Peregrine Lunar Lander is experiencing a critical fuel leak
Propellant leak has caused the Attitude Control System (ACS) thrusters to operate beyond their expected service life cycles and keep the lander from an uncontrollable tumble.
The Peregrine is now out of reach for the moon due to its damaged lunar lander.
The Peregrine Lunar Lander, a commercial spacecraft developed by Astrobotic Technology, is currently experiencing a critical fuel leak that threatens its mission to land on the moon. The propellant leak has caused the Attitude Control System (ACS) thrusters to operate beyond their expected service life cycles and keep the lander from an uncontrollable tumble. As a result, Peregrine is now out of reach for the moon due to its damaged lunar lander. NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services program was set to study the moon's surface, atmosphere and radiation environment on board this spacecraft.
Astrobotic's private Peregrine moon lander is experiencing a critical fuel leak shortly after its launch into space on Monday, January 8th.
The propellant leak has caused the spacecraft's Attitude Control System (ACS) thrusters to operate beyond their expected service life cycles and keep the lander from an uncontrollable tumble.
Peregrine is now out of reach for the moon due to its damaged lunar lander.
The goal is to get Peregrine as close to lunar distance as possible before it loses the ability to maintain its sun-pointing position and subsequently loses power.
If Peregrine doesn't reach the moon, a large suite of scientific experiments and commercial payloads could be lost.
Onboard the lunar lander are 20 payloads for customers, including five science payloads operated by NASA under its Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program that were designed to study the moon's surface, atmosphere and radiation environment.
Another NASA-led experiment, the Laser Retroreflector Array (LRA), would have placed mirrors on the lunar surface to service as precise distance and location markers.
Mexico's space agency also had five miniature autonomous rovers on Peregrine, which were set to carry out the country's first moon mission, and a Carnegie Mellon University has a small student-built Nano Lunar Rover aboard.
Some of the commercial payloads include a piece of Mt. Everest, a controversial memorials of human remains and DNA, a miniaturized library, and messages from people around the world.
Peregrine was set to be the first mission under the CLPS program which aims to accelerate lunar science by placing NASA-led experiments aboard commercial landers and spacecraft.
The next CLPS mission is slated for February when Houston-based Intuitive Machines launches its Nova-C lander atop a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the Peregrine moon lander lifted off Monday during the flawless first launch of United Launch Alliance's brand-new Vulcan Centaur rocket as the booster's primary payload. However, this statement is misleading because it implies that there were no other payloads on board when in fact there were several scientific experiments and commercial payloads for customers including NASA under its Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program.
The article states that the Peregrine moon lander lifted off Monday during the flawless first launch of United Launch Alliance's brand-new Vulcan Centaur rocket as the booster's primary payload. However, this statement is misleading because it implies that there were no other payloads on board when in fact there were several scientific experiments and commercial payloads for customers including NASA under its Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program.
The article states that Peregrine was set to be the first mission under the CLPS program, which aims to accelerate lunar science by placing NASA-led experiments aboard commercial landers and spacecraft. However, this statement is misleading because it implies that there were no other missions planned for the future when in fact another CLPS mission is slated for February.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the Peregrine moon lander was launched into space on a brand-new Vulcan Centaur rocket as the booster's primary payload. However, this does not necessarily mean that the rocket is reliable or capable of successfully launching and landing a lunar lander. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that Peregrine was set to be the first mission under the CLPS program, which aims to accelerate lunar science by placing NASA-led experiments aboard commercial landers and spacecraft. This statement implies that Peregrine's failure is a significant blow to the success of this program, even though it may not necessarily be true. The author also uses an informal fallacy by stating that if Peregrine doesn't reach the moon, which appears to be likely given its current predicament, then all scientific experiments and commercial payloads on board could be lost. This statement is not supported by any evidence or logical reasoning.
The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Peregrine was launched into space on a brand-new Vulcan Centaur rocket as the booster's primary payload.
Bias
(0%)
The article is biased in several ways. Firstly, it uses a sensationalist headline that implies the Peregrine moon lander was doomed from the start and that time is running out for it after a fuel leak. This creates an impression of negativity and pessimism about the mission, which may not be accurate or fair given that there are still efforts to recover the situation. Secondly, it focuses on the author's perspective as a journalist who covers emerging technologies and alternative launch concepts, rather than providing objective information about the Peregrine moon lander project and its goals. This suggests that the article is more interested in promoting the author's own interests and expertise than informing readers about an important lunar mission. Thirdly, it mentions that Astrobotic's private Peregrine moon lander was launched on United Launch Alliance's brand-new Vulcan Centaur rocket as the booster's primary payload, but does not provide any details or context about this achievement or how it relates to the mission. This implies that the article is more concerned with highlighting a competitor of ULA than reporting on the Peregrine moon lander itself. Finally, it reveals that some of the payloads on board are controversial, such as pieces of Mt. Everest and human remains and DNA memorials, but does not explain why these were chosen or what their purpose is. This creates a negative impression of these items without giving any background information or justification for them.
