However, this information contradicts what was stated earlier in the article where it says she tested negative for all of them including BRCA and her sister also tested negative around the same time.
Olivia Munn's post mentions that having her first child over the age of 30 was a factor in calculating her breast cancer risk assessment score. However, this information is not supported by any scientific evidence or research.
The author claims Olivia Munn had a negative result on a test that checked for 90 cancer genes. However, this information contradicts what was stated earlier in the article where it says she tested negative for all of them including BRCA and her sister also tested negative around the same time.
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The author has a clear bias towards promoting breast cancer risk assessments and encouraging women to get tested. The article is written in an empathetic tone that highlights the importance of early detection and treatment for breast cancer. However, this emphasis on testing may be seen as promoting fear or anxiety around the disease rather than providing accurate information about it.
Munn urged women to get a breast cancer risk assessment
The fact that she did saved my life
This weekend she shared images that showed her wearing a metallic Fendi gown for the Oscars ceremony, where Mulaney presented an award.
