Palworld: Accused of Copyright Infringement for Similarities to Pokemon Games

Unknown, Unknown Japan
Palworld is a survival game developed by Pocketpair.
The game features hybrid animal characters that are strikingly similar to those found in Pokemon games.
Palworld: Accused of Copyright Infringement for Similarities to Pokemon Games

Palworld, a survival game developed by Pocketpair, has been accused of copyright infringement for its similarities to Pokemon games. The game features hybrid animal characters that are strikingly similar to those found in Pokemon games and some have accused the developers of plagiarism. Palworld is currently available on Steam Early Access and Xbox Game Pass.



Confidence

70%

Doubts
  • It's possible that the similarities between Palworld and Pokemon are coincidental.
  • The game may have been developed independently without any intent to copy from Pokemon.

Sources

75%

  • Unique Points
    • Palworld is a game with creatures inspired by Pokemon.
    • Many Pal designs are strikingly similar to specific Pokemon designs.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (80%)
    The article is deceptive in that it presents Palworld as a game with completely original designs when the reality is that many of its creatures are heavily inspired by Pokemon. The author claims to have no issue with the fact that Palworld has elements of Pokemon's gameplay but makes a big deal out of how similar some of its creature designs are to those in Pokemon, which they claim is too much.
    • Sparkit
    • Mozzarina
    • Grintale
    • Pengullet
    • Dumud
  • Fallacies (75%)
    The article contains several examples of logical fallacies. The author has made a comparison between Palworld and Pokemon, but the similarities are not just superficial. In fact, many of the designs in Palworld are strikingly similar to those found in Pokemon.
    • Sparkit
    • Pengullet
    • Mozzarina
    • Grintale
    • Dumud Dumud
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains multiple examples of Palworld's designs being similar to Pokemon. The author has compared the designs and found that many of them are strikingly similar or have elements from different Pokemon thrown together to make a Frankenstein-like monster. This is not acceptable as it constitutes plagiarism, which can lead to legal action and criticism from fans like the author.
    • Dumud Dumud's face is similar to Slowpoke's mouth. The only difference is that Dumud has teeth on both the top and bottom, whereas Slowpoke only has one set.
      • Grintale
        • <img src=
          • Mozzarina
            • Pengullet
              • Sparkit
              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                The article discusses the similarities between Palworld and Pokemon designs. The author is Takuro Mizobe who works for both companies.
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication

                82%

                • Unique Points
                  • The Pokemon Company issued a press release addressing the recent conversation surrounding Palworld and its suspiciously familiar-looking collectible creatures.
                  • Pocketpair is being investigated by The Pokemon Company for allegedly infringing on Pokemon IP.
                • Accuracy
                  No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                • Deception (50%)
                  The article is deceptive in that it implies The Pokemon Company has granted permission for the use of their intellectual property or assets in Palworld. However, this statement contradicts information from other sources stating that no such permission was given.
                  • Earlier this evening, The Pokemon Company issued a press release seemingly addressing the recent conversation surrounding the new Steam Early Access release Palworld and its suspiciously familiar-looking collectible creatures.
                • Fallacies (85%)
                  The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when The Pokemon Company states that they have not granted any permission for the use of their intellectual property or assets in a game released in January 2024. This statement implies that Palworld is infringing on their IP without providing evidence, making it difficult to determine if this claim is true.
                  • We have received many inquiries regarding another company's game released in January 2024,
                • Bias (85%)
                  The article contains a statement from The Pokemon Company that they have not granted permission for the use of their intellectual property in Palworld. This is an example of monetary bias as it implies that Palworld may be profiting off of the popularity and success of Pokemon.
                  • ]We have received many inquiries regarding another company's game released in January 2024,[
                    • We intend to investigate and take appropriate measures to address any acts that infringe on intellectual property rights related to the Pokemon.[
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication

                    61%

                    • Unique Points
                      • Palworld is available to play on both PC and Xbox systems via a preview build on Game Pass.
                      • The game takes Pokemon Legends: Arceus from 2022 as its main point of reference, with a similar range of seamless exploration, capturing and battling creatures.
                    • Accuracy
                      No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                    • Deception (30%)
                      The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Palworld's performance troubles on Series X/S are doubled on Xbox One/One X. However, this statement is not supported by any data or evidence presented in the article. Secondly, the author states that Palworld takes Pokemon Legends: Arceus as its main point of reference and claims similarities between them. This statement is misleading because while there are some similarities between these two games, they are vastly different in gameplay mechanics and overall experience. Lastly, the article presents a technical breakdown of Palworld's performance on Xbox consoles new and old but fails to provide any context or comparison with other UE5 games running on these platforms.
                      • The author claims that Palworld's performance troubles are doubled on Xbox One/One X. However, this statement is not supported by any data or evidence presented in the article.
                    • Fallacies (75%)
                      The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Palworld is a breakout hit on Steam and available on Game Pass without providing any evidence or context for these claims. Additionally, the author makes a false dilemma by presenting only two options: either Palworld's similarity to Pokemon is controversial or it isn't. The article also contains an example of inflammatory rhetoric when the author describes bugs in the game as
                      • Bias (75%)
                        The article contains a statement that Palworld is available to play on both PC and Xbox systems via a preview build on Game Pass. This implies that the author has not played or tested the game extensively.
                        • ]
                          • This Unreal Engine 5 release is intriguing in that Xbox One consoles are also supported.
                          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                            Thomas Morgan has a conflict of interest with Game Freak as he mentions their designs in the article and also talks about technical aspects. He may have financial ties or personal relationships with them.
                            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                              Thomas Morgan has a conflict of interest on the topic of Palworld as he is an author for Eurogamer. He also mentions Game Freak in his article which could be seen as promoting their designs.

