Political Consultant Indicted for Voter Suppression: FCC Fines $6 Million for Illegal Robocalls Using Deepfake Technology

Nashua, New Hampshire, New Hampshire, USA United States of America
FCC fined Kramer $6 million for illegal scam calls
Investigations into the matter are ongoing, Rep. Dean Phillips' campaign employed Kramer at the time of incident
Kramer orchestrated fake Biden robocalls using deepfake technology and artificial intelligence-generated voices
Political consultant Steven Kramer indicted on 26 counts for voter suppression and impersonation in New Hampshire
Political Consultant Indicted for Voter Suppression: FCC Fines $6 Million for Illegal Robocalls Using Deepfake Technology

In a shocking turn of events, political consultant Steven Kramer has been indicted on 26 counts for voter suppression and impersonation of a candidate in New Hampshire. The charges come after Kramer orchestrated fake Biden robocalls that violated federal Caller ID laws and used artificial intelligence-generated voices to mimic President Joe Biden's voice, urging Democrats not to vote in the primary elections. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) fined Kramer $6 million for these scam calls.

New Hampshire Attorney General John Formella stated that the state is committed to ensuring free and fair elections and that investigations into this matter are ongoing. Kramer, who was employed by Rep. Dean Phillips' campaign at the time of the robocall incident, has yet to comment on these charges.

The use of deepfake technology in political campaigns raises serious concerns about voter suppression and manipulation. The FCC swiftly moved to declare robocalls made using AI-generated voices illegal following this scandal. It is crucial that stricter rules are put in place to protect against such nefarious activities, as deepfake audio and video tools become increasingly accessible and capable.

This incident serves as a reminder of the importance of factual reporting and transparency in politics. As responsible journalists, it is our duty to provide accurate information without bias or deception.



Confidence

91%

Doubts
  • Is there any evidence that the robocalls directly influenced voter turnout?
  • Were there any other individuals or campaigns involved in this scandal?

Sources

98%

  • Unique Points
    • Steven Kramer indicted for orchestrating fake robocalls using artificial-intelligence impersonation of President Biden in New Hampshire's presidential primary.
    • Steven Kramer faces about two dozen counts, split between impersonating a candidate (a misdemeanor) and voter suppression (a felony).
    • Each pair of charges is tied to a specific voter who received the robocall.
    • New Hampshire Attorney General John M. Formella announced the indictments on Thursday.
    • Neither Steven Kramer nor Lingo Telecom immediately responded to requests for comment.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

99%

  • Unique Points
    • Steven Kramer, a political consultant, was indicted on 26 counts for voter suppression and impersonation of a candidate in New Hampshire
    • Kramer was charged for setting up scam calls violating federal Caller ID law and fined $6 million by the FCC
    • New Hampshire Attorney General John Formella stated that the state is committed to ensuring free elections and ongoing investigation into the matter
    • Steven Kramer employed by Rep. Dean Phillips campaign at the time of robocall incident
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (95%)
    The author makes several statements in the article that are not fallacious. However, there is one instance of an appeal to authority when the author states 'Studies in recent years have shown most people already have trouble identifying deepfake audio and video.' This statement is made without providing any specific studies or sources, making it an appeal to unspecified authority. The score would be lower if there were more fallacies or examples of more egregious fallacies.
    • 'Studies in recent years have shown most people already have trouble identifying deepfake audio and video.'
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

100%

  • Unique Points
    • Steve Kramer admitted to creating the robocall and claimed he did it to prompt stricter regulations of AI deepfakes.
    • This was the first known example of a deepfake being used in national American politics.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

99%

  • Unique Points
    • Political consultant Steven Kramer orchestrated fake Biden robocalls to voters ahead of New Hampshire’s presidential primary.
    • ,
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

100%

  • Unique Points
    • Political consultant Steve Kramer indicted on 26 charges in New Hampshire for orchestrating a fake Biden robocall during the Democratic primary.
    • First use of ‘deepfake’ technology in a US election, raising concerns about AI interference in November elections.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication