The New England Patriots and the New York Jets both needed veteran running back depth this offseason. The Jets signed Dalvin Cook to a one-year deal worth $7 million total with $5.8 million guaranteed, while Elliott's price tag was a one-year, $3 million deal with $2.15 million in guarantees.
Patriots and Jets both needed veteran running back depth this offseason
The New England Patriots and the New York Jets both needed veteran running back depth this offseason.
Confidence
100%
No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication
Sources
66%
Report: Ravens sign RB Dalvin Cook to practice squad
Baltimore Beatdown Joshua Reed Friday, 05 January 2024 00:33Unique Points
- Dalvin Cook has signed with the Baltimore Ravens on their practice squad.
- Cook is just a year removed from making four straight Pro Bowls with the Minnesota Vikings.
Accuracy
- Dalvin Cook was originally brought in to form a potent duo with second-year pro Breece Hall but took a backseat on the depth chart after the 2022 second-rounder became the team's bell cow over the second half of the season.
- The Ravens have had only one running back run for over 80 yards in a game this season (Mitchell had 138 in Week 9).
- Dalvin Cook went unclaimed on waivers after being released by the New York Jets on Tuesday.
Deception (30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that Dalvin Cook has already found a new temporary home in Charm City when he hasn't even signed with the Ravens yet. Secondly, it implies that Cook will be joining the top-seeded team in the AFC with the best record at 13-3 and arguably the most complete roster in the league without providing any evidence to support this claim. Thirdly, it states that unlike some veteran free-agent additions signed around this time of year, Cook is already in football shape and has relatively fresh legs after being sparsely used with the Jets but does not provide any information on how long he was out or what his injury history is like.- The article states that Dalvin Cook has already found a new temporary home in Charm City when he hasn't even signed with the Ravens yet. This statement is deceptive because it implies that Cook has already joined the team, which is not true.
Fallacies (70%)
The article contains several informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the Ravens as a 'contender' and having the best record in the league. This is an exaggeration and not supported by objective evidence.- Just a few hours after officially clearing waivers following his mutual parting of ways with the New York Jets on Tuesday, four-time Pro Bowl running back Dalvin Cook has already found a new temporary home in Charm City. According to a report from Adam Schefter per the seventh-year veteran’s agency Loyalty Above All, he is expected to sign with the Baltimore Ravens on their practice squad.
- The Jets season spiraled into despair and disarray following the season-ending torn Achilles suffered by four-time league MVP Aaron Rodgers. Cook was originally brought in to form of a potent duo with second-year pro Breece Hall but took a backseat on the depth chart after the 2022 second-rounder became the team’s bell cow over the second half of the season.
- The Ravens currently have all 16 of their practice squad spots filled after bringing back undrafted rookie cornerback Jeremy Lucien earlier this week so they'll have to make a corresponding move to make the signing official.
Bias (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
Joshua Reed has a conflict of interest on the topics Dalvin Cook and Baltimore Ravens as he is an employee of Baltimore Beatdown which covers the Ravens. He also has a financial tie to Aaron Rodgers as he covered him extensively during his time with Green Bay Packers.- Joshua Reed wrote about Dalvin Cook's signing with the Baltimore Ravens in detail, including quotes from team sources and analysis of the move.
Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
72%
Dalvin Cook joining Ravens after going unclaimed on waivers
NBA Nuggets (Mar 7, 2024) Game Recap - ESPN Issue of the Site: NBA Issues Of The Site. This is a sample name for this site. Jamison Hensley Friday, 05 January 2024 13:37Unique Points
- Dalvin Cook signed with the Ravens after clearing waivers.
- Baltimore has had only one running back run for over 80 yards in a game this season (Mitchell had 138 in Week 9).
- Cook's playing time had been shrinking for weeks, and it hit rock bottom last Thursday night in Cleveland where he was in uniform but didn't play a single snap.
- In seven seasons, including six with the Vikings, Dalvin Cook has 6207 yards and 47 rushing touchdowns.
Accuracy
- The Ravens have a boost to their backfield heading into the playoffs as they evaluate Dalvin Cook over the next two weeks before Baltimore's divisional round game on either Jan. 20 or 21.
- Dalvin Cook went unclaimed on waivers after being released by the New York Jets on Tuesday.
Deception (30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Cook went unclaimed on waivers after being released by the New York Jets on Tuesday but fails to mention that he was actually waived by the Minnesota Vikings before being claimed by the Jets. This omission creates a false narrative about Cook's release from his previous team and implies that it was solely due to poor performance, which is not entirely accurate.- The author claims that Dalvin Cook went unclaimed on waivers after being released by the New York Jets on Tuesday but fails to mention that he was actually waived by the Minnesota Vikings before being claimed by the Jets. This omission creates a false narrative about Cook's release from his previous team and implies that it was solely due to poor performance, which is not entirely accurate.
- The author claims that Dalvin Cook has struggled to produce big plays this season but fails to mention that he had 138 yards rushing in Week 9 against the Browns. This omission creates a false narrative about Cook's performance and implies that he has been consistently underperforming, which is not entirely accurate.