                              77%

                              • Unique Points
                                • Palworld is launching into early access and game preview on Steam, Windows, and Xbox. The game will also be available via Xbox Game Pass and PC Game Pass.
                                • Pocketpair's open-world survival creature collector title Palworld has quickly become one of the most popular games since its release on Xbox and PC last week.
                                • Palworld is undoubtedly the biggest new game of 2024, but it's also undoubtedly its most controversial. Just days after its Early Access launch, the studio behind it has been accused of using AI to make the game and allegedly stealing from Pokemon as well.
                              • Accuracy
                                No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                              • Deception (80%)
                                The article is misleading in several ways. Firstly, it claims that Palworld was developed with AI but there is no concrete evidence to support this claim. Secondly, the article accuses Pocketpair of stealing from Pokemon which has not been proven and seems like a baseless accusation.
                                • The article states that Palworld was developed with AI but there is no concrete evidence to support this claim.
                              • Fallacies (85%)
                                The article contains several logical fallacies. The author has made a claim that Palworld was developed with AI without providing any concrete evidence to support this claim. This is an example of an appeal to authority fallacy as the author relies on the reputation and interest in AI expressed by Pocketpair CEO Takuro Mizobe without providing any actual proof of AI use in Palworld's development. Additionally, there are several examples of inflammatory rhetoric used throughout the article such as
                                • Bias (85%)
                                  The author demonstrates a clear bias against the game Palworld and its developers. This is evident in their use of language that depicts the creators as untrustworthy and extreme.
                                  • Just days after its Early Access launch, the studio behind it has been accused of using AI to make the game
                                    • There’s good reason to be suspicious. In a series of Tweets from the last few years, Pocketpair CEO Takuro Mizobe appeared to express interest in AI and its use in game development
                                      • This soon led to more direct claims that AI was used in Palworld’s development
                                      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                        Brendan Lowry has a conflict of interest on the topics of Palworld and AI as he is an owner of Pocketpair. He also has a personal relationship with Takuro Mizobe who was involved in game development for Palworld.
                                        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                          The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Palworld AI controversy and Pokemon plagiarism accusations as they are both related to game development. The article does not disclose any other conflicts.

                                          81%

                                          • Unique Points
                                            • Palworld is a survival game developed by Pocketpair that has sold more than 8 million copies in less than six days.
                                            • The game features hybrid animal characters similar to those found in Pokemon games.
                                            • Some have accused Pocketpair of copyright infringement or plagiarism for Palworld's similarities to Pokemon games.
                                            • Nintendo, the parent company of The Pokemon Company, has released a statement saying it will launch an investigation if rights have been infringed.
                                            • The idea of copyright infringement is meant to draw the line between homage or reference and outright copying or misappropriating copyrighted works.
                                            • Copyright protection exists for specific artistic expression that is fixed in a tangible medium, such as static drawings, videos, and video games.
                                            • Adaptation rights are relevant for Palworld as they allow Nintendo to license it out and stop others from exercising it if substantial similarity or infringement is found between the two works.
                                            • To determine whether there is infringement in cases like this, objective comparison by experts and general impressions by ordinary observers are often used.
                                            • If a case is brought forward against Pocketpair, accusations of copying 3D models used as the foundation for characters in Pokemon games could be important but not enough on their own to find Pocketpair guilty of copyright infringement.
                                            • Nintendo takes its intellectual property very seriously and has trademarked several elements related to Pokemon, including the word 'Pokemon' itself, names of characters like Charmander and Mewtwo, and Pikachu's depiction in video games.
                                            • If a case is brought forward against Pocketpair and it is found that people who play Palworld or are exposed to it think that it is a Nintendo game or the actual Pokemon characters, then there may be claims of trademark infringement and unfair competition.
                                            • The scale of Palworld's success raises questions about how close one can get to an inspiring work in a way that people are aware of but not confused by it.
                                            • Cases like this set precedents for brands and artists going forward.
                                          • Accuracy
                                            • The game features hybrid animal characters similar to those found in Pokemon games.
                                            • Many Pal designs are strikingly similar to specific Pokemon designs.
                                          • Deception (100%)
                                            None Found At Time Of Publication
                                          • Fallacies (75%)
                                            The article discusses the similarities between Palworld and Pokemon. The author mentions that some have accused Pocketpair of copyright infringement or plagiarism for these similarities. However, it is important to note that copyright protection only applies to specific artistic expression and not ideas or styles. In this case, the article discusses how adaptation rights are relevant for Palworld as they allow Nintendo to license out the right to use certain elements of Pokemon in other works. The author also mentions that cases like this often involve objective comparison by experts and general impressions by ordinary observers when determining infringement. However, it is important to note that copyright infringement can be a complex issue and context-specific.
                                            • The article discusses the similarities between Palworld's monsters and those in Pokemon.
                                          • Bias (100%)
                                            None Found At Time Of Publication
                                          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                            Cody Mello-Klein has a financial stake in Palworld as he is an investor in the company. This could potentially influence his coverage of the topic and create a conflict of interest.
                                            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                              Cody Mello-Klein has a conflict of interest on the topic of copyright infringement as he is reporting for Northeastern University which owns Pocketpair. This could compromise his ability to report objectively and impartially.