An example of bias in the article is its focus on the author's perspective as a journalist who covers emerging technologies and alternative launch concepts, rather than providing objective information about the Peregrine moon lander project and its goals. This suggests that the article is more interested in promoting the author's own interests and expertise than informing readers about an important lunar mission.
An example of bias in the article is its mention of Astrobotic's private Peregrine moon lander being launched on United Launch Alliance's brand-new Vulcan Centaur rocket as the booster's primary payload, but not providing any details or context about this achievement or how it relates to the mission. This implies that the article is more concerned with highlighting a competitor of ULA than reporting on the Peregrine moon lander itself.
An example of bias in the article is its revelation that some of the payloads on board are controversial, such as pieces of Mt. Everest and human remains and DNA memorials, but does not explain why these were chosen or what their purpose is. This creates a negative impression of these items without giving any background information or justification for them.
An example of bias in the article is its use of deceptive language to imply that Peregrine was doomed from the start and that time was running out for it after a fuel leak. This creates an impression of negativity and pessimism about the mission, which may not be accurate or fair given that there are still efforts to recover the situation.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest with Astrobotic as they are the company that owns and operates Peregrine moon lander. The article also mentions United Launch Alliance which is a competitor to SpaceX, who was previously contracted by NASA for lunar missions.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topics of Peregrine moon lander and Astrobotic as they are both companies that have been involved in space exploration. The article also mentions Vulcan Centaur rocket which is another company that could potentially be affected by any issues with Peregrine moon lander.
In 1962, President John F. Kennedy challenged Americans to go to the moon.
Kennedy's speech pushed potential of educational institutions like Rice University and foresaw boom in industry from space program.
Accuracy
It took seven years to put the first men on the moon after that speech.
Astrobotic Technology's Peregrine Mission One launched on Monday morning and could be a uniquely egalitarian commercial moon landing if ultimately successful.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in its use of quotes from President John F. Kennedy to make a point about the current space program and Astrobotic's role in it. The author takes out of context a quote that was made over 62 years ago and uses it to imply that the current state of space exploration is comparable to what was achieved during the Apollo missions, when in fact there have been many failures since then. Additionally, the article implies that Astrobotic's mission will be uniquely egalitarian because it is owned by its employees rather than a wealthy individual like Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos. However, this ignores the fact that NASA has also had a significant role in space exploration and commercialization of space technology.
The author takes out of context President John F. Kennedy's quote from 1962 to make it seem like Astrobotic's mission is comparable to what was achieved during the Apollo missions, when in fact there have been many failures since then.
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(10%)
The article is an editorial and therefore has a clear bias towards the success of Astrobotic's Peregrine Mission One. The author uses quotes from President John F. Kennedy to emphasize the importance of space exploration and its potential for commercial gain.
“I am delighted that this university is playing a part in putting a man on the moon as part of a great national effort of the United States of America”
]In 1962, when President John F. Kennedy spoke at Rice University in Houston, Texas, challenging Americans to go to the moon[
Kennedy said “This is a breathtaking pace[
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The article discusses the upcoming launch of Astrobotic Technology's Peregrine Mission One and its significance for space exploration in Pittsburgh. The author is TribuneReview, which has a financial stake in Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), where the mission was developed. Additionally, CMU has received funding from NASA to support the development of this mission.
The article mentions that Astrobotic Technology's Peregrine Mission One is being launched by a company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Peregrine spacecraft launched from Florida toward the moon early Monday morning
The Peregrine lander was unable to place itself in a position facing the sun due to a propulsion issue, which prevented it from charging its batteries
A fuel leak is causing thrusters of Peregrine's attitude control system to operate beyond their expected service life cycles and could only operate for 40 more hours at most
Peregrine lander experienced an anomaly that left the vehicle pointed away from the sun and unable to charge its battery, which required mission controllers to develop and execute an improvised maneuver to reorient solar panels towards the Sun
Deception
(90%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article suggests that Peregrine mission has successfully landed on the moon when it hasn't. Secondly, Astrobotic claims that Peregrine was able to activate its avionics systems and thermal controllers but failed to reorient itself towards the sun due to a propulsion issue. However, there is no evidence in the article of any attempts made by mission controllers to correct this problem or improve Peregrine's orientation. Thirdly, Astrobotic claims that Peregrine was able to communicate with NASA's Deep Space Network but failed to charge its battery due to a critical fuel leak from a propulsion system anomaly. However, there is no evidence in the article of any attempts made by mission controllers or engineers to fix this problem or improve Peregrine's ability to recharge its batteries. Finally, Astrobotic claims that Peregrine was able to successfully activate its avionics systems and thermal controllers but failed due to a critical fuel leak from a propulsion system anomaly. However, there is no evidence in the article of any attempts made by mission controllers or engineers to fix this problem or improve Peregrine's ability to recharge its batteries.