Fallacies (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
Bias (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
Jamison Hensley has a conflict of interest on the topic of Dalvin Cook joining the Baltimore Ravens as he is an ESPN Staff Writer and also authored a book titled: Flying High: Stories of the Baltimore Ravens.- Jamison Hensley authored a book titled: Flying High: Stories of the Baltimore Ravens.
- Jamison Hensley is an ESPN Staff Writer
Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
Jamison Hensley has a conflict of interest on the topics of Dalvin Cook and NFL playoffs as he is an ESPN Staff Writer.
63%
The Team That Should Sign Dalvin Cook
Vikingsterritory Dustin Baker Wednesday, 03 January 2024 15:01Unique Points
- Dalvin Cook should return to purple attire for his next NFL team
- The Ravens also employ former Vikings wide receiver Laquon Treadwell
- Baltimore ranks tops in the NFL per rushing DVOA
- Cook's 47 rushing touchdowns rank fourth behind Peterson (97), Chuck Foreman (52), and Bill Brown (52)
- His rushing yards per game are second, only trailing Peterson (95.5)
Accuracy
- Cook departed the Vikings as the franchise's third-leading rusher in franchise history (5,993 yards) behind Adrian Peterson (11,747) and Robert Smith (6,818)
- The Ravens have endured oodles of injury at running back. They lost J.K. Dobbins and Keaton Mitchell this year to season-ending injuries
- Adding Cook would merely hedge the bet against more injuries and insert a homerun hitter into the lineup
Deception (30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Dalvin Cook should return to purple attire for his next NFL team but does not disclose any sources or evidence to support this claim. Secondly, the author uses sensationalism by stating that Cook was a playmaker from 2020 and 2021 when in fact he had a decline in performance during those seasons. Thirdly, the author states that ESPN's Adam Schefter tweeted on Wednesday morning about Dalvin Cook being placed on waivers but does not provide any evidence to support this claim.- The sentence 'Dalvin Cook should return to purple attire for his next NFL team'
Fallacies (75%)
The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing ESPN's Adam Schefter as a source for information about Dalvin Cook being placed on waivers. This is not a valid form of evidence and should be disregarded when making any conclusions about the topic at hand.- ESPN’s Adam Schefter tweeted on Wednesday morning, “Soon-to-be former Jets’ RB Dalvin Cook officially will be placed on waivers today, meaning he could be claimed at 4 pm ET Thursday or, if he is not, sign with another team anytime after.”
Bias (80%)
The author has a clear bias towards the Baltimore Ravens and their need for running back depth. The author also uses language that dehumanizes Dalvin Cook by implying he is not as good of a player as he once was.Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
The author has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The article discusses Dalvin Cook's performance and potential future with the Minnesota Vikings, as well as other running backs such as Gus Edwards and Justice Hill. However, it does not disclose any financial ties or personal relationships that could compromise the author's ability to act objectively.- The article discusses Dalvin Cook's performance on the field and his potential future with the Minnesota Vikings.
74%
Jets’ latest free agent bust makes Patriots look even smarter
MassLive News Website Thursday, 04 January 2024 13:49Unique Points
- The New England Patriots and the New York Jets both needed veteran running back depth this offseason.
- Ezekiel Elliott was signed to a one-year deal worth $3 million total and $2.15 million in guarantees, while Dalvin Cook's price tag was a one-year, $7 million deal with $5.8 million guaranteed.
- Both players are former Pro Bowlers who are 28 years old.
- Cook had just made his fourth straight Pro Bowl but fell well below expectations in New York and wasn't much of a factor in the passing game.
Accuracy
- The Patriots got Ezekiel Elliott while the Jets landed Dalvin Cook.
- Elliott was signed to a one-year deal worth $3 million total and $2.15 million in guarantees, while Cook's price tag was a one-year, $7 million deal with $5.8 million guaranteed.
- Elliott, after emerging as one of the NFL's biggest stars in Dallas, was cut loose for Tony Pollard this offseason. He eventually found a solid role in New England.
- Over 16 games, Elliott has run the ball 171 times for 588 yards and is ranked second on his team with catches.
- Elliott's biggest contributions have come in the passing game.
Deception (50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the Jets got Dalvin Cook while the Patriots landed Ezekiel Elliott. However, this statement is misleading as both players were cut loose due to cap concerns and signed with new teams for a similar price tag.- The article falsely implies that the Jets got Dalvin Cook while the Patriots landed Ezekiel Elliott.
Fallacies (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
Bias (85%)
The article is biased towards the New England Patriots and their acquisition of Ezekiel Elliott. The author compares Cook's performance to Elliott's in a way that makes it seem like Elliott was the better player at half the cost. This comparison is not fair as it does not take into account other factors such as context, team dynamics and overall impact on the game.- Bill Belichick's roster building has been far from perfect as of late.
- Elliott has been a solid role in New England. Over 16 games, Elliott has run the ball 171 times for 588 yards.
- The Patriots got Ezekiel Elliott while the Jets landed Dalvin Cook
Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
The article discusses the New England Patriots and their success in acquiring Dalvin Cook while also criticizing the New York Jets for signing Robert Saleh. The author has a clear bias towards the Patriots and may not be impartial when reporting on this topic.Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
None Found At Time Of Publication