Oxford High School Shooter's Father Faces Involuntary Manslaughter Charges

Oxford, Michigan, Michigan United States of America
James Crumbley, the father of the Oxford High School shooter, is standing trial on four counts of involuntary manslaughter in connection with the deaths of four students at Oxford High School.
Oxford High School Shooter's Father Faces Involuntary Manslaughter Charges
The prosecution believes that James knew his son posed a danger to others but failed to provide appropriate mental health care in the months before the shooting. On day one of trial proceedings, both sides presented their opening statements and called two witnesses each.
Oxford High School Shooter's Father Faces Involuntary Manslaughter Charges

James Crumbley, the father of the Oxford High School shooter, is standing trial on four counts of involuntary manslaughter in connection with the deaths of four students at Oxford High School. The prosecution believes that James knew his son posed a danger to others but failed to provide appropriate mental health care in the months before the shooting. On day one of trial proceedings, both sides presented their opening statements and called two witnesses each.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It's not clear if James Crumbley had access to resources for providing mental health care.
  • The evidence presented in court may be subject to interpretation.

Sources

68%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

James Crumbley made threatening statements from jail, officials say

Fox2Detroit News FOX 2 Friday, 08 March 2024 11:41
  • Unique Points
    • James Crumbley trial began on March 7, 2024
    • The Oakland County Sheriff's Office confirmed that James Crumbley's phone and electronic messaging access is now restricted due to threatening statements he made while in jail
    • Jennifer Crumbley was convicted of involuntary manslaughter on the same charges as her husband
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (30%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that James Crumbley's phone and electronic messaging access are now restricted due to threatening statements he made while in jail. However, the article does not provide any evidence of these threats or who James was threatening. This statement is therefore a lie by omission as there is no proof provided for this claim.
    • The article states that James Crumbley's phone and electronic messaging access are now restricted due to threatening statements he made while in jail. However, the article does not provide any evidence of these threats or who James was threatening.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several fallacies including dichotomous depictions and appeals to authority. The author presents the case as a clear-cut matter of negligence on the part of the parents, without considering any other potential factors that may have contributed to the tragedy.
    • `There are three people responsible for the deaths`
    • `James Crumbley was one person in the world in the best position to stop the shooting.`
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains examples of bias in the form of sensationalism and emotional appeals. The author uses phrases such as 'nightmare come to life' and 'three people responsible for the deaths', which are intended to evoke strong emotions in readers rather than providing a clear and objective account of events. Additionally, some statements made by witnesses during their testimony were not directly related to the trial but instead served as emotional appeals.
    • James Crumbley is one person in the world in the best position to stop the shooting.
      • The nightmare that unfolded was preventable
        • There are three people responsible for the deaths
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
          The author has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The article discusses James Crumbley's behavior and his involuntary manslaughter trial, which are directly related to the Oxford High School shooting that occurred in November 2021. Additionally, the article mentions a cable lock that came with the gun used in the shooting and is owned by Michigan Sheriff's Office. The author also discusses Crumbley's statements from jail, which could be seen as an attempt to influence public opinion or sway jurors in his trial.
          • The article mentions James Crumbley's behavior and involuntary manslaughter trial, which are directly related to the Oxford High School shooting that occurred in November 2021. The author also discusses a cable lock that came with the gun used in the shooting and is owned by Michigan Sheriff's Office.
            • The article mentions James Crumbley's statements from jail, which could be seen as an attempt to influence public opinion or sway jurors in his trial.

            80%

            The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
            (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

            A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

            Live stream: James Crumbley’s manslaughter trial begins in Oakland County

            ClickOnDetroit News Site Profile Cassidy Johncox Thursday, 07 March 2024 11:00
            • Unique Points
              • James Crumbley is standing trial on four counts of involuntary manslaughter in connection with the deaths of four students at Oxford High School.
              • The prosecution believes that James Crumbley knew that his son posed a danger to others but failed to provide appropriate mental health care in the months before the shooting.
            • Accuracy
              • The trial of James Crumbley began on March 7. He is standing trial on four counts of involuntary manslaughter in connection with the deaths of four students at Oxford High School.
              • James and Jennifer Crumbley are being charged for gross negligence towards their son by failing to provide proper care when he reported having hallucinations and struggling with his mental health. They have been accused of demonstrating a significant lack of concern about their son's emotional state and actions, which could have prevented the mass shooting.
              • The prosecution believes that James Crumbley knew that his son posed a danger to others but failed to provide appropriate mental health care in the months before the shooting. The defense argues that they had no knowledge of such things as their son's multiple social media accounts and Nazi coin.
            • Deception (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Fallacies (85%)
              The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the parents are being charged with involuntary manslaughter for their son's actions without providing any evidence or context about why this is appropriate. Additionally, the author makes a false dilemma by presenting only two options: either James Crumbley should be found guilty of involuntary manslaughter or he should not have been charged at all. This ignores other possible outcomes and oversimplifies a complex issue.
              • The parents are being charged with involuntary manslaughter for their son's actions without providing any evidence or context about why this is appropriate.
            • Bias (85%)
              The author demonstrates bias by selectively quoting and interpreting information in a way that supports their argument. They use language to depict one side as extreme or unreasonable.
              • `Both James Crumbley and his wife, Jennifer Crumbley, were charged with the same crimes. They are the first parents of a U.S. mass shooter to be charged in connection with their child’s crimes.`
                • `James Crumbley is standing trial on four counts of involuntary manslaughter`
                  • `Prosecutors believe the parents knew that their son posed a danger to others, and failed to provide ‘ordinary care’ that could have prevented the mass shooting`
                    • `Prosecutors will try to prove that the father failed to take steps that could have prevented his son from opening fire in the hallways of the high school.`
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                      The author of the article has multiple conflicts of interest on several topics related to the Oxford High School Shooting. The author is reporting on James Crumbley's manslaughter trial and Hana St. Juliana's gross negligence trial in Oakland County.
                      • The author reports that she has been covering the Oxford High School shooting since it happened, which could indicate a personal interest or connection to the topic.
                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                        None Found At Time Of Publication

                      76%

                      The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                      (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                      A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                      Father of Michigan school shooter faces manslaughter trial weeks after his wife’s conviction

                      CNN News Site: In-Depth Reporting and Analysis with Some Financial Conflicts and Sensational Language Eric Levenson, Thursday, 07 March 2024 10:18
                      • Unique Points
                        • James Crumbley is on trial for involuntary manslaughter in the November 30, 2021 shooting at Oxford High School.
                        • The defense argues that James did not know his son had gained access to the weapon or was planning to commit violence.
                      • Accuracy
                        • The Oakland County Sheriff's Office confirmed that James Crumbley's phone and electronic messaging access is now restricted due to threatening statements he made while in jail
                        • James and Jennifer Crumbley are being charged for gross negligence towards their son by failing to provide proper care when he reported having hallucinations and struggling with his mental health. They have been accused of demonstrating a significant lack of concern about their son's emotional state and actions, which could have prevented the mass shooting.
                      • Deception (50%)
                        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that James Crumbley was grossly negligent for purchasing a murder weapon four days before the attack and failing to secure it even though he knew his son was in a downward spiral. However, this statement contradicts previous statements made by Jennifer Crumbley's defense attorney who stated that James did not know his son had gained access to the weapon and did not believe there was an imminent, immediate threat of danger. Secondly, the article claims that parents have previously faced liability for their child's actions such as neglect or firearms charges. However, this statement is false as no parent has ever been held responsible for a mass shooting in this way before.
                        • The author claims that James Crumbley was grossly negligent but the defense attorney stated that he did not know his son had gained access to the weapon and did not believe there was an imminent, immediate threat of danger. This contradicts each other.
                      • Fallacies (85%)
                        The article contains several examples of an appeal to authority and a false dilemma. The author presents the case as if there are only two options: either James Crumbley is grossly negligent or he is not responsible for his son's actions. However, this oversimplifies the complex legal issues at play in this trial.
                        • The prosecutor argues that James Crumbley was grossly negligent because he purchased the murder weapon four days before the attack and failed to secure it even though he knew his son was in a downward spiral. This is an appeal to authority, as it assumes that purchasing a firearm for one's child automatically makes them responsible for any actions taken with that firearm.
                        • The author presents the case as if there are only two options: either James Crumbley is grossly negligent or he is not responsible for his son's actions. This oversimplifies the complex legal issues at play in this trial.
                      • Bias (85%)
                        The article is biased towards the prosecution's case against James Crumbley. The author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes him, such as calling his actions 'grossly negligent', and portrays him as a neglectful father who failed to secure a murder weapon despite being aware of his son's mental health issues. The article also presents the prosecution's legal strategy in an overly positive light, while dismissing James Crumbley's defense arguments without providing any evidence or reasoning for their validity.
                        • The article portrays James Crumbley as a neglectful father who failed to secure a murder weapon despite being aware of his son's mental health issues
                          • The author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes James Crumbley
                            • The prosecution's legal strategy is presented in an overly positive light while dismissing James Crumbley's defense arguments without providing any evidence or reasoning for their validity
                            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                              None Found At Time Of Publication
                            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                              The author of the article has a conflict of interest on several topics related to the Oxford High School shooting and gun control laws in the United States. The author is Eric Levenson who works for CNN which has been criticized for its coverage of gun violence and advocacy for stricter gun control measures.
                              • Eric Levenson, a reporter at CNN, covered the aftermath of the Oxford High School shooting extensively in 2021. He interviewed survivors and family members of victims, as well as law enforcement officials. In his reporting on this topic, he may have had a conflict of interest due to CNN's advocacy for stricter gun control measures.
                                • Lauren del Valle is also an author of the article who works at CNN which has been criticized for its coverage of gun violence and advocacy for stricter gun control measures. She may have had a conflict of interest on topics related to gun control laws in the United States.