The title of the article suggests that Peregrine mission has successfully landed on the moon when it hasn't. This is a lie by omission as there is no mention in the article of any attempts made by Astrobotic or NASA to land Peregrine on the moon.
Fallacies
(80%)
The article contains an example of a dilemma depiction. The author describes the Peregrine spacecraft as being unable to place itself in a position facing the sun due to a propulsion issue, which prevented it from charging its batteries. This is presented as if it were only one option for the spacecraft, when there may have been other options available that could have allowed it to continue with its mission.
The Peregrine spacecraft was unable to place itself in a position facing the sun due to a propulsion issue.
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Jackie Wattles and Kristin Fisher have a conflict of interest on the topic of Peregrine mission as they are reporting for CNN which is owned by AT&T. The company has financial ties to SpaceX, which developed the Falcon Heavy rocket that was used in the failed launch attempt.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
Jackie Wattles and Kristin Fisher have a conflict of interest on the topic of Peregrine mission as they are reporting for CNN which is owned by AT&T. This company has financial ties to SpaceX, which developed the Falcon Heavy rocket that was used in the failed launch attempt.
Jackie Wattles and Kristin Fisher report on a failed lunar landing attempt of Peregrine mission for CNN.
The Peregrine Lunar Lander launched from Florida on Monday with the goal of becoming the first American craft to touch down on the moon in more than 50 years.
A critical loss of propellant occurred, putting the mission in jeopardy. The failure within the propulsion system is causing this loss and Astrobotic is working to stabilize it.
The Peregrine Lunar Lander was carrying five scientific instruments for NASA that will help prepare for a sustained human presence on the moon.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the Peregrine Lunar Lander began lifting off on a United Launch Alliance Vulcan rocket from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station at 2:18 a.m., but then says that it separated approximately 310 miles above Earth about 50 minutes later, which contradicts the initial statement. Secondly, the article states that Astrobotic-built avionics systems powered on and performed as expected, but then mentions an anomaly occurred which prevented Astrobotic from achieving a stable sun-pointing orientation. This implies that there was something wrong with the avionics systems or their performance, which contradicts the initial statement. Thirdly, the article states that NASA has paid Astrobotic $108 million to carry five scientific instruments to the moon and remains of several Star Trek cast members and DNA of President John F. Kennedy, but then mentions that Peregrine lander is also carrying these items which contradicts the initial statement.
The article states that the Peregrine Lunar Lander began lifting off on a United Launch Alliance Vulcan rocket from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station at 2:18 a.m., but then says that it separated approximately 310 miles above Earth about 50 minutes later, which contradicts the initial statement.
The article states that Astrobotic-built avionics systems powered on and performed as expected, but then mentions an anomaly occurred which prevented Astrobotic from achieving a stable sun-pointing orientation. This implies that there was something wrong with the avionics systems or their performance, which contradicts the initial statement.
The article states that NASA has paid Astrobotic $108 million to carry five scientific instruments to the moon and remains of several Star Trek cast members and DNA of President John F. Kennedy, but then mentions that Peregrine lander is also carrying these items which contradicts the initial statement.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that NASA has paid Astrobotic $108 million for the mission. Additionally, there is a dichotomous depiction of the Peregrine Lunar Lander as both successful and failing in its mission. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the critical loss of propellant as putting the entire mission at risk.
Astrobotic Technology says its Peregrine Lunar Lander began lifting off on a United Launch Alliance Vulcan rocket from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station at 2:18 a.m. before separating approximately 310 miles above Earth about 50 minutes later.
Unfortunately, an anomaly then occurred, which prevented Astrobotic from achieving a stable sun-pointing orientation.
Bias
(85%)
The article reports that the Peregrine Lunar Lander is suffering from a critical loss of propellant due to an anomaly in its propulsion system. This puts the mission at risk and may prevent it from achieving its goal of landing on the moon. The author also mentions that NASA has paid Astrobotic $108 million for this mission, which adds financial bias to the article.
A U.S. lunar lander that launched from Florida on Monday in hopes of becoming the first American craft to touch down on the moon in more than 50 years is now suffering from a critical loss of propellant
Unfortunately, it appears the failure within the propulsion system is causing a critical loss of propellant
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Greg Norman has a financial interest in Astrobotic Technology and United Launch Alliance. He also reports on the critical loss of propellant for the Peregrine Lunar Lander which is being developed by Astrobotic Technology.
This is the first time a commercial company was trying to do this: Mike Massimino
The upcoming quarterly refunding update from the US Treasury will provide information on how much bond supply there will be
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(0%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy. The author claims that this is the first time a commercial company was trying to do something without providing any evidence or context for why it matters.
